Trains.com

Is there any talk of expanding Amtrak Cascades to Sacramento?

10052 views
33 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 202 posts
Is there any talk of expanding Amtrak Cascades to Sacramento?
Posted by zkr123 on Wednesday, September 10, 2014 8:04 AM
(Wasn't finished with post) Since there seems to be trouble with keeping the Vancouver part of the Cascades line, would Amtrak consider having Sacramento as an alternative?

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, September 10, 2014 9:57 AM

Since the "Cascades" are funded in part by the states of Washington and Oregon, any southern extension beyond Eugene is highly unlikely.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:17 PM

No, and the troubles with the border have been resolved.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, September 11, 2014 7:10 AM

 Is there rider potential between Eugene and Sacramento to justify more frequent service?

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Thursday, September 11, 2014 7:52 AM

I don't think so. The only major cities in Oregon are Medford, Roseburg, and Grants Pass, (or Klamath Falls) all under 100,000. The route isn't suitable for any sort of fast running, being very steep and curvy.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Thursday, September 11, 2014 8:50 AM

NorthWest

I don't think so. The only major cities in Oregon are Medford, Roseburg, and Grants Pass, (or Klamath Falls) all under 100,000. The route isn't suitable for any sort of fast running, being very steep and curvy.

Which is why the Natron cutoff (about 22 miles shorter) was built, going through Klamath Falls. Local passenger service continued on the original line for several years, but was eventually discontinued for lack of sufficient business.

Johnny

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • 422 posts
Posted by Dragoman on Thursday, September 11, 2014 12:33 PM

As has been noted, most of southern Oregon's biggest towns are actually on the old Siskiyou Route (the original California - Oregon route, now largely paralleled by Interstate 5).  But that rail line is very problematic -- steep grades, tight curves, narrow tunnels, and poorly maintained by the current shortline owners.  Amtrak did, once long ago, run a Talgo demonstration train down that route, but nothing further ever came of it.

Caltrans has a general desire to extend daytime Amtrak California service north from Sacramento, through Chico to Redding (each with about 90,000 population, though Chico also has a large state university).  However, UP has said that they are not interested in hosting any more passenger service, and Caltrans hasn't pushed the issue.

Given the Coast Starlight's current overnight schedule between Sacramento and Portland, the beautiful Mt. Shasta scenery, and the Starlight's current popularity, there might be a market for a daytime train (in effect resurrecting Southern Pacific's Shasta Daylight).

Given UP's current attitude, and other budget priorities in Califonia and Oregon, any expansion between Eugene and Sacramento seems highly unlikely.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, September 11, 2014 2:38 PM

NorthWest

I don't think so. The only major cities in Oregon are Medford, Roseburg, and Grants Pass, (or Klamath Falls) all under 100,000. The route isn't suitable for any sort of fast running, being very steep and curvy.

All four cities total only ~170,000.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:19 PM

schlimm
All four cities total only ~170,000.

Thanks, I didn't have time to check this morning. Point is, there isn't enough online ridership to justify a train on the Siskiyou line, and the Coast Starlight fills the current need. It is also not an insignificant distance between Eugene and Sacramento, and would require a lot more equipment.  

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Thursday, September 11, 2014 6:12 PM

Would also require full PTC on Siskyou route. Bring money by the box car load.

Mac

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Thursday, September 11, 2014 10:45 PM
I'm away from home now, so I cannot check, but isn't this dark territory; several boxcar loads?

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Friday, September 12, 2014 7:16 AM

Yes, the Siskyou line is dark territory and hand throw switches.

Mac

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 202 posts
Posted by zkr123 on Friday, September 12, 2014 12:16 PM
Even with the Talgos ability to tilt it would need that much more work?
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Friday, September 12, 2014 6:53 PM

Tilting Talgos have nothing to do with PTC and hand throw switches. I suspect the entire Siskyou line would require extensive track rehabilitation for speed. In addition  ATK has no right of access to the line since SP got rid of the last passenger trains in the early 1950's so as I understand it the cost would be all on ATK.

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Friday, September 12, 2014 10:21 PM

Seattle to Sacramento is 824 miles, so it is an LD train, and no longer a corridor train.  Also ATK's time between the two is 21 hours.  Maybe a talgo would speed it up a bit, but it would not be a daytime train.  Would the talgos be suitable for LD, and would they need extra power to clime the Cascades?

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Friday, September 12, 2014 10:33 PM

The Talgo seats are wonderful, but not enough to keep you comfortable for that long. They would be adequately powered, as track speed is really low, and wouldn't be all that high if the Siskiyou Line was in perfect shape.

Also, because of the one-axle-per-car design, Talgos ride rather rough on jointed rail, having a tendency to rock ( for example at low speed in the Vancouver, BC yards, it isn't a problem on CWR).

 

It just isn't going to happen, ever.

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,879 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Friday, September 12, 2014 10:36 PM
As someone who lives in Roseville and lived 4 years in Portland area, I would love to have a daylight train Sac to Portland. But it would be an LD train or, at least it would not have a good travel time regardless of Natron or Siskyous. Still boarding at Midnight in Sac and arriving at 4pm in Portland sucks. It's a very pretty ride. I've often wondered if the Siskyous could support an excursion...assuming the pass was reopened for Freight traffic. Certainly Sac to Redding would be somewhat viable if you could convince UP. Sac to Dunsmuir or Mt Shasta City as an excursion extension. Certainly it would make those State of Jefferson people take notice. But none of this seems plausible.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, September 13, 2014 8:27 AM

The ridership (boardings and alightings) in those intervening towns currently is quite low (2013). 

Dunsmuir: 5912

Chico: 12,875

Redding: 13,269

Chemult, OR: 10,144

Klamuth Falls has a fairly large ridership number, 33,929.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • 422 posts
Posted by Dragoman on Saturday, September 13, 2014 2:44 PM

schlimm

The ridership (boardings and alightings) in those intervening towns currently is quite low (2013). 

Dunsmuir: 5912

Chico: 12,875

Redding: 13,269

Chemult, OR: 10,144

Klamuth Falls has a fairly large ridership number, 33,929.

Yes, but look at the Coast Starlight's scheduled times at those stations:

Klamath Falls roughly 8:15am (northbound) and 10pm (southbound).

The 3 California stops (Dunsmuir, Chico, & Redding) are all between 12 Midnight and 5am.  Given the middle-of-the-night schedules, those boardings numbers look pretty darn good. Thus the suggestion of daylight service over at least part of this route.

The fact that Chemult has 10,000, with decent morning an evening schedules, when the population of the town is only 3,000, would seem to say something about demand vs. time-of-day scheduling.

And this thread is really about long-distance service, because Eugene (or Portland) to Sacramento (or the San Francisco Bay area) is really too long to be a "corridor", much less an addition to the existing Vancouver-Seattle-Portland-Eugene corridor.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, September 13, 2014 4:17 PM

Chemult has only 300 residents.  It's mostly in the middle of national forests, pretty close to Crater Lake, as I recall.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • 422 posts
Posted by Dragoman on Saturday, September 13, 2014 4:38 PM

schlimm

Chemult has only 300 residents.  It's mostly in the middle of national forests, pretty close to Crater Lake, as I recall.

Thanks Schlimm.  My mistake -- it is 300, not 3,000.

Just makes my comment stronger, I think.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, September 13, 2014 7:22 PM

Dragoman

schlimm

Chemult has only 300 residents.  It's mostly in the middle of national forests, pretty close to Crater Lake, as I recall.

Thanks Schlimm.  My mistake -- it is 300, not 3,000.

Just makes my comment stronger, I think.

I agree, but it makes me wonder who is getting on and off there?  Campers and vacationers, but that seems a stretch.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Saturday, September 13, 2014 7:46 PM

schlimm

...

I agree, but it makes me wonder who is getting on and off there?  Campers and vacationers, but that seems a stretch.

Chemult is the closest station to Crater Lake Nat'l Park, and also the city of Bend, pop 77,000

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Saturday, September 13, 2014 9:00 PM

MidlandMike
Chemult is the closest station to Crater Lake Nat'l Park, and also the city of Bend, pop 77,000

As I said about Crater lake, but difficult to get to the park from Chemult by public transportation.  A lot of folks who live in Bend are well-off California retiree exiles.  They may be the traffic source.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Sunday, September 14, 2014 11:29 AM

If Amtrak in existence outside the NEC  25 - 30 years  in the future  ---- maybe once very more routes needing service. 

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,879 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Monday, September 15, 2014 11:52 PM
Can you get from Bend to Chemult in the winter? I'd think Ridership numbers on a mythical Siskyous routing could be good for Medford to Redding or Medford to Eugene in particular during winter months when I5 can be shut down or require chains. But I'm not sure what level of service it would support.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Tuesday, September 16, 2014 7:54 AM

YoHo,

Bend to Chemult in the winter is a piece of cake. At worst it is compact snow and ice, good for 60 MPH.

As to I 5, the only place that chains are routinely required is Syskiou Summit south of Medford. The three humps north of Medford could be kind of sporty in a storm but none of them are over 2000 feet. I do not recall seeing chain install/remove pull out lanes north of Medford.

Remember the SP got out of passenger service on this line in the early 1950's. The train could not compete with old, slow, through the middle of every town US 99. With I 5 anyone can overage about 65 MPH in good weather. The train would probably make half that speed between Eugene and Red Bluff.

Mac

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,879 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Tuesday, September 16, 2014 7:08 PM

Oh sure, and once you get from Oregon State troopers into CHP you can put the hammer down and average even more...except for the stop to have your produce inspected. 

All I know is friends in Roseville who want to go home to Salem during the winter have to watch the weather. 

I'm just curious if there's enough travel between the state of Jefferson towns to even justify anything? what SP could accomplish in the 50s is useful to know, but not a 1:1 map with what could be done in 2014.

I'm not advocating it strongly. I'm just curious if there is such a thing as a rural corridor train that is viable. Maybe using DMUs or something. 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Wednesday, September 17, 2014 12:28 AM
I never had a problem getting produce into or out of California. The worst problem I had with CalAg was having cargo checked for fireants.

Wild thought. It is roughly 600 miles Sacramento to Portland. If Gov. Brown can get high speed rail built in California it would be a 2-3 hour train ride to Portland by high speed rail.

Thx IGN
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Fountain Valley, CA, USA
  • 607 posts
Posted by garyla on Thursday, September 18, 2014 9:57 AM
Dragoman

As has been noted, most of southern Oregon's biggest towns are actually on the old Siskiyou Route (the original California - Oregon route, now largely paralleled by Interstate 5).  But that rail line is very problematic -- steep grades, tight curves, narrow tunnels, and poorly maintained by the current shortline owners.  Amtrak did, once long ago, run a Talgo demonstration train down that route, but nothing further ever came of it.

Caltrans has a general desire to extend daytime Amtrak California service north from Sacramento, through Chico to Redding (each with about 90,000 population, though Chico also has a large state university).  However, UP has said that they are not interested in hosting any more passenger service, and Caltrans hasn't pushed the issue.

Given the Coast Starlight's current overnight schedule between Sacramento and Portland, the beautiful Mt. Shasta scenery, and the Starlight's current popularity, there might be a market for a daytime train (in effect resurrecting Southern Pacific's Shasta Daylight).

Given UP's current attitude, and other budget priorities in Califonia and Oregon, any expansion between Eugene and Sacramento seems highly unlikely.

Until a few years ago, I never appreciated how limited the usefulness of the Siskiyou Line was. Then UP had a major landslide on the Natron Cutoff. To get around the mess, the company apparently used every alternate route EXCEPT that one (which looked so convenient on a railroad map). The drawbacks you describe pretty much restrict it to local traffic, even when the other choices are many miles longer. Let's hope that the local shippers can keep it in business.
If I ever met a train I didn't like, I can't remember when it happened!

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy