Overmod oltmannd (and NJDOT's U34CHs) Was it for potential freight use or because you couldn't package a steam generator and water tank? I'll vote "both/and"! Bet ya a case of Black Douglas you can't show me a U34CH with a steam generator... Also bet you can't show me an EL SDP35 with a steam generator installed, either...
oltmannd (and NJDOT's U34CHs) Was it for potential freight use or because you couldn't package a steam generator and water tank? I'll vote "both/and"!
(and NJDOT's U34CHs)
Was it for potential freight use or because you couldn't package a steam generator and water tank?
I'll vote "both/and"!
Bet ya a case of Black Douglas you can't show me a U34CH with a steam generator...
Also bet you can't show me an EL SDP35 with a steam generator installed, either...
I'd bet a case of Black Douglas that neither Don nor anyone else can show you an EL SDP35, period. EL had SDP45's, not 35's. (I know, the 3 and 4 keys are right next to each other. )
Even so, though, EL's SDP45's don't really speak to Don's point, which was about passenger power. EL's SDP45's were pure freight machines. (Of course, if you were just yanking Don's chain for talking about U34CH's and steam generators in the same breath, then that's a whole 'nother matter. )
Peace,--Peter
phbrownI'd bet a case of Black Douglas that neither Don nor anyone else can show you an EL SDP35, period.
That's part of it. (So are we into two cases of Black Douglas? We can send one to Mr. Wardale... ;-} )
Interestingly enough, a sort of distraction got going years ago regarding EL 3639 at VMT -- describing it as an SDP35. Of course, it isn't.
I noted a few posts ago that the EL SDP45s were bought for the larger tankage, to give extended range at higher TOFC/COFC speeds, and were not for passenger use.
I do confess to chain-yanking over the U34CHs -- it's so seldom Don Oltmann gets something sideways that I just couldn't resist. (And it's been tooooooo long since I had Black Douglas ;-} )
GDRMCo Squared off long hood on the EL SDP45? Say what?
Squared off long hood on the EL SDP45? Say what?
This Burlington Northern example has the squared off hood. Looks like they did make a carbody change that resulted in less space in the rear knowing that these wouldn't carry a steam generator, allowing for an easier to read numberboard and normal rear steps.
I was under the impression until your post that the only external change was the absence of the boiler air intakes and exhaust stacks.
Wonder why this went this route here with this order instead of something along the lines of the SD40A that was being built right around the same time. Above the frame, the SD40A is a typical SD40 despite the longer frame of the SDP45 for increased fuel capacity. Yet the similar situation here resulted in a modified SDP45 hood instead of a SD45 hood.
I'm sure that pricing had something to do with that decision, especially for a marginal carrier like EL. The SDP45 was pretty close to an off-the-shelf order with a few modifications, mostly sheet metal while the SD40A was non-standard and may have required some extra engineering.
Leo,
The SDP45(like the GN/BN one picture) were just frame extensions to allow the S/G and the extended fuel/water tank.
The E-L SDP45's were built to take advantage of the 5000 gallon fuel tank capacity(over the 4000 gallon 'normal' fuel tank). This larger tank gave the E-L SDP45's the range to run unrefueled from NJ to Chicago. The tapered rear end allowed normal rear steps and no need for the anticlimber extension as seen on the BN unit.
The SD40A took advantage of this longer frame as well for a larger fuel capacity, however IC only put the 3,000 hp SD40 above the frame. IIRC, many of these units were manufactured with upgraded electricals and sold to the SOO.
Jim
Modeling BNSF and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin
Thanks, but I know what a SDP45 is and why EL ordered them.
What I wondered about since the goals were identical (Larger frame to accommodate increased fuel storage) was why IC's SD40A's were straight SD40's above the frame (Rather than modified SDP40's) yet the almost simultaneous order for EL's SDP45's had most of the unnecessary hallmarks of a SDP45 above the frame.
Going the SD40A route since the goals for both models were the same, they should've had the carbody and machinery arrangement of a straight SD45 above the extended frame of a SDP45 on these EL locomotives.
I'm sure it was cheaper this way and I imagine there was a sound engineering reason behind both models as CSSHEGEWISCH says, but I'd love to know just what the particulars were that led to two different routes to accomplish the same thing for their two premier CC freight haulers of the time.
Most of the unnecessary hallmarks of a SDP45 above the frame? Such as? As has been said the rear of the EL SDP45 is different to the SP and GN versions in that it has a pointed end and absolutely zero grilles or outlets, doors, etc needed to access steam generator equipment, the rear steps are also different with the SP and GN versions having vertical ladders at the rear whilst the EL version has the normal EMD stepwell. For all intents and purposes the EL SDP45 IS an SD45 above the frame, just a longer end of the long hood behind the radiators.....
ML
Leo_AmesWhat I wondered about since the goals were identical (Larger frame to accommodate increased fuel storage) was why IC's SD40A's were straight SD40's above the frame (Rather than modified SDP40's) yet the almost simultaneous order for EL's SDP45's had most of the unnecessary hallmarks of a SDP45 above the frame.
Oh, oh, I know this one!
An SD40 uses a set of 6 row radiator cores - three double lengths per side arranged in a Vee with three cooling fans. An SD45 uses 8 row cores also arranged in a Vee - which is why they have the "flare" in the carbody. The 8 row cores are a different length than the 6 row cores so it's not completely simple to substitute one for the other - you pretty much want to stay with the whole assembly for each type.
Leaving the radiator compartment in the same proximity to the engine means no special plumbing needed to make it work. Same piping, structure, couplings, drawings, everything.
Shoving the radiator cab to the back of the long hood would be more work than just plopping some additional sheet metal back there.
The two real questions are:
1. Why extend the long hood at all on an SDP45? Why not just have a rear "porch".
2. Why did EMD push the radiator cab all the way back on the SD40a? Weight balance?
BTW, the SD45-2 solved the problem with the terribly leaky 8 row cores by going to four double six row cores...and there was much rejoicing.
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
GDRMCo Most of the unnecessary hallmarks of a SDP45 above the frame? Such as? As has been said the rear of the EL SDP45 is different to the SP and GN versions in that it has a pointed end and absolutely zero grilles or outlets, doors, etc needed to access steam generator equipment, the rear steps are also different with the SP and GN versions having vertical ladders at the rear whilst the EL version has the normal EMD stepwell. For all intents and purposes the EL SDP45 IS an SD45 above the frame, just a longer end of the long hood behind the radiators.....
It still has the rear compartment and the general machinery arrangement and weight distribution of a SDP45 which are the major elements of the design that differentiated it from a normal SD45 above the frame. That's why they carried ballast in that rear compartment to compensate for the missing steam generating equipment.
Illinois Central's SD40A's however were stock SD40's above the frame both in their internal machinery arrangement and their external carbody despite being built on the lengthened frame of the SDP45.
Seems reasonable to be curious why the same goal of increased fuel capacity for the SD40 and the SD45 resulted in two different styles of solutions above the lengthened frames.
Edit: Seems as if I misunderstood. There are indeed some differences. I had read several times over the years that they were identical inside and out above the frame but the close up shots here show otherwise.
http://dieseldetailer.proboards.com/thread/13155/building-illinois-central-sd40a
Slight nitpicking here, for which I apologize: the SDP40 used the same frame as the SD40, the SDP45 had the lengthened frame.
zkr123So overall the SD's are better than the GP's?
For what job?
As an overall locomotive, not specific to any job.
After the end of the EMD E-series (EA-E9) and the Alco PA's, the best passenger diesels generally had 4-wheel trucks, like GP-40's. But the extra two electric motors on power with six-wheel trucks, SD-40's, gave them more tractive effort to start heavier trains and maintain speed and avoid motor overload on grades, thus far better for most freight service. That is in general and there are, of course, excetions, both ways.
The 4-wheel trucks are generally kinder to tracks at high speed. Again, with a few exceptions.
To expand on Dave,
GPs were traditionally built for light and fast trains, such as hotshots, where they were lighter on the track. SDs have extra traction motors, and so are much better at heavy trains, being able to haul trains at 9MPH without damage, while GPs are limited to 13. But GPs are better at negotiating tight curves and industrial spurs. They can also be better on rough track. So, what job are they needed for?
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.