Trains.com

Shelling the Corn Belt Rocket

11847 views
92 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,955 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, November 29, 2016 3:00 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH
CMStPnP
Shadow the Cats owner

Here is how bad the local Teachers Unions are near me.  The State of IL put a local school district on the Fininical Difficulty watch list meaning the Board of Education had to submit a budget cutting plan to the State in order to get its budget approved to open the school.   Well one of the things on the cutting room floor was the Self Insured teachers Healthcare Insurance.  They sent it out for bids to take it back to private run.  Well they got the bids back in and they are going to save 800 grand per year.  They only need to cut 400 grand a year to make the States mandates in budget Cuts. 

 

Guess who gave these benefits to the teachers Retired Teachers and Superintendents.  One of them even tried to become a State Senator this year and got hammered over how she ran 2 districts into the ground. 

 

Oh yeah gotta love State Retriees here in IL that have Protected Pensions that can never be reduced.  Their screaming bloody murder that the state is broke but heaven help the taxpayers that have to cover the shortfall in the obligations for their pensions.  Lets just say IL owes close to 140 Billion in pension debt alone.  Yeah we are that screwed.  Yet all we hear from Chicago is higher taxes and more regulations that run businesses out of this state.  My boss this year said if somethings do not change with the business enviroment in Springfield he will sell out.

It's a big reason why EMD LaGrange is now Electro-Motive Fort Worth.   They stated for the press it was because the largest client was BNSF but most of us know the financial reason had to do with taxes and cost of living.

In Wisconsin's case the concern was rapidly expanding benefits vs rising pay and salary and the Unions were setting up insurance companies and making it mandatory their specific plan be used via collective bargaining.    Too much graft there for Wisconsin Taxpayers to swallow.    The State Employee right to collective bargaining is in the State Constitution and remains there unamended but it is restricted to pay only.    It was extended to benefits via legislation by Democratic Governor Pat Lucy in the 1970's and has been increasingly abused since then........so the extension to include benefits was revoked.    The Left just went ape crazy over the change because a LOT of those same Labor unions were contributing heavily to their campaigns (which you could make a case against as well being a conflict of interest).     However, I am not aware after the laws that passed any union being busted financially or going broke.    In fact they are all still there attempting repeatedly to overturn the legislation at every chance they get......which is also sad.

 Gotta bust those unions, gotta keep that workforce cheap and docile.

Got to keep the slaves working for their gruel.  Keep them out in the fields, not up at the big house.  Beatings will continue until moral improves.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Tuesday, November 29, 2016 4:46 PM

Some "slaves." Some "cheap work force." When the truth is that public employees, as a category, have been largely shielded from the drastic adjustments -- including but not limited to lower real wages and reduced benefits -- that the private sector has endured for at least 30 years now.

I don't begrudge them anything but the occasional excesses, of which I count collective bargaining as one. (What percentage of private employees have that tool? Or the right to strike?) I just don't like to be filled full of B.S. about how poor and exploited they are.    

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,955 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, November 29, 2016 5:43 PM

dakotafred
I don't begrudge them anything but the occasional excesses, of which I count collective bargaining as one. (What percentage of private employees have that tool? Or the right to strike?) I just don't like to be filled full of B.S. about how poor and exploited they are.

ALL employees have the RIGHT to organize.  Private employees don't have collective bargining because they have not organized to be in a position to collectively bargin. They collectively have the power to organize and get their organization recognized and thereby bargin collectively with their employer.  The organizations that are presently Unionized went through this process with all the hard feelings, harassment, violence and all the other actions that take place to defeat union formation.  Unionization is not for the weak of heart.  In most cases non-union employees ultimately enjoy many of the benefits that Union employees won through the collective bargining process.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,260 posts
Posted by n012944 on Tuesday, November 29, 2016 9:45 PM

CMStPnP

 

It's a big reason why EMD LaGrange is now Electro-Motive Fort Worth.   

GE moved to Fort Worth, not EMD.  

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,828 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Tuesday, November 29, 2016 9:58 PM

dakotafred

-- including but not limited to lower real wages and reduced benefits -- that the private sector has endured for at least 30 years now.

    

 

Which just about coincides with the drop in union membership in the private sector. 

Jeff

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,843 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Wednesday, November 30, 2016 8:59 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH
Gotta bust those unions, gotta keep that workforce cheap and docile.

Seems to me the Union Members that pushed for the Governor to intervene are happy with the change.    Only ones that complained were the featherbedders and they had to import lots and lots of union folks via bus from other states because they could not find enough union members within the state of Wisconsin to mount a significant protest..........that itself should tell you something.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,483 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, December 1, 2016 6:57 AM

CMStPnP
 
CSSHEGEWISCH
Gotta bust those unions, gotta keep that workforce cheap and docile.

 

Seems to me the Union Members that pushed for the Governor to intervene are happy with the change.    Only ones that complained were the featherbedders and they had to import lots and lots of union folks via bus from other states because they could not find enough union members within the state of Wisconsin to mount a significant protest..........that itself should tell you something.

 
Proof, please.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,843 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Thursday, December 1, 2016 9:18 AM

CSSHEGEWISCH
Proof, please.

Read the press reports.......I'm not your internet secretary.    Nor is my job to find the truth for you.....thats your job as a informed citizen.   If you want to bury your head on issues fine.   Is it fair to ask me to waste my time attempting to unbury your head.....I don't think it is.     The issue was brought to the table in Wisconsin and won by 55-45% via recent poll.   Won a recall election.   Won a Wisconsin Supreme Court Test (read what the justices said).    Unions lost, the people won and get to keep more of their hard earned tax money.    Has it impacted Union pay?.......nope.    Has any union gone out of business because of the measure?........nope.     The impact has been taxpayers can keep more of their money and the outright theft from the Wisconsin Treasury in this one area has stopped. 

My Sister is a former union steward..........for Governor Walker's measure.

My Nephew is a state employee...............for Governor Walker's measure.

A good portion of my extended family is blue collar in Wisconsin........haven't met one that was against Governor Walker's measure.

People out of state.  Different story as they have been told all sorts of nasty things about what happened and never bothered to dig deeper or research the issue.

Now if any of you Union Stiffs knew anything about your Union history you would know that George Meany, and other union Leaders in the Union glory days were against public employee unions not for them.     It was not until the 1950's when some unions discovered how lucrative it could be to hold localities hostage that union opinions changed.   About the time the Mob started to get intimately involved with James Hoffa and the Teamsters Union.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,483 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, December 1, 2016 10:07 AM

I guess that you believe that unions of any sort are bad for business since they allow labor to be treated more fairly, including a decent wage.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,874 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, December 1, 2016 12:37 PM

It's always been my feeling that unions are a mixed blessing.

There is no question that they improved working conditions.

There is no question that they improved pay.

But pay and benefits is an area where they went overboard.  Taking Eugene Debs call for "More!" to heart, it wasn't a contract unless there were often sizeable increases in both, even if economic conditions as a whole didn't justify them.

And those increases filtered down.  Even a non-union employee now needs more money to pay for the increases in prices of union-made items.

It becomes circular.  And therein lies the problem.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Thursday, December 1, 2016 2:15 PM

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,843 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Thursday, December 1, 2016 6:23 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH
I guess that you believe that unions of any sort are bad for business since they allow labor to be treated more fairly, including a decent wage.

No I think some Unions when it comes to politics and their own good are pretty stupid at times.   Look at how many union folks voted for Democrat John Dingal  of Michigain all the while his heiress wife (Fisher Body Fortune) was collecting Millions of Dollars in bonuses from General Motors as an Executive while it was closing plants everywhere and moving jobs out of the country.    Now Debbie Dingal they elected to replace her husband John in Congress...........smart move but she doesn't care one whit about Union Jobs or Union Benefits despite what she says on TV, she just wanted to be in Congress to work on other issues closer to her heart.    So great move there and when I see that kind of thing politically I have to chuckle to myself.

Hari Kari move to elect her to Congress by organized labor.

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Thursday, December 1, 2016 8:17 PM

After unions blew most of the decent-paying jobs -- look at what's happened to railroad employment, half of what it was when I railroaded 50 years ago, which was half of what it was 25 years before that -- they started going after public employees (paid by politicians with other people's dollars) and low-skill folks in the lettuce fields, restaurants and hotels.

Pitiful. And of course unions stuck with Democrats like Hillary Clinton because of the party label, no matter how poorly they performed for the working cause. And two-thirds of union voters dutifully followed -- pitiful again.

I heard railroad workers liking everything Barry Goldwater said 50 years ago -- then turn around and vote Democratic after their union mouthpieces, including Labor magazine, laid down the law.

Same with Obama in '08 and '12. If there's anybody you'd expect RR workers to dislike instinctively it's an Ivy League liberal like Obama who never got his hands dirty in his life -- a "community organizer," for the love of something or other. But when the union barked, they jumped thru the hoops like the puppy dogs they were.

Maybe this last election marked the beginning of a change. Or maybe not. We've seen "Reagan Democrats" before, but the awakening didn't last.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,522 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, December 1, 2016 8:33 PM

dakotafred
Same with Obama in '08 and '12. If there's anybody you'd expect RR workers to dislike instinctively it's an Ivy League liberal like Obama who never got his hands dirty in his life -- a "community organizer," for the love of something or other. But when the union barked, they jumped thru the hoops like the puppy dogs they were.

C'mon Fred, there hasn't been a presidential candidate in the last couple decades that ever got their hands dirty.   That argument is downright stupid.  You do realize that many railroaders out here do actually have higher education and are not mindless drones?  We can actually vote for our candidate of choice.  We also know that while the unions aren't perfect (far from it) it would be a hell of a lot worse (and less lucrative for us) without them.  I mean, there's plenty of $10/hour non-union shortlines one can get a job with if they so desire.

 

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Friday, December 2, 2016 7:11 PM

zugmann
presidential candidate in the last couple decades that ever got their hands dirty

More than a few decades, I believe.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Friday, December 2, 2016 7:22 PM

schlimm
zugmann

More than a few decades, I believe.

Not sure how y'all can say that with a straight face

I didn't vote for him, and I didn't care for many things in his administration, but I won't sit idly by and have him accused of not working, or caring about things that matter.

And his mother, Lillian, was one of the ten finest people I've ever met -- she raised him right.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Friday, December 2, 2016 7:42 PM

Farming was not his main career.  I for one, think he was a fine man and was glad to speak briefly with him in Atlanta.  Probably too honest to be a politician.  But he's been out of office almost 36 years.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Friday, December 2, 2016 7:48 PM

RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Friday, December 2, 2016 8:18 PM

schlimm
Farming was not his main career.

I wasn't referring to the peanut farming; I was referring to the homebuilding.  His hands 'got dirty' on a very regular basis with Habitat.  That is not the same thing as hammering out a living with hard physical work, I'll grant you, but I have no question that Carter could, and would, have done that if it were necessary.

 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,955 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, December 2, 2016 8:54 PM

RME
schlimm
zugmann

More than a few decades, I believe.

Not sure how y'all can say that with a straight face

I didn't vote for him, and I didn't care for many things in his administration, but I won't sit idly by and have him accused of not working, or caring about things that matter.

And his mother, Lillian, was one of the ten finest people I've ever met -- she raised him right.

Believe it or not - it has been several decades since Carter.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
Posted by Victrola1 on Friday, June 23, 2017 8:26 AM

A Federal Railroad Administration official said Thursday the agency is committed to working with the state of Illinois to complete a passenger rail connection between the Quad-Cities and Chicago.

Meanwhile, a state official said a much anticipated agreement between the state and the railroad that owns much of the track between here and Chicago has been signed.......   

http://qctimes.com/news/local/government-and-politics/bustos-trump-administration-committed-to-q-c-rail/article_9a183aac-4b1e-56f5-85d6-e6af354c3af7.html

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,163 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Friday, June 23, 2017 7:34 PM

Victrola1

"...A Federal Railroad Administration official said Thursday the agency is committed to working with the state of Illinois to complete a passenger rail connection between the Quad-Cities and Chicago.

Meanwhile, a state official said a much anticipated agreement between the state and the railroad that owns much of the track between here and Chicago has been signed.......

http://qctimes.com/news/local/government-and-politics/bustos-trump-administration-committed-to-q-c-rail/article_9a183aac-4b1e-56f5-85d6-e6af354c3af7.html

 

   The linked article does quote Rep. Bustos (D-Ill) but while seeming to be 'upbeat' also mentions an apparent lack of support for the Rail link between Chicagoland and the Quad Cities.

Here is the quote from the linked article by Victrola1:

  [FTA] "...The federal government awarded $177 million to Illinois in 2010 to establish the connection between here and Chicago. But after seven years, much of the work is left to be done. [emphasis added]

)Rep) Bustos noted the commitment comes even as the Trump administration has proposed cuts to Amtrak.

"Securing passenger rail for the Quad-Cities has always been among my top priorities, and I'm pleased the Federal Railroad Administration is committed to bringing this project across the finish line," she said in a statement.

It's not clear when work will begin on upgrading track to accommodate passenger traffic.

The state of Illinois has been working toward an agreement with the Iowa Interstate Railroad that would allow the railroad to be reimbursed for costs associated with planning on the project, such as for engineering and environmental studies..."    [added emphasis ]

 Sounds like the Folks in the Quad Cities are anxious for the 'Commuter Rail Service' to begin, but the State of Illinois ?  (Maybe, not so much?).

 My question is: If Illinois is 'teetering on the brink of Insolvency'...How can they provide funds for relief, where this particular project is concerned? The Media stories concerning the solvency of the State of Illinois, and its leadership; currently, seem to paint a pretty bleak picture of the future of its financial solvency.    

   I would guess those holding Ill. State Pension Plans should be really concerned?

 

 


 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Saturday, June 24, 2017 10:59 AM

samfp1943
   The linked article does quote Rep. Bustos (D-Ill) but while seeming to be 'upbeat' also mentions an apparent lack of support for the Rail link between Chicagoland and the Quad Cities.

Here is the quote from the linked article by Victrola1:

  [FTA] "...The federal government awarded $177 million to Illinois in 2010 to establish the connection between here and Chicago. But after seven years, much of the work is left to be done. [emphasis added]

It's not clear when work will begin on upgrading track to accommodate passenger traffic.

The state of Illinois has been working toward an agreement with the Iowa Interstate Railroad that would allow the railroad to be reimbursed for costs associated with planning on the project, such as for engineering and environmental studies..."    [added emphasis ]

 

 

In fact, NONE of the work has been done. Distilling these items down, the Feds put up $177 million 7 years ago. They (the Feds, IL, IA or some comgination of the above?) now anticipate entering into an agreement with the railroad to figure out what capital investment will be required in the fixed plant to support the service.

Seven years to come to a relatively simple agreement that says basically "We will pay you to do a traffic and engineering study to figure out what fixed plant investments we need to make to your railroad." The threat of this boondogle coming to fruition seems mercifully low.

Mac

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Saturday, June 24, 2017 3:22 PM

Excerpt from Feasibility Report on Proposed Amtrak Service Quad Cities-Chicago

http://www.passengerrailok.org/memberfiles/AMTK-IL-QuadCitiesFULLREPORT.pdf

 

It should be understood that the current car supply situation at Amtrak is extremely tight and it is likely that equipment for this service would have to be generated from our bad order storage inventory, and scheduled for heavy repair in a car shop, thus requiring significant initial rehabilitation expenditures and time.

Excerpt from QC Times

http://qctimes.com/news/local/senators-ask-amtrak-to-get-rail-cars-ready-for-q/article_c5239a39-648b-5f91-a535-01b78d4bac86.html

Iowa and Illinois lawmakers are asking that Amtrak move quickly to prepare rail cars in the event Amtrak connections between Chicago and Iowa are built.

U.S. Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., Barack Obama, D-Ill., Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, made the request in a letter dated Tuesday.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, June 24, 2017 4:20 PM

wanswheel

Excerpt from Feasibility Report on Proposed Amtrak Service Quad Cities-Chicago

http://www.passengerrailok.org/memberfiles/AMTK-IL-QuadCitiesFULLREPORT.pdf

 

It should be understood that the current car supply situation at Amtrak is extremely tight and it is likely that equipment for this service would have to be generated from our bad order storage inventory, and scheduled for heavy repair in a car shop, thus requiring significant initial rehabilitation expenditures and time.

Excerpt from QC Times

http://qctimes.com/news/local/senators-ask-amtrak-to-get-rail-cars-ready-for-q/article_c5239a39-648b-5f91-a535-01b78d4bac86.html

Iowa and Illinois lawmakers are asking that Amtrak move quickly to prepare rail cars in the event Amtrak connections between Chicago and Iowa are built.

U.S. Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., Barack Obama, D-Ill., Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, made the request in a letter dated Tuesday.

 

How are an eight-year-old study and newspaper article relevant to today's situation?  Both are from 2008.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Saturday, June 24, 2017 8:34 PM

schlimm
How are an eight-year-old study and newspaper article relevant to today's situation?  Both are from 2008.

Kind of ironic, it seems to me, that an entire two-term 'Amtrak friendly' presidency passed without a train through or to Quad Cities, since Senator Obama was supportive, according to the 8-year-old article from 9 years ago.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, June 24, 2017 9:52 PM

wanswheel

 

 
schlimm
How are an eight-year-old study and newspaper article relevant to today's situation?  Both are from 2008.

 

 

Kind of ironic, it seems to me, that an entire two-term 'Amtrak friendly' presidency passed without a train through or to Quad Cities, since Senator Obama was supportive, according to the 8-year-old article from 9 years ago.

 

Excuse me!  Nine!!    Nice try to excuse your dated post by rationalizing post facto. You know very well that State-supported corridors require the states' participation and initiative to make them happen. And Illinois is a leader in that endeavor.

I'm surprised you didn't post a five-page spread from the 1850s and Mississippi riverboats or from WWI or WWII and the Rock Island Arsenal's weapon production.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Sunday, June 25, 2017 1:19 AM
  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Sunday, June 25, 2017 1:37 AM

Wanswheel with the 20 foot jump shot! Takes the lead. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, June 25, 2017 10:31 AM

Miningman

Wanswheel with the 20 foot jump shot! Takes the lead. 

 

Although historical posts are Wanswheel's thing and may be interesting, these are totally irrelevant to the subject.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy