Trains.com

Classic Train Questions Part Deux (50 Years or Older)

856722 views
8197 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, October 27, 2017 10:58 AM

CSSHEGEWISCH

The cars in this series were called "flat-door Six's" since their doors were flat and did not match the carbody.

 

Thats it!

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, October 28, 2017 4:36 AM

Can someone fix the reason -- almost certainly hot-linking a photo illegally -- why I am being asked for a BERA name-and-password login every time I go to read this thread?

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, October 28, 2017 10:12 AM

Chicago Surface Lines was strictly an operating entity.  What were the names of the FOUR underlying companies that continued to exist and actually owned the equipment (streetcars, trolley buses, buses, etc.)?

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Saturday, October 28, 2017 10:42 AM

Yes ...I recieve the Bera request as well, for maybe week or more now.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Saturday, October 28, 2017 4:38 PM

I might be the guilty one for the BERA request, because I regularly visit the website, www.shorelinetrolley.org, and log in with my password.  I did use a photo from the website, no problem, we are even encouraged for the added publicity for the museum, but I believe it was not one this thread and considerably earlier than one week ago (convertables and semi-convertables).  If I had the edit button, I might be able to experiment to what post might have caused it.  Why would it ask you for that information and not ask me?  There is not any automatic sign-in.

Can I ask the moderator to please run a malwear and virus check on the Kalmbach website.  Possibly what happened is that I incurred a virus that my AVG anti-virus protection did not catch before it somehow infected the Kalmbach website, and this virus transferred the stuff from one email contact to another, a new type of annoyance virus.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, October 30, 2017 9:45 AM

CSSHEGEWISCH

Chicago Surface Lines was strictly an operating entity.  What were the names of the FOUR underlying companies that continued to exist and actually owned the equipment (streetcars, trolley buses, buses, etc.)?

 

Chicago Railways (North Side)

Chicago City Railway  (South Side)

Calumet & South Chicago Railway (Far Southeast side)

Southern Street Railway (Roosevelt Road)

Although all four owned cars, during the CSL era only CRys and CCRy received new ones.  C&SC did get one car out of a new order in the 1920s to replace a destroyed car.  CRys shops were on the West Side near the Lake Street L's Hamlin shops, CCRys shop at 77th and Vincennes.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, October 30, 2017 10:33 AM

We have a winner, rcdrye has the next question.

As an aside, all of the trolley buses under CSL were owned by Chicago Railways and all four companies owned new buses.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 4:44 AM

PCCs, the two of the four?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 7:21 AM

When the Chicago Elevated Railways Collateral Trust, an earlier version of Chicago Rapid Transit, bought its first steel cars, none of them were assigned to one of the four operating companies.  Name the company and the reason.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 7:28 AM

Did the first ones lack trolley poles?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 11:53 AM

daveklepper

Did the first ones lack trolley poles?

 

They did, but at the time two of the companies had operations that needed poles. 

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 12:28 PM

Yes, but one of the two had only one operation, and it needed trolley poles.  I don't have the names of the four companies, but the Lake Street line needed trolley poles and was that company's only operation, so I assume Lake Street did not get the steel cars.

Northwest had lines that needed trolley poles and one line that did not.

Southside did not need trolley poles and got steel cars.

Metropolitan did not need trolley poles.  The extension over CA&E was not a problem because CA&E was third rail except for far west areas not touched by CRT.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 7:12 PM

Lake Street (Chicago & Oak Park Railway) didn't get cars, but it wasn't because of trolley poles.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:54 PM

rcdrye
Lake Street (Chicago & Oak Park Railway) didn't get cars, but it wasn't because of trolley poles.

If I remember from when this question was asked in one of these quiz threads before, it was because of inadequate clearances.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 6:47 AM

Actually, the 1913 cars fit just fine on Lake Street, and in later years did run in multiple with the later "plushies" even on the restricted clearance surface (the 5000 and 6000 series didn't clear the Lake Street ground-level station "houses").  It was something that a judge would have had to sign off on, and didn't.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 9:49 AM

In other words, one of the four was in receivership.  Which one?  Just a guess, but I would suspect the Metropolitan, the three lines entering the downtown area via the structure on Congress St.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 7:57 PM

The Met was pretty healthy, at least as Chicago elevated railway companies go. Since you guessed Lake Street (Chicago and Oak Park Railway) you get the win, as it was very broke at the time.  Its principal asset from the point of view of the CERCT was the Lake Street leg of the loop.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, November 2, 2017 7:16 AM

The present New Jersey Transit Philadelphia - Atlantic Citiy line was never electrified, even in its fastest Camden - Atlantic Citiy days, PRSL or earlier.  But at one time, there was Camden - Atlantnic City electric train service.  Explain, please.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, November 2, 2017 9:31 AM

Isn't that the first true mainline electrification in the United States, the PRR's West Jersey and Seashore line (600V mostly but not completely third rail, via Woodbury/Millville and Newfield).  This service lasted an astoundingly long time for an 'orphan' electrification, and it is interesting to see what specific issues accounted for its termination.

Might have been fun to ask why it wasn't all third rail, or ... well, I have the follow-on question to this one if right.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, November 2, 2017 4:43 PM

You are correct.  That is the electrificaion.  It was cut back to a suburban service, I think Glassboro, and the line does not exist any more all the way to A. C.  The trunkated electrification lasted through WWII.  The part that remained was, I believe mostly or completetly trolley wire.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Friday, November 10, 2017 9:29 AM

Dave mentioned on another thread

"As late as 1953, a single track remained of the connection linking the IRT at E. 180th with the New Haven."

If I recall correctly, it was retained longer than that, through 1955.  There was a very important reason for this, concerning operation of the elevated system ... what was it, and how was it accomplished?

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Saturday, November 11, 2017 2:27 PM

The reason could have been that the connection between the IRT and the B Divison combined IND and BMT had essentially been broken when the 2nd Avenue elevated line across the Queensboro Bridge was abandoned in 1942.  The ex-NYW&B track was the only IRT connection to the national railroad system after the Third Avenue Elevated was abandoned south of 149th Street, including the Willis Avenue old shuttle connection.  (Consider the 7 Flushing line as part of the B Divison physically, even though its clearances permit only IRT equipment, beause track connections with other lines are only at Queens Plaza, and then only with the B Division.)

To replace the last of the gate cars on Myrtle Avenue, it was necessary to transfer the Q-Types to the B Division from the Third Avenue Elevated, which had been abandoned south of 149th Street.  So the cars were picked up at the old NYW&B connection, having been moved there by a TA Diesel, then handled by the New Haven over the Hell Gate to Fresh Pond Junction, then by the LIRR to Bay Ridge, the New York Dock to its connection with the South Brooklyn, and finally via the Culver or West End elevated structure or the tracks on MacDonald Avenue to Coney Island shops. They then had their roofs lowered so they could run via the Nassau Cut to the Williamsburg Bridge and then to Fresh Pond Yard.

The Qs on the remaining 149th Street - Gun Hill Road elevated operation, now also gone, were replaced by Stienway and Worlds Fair steel subway cars that twice had been replaced by post-WWII cars, first off Flushing and then off the Seventh Avenue and Broadway-Seventh Avenue locals where they had replaced Gibbs and deck-roof steel cars.  The Q's had earlier been bumped from Queens to replace the composits on the Third Avenue Elevated when all-IRT operation was instituted to Flusing and all through BMT operaton to Astoria.

Today there is connection between the IND Concourse Yard and the Jerome Avenue Structure.  And there still is a connection between Bush Terminal and the 9th Avenue station and 39th Street yard of the subway system.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Sunday, November 12, 2017 12:52 PM

Yes, but what I’m looking for is much more regular, and more important at certain times of the year.  And while it could certainly involve gate cars there were no paying passengers aboard them at the time...

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, November 12, 2017 3:15 PM

Well, there certainly were no paying passengers aboard the Qs when they were shifted.  I do know that the Third Avenue elevated shop at 99th Street and Third Avenue became the real wood car specialty repair place as long as the elevated existed south of 149th Street,  But then the Willis Avenue connection was also in.   And the only thing that was seasonal in car modification work was changing the BMT Myrtle Avenue 1300-series convertable cars from summer to winter configuration and back, but that could have been accomoplished right at Fresh Pond yards near Myrtle and Metropolitan Avenues.  No overhead cranes or wheel laths or shop equipment was required.  I don't see why those cars would have to be transferred.  And then they were replaced by the Qs.

Possibly there was a greater demand for number of cars on the 7 in summer with ball games etc., and a greater demand for number of cars on the Broadway-7th Avenue and Lexington lines in winter, and after the Third Avenue elevated cutback to north of 149th, the route I described for the Qs was the only way these cars could have been transferred at the time?

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Sunday, November 12, 2017 5:19 PM

It has something important (and seasonal) to do with passengers, but not with moving them.

Hint: it was more than a little surprising in 1955.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, November 13, 2017 12:50 AM

Weed control on the Dyar Avenue line, the portion of the ex-NYW&B taken over by the TA, operated first with gate-car elevated trains equipped with subway shoes, then steel Low-V's, then, with a flyover consructed, through-routed with the Lexington Avenue subay line.

I assume that until a new weed-control train was constructed for the IRT from older subway cars, the same weed-control train that was used on Brighton, Sea Beach, and Nortons Point was transferred to the IRT and returned, and the old NYW&B connection was probably the only way possible at the time.

For the same reason the track connection between the lower level Culver tracks and the Nortons Point streetcar line was kept for many years, with transfer passengers walking across the two tracks on wood board pavement not giving the rails a second thought.  (The Stillwell Avenue Terminal of the Nortons Point line was elevated.  The line was completely PRoW and should never have been abandoned.  It was operated during my lifetime with double-end Peter Witts in the 8001 series.  The other track connection to the rest of the system was via the abandoned Sea Gate line on Coney Island's Surf  Avenue where some rail clearly lasted from horsecar days, tracks connecting to the two PCC lines to Coney Island, Coney Island Avenue and Macdonald Avenue.)  A photo of the weed-control train in Coney Island Yard:

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Monday, November 13, 2017 6:01 AM

Mr. Klepper, was it normal to weed-spray the passengers in the ‘50s? perhaps to quietly reduce the number of people using the service to facilitate abandonment?  That would be clever, but it’s something more directly passenger-service related, and that depends materially on that Class 1 connection to provide, that I was looking for.  (I do not think the herbicide or whatever used by the spray train came in by rail ... did it?)

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, November 13, 2017 7:54 AM

The train's equipment did the spraying, and I presume the tanks were filled at Coney Island before it ventured forth whether its destination was the Nortons Point trolley line, the Sea Beach Line, the Brighton Line, or the ex-NYW&B Dyer Avenue line.

Subway service was pretty basic.  No dining cars or fresh water or johns.  What supplies could the IRT want that could come in by rail?  Nothing on the cars themselves.  Possibly new ballast, ties, rail?  Logically delivered by freight cars.  And the old NYW&B station and its tracks was transitioned to maintenance-of-way purposes.  And the station building still exists in good condition.  But you mentioned gate cars. Well, until surplus steel cars were available, they could have been used as motors in maintenance of way trains until sufficient retired steel cars were available.  As were the two BMT gate cars on the weed-spray train.

Do you have a photo of the IRT maintenance-of-way train of the period?

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Monday, November 13, 2017 7:57 AM

There is something very important the Elevated could want that needed to come in by rail.  At certain times of the year.  Not those generally associated with weed spraying.

I have pictures of the operation but that would give it away...

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, November 13, 2017 9:21 AM

Of course, coal in hopper or gondola cars for the remaining coal stoves in the stations.

And the gate cars were the horses until steel cars were available.

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter