Since you guys can't play nice, this conversation can startup again when the admins have a chance to look at it on Monday. Have a good weekend.
https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling
Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.
I suggest you get a thorough examination. I'm not the only one who notices your argumentiveness and rudeness. You argue with almost everyone who comments on shared threads and engage in name calling.
charlie hebdoLast I looked even though mandatory retirement at 65 is long gone,
FYI. At 70 (on the NY NH & H) you were no longer allowed to operate passenger or through freight but you could stay to any age in yard service. 65 was the earliest you could retire. In later years you could remain on the main line at any age or you could retire at 60
charlie hebdoLast I looked even though mandatory retirement at 65 is long gone, most people are forced to retire from their careers, one way or another. It does not mean they are terminated, just reach a point of ending. Retirement is not the same as termination.
Feeble try at damage control. It does not alter the fact that you are a liar.
charlie hebdoWatch the name calling, pal. It is in clear violation of forum rules, as well as common decency and courtesy
I am NOT your "pal". Telling lies and slander are "clear violation of forum rules, as well as common decency and courtesy"
Last I looked even though mandatory retirement at 65 is long gone, most people are forced to retire from their careers, one way or another. It does not mean they are terminated, just reach a point of ending. Retirement is not the same as termination.
Watch the name calling, pal. It is in clear violation of forum rules, as well as common decency and courtesy . But then, hurling insults and calling people names is what you do. Chalk it up to your NH and PC experience.
CMStPnP 243129 I was forced to retire. Most people here do not even know who the heck you are. Why would you even care about your work history here? Nobody here is going to interview you in the future for a job.
243129 I was forced to retire.
Most people here do not even know who the heck you are. Why would you even care about your work history here? Nobody here is going to interview you in the future for a job.
So you condone slander, lies and false allegations? How would you react if they were leveled at you? Do you like people telling lies about you?
charlie hebdo is a liar,and that fact is evident in his refusal to provide proof of his allegation about me being forced to retire.
charlie hebdo And nothing in the forum rules about documentation of anything. This is an informal place to share ideas, thoughts, recollections, opinions, etc. It's not for demanding other members do what you want. If you don't like that, try another forum or blog.
And nothing in the forum rules about documentation of anything. This is an informal place to share ideas, thoughts, recollections, opinions, etc. It's not for demanding other members do what you want. If you don't like that, try another forum or blog.
You stated that I was forced to retire. I asked you to present proof of that statement/allegation and you refuse ergo you are a liar.
When someone (you) slanders, lies and makes false allegations, yes I will be demanding. I demand proof.
Backshop Just like you avoid answering questions that you don't want to answer. There's nothing forcing anyone here to answer anything.
Just like you avoid answering questions that you don't want to answer. There's nothing forcing anyone here to answer anything.
Please list the questions you say I will not answer.
243129I was forced to retire.
charlie hebdo BaltACD 243129 243129 Backshop 243129 How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations. That's all you talked about in this thread started by you... http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/743/t/268471.aspx Read it again carefully and tell me where I say they are universal remedies. So??? So? Maybe they will want his universal nostrum.
BaltACD 243129 243129 Backshop 243129 How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations. That's all you talked about in this thread started by you... http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/743/t/268471.aspx Read it again carefully and tell me where I say they are universal remedies. So??? So?
243129 243129 Backshop 243129 How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations. That's all you talked about in this thread started by you... http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/743/t/268471.aspx Read it again carefully and tell me where I say they are universal remedies. So???
243129 Backshop 243129 How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations. That's all you talked about in this thread started by you... http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/743/t/268471.aspx Read it again carefully and tell me where I say they are universal remedies.
Backshop 243129 How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations. That's all you talked about in this thread started by you... http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/743/t/268471.aspx
243129 How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations.
How about this one too?
"Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"???
C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations.
That's all you talked about in this thread started by you...
http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/743/t/268471.aspx
Read it again carefully and tell me where I say they are universal remedies.
So???
So?
Maybe they will want his universal nostrum.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
Joe, every time I open this site there is a popup for a position--FRA-Director, Office of Safety Analysis. Maybe you should apply so your voice will really be heard. You don't want to be one of those lockerroom lawyers you've mentioned in the past.
charlie hebdo Part of the ongoing supervision of T&E personnel should include yearly medical and mental fitness exams, starting at age 65 or even earlier. If it is not mandatory, it should be. Only Amtrak requires annual medical examinations (as of 2014, at least), but I believe this is insufficient. Reaction times and judgment should be empirically evaluated rofessionally. https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-me-adv-railroad-medical-standards-20140420-story.html
Part of the ongoing supervision of T&E personnel should include yearly medical and mental fitness exams, starting at age 65 or even earlier. If it is not mandatory, it should be. Only Amtrak requires annual medical examinations (as of 2014, at least), but I believe this is insufficient. Reaction times and judgment should be empirically evaluated rofessionally.
https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-me-adv-railroad-medical-standards-20140420-story.html
So Charlie are you going to address the fact that you lied? Or do you opt to carry on nonplussed as Trump does?
BaltACD 243129 243129Attention Charlie Hebdo! 243129 So where did you get your info that I was forced to retire? Are you going to run from the question as is your M.O.? How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations. Notice how charlie has avoided answering. His dislike of me has led him to slander me. The above has been brought to you by poor vetting, training and supervision.
243129 243129Attention Charlie Hebdo! 243129 So where did you get your info that I was forced to retire? Are you going to run from the question as is your M.O.? How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations. Notice how charlie has avoided answering. His dislike of me has led him to slander me.
243129Attention Charlie Hebdo! 243129 So where did you get your info that I was forced to retire? Are you going to run from the question as is your M.O.? How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations.
243129 So where did you get your info that I was forced to retire? Are you going to run from the question as is your M.O.?
Notice how charlie has avoided answering. His dislike of me has led him to slander me.
The above has been brought to you by poor vetting, training and supervision.
So sayeth the desk jockey.
243129 Attention Charlie Hebdo! 243129 So where did you get your info that I was forced to retire? Are you going to run from the question as is your M.O.? How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"??? C'mon charlie and substantiate your allegations.
Attention Charlie Hebdo!
charlie hebdo "Let [others] count the ways."
I see that you still make baseless allegations and when confronted with them you run.
So where did you get the info that I was forced to retire?
No answer= no credibility. Not that you had much to begin with.
243129 How about this one too? "Where do I say "poor vetting, training and supervision as universal remedies"???
"Let [others] count the ways."
243129 Backshop The question isn't would he accept it, the question is "what will the public pay for". They've spoken with their wallets. Not everyone wants or can afford to travel first class so having both classes available appeals to the traveler who wants luxury and the traveler who wants to get from A to B.
Backshop The question isn't would he accept it, the question is "what will the public pay for". They've spoken with their wallets.
The question isn't would he accept it, the question is "what will the public pay for". They've spoken with their wallets.
Not everyone wants or can afford to travel first class so having both classes available appeals to the traveler who wants luxury and the traveler who wants to get from A to B.
As to Acela first class, to me, after making a round trip Washington to Boston and back, it does not compare with what VIA was offereing in VIA 1 10 years ago.
Johnny
Re: If the same amenities were available in a business class or parlor car in an Amfleet consist which attained the same running time as the Acela would you accept that?
You aren't trying to convince ME! I'd rather ride in the 52-seater built by Budd WITH the old GG1's. But, people like us don't matter. It's the people who are playing the game that matter, and have ALWAYS mattered.
Amtrak can't suddenly buy 1950's technology after 50+ years of BS. THAT... WILL... NOT... HAPPEN....
It would be like the Air Force suddenly announcing: "Oh, those F35's.... Yeah, they're just too expensive. I mean, those Godless Commies haven't figured out how to make an F22 yet (regardless what the CIA's says. Yeah, you know how the CIA used to tell us about those flying Soviet Tanks? Yeah, same thing, those CIA guys are total scum). So, we're going to buy more F-22."
HA HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Yeah right. THAT... WON'T... HAPPEN!!!
It's NOT about the equipment. It's about the BS and the BLING.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.