Trains.com

George Bush

7051 views
68 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Sunday, December 2, 2018 10:06 AM

PJS1, the US wasn't the only "offender,"  if you want to call it that.  If what I've read is true most of the Luftwaffe's Me109's were destroyed not in combat, but in take-off and landing accidents.

And "Semper Fi!"  to you!

  • Member since
    February 2016
  • From: Texas
  • 1,538 posts
Posted by PJS1 on Sunday, December 2, 2018 9:28 AM

Firelock76
 You know, I always wondered if it was slightly irresponsible for the US government to turn a bunch of kids loose with this kind of high-powered machinery, but on the other hand, what choice did they have? 

According to World War II – A Statistical Survey, by John Ellis, approximately 45 percent of the U.S. military aircraft losses during the war were due to accidents. 
 
I served in Marine Corp Aviation from 1957 to 1961.  Some of the career men in my units had served in WWII.  I remember them telling me of the large number of aircraft destroyed due to accidents.
 
By 1944 many of the pilots and aircrew members, who were still in their teens, were sent into combat with less than 100 hours of flying experience. 
 
I was a full-time or part-time flight instructor for more than 20 years.  One hundred hours does not make an experienced pilot, especially for complex airplanes.  No wonder the accident rate was so high.
 
Although it is always easier to look in the rear-view mirror, more judicious use of airpower during the war might have lessened the need for so many inexperienced aircrews. 

Rio Grande Valley, CFI,CFII

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Under The Streets of Los Angeles
  • 1,150 posts
Posted by Metro Red Line on Saturday, December 1, 2018 8:01 PM
  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Saturday, December 1, 2018 10:32 AM
 
Whistle stop tour Michigan  
  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Saturday, December 1, 2018 10:27 AM

Anyone care for a look at young Mr. Bush's "charger" from World War Two?

Not just one, but five of them!

You know, I always wondered if it was slightly irresponsible for the US government to turn a bunch of kids loose with this kind of high-powered machinery, but on the other hand, what choice did they have?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiY1VzmFNeM

Rest in peace Lt. Bush.  So long "Airdale!"

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,442 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, December 1, 2018 8:13 AM

Well, I guess we'll find out now what they do after they take the tarp off.

  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,563 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Saturday, December 1, 2018 7:18 AM
George H. W> Bush was a fine man.
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Saturday, December 1, 2018 1:42 AM

Miningman

https://www.uprr.com/newsinfo/releases/heritage_and_steam/2005/1018_4141.shtml

 

George Bush and the Queen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaugcfHUrZs

George Bush and Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTvMEuGG1IQ

Thanks to Mike

 

 

 

 

 

What's with the weirded-out winshields?

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
George Bush
Posted by Miningman on Saturday, December 1, 2018 12:06 AM

https://www.uprr.com/newsinfo/releases/heritage_and_steam/2005/1018_4141.shtml

 

George Bush and the Queen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaugcfHUrZs

George Bush and Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTvMEuGG1IQ

Thanks to Mike

 

 

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy