Trains.com

October 26th, 2022

6143 views
32 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
October 26th, 2022
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, October 26, 2017 1:02 PM

Cast your gaze about 5 years down the road. There are a lot of trends in the works right now concerning transportaion. How will they play out? Five years from now, on October 26th,  2022 what will we be discussing on the Trains Magazine Forum?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,513 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, October 26, 2017 8:19 PM

Murphy Siding
Five years from now, on October 26th, 2022 what will we be discussing on the Trains Magazine Forum?

We seem to discuss the same stuff today as we did 5 years ago.

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Thursday, October 26, 2017 8:51 PM

What will we be discussing?  Probably how those lousy, low-down, dirty, stinky, smelly, soul-less, motherless diesel assassins murdered our beloved steam locomotives and how it shows there's no justice in this world! 

Hey, that's what we ALWAYS do!  Some thing's ain't gonna change, nor should they!

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, October 26, 2017 8:51 PM

The disappearance of the 50-foot IPD box cars.

Why can't we have any long-distance passenger service in the country?

The wrecks caused by malfunctions in Positive Train Control.

EHH attempts to bring precision service to the Hudson Bay Railway, because the crisp air is better for him up there.

Mudchicken might retire, after which Mookie will probably consent to being declawed and be content to be lying by the fire.  A certain pair of tin shoes will have corroded, and the Scoundrel Command will completely disband.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,862 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, October 26, 2017 8:53 PM

zugmann
We seem to discuss the same stuff today as we did 5 years ago.

Indeed.

I suspect that much will depend on where energy goes - is coal still a player?  How about oil?  

And technology - has PTC been worth it?  One man crews, and even self-driving or remote (as in miles away) control trains?

I suspect our two resident taboo topics will still be taboo, albeit unchanged in the real world.

And has CSX recovered from EHH yet?  Devil

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, October 26, 2017 9:53 PM

CShaveRR
Mookie will probably consent to being declawed 

When pigs fly! Grumpy

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Thursday, October 26, 2017 9:59 PM

Mookie

 Wow! we have a feisty cat!Smile

 
CShaveRR
Mookie will probably consent to being declawed 

 

When pigs fly! Grumpy

 

 

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, October 29, 2017 8:29 PM

   Well that took a weird turn.

     For starters, I'd say in 5 years we'll be talking about how the pendulum has swung back in the energy world, making coal and oil shipments hot items again,

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Sunday, October 29, 2017 10:31 PM

Murphy Siding

   Well that took a weird turn.

     For starters, I'd say in 5 years we'll be talking about how the pendulum has swung back in the energy world, making coal and oil shipments hot items again,

Nope... the pendulum will stop swinging due to lack of energy (or interest). Grumpy

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Monday, October 30, 2017 7:18 AM

Semper Vaporo
 
Murphy Siding

   Well that took a weird turn.

     For starters, I'd say in 5 years we'll be talking about how the pendulum has swung back in the energy world, making coal and oil shipments hot items again,

 

 

Nope... the pendulum will stop swinging due to lack of energy (or interest). Grumpy

 

I'm not sure I understand your post. Lack of coal and oil? Lack of interest in coal and oil? Lack of interest in forum discussions about cole and oil? Ot lack of energy or interest in internet forums in general?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Monday, October 30, 2017 9:20 AM

Murphy Siding
 
Semper Vaporo 
Murphy Siding

   Well that took a weird turn.

     For starters, I'd say in 5 years we'll be talking about how the pendulum has swung back in the energy world, making coal and oil shipments hot items again,

 

  

I'm not sure I understand your post. Lack of coal and oil? Lack of interest in coal and oil? Lack of interest in forum discussions about cole and oil? Ot lack of energy or interest in internet forums in general?

You left out lack of energy to discust Cole and oil.

But to answer all 5 questions... Yes.

 

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • 288 posts
Posted by CNSF on Monday, October 30, 2017 4:21 PM

Intermodal profitability and growth - or the lack thereof.

And yes - autonomous vehicle technology. It should be far easier to implement on railraods, and in controlled situations such as an intermodal yard, than out on the public streets and highways.

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, October 30, 2017 9:15 PM

Brave, very very brave.....

 

 
CShaveRR
Mookie will probably consent to being declawed 

 

When pigs fly! Grumpy

 

 

[/quote]

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: East Coast
  • 1,175 posts
Posted by D.Carleton on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 8:55 AM

Five years from now Brightline Florida will be running and (hopefully) extended to Orlando. By then we will certainly know if the idea is a local success or a success worthy of repeating on a national scale. It will be an interesting half-decade.

Editor Emeritus, This Week at Amtrak

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,826 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:42 AM

On 10/26/22 we could talk about how I celebrated my 24th year on the railroad.  10/26 is my hire date, the day I started new-hire class.  My trainman's seniority date is 11/14, the day we graduated from class.  I had to wait for the conductor I was assigned to for training to return before I could mark up, so my first actual trip was 11/16.  Which was also my father's birthday.

This year I celebrated 19 years with a 9900 foot manifest that had a dynamiter.  The inbound crew said the air went everytime they set air.  Using a trick of the trade, I was luckier.  I set air four times and it only went twice. 

Jeff  

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,934 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 1:01 PM

jeffhergert
This year I celebrated 19 years with a 9900 foot manifest that had a dynamiter.  The inbound crew said the air went everytime they set air.  Using a trick of the trade, I was luckier.  I set air four times and it only went twice. 

Jeff  

For which your Conductor thanked you (under their breath).

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Cardiff, CA
  • 2,930 posts
Posted by erikem on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:20 PM

zugmann

 

 
Murphy Siding
Five years from now, on October 26th, 2022 what will we be discussing on the Trains Magazine Forum?

 

We seem to discuss the same stuff today as we did 5 years ago.

 

That's pretty much what I expect as well. I would expect some more discussion/nostalgia over the equipment from the beginnings of the passenger rail revival - Amfleet will be 45+ years old, original BART cars will be 50 years old (BART service started in September 1972.

 

  • Member since
    August 2009
  • 322 posts
Posted by BLS53 on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 4:35 AM

Progress only moves that rapidly with Information Technology. Transportation moves at a snail's pace (no pun intended).

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 11:33 AM

BLS53

Progress only moves that rapidly with Information Technology. Transportation moves at a snail's pace (no pun intended).

AMEN!

 

Norm


  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,934 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 12:23 PM

I suspect there will be discussion of some incident that PTC was thought to protect and didn't.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,320 posts
Posted by rdamon on Thursday, November 2, 2017 2:56 PM

News Wire: Lac-Mégantic disaster trial enters fifth year

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,326 posts
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, November 2, 2017 3:41 PM

rdamon
News Wire: Lac-Mégantic disaster trial enters fifth year

No, you meant

Lac-Mégantic disaster trial discussion enters fifth year

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,320 posts
Posted by rdamon on Thursday, November 2, 2017 9:14 PM

Laugh

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,934 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:10 PM

Overmod
 
rdamon
News Wire: Lac-Mégantic disaster trial enters fifth year 

No, you meant

Lac-Mégantic disaster trial discussion enters fifth year

Sorry - the discussion will be in it's NINTH year in 2022.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,326 posts
Posted by Overmod on Friday, November 3, 2017 1:42 AM

BaltACD
Sorry - the discussion will be in its NINTH year in 2022.

Note that I said ‘Lac Megantic trial discussion’ (the trial only having started a month ago) not ‘the trial of the Lac Megantic discussion’ which of course has been ‘trying since 2013’.

The trial discussion will only seem like it‘s nine years old in 2022.  Of course, in some respects it already does.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,934 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, November 3, 2017 7:30 AM

Overmod
 
BaltACD
Sorry - the discussion will be in its NINTH year in 2022. 

Note that I said ‘Lac Megantic trial discussion’ (the trial only having started a month ago) not ‘the trial of the Lac Megantic discussion’ which of course has been ‘trying since 2013’.

The trial discussion will only seem like it‘s nine years old in 2022.  Of course, in some respects it already does.

One cannot separate the incident from the trial about the incident.  You can't have one without the other - unless there was no trial at all.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,326 posts
Posted by Overmod on Friday, November 3, 2017 9:05 AM

Yes, but...

... the story about the trial proceedings, what the witnesses and counsel said and didn’t say, how the news workers use the fact of the trial to spin things ... THAT is the focus of the present discussion.  Not rehashing what we understand to be the matters of fact, or what we think about management or employees or training policies — but rather what the Court is saying about those things.  

Now, much of the present discussion has involved a certain amount of speculation about specific questions or lines of questioning that we’d like to see raised, and while this can verge over into a certain amount of wishful thinking or even castigation it still involves the trial’s interpretation of the ‘facts of the case’ and not reopening the speculo-fest of the original post-accident thread... which a number of posters obstinately keep trying to do.

My attempt at humor was to note that the ‘Trial’ thread was likely to drag on even longer than the other one did.  It did not occur to me that the original discussion might be hellishly resurrected repeatedly to trouble our lives and yea perhaps our very souls.  But as the Yale band said to Princeton at a football game in November, Halloween’s over, so perhaps there can be hope for a while.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,148 posts
Posted by Euclid on Friday, November 3, 2017 10:03 AM

Overmod

Yes, but...

... the story about the trial proceedings, what the witnesses and counsel said and didn’t say, how the news workers use the fact of the trial to spin things ... THAT is the focus of the present discussion.  Not rehashing what we understand to be the matters of fact, or what we think about management or employees or training policies — but rather what the Court is saying about those things.  

Now, much of the present discussion has involved a certain amount of speculation about specific questions or lines of questioning that we’d like to see raised, and while this can verge over into a certain amount of wishful thinking or even castigation it still involves the trial’s interpretation of the ‘facts of the case’ and not reopening the speculo-fest of the original post-accident thread... which a number of posters obstinately keep trying to do.

My attempt at humor was to note that the ‘Trial’ thread was likely to drag on even longer than the other one did.  It did not occur to me that the original discussion might be hellishly resurrected repeatedly to trouble our lives and yea perhaps our very souls.  But as the Yale band said to Princeton at a football game in November, Halloween’s over, so perhaps there can be hope for a while.

 

I don’t see how you make the distinction between what was discussed right after the accident versus what is discussed during the trial now.   It is all one story. Where is the speculo-fest that so troubles you?  The facts being discussed in the trial are the same facts we learned after the accident and the TSB reports.  Speculation always precedes leaning the facts.  Nobody is now speculating on what has become known.  But what is not yet known is how the known facts will be processed through this trial.  All we can do, therefore, is weigh the potential interpretations and outcomes.  We would not even be talking about the accident if it were not for the trial revisiting it.   

Maybe we need a new forum rule:

 

No discussions that hellishly trouble our lives and perhaps our very souls.

 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, November 3, 2017 12:58 PM

Overmod

Yes, but...

 

Laugh Thank you. It's been a long week and I needed a good laugh.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, November 3, 2017 1:00 PM

Euclid
  

Maybe we need a new forum rule:

 

No discussions that hellishly trouble our lives and perhaps our very souls.

 

 

That could curtail participation on the forum by some individuals.... hopefully. Whistling

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy