Trains.com

What happens to Amtrak ridership when Airlines start to charge for excessive body weight

6376 views
40 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Thursday, March 17, 2016 5:03 PM

Yah, and another strategy would be SRO cabins, as proposed (but not implemented, so far) by Ryanair president Michael O'Leary. (Wall Street Journal, March 14, Page B7.) Or seats on the wings.

The real blockbuster would be an airTRAIN, with a second cabin towed by the first. I don't assert ownership, confident somebody is already at work on this idea.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, March 17, 2016 7:02 AM

Everybody wants the seats and service that the various airlines provided to their passengers prior to de-regulation but nobody seems willing to pay the higher fares needed to cover the extra costs and lost capacity.  As a rather simplistic example, if the 3-3 seating in the coach section of a 737 were to be replaced with 3-2 seating, that's a loss of 30+ seats, the lost revenue from those seats has to come from somewhere.  Same thing would happen with increased seat pitch, although not as drastic.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Wednesday, March 16, 2016 8:22 PM

I must say, as one who has had at least one beloved relative who was very much overweight, I find the entire discussion cruel, including my stupid, off-the-cuff comment above.

As a rule -- there are exceptions -- the problem on airplanes is not people who are too large but seats that are too small. In this age of large Americans, there are many passengers who are too big for their seats without being obese. Their legs are also too long for the space between seats.

Instead of dissing fat people, how about getting after the airlines for their contempt for the entire, including skinny, traveling public?

In a perverse way, I wouldn't mind another business turndown, just to punish the arrogance of those (temporarily) high-flying SOBs.

Telecommunications will put the airlines out of business one day except for charter and international travel, and I can't wait.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, March 15, 2016 9:56 PM

GERALD L MCFARLANE JR

Someone is a little behind on the times here, airlines already make obese people either pay for a second seat, or are charged the same day booking fair for their tickets.  Even Southwest Airlines will charge a person for a second seat, I know, I have had to check someones boarding pass and wondered why they had two of them, until I realized why, and was appalled at the gall, but business is business, even if you find it personally objectionable.

 

You realize we aren't talking about a little overweight.  We are referring to grossly obese folks, weighing 300+ pounds.   Try having one of those seated next to yourself on a long flight.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 376 posts
Posted by GERALD L MCFARLANE JR on Tuesday, March 15, 2016 8:33 PM

Someone is a little behind on the times here, airlines already make obese people either pay for a second seat, or are charged the same day booking fair for their tickets.  Even Southwest Airlines will charge a person for a second seat, I know, I have had to check someones boarding pass and wondered why they had two of them, until I realized why, and was appalled at the gall, but business is business, even if you find it personally objectionable.

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Saturday, March 12, 2016 6:23 PM

Overweight people get discriminated against and are not covered by the ADA. Its one group that gets frequently put down without recourse and as a current weight watcher with about another 70 pounds to loose, I can understand the emnity expressed by some as I have had some of the same emotions about overweight people as others. I will always remember a NEW YORKER cartoon with a carny worker on a boardwalk standing next to a scale and a GUESS YOUR WEIGHT sign saying to another person looking down at a big hole under the scale "Fatest g--d--m woman I ever saw" and laughing. And when much younger, remembering siding in the longitudinal seat over the curbside front wheel seat (4 passenger seat) on a transit bus and a lady getting on (having to turn sideways to get through the front door) and sitting down alongside me and taking the three other spaces on the seat. I understand the disconnect between baggage fees and passenger weight but where do you draw the line. Airlines have gone IM not so HO overboard on fees. I love Southwest Airlines for their sane policies and have never had a bad experience on them. And I used slumbercoaches while overweight and had no problems with them. They were superior to riding overnight in a coach seat. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 40 posts
Posted by Dixie Flyer on Friday, March 11, 2016 8:56 AM
In a way the railroads did use to charge for weight. A slumbercoach was a very good deal vs a roomette but it was only suitable for the younger or more agile passenger. How you feel about charging for weight depends on where you fall on the scale so to speak. It bothers me to pay $25 extra charge for a bag that is two pounds overweight and have the person sitting in the seat paying the same fare I do weighing 100 pounds more than I do.
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, March 11, 2016 7:36 AM

I don't know what it will do for Amtrak, but a proposal like this one sounds like guaranteed full employment for attorneys.  Any number of discrimination suits will be filed if the airlines decide to act on this proposal.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Tuesday, March 8, 2016 5:53 AM

Maybe, finally, a use besides bicycles for all those shiny new baggage cars?

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, March 7, 2016 9:48 PM

CMStPnP

In a turn of events that I think would be totally awesome for both our Country and Health Care costs.   A group of American Airlines are considering breaching the taboo of embarrassing passengers by charging extra for obesity.    Not sure how this would work but I for one would be a ethusiastic supporter of such a change.....just because of the reduced medical costs that a reduction in obesity would give the average joe in the United States.

At any rate, I would also be curious what such a change would mean for Amtrak ridership.   Would it mean yet another segment of the population be limited to buses and Amtrak or would we not see much of a bump in ridership (ie would most folks choose to lose weight).

Weigh out or Cube out?

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Monday, March 7, 2016 9:16 PM

1. Many of those grossly obese folks would have only the car or bus as options, since many places are not served by Amtrak.

2. I wonder what would happen if Amtrak also charged?   Maybe some crew would have to pay too?

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
What happens to Amtrak ridership when Airlines start to charge for excessive body weight
Posted by CMStPnP on Monday, March 7, 2016 9:11 PM

In a turn of events that I think would be totally awesome for both our Country and Health Care costs.   A group of American Airlines are considering breaching the taboo of embarrassing passengers by charging extra for obesity.    Not sure how this would work but I for one would be a ethusiastic supporter of such a change.....just because of the reduced medical costs that a reduction in obesity would give the average joe in the United States.

At any rate, I would also be curious what such a change would mean for Amtrak ridership.   Would it mean yet another segment of the population be limited to buses and Amtrak or would we not see much of a bump in ridership (ie would most folks choose to lose weight).

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy