Trains.com

Classic Railroad Quiz (at least 50 years old).

741847 views
7952 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, November 9, 2015 9:51 AM

Wiz, it was not a trick question, and your first answer is correct, and the others don't count. The others may have passenger service today, but (whatever the future brings) it is not electric passenger service.    Stamford- New Canaan was 550-600V DC, then 11,000 25Hz-AC, now 12,500V 60Hz AC.

Your question

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Monday, November 9, 2015 9:09 PM

In April 1910, before the formal opening of Penn Station, a two-car director's special made its way from Manhattan Transfer through to the west yard.  There was something highly unusual about this train - what was it?  (Hint: it returned under what were most likely even more unusual conditions...)

Extra points if you know the engineer's name.

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • 487 posts
Posted by rfpjohn on Saturday, November 14, 2015 7:14 AM

It was powereed by D16b 937. Engineer Andy Chambers at the throttle. 937 was the President's engine, last of four engines of the same number used to pull specials for the railroad's president when he, or other high company officers, went out on the line. She was built in 1906 and featured a single combined steam/sand dome.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Saturday, November 14, 2015 7:24 AM

And it must have had to operate backwards to get out?  The only other choice would be to go through the East River tunnels and turn around at Sunnyside or somewhere on the LIRR.

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • 1,644 posts
Posted by Wizlish on Sunday, November 15, 2015 9:16 AM

Gold star.

I got this out of Westing, of course, and I wish he had provided details of how the trick was done, including whether the consist was turned at Sunnyside, or whether a fuel like coke might have been fired for part of the run.  I can't really quite imagine backing a steam consist up the internal tunnel grade, even with two cars, with the sanders not 'bearing' properly...

Perhaps relevant here is the highly interesting note in the same book on how far some PRR trains could go without 'intervention' by the fireman.  I would think it easily possible that a light fire on a D16 would keep steam up without excessive smoke or gassing long enough to get up the tunnel grade in either direction.

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • 487 posts
Posted by rfpjohn on Monday, November 16, 2015 1:29 AM

Mr. Westing put out some fine books. The section about the benefits of "bank" firing is most interesting. Perhaps this was the method used to minimize smoke and gas on that tunnel trip. I guess we'll never know!

I suppose I should now pose a question.

This shortline, heavily dependent on one commodity, once served as a busy bridge carrier between a disconnected segment of a major carrier and the main line of said major carrier. After attempting to acquire this shortline, the big road built it's own line, connecting it's main to the isolated segment and removing the bridgeline traffic from the shortline. The shortline continued to operate profitably for several decades, even providing passenger service on a short portion of the major carrier's formerly isolated segment. They never dieselized, but did have a gas-electric car which ended it's career being hauled by steam.

 

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • 487 posts
Posted by rfpjohn on Monday, November 23, 2015 9:32 AM

No takers? It was outlived by a nearby narrow gauge pike.

 

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, November 23, 2015 9:46 AM

Was the narrow gauge ever converted to standard?    Did the narrow gauge belong to the line that built a connection to bypass the shortline?   Was the shortline ever a part of a much larger system that was mostly abandoned?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, November 23, 2015 12:35 PM

Would that be the Huntingdon and Broad Top Mountain in Pennsylvania?  Main commodity was coal. 

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • 487 posts
Posted by rfpjohn on Monday, November 23, 2015 7:00 PM

Mr. rcdrye you are correct! H&BTM was heavily dependent on coal traffic and the decline in demand for Broad Top coal ultimately led to it's demise, about three years ahead of it's narrow gauge neighbor, East Broad Top. They ran passenger service until nearly the end from Huntington to Bedford, utilizing PRR trackage rights on the south end for the short jaunt from Mt. Dallas to Bedford. PRR completed their Bedford division roughly parallel to the HB&TM in 1910, syphoning off thru traffic from Cumberland, MD.

Your question, sir! 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, November 23, 2015 8:08 PM

This combined city and interurban system had three major interurban lines and acquired a fourth.  Two of its own lines were operated at different times on three different voltages.  Name the system and at least two of its interurban lines.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, November 24, 2015 1:51 AM

The Milwaukee Electric Light and Railway, with the line to Sheboygan, the line to the north, being the purchased line.  Two other interurban lines were to Kenosha, competing with the NorthShore, and to East Troy, where a remenant museum and freight operaiton continues.  The fourth line was at one time partly 1200V AC and then 1200V DC.  Was its destinaiton Watertown?  The rest of the system, including the inner portion of this line, was the usual 550-600V DC.

The Milwaukee local city lines outlasted its interurbans, and I rode them in 1952.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, November 24, 2015 6:12 AM

Close enough.  Both the Watertown line and the "Lakes" lines to Burlington and East Troy were originally electrified at 3300 VAC in 1907/8, quickly converted to 1200 VDC in 1909, and reconverted to 600VDC in 1924 (the "Lakes" lines may have been converted to 600V  earlier.)  Though cut back in the thirties, the lines lasted into 1951 under Speedrail.  Both the M-R-K (Milwaukee-Racine-Kenosha) and Milwaukee Northern to Sheboygan were 600V their entire lives.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:16 AM

A large USA city had a cable-car transit operation before San Francisco.  When opened, it was unique in one other important way.   It was not a funicular, and a primitive type of grip mecanism was used.  What, when, who -  and why and to what was it converted, and its subsequent history and termination and the political leader that led to its final termination, with the more modenized equipment serving in the city for another approximately eleven years on a different route.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 12:10 PM

New York's initial elevated line of about a mile, known variously as the Greenwich Street Elevated, the New York and Yonkers Patent Railway, and the Westside Patented Elevated, operated with a cable for a few years from about 1867 to about 1871 before being converted to steam and extended.  With route changes and rebuildings, it became the basis of the Ninth Avenue El.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, November 25, 2015 1:08 PM

Correct, and it was the world's first rapid transit line,  preceding the Metropolitan initial steam operated subway line in London. Steam dummy engines, then the 0-4-4T Forneys, then electrification, then IRT ownership, extensive rebuilding with a continuous center track for express service, then a substantial nunmber of system-wide gate cars equipped with closed platforms and mu door control, then closure in June 1940, largely because of Mayor LaGuardia's distaste for elevated lines and because of the parallel IND 8th-Avenue Subway, with the closed-platform cars continiuing in oiperation on the 3rd Avenue Elevated, whose Manhattan portion lasted another 13 years.

Your question

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, November 27, 2015 7:34 AM

Fifty-four LIRR wooden cars, made surplus when they were banned rom the East River tunnels, were sold to support traffic growth to a U.S. Army facility after the outbreak of Word War I.  Name the buyer and the Army facility.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, November 29, 2015 4:00 PM

Possibly the Quincy, MA Naval Yard, with the cars being bought either by the Navy or the NYNH&H for the service.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, November 30, 2015 6:44 AM

A little further south.  If it's any help the junction for the line to the Army facility was named for another miltary facility.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, November 30, 2015 9:25 AM

Involving Monmouth Junction?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, November 30, 2015 10:26 AM

Keep heading south...

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, November 30, 2015 1:13 PM

Annapolis Junction, and the Baltimre Washington and Annapolis to Fort Mead?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, November 30, 2015 3:05 PM

AH!  Camp Meade (now Fort Meade) went from a sleepy post to a booming training area within a couple of months in 1917.  The LIRR cars were the only rolling stock WB&A could get in a hurry.  The WB&A put 1200v lighting jumpers and coal stoves in the ex-LIRR cars (built to BMT dimensions for planned operation on the El and Subway, rendered surplus when wood cars were banned from tunnels in Manhattan) and ran them on fairly short headways in trains pulled by box motors.  Because the cars were not particularly suited to street trackage, the WB&A built a connection to B&O's Pratt Street line in Baltimore, loading the trains in the street.  A couple of years later WB&A built its new Baltimore terminal on Pratt Street near the earlier loading site.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, December 1, 2015 11:30 AM

These cars had been used as trailers with the steel Gibbs MP41 motor cars into Manhattan in summer months over the Williamsburg Bridge in Essex Street, later Chambers Street - Rockaway Park over the bay joint service where a connection between the Jamaica elevated and the LIRR Atlantic Avenue line existed.  You can still see the steel for the switch just before Cypress or Cresent St.  on  the J today.  Alternate trains used the 1300-series composit steel-and-wood Brookliyn United convertable gate cars.  The service was discontinues after the last summer before Penn Station opened.  But the wood cars never ran into Penn Station.  I  donj't u nderstand the reason for coal stoves, since the cars should have had elecric heat via jumper cables from the MP-41s.  Possibly the reason was insufficient power on the interurban for heat and light and box-motor traction, and/or jumper cables could not handle a whole train-load of hotel power.  On the LIRR the configuration was m-t-m-t-m for a five-car train.  The MP-41's were narrower than the later LIRR equipement, identacle in dimensions to the first IRT steel cars, and so could fit on BU elevated lines.  Ditto the wood trailers, which had run behind steam into the BU Sands Street Brookliyn elevated terminal but only once, by error, ran across the Brooklyn Bridge, at least accoreding to legend.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Somewhat related next questionl.   I visited the Mason City and Clear Lake, now Iowa Tractionl, in 1952.  In the yard was a derelict wood open-platform coach, identacle in most respects to gate cars as used in Chicago, Brooklyin, and Manhattan elevated service.  I was told it had been used as a trailer, bought second-hand, when passenger service had been provided, much like the cars the question answered.  The big difference was that it was a full or near-full ten-feet wide, like standard railroad passenger cars.   Where did it originate, what was its original purpose? 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, December 1, 2015 11:56 AM

The WB&A used coal stoves because the heaters in the LIRR cars were 600V, and WB&A's electricians didn't want to connect two elements in series.  The need for speed won, so coal stoves it was - OK in the generally mild climate.

The car you saw in Mason city was built for the Brooklyn Bridge Railway, and was originally cable hauled.  MC&CL got it in the teens?  George Hilton covered it in his book "The Cable Car in America"

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, December 1, 2015 1:06 PM

Correct and your question.   It may have been used as a trailer on tje Fulton Street line, which always had the wide clearances, before it went to MC&CL.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, December 1, 2015 2:01 PM

Hard to believe this question fits our 50 year rule...

When the N&W merged with the Nickel Plate and leased the Wabash, it purchased a secondary line from another railroad to tie the merged/leased lines to the original N&W.  Name the selling railroad and the endpoints of the purchased line.

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • 1,002 posts
Posted by NP Eddie on Tuesday, December 1, 2015 5:58 PM

Rob:

The answer is a PRR secondary line between Columbus, Ohio and Sandusky, Ohio.

Yes--time does fly.

Ed Burns

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, December 1, 2015 6:57 PM

You are correct.  Without the PRR line, the N&W merger would not quite have worked, with a gap of about 70 miles between the nearest points on the NKP and the N&W.

You are up, Ed!

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Tuesday, December 1, 2015 7:56 PM

rcdrye

Hard to believe this question fits our 50 year rule...

 

Or are we just getting older.  Hard to believe how many "Museum Pieces" we all remember brand new from the builder when we were in High School!

Thx IGN

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter