charlie hebdo Part of the ongoing supervision of T&E personnel should include yearly medical and mental fitness exams, starting at age 65 or even earlier. If it is not mandatory, it should be. Only Amtrak requires annual medical examinations (as of 2014, at least), but I believe this is insufficient. Reaction times and judgment should be empirically evaluated rofessionally. https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-me-adv-railroad-medical-standards-20140420-story.html
Part of the ongoing supervision of T&E personnel should include yearly medical and mental fitness exams, starting at age 65 or even earlier. If it is not mandatory, it should be. Only Amtrak requires annual medical examinations (as of 2014, at least), but I believe this is insufficient. Reaction times and judgment should be empirically evaluated rofessionally.
https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-me-adv-railroad-medical-standards-20140420-story.html
So Charlie are you going to address the fact that you lied? Or do you opt to carry on nonplussed as Trump does?
Joe, every time I open this site there is a popup for a position--FRA-Director, Office of Safety Analysis. Maybe you should apply so your voice will really be heard. You don't want to be one of those lockerroom lawyers you've mentioned in the past.
243129 Backshop 243129 How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations. That's all you talked about in this thread started by you... http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/743/t/268471.aspx Read it again carefully and tell me where I say they are universal remedies.
Backshop 243129 How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations. That's all you talked about in this thread started by you... http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/743/t/268471.aspx
243129 How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations.
How about this one too?
"Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"???
C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations.
That's all you talked about in this thread started by you...
http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/743/t/268471.aspx
Read it again carefully and tell me where I say they are universal remedies.
So???
243129 243129 Backshop 243129 How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations. That's all you talked about in this thread started by you... http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/743/t/268471.aspx Read it again carefully and tell me where I say they are universal remedies. So???
So?
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
BaltACD 243129 243129 Backshop 243129 How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations. That's all you talked about in this thread started by you... http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/743/t/268471.aspx Read it again carefully and tell me where I say they are universal remedies. So??? So?
Maybe they will want his universal nostrum.
charlie hebdo BaltACD 243129 243129 Backshop 243129 How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations. That's all you talked about in this thread started by you... http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/743/t/268471.aspx Read it again carefully and tell me where I say they are universal remedies. So??? So? Maybe they will want his universal nostrum.
Just like you avoid answering questions that you don't want to answer. There's nothing forcing anyone here to answer anything.
And nothing in the forum rules about documentation of anything. This is an informal place to share ideas, thoughts, recollections, opinions, etc. It's not for demanding other members do what you want. If you don't like that, try another forum or blog.
243129I was forced to retire.
Most people here do not even know who the heck you are. Why would you even care about your work history here? Nobody here is going to interview you in the future for a job.
Backshop Just like you avoid answering questions that you don't want to answer. There's nothing forcing anyone here to answer anything.
Please list the questions you say I will not answer.
charlie hebdo And nothing in the forum rules about documentation of anything. This is an informal place to share ideas, thoughts, recollections, opinions, etc. It's not for demanding other members do what you want. If you don't like that, try another forum or blog.
You stated that I was forced to retire. I asked you to present proof of that statement/allegation and you refuse ergo you are a liar.
When someone (you) slanders, lies and makes false allegations, yes I will be demanding. I demand proof.
CMStPnP 243129 I was forced to retire. Most people here do not even know who the heck you are. Why would you even care about your work history here? Nobody here is going to interview you in the future for a job.
243129 I was forced to retire.
So you condone slander, lies and false allegations? How would you react if they were leveled at you? Do you like people telling lies about you?
charlie hebdo is a liar,and that fact is evident in his refusal to provide proof of his allegation about me being forced to retire.
Last I looked even though mandatory retirement at 65 is long gone, most people are forced to retire from their careers, one way or another. It does not mean they are terminated, just reach a point of ending. Retirement is not the same as termination.
Watch the name calling, pal. It is in clear violation of forum rules, as well as common decency and courtesy . But then, hurling insults and calling people names is what you do. Chalk it up to your NH and PC experience.
charlie hebdoLast I looked even though mandatory retirement at 65 is long gone, most people are forced to retire from their careers, one way or another. It does not mean they are terminated, just reach a point of ending. Retirement is not the same as termination.
Feeble try at damage control. It does not alter the fact that you are a liar.
charlie hebdoWatch the name calling, pal. It is in clear violation of forum rules, as well as common decency and courtesy
I am NOT your "pal". Telling lies and slander are "clear violation of forum rules, as well as common decency and courtesy"
charlie hebdoLast I looked even though mandatory retirement at 65 is long gone,
FYI. At 70 (on the NY NH & H) you were no longer allowed to operate passenger or through freight but you could stay to any age in yard service. 65 was the earliest you could retire. In later years you could remain on the main line at any age or you could retire at 60
I suggest you get a thorough examination. I'm not the only one who notices your argumentiveness and rudeness. You argue with almost everyone who comments on shared threads and engage in name calling.
Since you guys can't play nice, this conversation can startup again when the admins have a chance to look at it on Monday. Have a good weekend.
https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling
Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.