Rob:
Yes, the MILW used the NP from St. Paul to Duluth, but both the NP and GN timetables had trains going to Duluth or Superior was eastbound and trains from Superior and Duluth were westbound. At Coon Creek, trains were westbound on the NP/GN joint line, but eastbound from Coon Creek to Superior.
Next question to Rob.
Ed Burns
MILW used NP's "Skally Line" from St. Paul to Duluth and Superior. Even though the compass direction was north by northeast, the line was east-west by timetable. The NP lines were timetable west away from St. Paul. The MILW used NPs direction (and rules), though of course Duluth was also "west" of Milwaukee and Chicago.
Rob and All:
The Milwaukee Road had a line between St. Paul, MN and Duluth, MN.
Did the Milwaukee use their own tracks or use another railroad. If so, which railroad did the Milwaukee use?
Also, Milwaukee trains headed north (geographically), but what railroad direction was used and why?
Happy Hunting!!!
The Columbus-Samdusky line was known as "The Sandusky Line" and was where PRR Js replaceced the Decopads on mostly coal, then were supplemented with Sante Fe Texas types for a fiinal great steam show.
And some equiment built new when I was a younster has spenet more time in railroad museum service or just display than in revenue service. In fact, this is true of the locomotives in UP's steam program. And 611.
rcdrye Hard to believe this question fits our 50 year rule...
Hard to believe this question fits our 50 year rule...
Or are we just getting older. Hard to believe how many "Museum Pieces" we all remember brand new from the builder when we were in High School!
Thx IGN
You are correct. Without the PRR line, the N&W merger would not quite have worked, with a gap of about 70 miles between the nearest points on the NKP and the N&W.
You are up, Ed!
The answer is a PRR secondary line between Columbus, Ohio and Sandusky, Ohio.
Yes--time does fly.
When the N&W merged with the Nickel Plate and leased the Wabash, it purchased a secondary line from another railroad to tie the merged/leased lines to the original N&W. Name the selling railroad and the endpoints of the purchased line.
Correct and your question. It may have been used as a trailer on tje Fulton Street line, which always had the wide clearances, before it went to MC&CL.
The WB&A used coal stoves because the heaters in the LIRR cars were 600V, and WB&A's electricians didn't want to connect two elements in series. The need for speed won, so coal stoves it was - OK in the generally mild climate.
The car you saw in Mason city was built for the Brooklyn Bridge Railway, and was originally cable hauled. MC&CL got it in the teens? George Hilton covered it in his book "The Cable Car in America"
These cars had been used as trailers with the steel Gibbs MP41 motor cars into Manhattan in summer months over the Williamsburg Bridge in Essex Street, later Chambers Street - Rockaway Park over the bay joint service where a connection between the Jamaica elevated and the LIRR Atlantic Avenue line existed. You can still see the steel for the switch just before Cypress or Cresent St. on the J today. Alternate trains used the 1300-series composit steel-and-wood Brookliyn United convertable gate cars. The service was discontinues after the last summer before Penn Station opened. But the wood cars never ran into Penn Station. I donj't u nderstand the reason for coal stoves, since the cars should have had elecric heat via jumper cables from the MP-41s. Possibly the reason was insufficient power on the interurban for heat and light and box-motor traction, and/or jumper cables could not handle a whole train-load of hotel power. On the LIRR the configuration was m-t-m-t-m for a five-car train. The MP-41's were narrower than the later LIRR equipement, identacle in dimensions to the first IRT steel cars, and so could fit on BU elevated lines. Ditto the wood trailers, which had run behind steam into the BU Sands Street Brookliyn elevated terminal but only once, by error, ran across the Brooklyn Bridge, at least accoreding to legend.
Somewhat related next questionl. I visited the Mason City and Clear Lake, now Iowa Tractionl, in 1952. In the yard was a derelict wood open-platform coach, identacle in most respects to gate cars as used in Chicago, Brooklyin, and Manhattan elevated service. I was told it had been used as a trailer, bought second-hand, when passenger service had been provided, much like the cars the question answered. The big difference was that it was a full or near-full ten-feet wide, like standard railroad passenger cars. Where did it originate, what was its original purpose?
AH! Camp Meade (now Fort Meade) went from a sleepy post to a booming training area within a couple of months in 1917. The LIRR cars were the only rolling stock WB&A could get in a hurry. The WB&A put 1200v lighting jumpers and coal stoves in the ex-LIRR cars (built to BMT dimensions for planned operation on the El and Subway, rendered surplus when wood cars were banned from tunnels in Manhattan) and ran them on fairly short headways in trains pulled by box motors. Because the cars were not particularly suited to street trackage, the WB&A built a connection to B&O's Pratt Street line in Baltimore, loading the trains in the street. A couple of years later WB&A built its new Baltimore terminal on Pratt Street near the earlier loading site.
Annapolis Junction, and the Baltimre Washington and Annapolis to Fort Mead?
Keep heading south...
Involving Monmouth Junction?
A little further south. If it's any help the junction for the line to the Army facility was named for another miltary facility.
Possibly the Quincy, MA Naval Yard, with the cars being bought either by the Navy or the NYNH&H for the service.
Fifty-four LIRR wooden cars, made surplus when they were banned rom the East River tunnels, were sold to support traffic growth to a U.S. Army facility after the outbreak of Word War I. Name the buyer and the Army facility.
Correct, and it was the world's first rapid transit line, preceding the Metropolitan initial steam operated subway line in London. Steam dummy engines, then the 0-4-4T Forneys, then electrification, then IRT ownership, extensive rebuilding with a continuous center track for express service, then a substantial nunmber of system-wide gate cars equipped with closed platforms and mu door control, then closure in June 1940, largely because of Mayor LaGuardia's distaste for elevated lines and because of the parallel IND 8th-Avenue Subway, with the closed-platform cars continiuing in oiperation on the 3rd Avenue Elevated, whose Manhattan portion lasted another 13 years.
Your question
New York's initial elevated line of about a mile, known variously as the Greenwich Street Elevated, the New York and Yonkers Patent Railway, and the Westside Patented Elevated, operated with a cable for a few years from about 1867 to about 1871 before being converted to steam and extended. With route changes and rebuildings, it became the basis of the Ninth Avenue El.
A large USA city had a cable-car transit operation before San Francisco. When opened, it was unique in one other important way. It was not a funicular, and a primitive type of grip mecanism was used. What, when, who - and why and to what was it converted, and its subsequent history and termination and the political leader that led to its final termination, with the more modenized equipment serving in the city for another approximately eleven years on a different route.
Close enough. Both the Watertown line and the "Lakes" lines to Burlington and East Troy were originally electrified at 3300 VAC in 1907/8, quickly converted to 1200 VDC in 1909, and reconverted to 600VDC in 1924 (the "Lakes" lines may have been converted to 600V earlier.) Though cut back in the thirties, the lines lasted into 1951 under Speedrail. Both the M-R-K (Milwaukee-Racine-Kenosha) and Milwaukee Northern to Sheboygan were 600V their entire lives.
The Milwaukee Electric Light and Railway, with the line to Sheboygan, the line to the north, being the purchased line. Two other interurban lines were to Kenosha, competing with the NorthShore, and to East Troy, where a remenant museum and freight operaiton continues. The fourth line was at one time partly 1200V AC and then 1200V DC. Was its destinaiton Watertown? The rest of the system, including the inner portion of this line, was the usual 550-600V DC.
The Milwaukee local city lines outlasted its interurbans, and I rode them in 1952.
This combined city and interurban system had three major interurban lines and acquired a fourth. Two of its own lines were operated at different times on three different voltages. Name the system and at least two of its interurban lines.
Mr. rcdrye you are correct! H&BTM was heavily dependent on coal traffic and the decline in demand for Broad Top coal ultimately led to it's demise, about three years ahead of it's narrow gauge neighbor, East Broad Top. They ran passenger service until nearly the end from Huntington to Bedford, utilizing PRR trackage rights on the south end for the short jaunt from Mt. Dallas to Bedford. PRR completed their Bedford division roughly parallel to the HB&TM in 1910, syphoning off thru traffic from Cumberland, MD.
Your question, sir!
Would that be the Huntingdon and Broad Top Mountain in Pennsylvania? Main commodity was coal.
Was the narrow gauge ever converted to standard? Did the narrow gauge belong to the line that built a connection to bypass the shortline? Was the shortline ever a part of a much larger system that was mostly abandoned?
No takers? It was outlived by a nearby narrow gauge pike.
Mr. Westing put out some fine books. The section about the benefits of "bank" firing is most interesting. Perhaps this was the method used to minimize smoke and gas on that tunnel trip. I guess we'll never know!
I suppose I should now pose a question.
This shortline, heavily dependent on one commodity, once served as a busy bridge carrier between a disconnected segment of a major carrier and the main line of said major carrier. After attempting to acquire this shortline, the big road built it's own line, connecting it's main to the isolated segment and removing the bridgeline traffic from the shortline. The shortline continued to operate profitably for several decades, even providing passenger service on a short portion of the major carrier's formerly isolated segment. They never dieselized, but did have a gas-electric car which ended it's career being hauled by steam.
Gold star.
I got this out of Westing, of course, and I wish he had provided details of how the trick was done, including whether the consist was turned at Sunnyside, or whether a fuel like coke might have been fired for part of the run. I can't really quite imagine backing a steam consist up the internal tunnel grade, even with two cars, with the sanders not 'bearing' properly...
Perhaps relevant here is the highly interesting note in the same book on how far some PRR trains could go without 'intervention' by the fireman. I would think it easily possible that a light fire on a D16 would keep steam up without excessive smoke or gassing long enough to get up the tunnel grade in either direction.
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter