Trains.com

PSR an open ticket for Government Regulator to step in?

2695 views
29 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
PSR an open ticket for Government Regulator to step in?
Posted by samfp1943 on Monday, January 7, 2019 6:21 PM

In the TRAINS Newswire of this date; there is an article by David Lassen on a "Fireside Chat" with Matt Rose at the NRCMA Convention at Marco Is. Fl.

During that 'chat' Rose made a couple of statements regarding PSR, and its potential to create some meanings and maybe, new definitions on the marketing and operational sides of the PSR... one might call them unintended consequences?

Part of Mr. Rose's statement says [in part]FTA: "...what we’re doing in PSR is we’re redefining what we’re willing to accept in the freight railroad industry on certain lanes. And I really do believe we’re going to get in a lot of trouble by doing that..." 

Stating further he is quoted:"...“What the [Surface Transportation Board] allows us to do is what we call price differentiate,” he said, illustrating with an example of airline passengers in adjacent seats who may have paid significantly different fares depending on when they bought the ticket. “We get that same right, but we have to carry you from Point A down here to Florida. If the airlines say, ‘We’re not going to provide service to that market,’ I think they’d get in trouble. I think the freight rails will get in trouble doing that..."

And Futher:"...“When two railroads do business with each other, we make a commitment that we’re going to deliver to the gateway at X time on X days.

“We do business with railroads that are fully impiemented from a PSR standpoint, and I don’t see any improvement in our ISA’s with them. Zero. When I look at how those railroads do with commuter rail or passenger rail service, I don’t see any improvement … I don’t hear any customers jumping up and down talking about how service is so much better on any railroad. In fact, I would tell you it’s just the opposite, when I look at what the network is really doing..."

Mr. Roses final point on PSR is:"...“And I think the point that I’m trying to make is, when railroads say we’re no longer to serve these markets, one railroad may be able to get away with it, because then everybody can point to, well, the other railroads are going to get the business.” If other railroads follow suit, he said, “then trust me, there will be a whole series of hearings in D.C. on this..."

A different direction on PSR?  Unintended Consequences?  A different direction,Maybe?  Should provoke some interesting conversations?.

 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Monday, January 7, 2019 7:01 PM

The best thing to do is to define "PSR".  I can't find any words on-line that form that acronym that has anything to do with Railroads or the goverment.

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, January 7, 2019 7:03 PM

PSR is buzzword BS.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Monday, January 7, 2019 8:11 PM

Precision Scheduled Railroad... another meaning to add to the list I found that had 91 entries... none of which had anything to do with Railroads.  I had a hard time even finding the Trains Newswire.  (Link at the top right of the page, "Trains .com Sites", click 'Trains Magazine'.  This is apparently the front door to the web site, I tend to come in through the servants entrance to the forums and never see the foyer.)

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 2:21 AM

See my new thread.  PSR is assett utilization oriented railroadoing,  The other approach is customer oriented railroading.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 5:44 AM

Interesting difference in operating philosophies.

In 2018, BNSF carried 10.674 million revenue units while UP carried 8.886 million revenue units.

That is 1.788 million or 20% more than UP.

http://trn.trains.com/news/news-wire/2019/01/07-a-sea-of-sameness-for-class-i-railroad-traffic-growth-in-2018

 

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 8:09 AM

kgbw49

Interesting difference in operating philosophies.

In 2018, BNSF carried 10.674 million revenue units while UP carried 8.886 million revenue units.

That is 1.788 million or 20% more than UP.

http://trn.trains.com/news/news-wire/2019/01/07-a-sea-of-sameness-for-class-i-railroad-traffic-growth-in-2018

 

 

 

 

The regulation threat most likely will start not with the shippers but with stalled civil/civic projects that cannot get over or under rail lines because of slow or tardy responses by railroad staff for sewer/water/roadway applications processed in reasonable time. (Won't do anything about the arrogant oil & gas pipeline applications that want rubber-stamped overnight approval of poorly prepared applications and designs, ....usually submitted after construction has begunHmm)... First place the PSR cuts hit were the engineering and non-operating staffs of the railroads that were already too thin.

Politicians howling over stalled pet projects will supercede unhappy shippers.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 8:13 AM

samfp1943
Part of Mr. Rose's statement says [in part]FTA: "...what we’re doing in PSR is we’re redefining what we’re willing to accept in the freight railroad industry on certain lanes. And I really do believe we’re going to get in a lot of trouble by doing that..."

samfp1943
Stating further he is quoted:"...“What the [Surface Transportation Board] allows us to do is what we call price differentiate,” he said, illustrating with an example of airline passengers in adjacent seats who may have paid significantly different fares depending on when they bought the ticket. “We get that same right, but we have to carry you from Point A down here to Florida. If the airlines say, ‘We’re not going to provide service to that market,’ I think they’d get in trouble. I think the freight rails will get in trouble doing that..."

So, which is it, price differentiation or refusal to haul?

I agree that a definition of PSR is needed.  All I have ever heard are explantions of it that are incomprehensible.  It sounds like Mr. Rose is trying to explain why BNSF will not make PSR a part of their marketing style. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 8:26 AM

Euclid

 

 
So, which is it, price differentiation or refusal to haul? 

It's cutting overhead, expenses and unprofitable operations in every way, shape and form to mollify Wall Street Trash/Fast Buck Artists looking for more short term $$$$.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 8:50 AM

Euclid
I agree that a definition of PSR is needed.

I think you seek what does not exist.  Investors like PSR because it's all buzzwordy.  Sounds better than decreasing dwell time, increasing velocity, streamlining rules, etc.

But as PSR being one set of guidelines?  Nah, I think it's more a generic term that can encompass many different approaches to improve shareholder value.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 9:55 AM

zugmann
 
Euclid
I agree that a definition of PSR is needed.

 

I think you seek what does not exist.  Investors like PSR because it's all buzzwordy.  Sounds better than decreasing dwell time, increasing velocity, streamlining rules, etc.

But as PSR being one set of guidelines?  Nah, I think it's more a generic term that can encompass many different approaches to improve shareholder value.

 

 

Yes, I agree that it is a buzzword for something that is not new at all.  But you can’t prove that in debating all of the platitudes of PSR.  So, I seek a definition of PSR only to prove that it has none.  PSR is an illusion.  

The PSR illusion, in practical terms, manifests as cost cutting, which puts it into conflict with labor.  I am sure that this is what Mr. Rose was getting at.

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:20 AM

The refusal to haul predates the PSR movement at some railroads.  It's not really an outright refusal, except maybe for new business opprotunities, but more just making it difficult for those customers you no longer want.  Eventually most go away.  It's not always that they don't make money on them, just not enough.  Or serving them makes the Operating Ratio a bit higher, nevermind that you might have more cash in hand.  As long as they can squeeze more pennies out of each dollar they have, they don't care about bringing in more dollars.

Jeff

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 11:35 AM

Someone please describe how throwing away current customers is a realistic long-term business plan.  Over time, customers go away on their own.  

Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 12:52 PM

rrnut282

Someone please describe how throwing away current customers is a realistic long-term business plan.  Over time, customers go away on their own.  

Of course, it's not.  

Sometimes it does cost more to provide the service than not.  Or as Jeff points out, you just don't make enough money on providing the service.  A low-volume customer that causes you to go out of your way to service it, f'rinstance.

Getting rid of those customers is important to some as it represents money not funnelled to the investors.  A crew that doesn't have to be called, a locomotive that can be used elsewhere, track time that can be used for more profitable trains.

The question becomes what's worth keeping.  The customer, the employees, and the investors are going to have very different takes on that.

In a way, you can see parallels in the trucking business.  Some companies handle the long-distance stuff (RR Class 1's), other handle the local or regional business (Class 2's and short lines).

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
Posted by Victrola1 on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 1:11 PM

"The public damned."

What will the media make of re-regulation should it raise up its head again? What version of the story will be told and to what end? 

"Still a third version comes from Vanderbilt’s favorite nephew, Samuel Barton, who was traveling aboard the train with his uncle that day. He reported quite a different context a few years later to William A. Croffut, who published a biography of Vanderbilt in 1886.

“Why are you going to stop this fast mail-train?” Dresser asked in this version.

“Because it doesn’t pay. I can’t run a train as far as this permanently at a loss.”

“But the public find it very convenient and useful. You ought to accommodate them.”

“The public? How do you know they find it useful? How do you know, or how can I know, that they want it? If they want it, why don’t they patronize it and make it pay? That’s the only test I have of whether a thing is wanted—does it pay? If it doesn’t pay, I suppose it isn’t wanted.”

“Mr. Vanderbilt, are you working for the public or for your stockholders?”

“The public be damned! I am working for my stockholders! If the public want the train, why don’t they support it?”

https://www.americanheritage.com/content/%E2%80%9C-public-be-damned%E2%80%9D

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • 1,447 posts
Posted by Shadow the Cats owner on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 1:58 PM

The public right now is finding out how well forcing ELD onto the OTR industry is biting them in the rear end.  Why the logjams of shippers and consignees that refuse to load and unload in a timely fashion are showing up in the form of empty shelves on things people like to buy.  Things like yogurts meats produce.  Why are there problems now drivers are required to log it as it happens no more hiding the time they are holding the trucks.  Kraft and other food makers are pulling their hair out trying to solve the problems they themselves have caused.  Grocery warehouses are becoming where trucks go to die on the clock.  

 

Just before Christmas we had a load of boxed cereal that went to the Jewel DC in Melrose Park.  Our driver was on time for his appointment had made the run up from just south of Joliet where he had stopped the night before.  It took them 15 hours to get him unloaded.  Yet they say it is the drivers causing the problems.  

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 3:13 PM

Shadow the Cats owner
The public right now is finding out how well forcing ELD onto the OTR industry is biting them in the rear end.  Why the logjams of shippers and consignees that refuse to load and unload in a timely fashion are showing up in the form of empty shelves on things people like to buy.  Things like yogurts meats produce.  Why are there problems now drivers are required to log it as it happens no more hiding the time they are holding the trucks.  Kraft and other food makers are pulling their hair out trying to solve the problems they themselves have caused.  Grocery warehouses are becoming where trucks go to die on the clock.   

Just before Christmas we had a load of boxed cereal that went to the Jewel DC in Melrose Park.  Our driver was on time for his appointment had made the run up from just south of Joliet where he had stopped the night before.  It took them 15 hours to get him unloaded.  Yet they say it is the drivers causing the problems.  

The 'shipping public' has alway felt that they can stiff carriers (truck and rail) on the so call Accessorial Charges (Demurrage, Intraplant switching, storage etc. etc.)  In Shadow's example the shippers lack of efficiency is coming right back to their loading/unloading dock and truckers 'going on the law'.  Rail carriers have faught the same lack of efficiency among their customers ever since I was employed in 1965 and probably back when my Grandfather was hired in 1910.

When is comes time to renegotiate contract rates with the shipper, those that get the most hostile are those that have virtual monoply control of their customers and continually jack the costs their customers have to pay, maybe 50 to 75% or more over the life of the transporation contract.  When the rail carriers propose market rate increases all these monopolistic shippers can do is cry about how the railroads are 'taking advantage' using their own market power.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • 1,447 posts
Posted by Shadow the Cats owner on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 5:29 PM

Balt right now even the big boys are starting to scream at the shippers over lost time.  Why they can not keep enough bodies in the seats to maintain their deliveries that they have scheduled already.  Hell our insurance industry is screaming at the Federal government over the ELD and HOS dibacles.  Since ELD's were mandated there hasn't been the drop in accidents that the FMCSA swore there would be in OTR truck accidents.  NOPE in the first year since ELD's have been forced down our throats OTR accidents that the cause is suspected of being Fatigue as the primary cause jumped 40% in the industry.   Drivers are pushing harder to make up for lost time and not getting the rest they need due to lack of parking in the areas where their clocks are running out.  Yet the ELD was supposed to save lives.  It's costing more lives.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, January 8, 2019 6:07 PM

Shadow the Cats owner
Balt right now even the big boys are starting to scream at the shippers over lost time.  Why they can not keep enough bodies in the seats to maintain their deliveries that they have scheduled already.  Hell our insurance industry is screaming at the Federal government over the ELD and HOS dibacles.  Since ELD's were mandated there hasn't been the drop in accidents that the FMCSA swore there would be in OTR truck accidents.  NOPE in the first year since ELD's have been forced down our throats OTR accidents that the cause is suspected of being Fatigue as the primary cause jumped 40% in the industry.   Drivers are pushing harder to make up for lost time and not getting the rest they need due to lack of parking in the areas where their clocks are running out.  Yet the ELD was supposed to save lives.  It's costing more lives.

All I know - is when I travel the Interstates at night - it is difficult to find a spot to park my pick-up and race car trailer for all the OTR trucks that are tied down for HOS rest.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Friday, January 11, 2019 6:31 PM

BaltACD
Shadow the Cats owner

All I know - is when I travel the Interstates at night - it is difficult to find a spot to park my pick-up and race car trailer for all the OTR trucks that are tied down for HOS rest.

Parking for OTR units [and other trucks] has been a growing problem for years, and very little signs that it was going to get any better.  Small rest areas on Interstates definitely, have been a big issue! 

        Virginia Hy-Po's used to run through the Rest Areas regularly, checking Big Rig at the parking areas, and mark trailer wheels with a chalk stick; come back and write tickets for drivers whom they perceived had been there too long(?).    

       Enforcement of Rest Area rules seemed to depend on individual jurisdictions, and local practices. East Coast areas were definitely, more heavily watched.  Trucks Stop lots would fill up early, and the 'later arrivals' there would snarl the traffic flows, and access in many T/S parking lots.  With the poorer parkig choices for stopping places becoming, more and more dangerous for drivers who 'had' to stop.

        The more recent changes in HOS rules, more than likely; have seriously exacerbated a lack choice of options for those drivers; who found themselves with fewer options to comply, with HOS regulations (?)

My feeling is that Shipper Loading, and Consignee Unloading, will always be problematic fo the Trucking Industry.       Maybe, not so much with the Railroads ? 

   Until, the Truckers get relief and get some legislative backing; The load/Unload will be out of their control...Shipper's and Receiver's seem to be able to laugh off the threats of demurrage charges by trucking companies?Sigh

 

 


 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, January 11, 2019 8:07 PM

samfp1943

 

 
BaltACD
Shadow the Cats owner

All I know - is when I travel the Interstates at night - it is difficult to find a spot to park my pick-up and race car trailer for all the OTR trucks that are tied down for HOS rest.

 

 

Parking for OTR units [and other trucks] has been a growing problem for years, and very little signs that it was going to get any better.  Small rest areas on Interstates definitely, have been a big issue! 

 

        Virginia Hy-Po's used to run through the Rest Areas regularly, checking Big Rig at the parking areas, and mark trailer wheels with a chalk stick; come back and write tickets for drivers whom they perceived had been there too long(?).    

       Enforcement of Rest Area rules seemed to depend on individual jurisdictions, and local practices. East Coast areas were definitely, more heavily watched.  Trucks Stop lots would fill up early, and the 'later arrivals' there would snarl the traffic flows, and access in many T/S parking lots.  With the poorer parkig choices for stopping places becoming, more and more dangerous for drivers who 'had' to stop.

        The more recent changes in HOS rules, more than likely; have seriously exacerbated a lack choice of options for those drivers; who found themselves with fewer options to comply, with HOS regulations (?)

My feeling is that Shipper Loading, and Consignee Unloading, will always be problematic fo the Trucking Industry.       Maybe, not so much with the Railroads ? 

   Until, the Truckers get relief and get some legislative backing; The load/Unload will be out of their control...Shipper's and Receiver's seem to be able to laugh off the threats of demurrage charges by trucking companies?Sigh

 

Note: thia is not quite germane to the topic, but the mention of the Virginia hy-po's practice reminded me of what I saw in Seneca, S.C. 59 years ago: there were no parking meters, but a policeman went around with chalk and marked the tires of parked cars. I never saw what he did when he came to one with an aleady marked tire, but I am sure it was a measure used against extensive parking. I sleep through Seneca now, so I do not have an opportunity to look for chalk on tires.Smile

Johnny

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, January 11, 2019 8:55 PM

I was recently going through a shoebox I have full of old RR correspondance from one of the railroad stations in town.  Mostly general sup't notices and the like, from lates 30s into the 1950s.  Even back then they were complaining about reducing OT and equipment utilization. 

 

They can call it PSR, but it's the same dance that has been going on forever.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Saturday, January 12, 2019 6:55 AM

samfp1943
My feeling is that Shipper Loading, and Consignee Unloading, will always be problematic fo the Trucking Industry.       Maybe, not so much with the Railroads ? 

I would opine that the big difference between the two is that in most cases the truckers stay and wait for the load/unload while rail crews simply drop/pick up the car and keep going.  The customer can keep the car for just as long as they are will to pay the requisite charges.

 

 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Saturday, January 12, 2019 7:28 AM

tree68
samfp1943
My feeling is that Shipper Loading, and Consignee Unloading, will always be problematic fo the Trucking Industry.       Maybe, not so much with the Railroads ? 
 I would opine that the big difference between the two is that in most cases the truckers stay and wait for the load/unload while rail crews simply drop/pick up the car and keep going.  The customer can keep the car for just as long as they are will to pay the requisite charges.

                  Spot on, Larry [tree68]: It seems that like most everything in business (and life?); it boils down to whose side is' responsible for stacking the Benjamin's'. 
                   The 'contracts' between the shipper and the carrier, whose resaponsibility for what.  The rails seem to have some advantage (of size?). The truckers, somewhat less( again, a 'size'  thing.) The trucker can 'drop and hook'. IF the trucking company has invested in excess of trailers,and the customer has a facilities to handle the excess equipment on its property, and personnel to load and unload?  Lotsa, IF's and Maybe's. Every siuation is different. Sigh

 

 


 

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Saturday, January 12, 2019 3:00 PM

Euclid
I agree that a definition of PSR is needed. 

Potential Service Reduction

Performance Suffering Radically

Practicing Silly Reforms

Practically Slavery Railroading

Preposterous Senseless Reckless

Paralyzingly Stupid Railroading

Perfunctory Shortsighted Railroaders

Preposterous Senseless Reforms

Profit Superscedes Rationality

Pathetic Self-serving Retards

Preposterous Shortsighted Ruinous

Proposterous Silly Ridiculous

Practicing Stupid Ridiculousness

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Saturday, January 12, 2019 3:12 PM

Why not go back to PT--Precision Transportaion?

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Saturday, January 12, 2019 7:51 PM

BaltACD

 

 
Shadow the Cats owner
Balt right now even the big boys are starting to scream at the shippers over lost time.  Why they can not keep enough bodies in the seats to maintain their deliveries that they have scheduled already.  Hell our insurance industry is screaming at the Federal government over the ELD and HOS dibacles.  Since ELD's were mandated there hasn't been the drop in accidents that the FMCSA swore there would be in OTR truck accidents.  NOPE in the first year since ELD's have been forced down our throats OTR accidents that the cause is suspected of being Fatigue as the primary cause jumped 40% in the industry.   Drivers are pushing harder to make up for lost time and not getting the rest they need due to lack of parking in the areas where their clocks are running out.  Yet the ELD was supposed to save lives.  It's costing more lives.

 

All I know - is when I travel the Interstates at night - it is difficult to find a spot to park my pick-up and race car trailer for all the OTR trucks that are tied down for HOS rest.

 

You haven't noticed the digital signs on the interstates for how many truck spaces available at the rest areas and  former rest areas now known as "parking areas"....Wating for reservations and maitre d's for the 18 wheelers soon.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, January 12, 2019 8:52 PM

mudchicken
 
BaltACD
 
Shadow the Cats owner
Balt right now even the big boys are starting to scream at the shippers over lost time.  Why they can not keep enough bodies in the seats to maintain their deliveries that they have scheduled already.  Hell our insurance industry is screaming at the Federal government over the ELD and HOS dibacles.  Since ELD's were mandated there hasn't been the drop in accidents that the FMCSA swore there would be in OTR truck accidents.  NOPE in the first year since ELD's have been forced down our throats OTR accidents that the cause is suspected of being Fatigue as the primary cause jumped 40% in the industry.   Drivers are pushing harder to make up for lost time and not getting the rest they need due to lack of parking in the areas where their clocks are running out.  Yet the ELD was supposed to save lives.  It's costing more lives. 

All I know - is when I travel the Interstates at night - it is difficult to find a spot to park my pick-up and race car trailer for all the OTR trucks that are tied down for HOS rest. 

You haven't noticed the digital signs on the interstates for how many truck spaces available at the rest areas and  former rest areas now known as "parking areas"....Wating for reservations and maitre d's for the 18 wheelers soon.

The 'parking space' signs exist in Florida.  Haven't seen them on I95 in Georgia, North and South Carolina or Virginia.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Saturday, January 12, 2019 9:09 PM

   Balt, I haven't done much driving lately, but I remember seeing what you were talking about.  Sometimes the entrance and exit ramps for the rest areas even had their shoulders lined with trucks.   About ten years ago, Louisiana started closing a lot of rest areas.   They said they weren't responsible for providing parking spaces for trucks.   I don't know what the trucks do now.

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • 1,447 posts
Posted by Shadow the Cats owner on Sunday, January 13, 2019 8:58 AM

mudchicken

 

 
BaltACD

 

 
Shadow the Cats owner
Balt right now even the big boys are starting to scream at the shippers over lost time.  Why they can not keep enough bodies in the seats to maintain their deliveries that they have scheduled already.  Hell our insurance industry is screaming at the Federal government over the ELD and HOS dibacles.  Since ELD's were mandated there hasn't been the drop in accidents that the FMCSA swore there would be in OTR truck accidents.  NOPE in the first year since ELD's have been forced down our throats OTR accidents that the cause is suspected of being Fatigue as the primary cause jumped 40% in the industry.   Drivers are pushing harder to make up for lost time and not getting the rest they need due to lack of parking in the areas where their clocks are running out.  Yet the ELD was supposed to save lives.  It's costing more lives.

 

All I know - is when I travel the Interstates at night - it is difficult to find a spot to park my pick-up and race car trailer for all the OTR trucks that are tied down for HOS rest.

 

 

 

You haven't noticed the digital signs on the interstates for how many truck spaces available at the rest areas and  former rest areas now known as "parking areas"....Wating for reservations and maitre d's for the 18 wheelers soon.

 

 

 

Well the reserved parking is here at some of the truckstop chain places.  We will pay for them all the freaking time.  Why so my kids on the road are not forced to park on the shoulders of off ramps and on ramps.  We haul some of the more nasty crap and can't risk having a truck hit in the rear end while a driver tries to sleep at night on the ramp.  My biggest worry when my drivers are out on the road is a rear end collision while they are trying to sleep that kills someone that hit them.  

 

We do have D/H operations at our largest shippers and recievers even with our tanker operations.  The trouble is the capital required to do that.  A new van is around 35K each with our specs.  A new dry bulk tanker your in the 80-90K range.  A new liquid tanker can approach 100K why so much. 100 percent Stainless steel in the barrel is not cheap to do.  Then if your wanting extras it adds up in a hurry.  

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy