Trains.com

Classic Train questions (50 years or older) Locked

81216 views
710 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, February 4, 2009 9:01 AM

Two-tone grey was also used on the SF Overland Lmtd.  Instead of UP yellow.

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Wednesday, February 4, 2009 9:59 AM

I guess its Texas Zephyrs turn to ask the  next question. The Cascade was initially two tone grey like the Lark and don't forget the San Joaquin Daylight in Daylight colors. Since the SP owned the T&NO I guess you would have to include those two train as well under Daylight painted equipment that operated between Dallas and Houston the Sunbeam and Hustler.

Al - in - Stockton

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Wednesday, February 4, 2009 7:02 PM

passengerfan
I guess its Texas Zephyrs turn to ask the  next question.

I'm not prepared nor inclined to prepare the next question.  What about CSSHEGEWISCH?  Would you like to ask the next question?

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, February 5, 2009 10:11 AM

Many thanks to Texas Zephyr for deferring to me. 

In the diesel era, the Chicago River & Indiana RR briefly held an unusual distinction.  What was it?

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Thursday, February 5, 2009 5:03 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH
In the diesel era, the Chicago River & Indiana RR briefly held an unusual distinction.  What was it?

WAG - They were the only railroad that had a roster of only Lima built locomotives?

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, February 6, 2009 6:50 AM

Texas Zepher

CSSHEGEWISCH
In the diesel era, the Chicago River & Indiana RR briefly held an unusual distinction.  What was it?

WAG - They were the only railroad that had a roster of only Lima built locomotives?

Close enough.  In the early 1960's, CR&I was the only Class 1 railroad with an all-Lima roster. 

Texas Zephyr, it's your question.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Friday, February 6, 2009 3:42 PM

The Denver South Park & Pacific, Union Pacific, Union Pacific Denver & Gulf, and Colorado Southern railroads had Pullman built sleepers in rosters until about 1892.   What was the only narrow gauge train that regularly ran a Pullman sleeper (I think it was an 8-1) after that time? 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, February 6, 2009 5:51 PM

I'll guess that the D&RG still operated sleepers on its narrow gauge lines after 1892.

Johnny

Johnny

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Friday, February 6, 2009 6:43 PM

As Johnny has already said I'm fairly sure it was the D&RGW. If I had to guess on what train, I'd say the San Juan.

Mark

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Friday, February 6, 2009 7:55 PM

How about the CN Newfoundland narrow gauge they operated sleeping cars right up until the Newfie Bullet was discontinued.

Al - in - Stockton

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Friday, February 6, 2009 8:15 PM

KCSfan
As Johnny has already said I'm fairly sure it was the D&RGW. If I had to guess on what train, I'd say the San Juan.

That would be the one I was looking for.  The San Juan Express from Durango to Antonito.  Discontinued in 1951.

KCSfan take it away. 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Friday, February 6, 2009 8:18 PM

passengerfan
How about the CN Newfoundland narrow gauge they operated sleeping cars right up until the Newfie Bullet was discontinued.

Oh yeah, that would have been 1968?  I always forget Alaska & Canada when it come to narrow gauge.   What was running on the White Pass & Yukon?

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, February 6, 2009 9:30 PM

The White Pass and Yukon operated parlor cars, I know. I do not know enough of its early history to say that it operated day trains only. The June 1916 Guide shows day service only; the June 1893 issue does not have any mention of the road. 

Also, the June 1916 Guide has no indication of the equipment of the trains on the Reid Newfoundland road. The representation of the Newfoundland Ry in the June 1930 issue ahs the notation "sleeping and dining cars on all express trains." Of course, in later years we know that the road did carry sleepers between Port-aux-Basques and St. John's. According to Wikipedia, the Caribou (aka Newfie Bullet) ran until 1969. The railroad was abandoned in 1988. I discussed the action with a native Newfoundlander who worked for the same company that I worked for. Some of the cars were converted from 3' 6" gauge to 3' gauge, and sold to the White Pass and Yukon.

The sleepers (no description), according to the June 1893 Guide, on the San Juan were through cars from Denver to Durango--overnight to Alamosa, and day to Durango. In 1916, the sleepers (standard) ran only east of Alamosa.

Just as Al - in - Stockton, I seldom think of narrow gauge as having been laid outside the U. S. A.

Johnny

Johnny

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Saturday, February 7, 2009 10:27 AM

This question has to do with the Milwaukee Road's southern Indiana branch. Shortly after leaving The Bensenville Yard Milw Road trains ran on trackage rights over another railroad before regaining Milw owned tracks. 

1. What was this other railroad over which the Milw Rd had trackage rights?.

2. Between what two points did Milw Rd  trains operate operate over this other road?

3. What was the name of the railroad that the Milw acquired to gain access to southern Indiana?

Mark

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Saturday, February 7, 2009 6:00 PM

KCSfan
1. What was this other railroad over which the Milw Rd had trackage rights?.

I guess it depends upon the time period one is talking about. Assuming not recent stuff with Conrail or when the CN / Soo took over but older things.   Also I'll assume not ancient things like the Pittsburgh Cincinnati & St. Louis or Pitsburgh Fort Wayne and Chicago.  That puts me with the Pennsylvania (the subsequent owner/operator of the previously mentioned two).   

2. Between what two points did Milw Rd  trains operate operate over this other road?

Ummmm  from the intersection of W. Kinzie and North Western Avenue to ummm  Chicago Heights.

3. What was the name of the railroad that the Milw acquired to gain access to southern Indiana?

Access through Chicago, or access to the southern part of the state.  Getting through to the southern part of the state was the Chicago Terre Haute & Southern,  to connect that to Chicago was the Chicago Milwakee & Gary.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Saturday, February 7, 2009 7:10 PM

TZ,

1. Not the Pennsy. Yes, the question refers to days when the Milw owned and operated the line - say the 1940 and 50's for purposes of the question.

2. I'm not sure about the street location. Can you name the town on the northern end? Also the trackage rights extended beyond Chicago Heights on the south end.

3. Close enough. It was actually the Chicago Terre Haute and Southeastern.

Keep trying.

Mark

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Sunday, February 8, 2009 1:33 PM

KCSfan
1. Not the Pennsy.

Hmmm, really clueless then.  I'd have to go with IC as my next guess.

2. I'm not sure about the street location. Can you name the town on the northern end?

My Chicago geography isn't all that great, especially when it comes to suburbia names.  Hmmmm..  Franklin Park on the north? and Kankakee on the south?

3. Close enough. It was actually the Chicago Terre Haute and Southeastern.

yeah, I knew that, just didn't type it right. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Sunday, February 8, 2009 10:51 PM

TZ,

1. Not the IC either.

2. Yep, Franklin Park on the north end but not Kankakee on the south. You were closer when you first answered Chicago Heights.

Mark

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Monday, February 9, 2009 7:03 AM

MILW operated over the IHB/B&OCT between Norpaul and Faithorn.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Monday, February 9, 2009 1:52 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH
MILW operated over the IHB/B&OCT between Norpaul and Faithorn.

I have one rail line marked on my Chicago map that simply says "BELT".  Its position makes it a candidate.  In fact it parallels the CNW for almost a mile south out of the MILW yard in question, but got the impression that it was an interurban line.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Monday, February 9, 2009 3:13 PM

Paul and TZ,

I just don't know about Norpaul and the IHB. I always thought the trains were routed from Bensenville over the Milw to Franklin Park then over the B&OCTRR to Faithorn.

Since you both answered parts of the question, which ever of you has another ready feel free to ask it.

I remember Faithorn from the post WW2 period when I hung out a few times there. As I  remember there was no town, just a wooden Milw roundhouse and outlying structures and a train order and register office. Trains were headed by 2-8-2's and the engines bringing them down from Bensenville would be turned and they and their crews return on a northbound run. Other crews and engines would handle the trains south of Faithorn.

Mark

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Monday, February 9, 2009 4:02 PM

1911 map shows Galewood Yard and Western Ave. Yard

http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/su/maps/chi1900/G4104-C6P3-1911-C4.html

Mike

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Tuesday, February 10, 2009 7:50 PM

KCSfan
Since you both answered parts of the question, which ever of you has another ready feel free to ask it.

Paul go for it.  I've got nothing at the moment.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:04 AM

The South Shore Line currently operates on trackage rights over the Illinois Central between Kensington and Randolph Street.  Which steam road had trackage rights over South Shore and between which two points?

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Wednesday, February 11, 2009 7:10 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH

The South Shore Line currently operates on trackage rights over the Illinois Central between Kensington and Randolph Street.  Which steam road had trackage rights over South Shore and between which two points?

Paul,

I believe it might have been the C&O (of Indiana) between Hammond and Kensington because I remember seeing C&O Mikes at the IC's 23rd St. roundhouse.

Mark

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, February 12, 2009 6:31 AM

KCSfan

CSSHEGEWISCH

The South Shore Line currently operates on trackage rights over the Illinois Central between Kensington and Randolph Street.  Which steam road had trackage rights over South Shore and between which two points?

Paul,

I believe it might have been the C&O (of Indiana) between Hammond and Kensington because I remember seeing C&O Mikes at the IC's 23rd St. roundhouse.

Mark

Not quite, C&O passenger trains terminated at Hammond and C&O of Indiana used NKP Calumet Yard for its terminal.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Thursday, February 12, 2009 8:26 AM

Just a WAG:  B&O from Kensington to Portage?  - a.s.

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:15 PM

al-in-chgo

Just a WAG:  B&O from Kensington to Portage?  - a.s.

 

Getting close but not quite there.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 2,535 posts
Posted by KCSfan on Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:38 PM

The NYC Michigan Central line to its connection at Kensington with the IC . Not sure where the MC would have gotten onto the South Shore - I'll say Hammond but it could have Gary or Porter.

Mark

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:01 PM

KCSfan

The NYC Michigan Central line to its connection at Kensington with the IC . Not sure where the MC would have gotten onto the South Shore - I'll say Hammond but it could have Gary or Porter.

Mark

Michigan Central picked up the IHB at Ivanhoe to Calumet Park where MC then used its own branch to Kensington.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter