Trains.com

Heritage Locomotive

51110 views
154 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Monday, March 1, 2010 9:41 PM

Another Classical Heritage Unit

http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,264 posts
Posted by CAZEPHYR on Monday, March 1, 2010 5:16 PM

Rather nice!!

 

CZ

Awesome!

Cajon:

What do you think about KCS?

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Sunday, February 28, 2010 10:30 PM

Cajon:

What do you think about KCS?

http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Saturday, February 27, 2010 8:18 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mX5FKm6I7pY

Heritage Locomotives tribute

http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Friday, February 26, 2010 7:30 AM
http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Friday, February 26, 2010 7:29 AM

Another 1996

http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,264 posts
Posted by CAZEPHYR on Friday, February 26, 2010 12:22 AM

 

 In the beginning::   First day, August 19th, 2006 for the 1996 in Roseville California.  The E9 from CSRM also showed up for the unveiling.

 

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Thursday, February 25, 2010 7:19 PM

 Ah, the "Executive" Es. Saw them go past where I worked once. Picked the right time to look out the back door.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, February 25, 2010 10:57 AM
silicon212
That's an E unit, not an F - you can tell by the number boards - this was early in Conrail's existence and is a 'patched' PC unit.
Not an early-on patch job. This is one of the two ex-PRR E8s Conrail picked up from Amtrak in the 80s (they had HEP eng-gen sets in them) specifically to haul the business train. Bennet Levin has them now and has repainted them into PRR "single stripe, large Keystone" scheme.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Mesa, AZ
  • 778 posts
Posted by silicon212 on Thursday, February 25, 2010 9:49 AM

That's an E unit, not an F - you can tell by the number boards - this was early in Conrail's existence and is a 'patched' PC unit.

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Wednesday, February 24, 2010 10:32 PM

What about this old F-Units of Conrail. If you notice they are not Blue!

http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, February 24, 2010 6:46 AM

BNSFwatcher

Metro-North Railroad had a lot of "heritage" units: the FL-9s painted in theNew Haven McGinnis orange-black-and white scheme.  They also did two of them in New York Central two-tone grey, with lightning stripes scheme.  Really cool, although NYC never owned any FL-9s.  I think they are gone, now.  An AC44-CW would look good in that livery!  Well, an AC44-CW even looks good in NS's "Funeral Train" scheme...

Hays

Except for the fact that NS doesn't own any AC4400CW's.  Also, the FL9's (and other power) painted in the McGinnis madness colors are owned by ConnDOT but operate in the Metro North pool.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    May 2009
  • 798 posts
Posted by BNSFwatcher on Tuesday, February 23, 2010 2:37 PM

Metro-North Railroad had a lot of "heritage" units: the FL-9s painted in theNew Haven McGinnis orange-black-and white scheme.  They also did two of them in New York Central two-tone grey, with lightning stripes scheme.  Really cool, although NYC never owned any FL-9s.  I think they are gone, now.  An AC44-CW would look good in that livery!  Well, an AC44-CW even looks good in NS's "Funeral Train" scheme...

Hays

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Tuesday, February 23, 2010 5:13 AM

I read an article from Railspot and I had to copy paste the information. I would like to see this new Boy Scout Locomotive.

"UP 2002, the Salt Lake Olympic unit, is in the UP yards in North
Little Rock, Arkansas today, Monday, February 22, 2010, awaiting
overhaul at UP's Jenks Shops. UP 4141, the George Bush unit, is still
sitting in front of Jenks, and has been since late last Spring. I was
told yesterday that the Boy Scout special unit has been painted at
Jenks, and is having the decals put on this week. No, I have not seen
this unit nor do I know what UP will do with it after the Boy Scout
decals are applied. I'll try to keep you posted on it." (Ken
Ziegenbein)

Click on this link to view the photos:
http://thundertrain .org/up2002- 4141-022210. html

Here's the 2002 and 2001 on the official Olympic Torch Relay Train
taken on December 13, 2001 as the train sped through Gurdon, Arkansas:
http://www.trainwea ther.com/ olympictrain1213 01.MPG

Ken Ziegenbein

http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Monday, February 22, 2010 10:59 PM

CAZEPHYR

Awesome!

CZ

I think the Katy heritage locomotive it would have look better if they had painterd the traditional colors of green and yellow with words MKT. What do you think?

When a railroad uses more than one color paint scheme over the years, It would be hard for me personally to decide which to use.  If I had my choice of colors for the SP 1996, I would have used a version of the Black Widow scheme mixed in to the Daylight colors.    They are what they are because the Union Pacific decided on the schemes to use.  I believe they did look into several schemes for each one, but how they decided on the final one to use is anyone's guess.   The older Katy units used the Red color with the star on the front of the E units for the Texas Special and it looked nice.

CZ 

CZ

I always wonder how UP came up with the colors...Banged Head What is your favorite?

http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,264 posts
Posted by CAZEPHYR on Sunday, February 21, 2010 6:39 PM

Awesome!

CZ

I think the Katy heritage locomotive it would have look better if they had painterd the traditional colors of green and yellow with words MKT. What do you think?

When a railroad uses more than one color paint scheme over the years, It would be hard for me personally to decide which to use.  If I had my choice of colors for the SP 1996, I would have used a version of the Black Widow scheme mixed in to the Daylight colors.    They are what they are because the Union Pacific decided on the schemes to use.  I believe they did look into several schemes for each one, but how they decided on the final one to use is anyone's guess.   The older Katy units used the Red color with the star on the front of the E units for the Texas Special and it looked nice.

CZ 

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Sunday, February 21, 2010 2:20 PM

CAZEPHYR

Cajon_92

Nice shots of 1988 in the snow CZ, that shot in Colfax is excellent.

In contrast to the cold I submit 2 pictures of 1988 at Manix, CA from July 14th 2009. It was 110 degrees that fine afternoon but great light to shoot the near 2 mile long KG1LA 12 with UP 1988, 1996, & 1983 for power.

Cajon

We have pictures from the very cold and snow to the hot and dry California desert.  What a contrast in temperatures and locations.  Nice pictures of the 1988, which is a great looking Heritage unit.  The first time I viewed it was at 3:45 AM in Roseville with the 2001 and 1989 on the Z train.  This is the 1988 at night with the 2001 and 1989.

CZ

 

 

CZ

I think the Katy heritage locomotive it would have look better if they had painterd the traditional colors of green and yellow with words MKT. What do you think?

http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Sunday, February 21, 2010 2:13 PM

http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Sunday, February 21, 2010 2:12 PM

http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,264 posts
Posted by CAZEPHYR on Sunday, February 21, 2010 2:09 PM

Cajon_92

Nice shots of 1988 in the snow CZ, that shot in Colfax is excellent.

In contrast to the cold I submit 2 pictures of 1988 at Manix, CA from July 14th 2009. It was 110 degrees that fine afternoon but great light to shoot the near 2 mile long KG1LA 12 with UP 1988, 1996, & 1983 for power.

Cajon

We have pictures from the very cold and snow to the hot and dry California desert.  What a contrast in temperatures and locations.  Nice pictures of the 1988, which is a great looking Heritage unit.  The first time I viewed it was at 3:45 AM in Roseville with the 2001 and 1989 on the Z train.  This is the 1988 at night with the 2001 and 1989.

CZ

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,264 posts
Posted by CAZEPHYR on Sunday, February 21, 2010 1:44 PM

Lord Atmo

Also, I fail to see what's so special about UP 5011

 http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2847502330034755993FtISLR

I dunno...Just looks like a typical SD70M to me....

The one should have been 5511.   The one we mentioned is a 2-10-2 in the round house at Cheyenne and is not active since 1957.  Sorry, I should have made that correction. 

And you are correct, the 5011 is a typical SD70M.    

CZ

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Eau Claire, WI
  • 1,882 posts
Posted by Lord Atmo on Sunday, February 21, 2010 12:12 AM

CAZEPHYR
 but the three E units are part of the real Heritage units much like the 844, 3985 and the 6926, 5011.

 

 

You mean 6936? I love that unit. Sad that no other DDA40Xs run anymore

 Also, I fail to see what's so special about UP 5011

 http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2847502330034755993FtISLR

I dunno...Just looks like a typical SD70M to me....

Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • 102 posts
Posted by Cajon_92 on Saturday, February 20, 2010 7:58 PM

Nice shots of 1988 in the snow CZ, that shot in Colfax is excellent.

In contrast to the cold I submit 2 pictures of 1988 at Manix, CA from July 14th 2009. It was 110 degrees that fine afternoon but great light to shoot the near 2 mile long KG1LA 12 with UP 1988, 1996, & 1983 for power.

Cajon

Roster shot-

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,264 posts
Posted by CAZEPHYR on Saturday, February 20, 2010 7:00 PM

 

And for good measure, how about the 1988 on a snow day last year in Colfax, CA.

 The 1988 into Roseville with the storm behind it.

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,264 posts
Posted by CAZEPHYR on Saturday, February 20, 2010 1:31 PM

 

 The 1983 headed up the Z train yesterday at Roseville, CA.  The sun was blocked by the clouds but the light is what it is.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • 102 posts
Posted by Cajon_92 on Sunday, February 14, 2010 12:53 PM

Great shots CZ, that shot of 3985 at James is excellent.

Here is a shot of a 3 for 1 special in Cajon. UP 1983, 1996, & 1995 pass Swarthout en Route to Los Angeles. UP 2002 is also on the train, cut in as a DPU.

Cajon

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Saturday, February 13, 2010 1:18 PM

Awesome Pictures!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks for sharing!! Keep photos coming! :)

http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,264 posts
Posted by CAZEPHYR on Saturday, February 13, 2010 11:50 AM

 And speaking of Heritage units, here are some more from the past two years.  All have been via Roseville in the very recent past years and I hope they keep coming back.  Enjoy! The last two are true Heritage locomotives.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Saturday, February 13, 2010 12:49 AM

Cajon_92

Thanks for the comments Awesome and CZ, UP 4852 brings back the memories 4sure. Of Course CZ and I can recall 1996 looking like that back in early 2009 before it got involved with the 844 in April. 1996 seems to be kept clean these days but it hasn't spent to much time on the LA-Portland run through all the tunnels. If fact before 2/2/2010 1996 hasn't been over the Tehachapi's since Sept. of 09 when it was on the ZLCBR/ZBRLC.

 Nice set of images CZ. 95 has spent a lot of time around Roseville and Northern California as of late, currently on its way back on the MFRRV.

Cajon 

Great Thread to post pictures of UP Heritage. Thanks for sharing!  

http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    January 2010
  • 102 posts
Posted by Cajon_92 on Friday, February 12, 2010 10:41 PM

Thanks for the comments Awesome and CZ, UP 4852 brings back the memories 4sure. Of Course CZ and I can recall 1996 looking like that back in early 2009 before it got involved with the 844 in April. 1996 seems to be kept clean these days but it hasn't spent to much time on the LA-Portland run through all the tunnels. If fact before 2/2/2010 1996 hasn't been over the Tehachapi's since Sept. of 09 when it was on the ZLCBR/ZBRLC.

 Nice set of images CZ. 95 has spent a lot of time around Roseville and Northern California as of late, currently on its way back on the MFRRV.

Cajon 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy