I misuderstood what my source of information meant. Clearly, he meant that when the A of the AB combination was wrecked, at that time the single A was paired by the B&M with the B as a replacement, not that the single A came from EMD as a replacement. So, apparenly between 1946 and 1949, 18 F2As is the correct number.
On page 18 the photo caption for the train passing Dallas Union Terminal is wrong. On the Cotton Belt per timetable authority trains ran north and south, never east or west. And if this is a Cotton Belt train exercising Espee trackage rights its definitely a westbound headed for Miller Yard.
SSW9389 On page 18 the photo caption for the train passing Dallas Union Terminal is wrong. On the Cotton Belt per timetable authority trains ran north and south, never east or west. And if this is a Cotton Belt train exercising Espee trackage rights its definitely a westbound headed for Miller Yard.
Amazing how Timetable direction and geographical direction can be in conflict - but there is a lot of it.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
BaltACD Amazing how Timetable direction and geographical direction can be in conflict - but there is a lot of it.
Reminds me of the situation that once existed at Drumheller, AB. The town was located in a very steep sided valley and to reduce costs both CP and CN used CN's line. The line ran NNW to SSE through town.
However, according to the ETT's it went like this. On CP; NB Langdon Sub. trains ran SSE, and SB trains ran NNW. On CN; EB Hanna Sub. trains ran NNW, and WB trains ran SSE.
Dad used to joke it must have made new men working 3rd trick jobs head's explode without the benefit of sunlight to help keep them oriented!
CP's Langdon Sub. was abandoned in the early '70's. It was the line through Irricana and there it ran in the approved north-south manner.
Bruce
So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.
"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere" CP Rail Public Timetable
"O. S. Irricana"
. . . __ . ______
, /
16-567D3A Overall I thought that it was a good issue,There was no mention of the Model TR1 which had the FT 1500hp. Machinery in a elongated switcher body with blomberg road trucks and like the 1000hp.NW3/ NW5 and later 1500hp BL series were Developmental steps leading up to the GP7 roadswitcher.Two TR1 Cow-calf sets were built for the Illinois Central in 4-5-41,#9250A/B, 9251A/B. And on the question of FTs that had Automatic transition kits later installed. I had a discussion at a ACL-SAL Historical society meet 25 years ago with Warren Calloway about the Excellent 50th Anniversary of the FT articles that had just been published in three monthly installments in Railfan and Railroad magazine in late 1989.he had told me about how the extensively modified ACL and Southern FTs were converted to automatic transition and the B units eventually separated and fitted with couplers,while the Seaboards stayed manual and drawbar connected until their retirement,and we also discussed the FTs unique complicated Engineering features that made them poor upgrade and rebuild candidates that were later changed on subsequent F models.
Overall I thought that it was a good issue,There was no mention of the Model TR1 which had the FT 1500hp. Machinery in a elongated switcher body with blomberg road trucks and like the 1000hp.NW3/ NW5 and later 1500hp BL series were Developmental steps leading up to the GP7 roadswitcher.Two TR1 Cow-calf sets were built for the Illinois Central in 4-5-41,#9250A/B, 9251A/B. And on the question of FTs that had Automatic transition kits later installed. I had a discussion at a ACL-SAL Historical society meet 25 years ago with Warren Calloway about the Excellent 50th Anniversary of the FT articles that had just been published in three monthly installments in Railfan and Railroad magazine in late 1989.he had told me about how the extensively modified ACL and Southern FTs were converted to automatic transition and the B units eventually separated and fitted with couplers,while the Seaboards stayed manual and drawbar connected until their retirement,and we also discussed the FTs unique complicated Engineering features that made them poor upgrade and rebuild candidates that were later changed on subsequent F models.
The lack of editing/fact checking apalls me. The layout and photos are great, but the facts need some serious work before the magazine goes to the printer.
I knew about the ACL FTs I was looking at some FT photos this morning and noticed the non-standard stirrup steps in the tail position on an A unit. The Southern units are a bit tricky because Southern had both FT and FS units.
Ed in Kentucky
The F3 production totals on page 26 needs some work. Santa Fe had another B unit the #32A, the first one had a fire and was returned to EMD. EMD replaced it with another unit of the same number and kept the ex-Santa Fe unit to use as a demonstrator. Bangor and Aroostook had 8 A units, not 9. The Burlington had 58 A units not 53. I previously noted the two A and two B units built in November 1948 for the Rio Grande that are included on the F7 count. And EMD Demonstrator 291A2 which was wrecked before sale is not included in the count. The other F3 demonstrators are included in the individual railroad counts. The Monon had two A units and a B unit demonstrator. The KCS had the first F5 demonstrator built. And the TP&W had an A and B demonstrator. Ed in Kentucky
That first Santa Fe #32A an F3B ended up being counted with the Santa Fe F7Bs. That particular F3B was rebuilt by EMD as an F7B and used as part of the #1950 demonstrator set before being sold to Santa Fe as their #48A.
SSW9389 The F3 production totals on page 26 needs some work. Santa Fe had another B unit the #32A, the first one had a fire and was returned to EMD. EMD replaced it with another unit of the same number and kept the ex-Santa Fe unit to use as a demonstrator. Bangor and Aroostook had 8 A units, not 9. The Burlington had 58 A units not 53. I previously noted the two A and two B units built in November 1948 for the Rio Grande that are included on the F7 count. And EMD Demonstrator 291A2 which was wrecked before sale is not included in the count. The other F3 demonstrators are included in the individual railroad counts. The Monon had two A units and a B unit demonstrator. The KCS had the first F5 demonstrator built. And the TP&W had an A and B demonstrator. Ed in Kentucky
, . . /
The ACL rebuild is not in the F7 count on page 30. I use A J Kristopans serial number page among others and post the results to the Wikipedia rosters page on the subject locomotives. There are numerous errors on the F7 tally, but wrecks, rebuilds and demonstrator history is messy.
Mr. Kristopans serial number pages are now on Don Strack's Utah Rails website. See http://www.utahrails.net/ajkristopans/ajkristopans-index.php
Ed in Soggy, Kentucky
16-567D3A SSW9389, Don't know if these two FT-F7 units rebuilt into F7/ F9s were counted twice or as what model, But for the record ATLANTIC COAST LINE FT 317:1 was wrecked/retired in in1951.ACL purchased an stripped F7A carbody from EMD. In 5/51 Tampa shops transplanted the FT components to the new F7 carbody,and was returned as 1500hp F7 317:2 to service. Then in1956 317:2 was wrecked and sent to EMD and rebuilt with an F9 carbody and major components under new builder`s number 23465 as F9 317:3. ACL F7 417:1, was also wrecked in the same 10/18/56 Floral City Fla.head-on accident returned to Lagrange and also rebuilt with F9 components becoming F9 417:2. B/N 23466, and both returned to service 5/57.these two units,the only F9s on ACL,(several Fs were upgraded by road shops to F9 specs)lasted through the SCL merger being among the last cab units on the Seaboard Coast Line and retired/traded with the last 23 FP7s on GP38-2/U18B orders in 1973. This information is from Warren Calloways, ATLANTIC COAST LINE The Diesel Years.
SSW9389, Don't know if these two FT-F7 units rebuilt into F7/ F9s were counted twice or as what model, But for the record ATLANTIC COAST LINE FT 317:1 was wrecked/retired in in1951.ACL purchased an stripped F7A carbody from EMD. In 5/51 Tampa shops transplanted the FT components to the new F7 carbody,and was returned as 1500hp F7 317:2 to service. Then in1956 317:2 was wrecked and sent to EMD and rebuilt with an F9 carbody and major components under new builder`s number 23465 as F9 317:3. ACL F7 417:1, was also wrecked in the same 10/18/56 Floral City Fla.head-on accident returned to Lagrange and also rebuilt with F9 components becoming F9 417:2. B/N 23466, and both returned to service 5/57.these two units,the only F9s on ACL,(several Fs were upgraded by road shops to F9 specs)lasted through the SCL merger being among the last cab units on the Seaboard Coast Line and retired/traded with the last 23 FP7s on GP38-2/U18B orders in 1973. This information is from Warren Calloways, ATLANTIC COAST LINE The Diesel Years.
Here's an easy one to check from the F7 tally and one of the photos on page 30. The Wabash owned 118 F7As and 9 F7Bs. This was checked with several sources including the Wabash roster in Extra 2200 South issue #90. The photo caption about the Wabash F7s is wrong. The Wabash purchased eight F7ABA sets in August 1949 and followed up with the purchase of a single F7ABA set in June 1950. There were only 50 Wabash F7AA pairs, not 54. And then the caption goes on with 22 built in Canada. Is that 22 units or 22 sets? The truth is 22 units or 11 F7AA sets were built by GMDL.
What is the correct count on Southern F7 units? The Classic Trains article roster shows 93 F7As and 54 F7Bs. Extra 2200 South February-March 1970 shows a combined total of 76 A units and 71 B units. The Diesel Shop roster here http://www.thedieselshop.us/SouRy.HTML shows 79 A units and 68 B units. And the Wikipedia roster here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMD_F7 shows 76 A units and 71 B units. Ed in Kentucky
How many F7 units did Union Pacific have? The article states 17 A units and 35 B units. Don Strack's F unit page states 20 A units and 36 B units. See http://utahrails.net/articles/up-f-units.php And Wikipedia's F7 page gives 21 A units and 38 B units. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMD_F7 The difference between the Don Strack article and the Wikipedia article is how UP 1466, 1466B and 1466C are accounted for. Again the truth between most of this information and what is in print in Classic Trains is how EMD demonstrators and wreck rebuilds are accounted for.
The ACL #317:2 was on EMD repair order #7005 dated 3/51. Your 5/51 date is the completion shop date for the unit. EMD repair order #7006 was for Rio Grande #5481 an FT which was rebuilt on an F7 frame. EMD repair orders #7000-7004 are undocumented. One those undocumented repair orders was for Cotton Belt #921 an FT wrecked at Aurich, AR and rebuilt on an F7 frame by EMD.
See http://www.utahrails.net/ajkristopans/REPAIRJOBS.php
Dave Keppler: My recent research has found photos that show your FT automatic transition was added to ACL, Cotton Belt, and Rock Island units. I have a report of a MP B unit operating with more modern units. And I'm thinking maybe the Southern had updated units. The Southern had both FT and FS units. And those railroads are besides the B&O units you mentioned.
daveklepper EMD sold a kit (I designed it in the summer of 1952) to convert FTs to automatic transition. It was first applied to B&O's FTs. I don't know which other railroads bought it.
EMD sold a kit (I designed it in the summer of 1952) to convert FTs to automatic transition. It was first applied to B&O's FTs. I don't know which other railroads bought it.
New York Central had an additional F7B unit. The total should be 56 F7Bs instead of 55. There was a second #2446, parts from the first unit were used to build the new unit.
Thank You.
.
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter