Trains.com

Dynamic vs Air Brakes....When do you use which?

14541 views
50 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Wednesday, April 23, 2008 5:11 PM
 BigJim wrote:

you know as well as i do that the carriers want you to learn how to strech break too..

Do I?
Well I would hope that there is someone, somewhere in the system that knows what they are doing, however, it doesn't seem to trickle down in a heavy enough stream. It's amazing how brainwashed some of these low level officials turn out to be.  

yes i do.... and i was tought how to strech brake as well as dynamic brake.. and im sure you where at some point and if you dont teach your hogger trainees when you have them how to do it..your a fool and have no right to talk about anyones else lack of teaching it... myself..i do use and like to use DB more then air when i run.. mostly becouse in cold weather it donst run the risk of getting a stuck brake... and it takes all the quess work out of if the train has a kicker.. and you should know that with kickers they are unpredictable as in they might kick once for every 10 times you use the air or might kick every time..or kick once and never kick agin.. yes there are ways around that by useing the feed valve (if you have a unit in the lead with one..the new engins have that thourgh the comptuer screens and cant change the EQ res settings while moving) but they frown on that too... the bottom line is they want you to run a train the way that the "powers to be" think it should be run.. and thats is all well and good..they are the ones signing your pay check.. but it dont hurt to know what your doing and learn how to do it from an old head or if you have a short train to do alittle experimenting on your own from time to time to get the hang of it...

csx engineer 

"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    April 2008
  • 5 posts
Posted by RailfanRailroader on Wednesday, April 23, 2008 11:02 PM
My personal choice depends on the territory I run on.  I like to get in and out of slow orders quickly so I use air mostly.  Dynamics are nice on the long downgrade or if your airbrakes don't do what you like.  Having a locomotive fleet with both equipped and non-equipped forces you to make the choice.  Knowing how much dynamic braking effort you have compared to the weight of the train is mandatory.  Too many young engineers and I'm only 27, come to rely on the dynamics.  Then winter comes and you have to make a emergency stop and then they can't.  I learned a lot from a IC veteran about air.  Some of the things I do may scare the hell out of someone from another railroad.  I listen to what the old timers say and not what the college graduate manager that never ran a train says.  When you got 15,000 tons and stop exactly where you want is a great feeling.  It's even better when the manager is behind you sweating about the red signal and you smile as you lay it down one car length from the insulated joints.  Running with someone that doesn't understand the air really makes me nervous.  And having your dynamics cut out on you can get bad quickly.  Reaction time is the number one thing when running a train.  As my friend said you'll feel what the train is doing through your ***.  The vibrations up the seat into your body.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:35 AM

http://ge.ecomagination.com/site/showcase/erie.html  

Now the rules have changed?

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:46 AM

 RailfanRailroader wrote:
  It's even better when the manager is behind you sweating about the red signal and you smile as you lay it down one car length from the insulated joints. 

And you have a bridge to sell us as well?

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:48 AM
 transitrapid wrote:

http://ge.ecomagination.com/site/showcase/erie.html  

Now the rules have changed?

Interesting that the track that the new locomotive is shown running on has catenary overhead.

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,019 posts
Posted by BigJim on Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:59 PM
 RailfanRailroader wrote:
  It's even better when the manager is behind you sweating about the red signal and you smile as you lay it down one car length from the insulated joints. 


zardoz wrote:
And you have a bridge to sell us as well?


Hmmmm...Do you need a high place to jump from?

.

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Western Wyoming
  • 162 posts
Posted by UPRR engineer on Friday, April 25, 2008 1:25 PM
Take it easy on him. I've had my MOP ask me if i was gonna get her stopped, no one else in the cab thought i was show boating. My thoughts are the same, if ya cant show your boss ya know how to run.... ????
  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Western Wyoming
  • 162 posts
Posted by UPRR engineer on Friday, April 25, 2008 1:30 PM
More on getting her close to the lights, where i work they need us to get as tight as we can so they can squeeze another one behind us. I've put her as close as 20 feet from the block.
  • Member since
    April 2008
  • 5 posts
Posted by RailfanRailroader on Friday, April 25, 2008 8:11 PM
Thank you. I have been told to pull tight many time so much for the 400 ft rule. The BRC is famous for it.   As for a bridge to sell, yes but it has a 5 mph slow order on it and it's not all that high.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, April 25, 2008 9:12 PM
 zardoz wrote:
 transitrapid wrote:

http://ge.ecomagination.com/site/showcase/erie.html  

Now the rules have changed?

Interesting that the track that the new locomotive is shown running on has catenary overhead.

I believe the GE Test track at Erie, has catenary to test the Electirc locomotives they build.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 9:06 AM

So whats going on when I see a train back up to move forward out of a Intermodal yard?

Is the train using the springs of the couplers to back up and "spring the train forward?

 

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Western Wyoming
  • 162 posts
Posted by UPRR engineer on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 11:18 AM
Are you talking about a switch engine doing that move? The idea isnt to spring the train forward, there getting some slack. Its easier to move the cars that way, hard on equipment, but sometimes a switch engine cant move them other wise. Its physics, im sure you can see in your head why it would be an easier way to get them rolling.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: weatherford,Tx
  • 367 posts
Posted by zapp on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 2:11 AM

I got the weirdest train yesterday morning, a loaded grain train with a single unit on the head end and two DP's! It had 100 cars, 14,000 tons. It took a little getting used too, but my MOP said UP is trying to stop break in two's. This goes against everything they have been preaching about "no air" because with this configuration you have no real dynamics on the headend, so you have to use air to slow the thing really down, but it sure is fun starting up a steep grade in notch 2 on the head end and notch 5-6 on the rear!

We'll see if the experiment continues.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 2:26 AM
Were the DP's approximately 50 cars back or about 33 cars back?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 8:40 AM
No its when a Stack Train is about to pull out of the yard,,,Each couple has a cushion spring and it seems that the train is using the combined pushing power of 200 of those springs to push the train forward kinda of like those toy cars that you pull and push forward
  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Western Wyoming
  • 162 posts
Posted by UPRR engineer on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 10:24 AM
 zapp wrote:

I got the weirdest train yesterday morning,................

 We'll see if the experiment continues.

Don't get too excited, the reason for the "no break train" is to run the trains ran from space.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: weatherford,Tx
  • 367 posts
Posted by zapp on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 11:51 AM

 daveklepper wrote:
Were the DP's approximately 50 cars back or about 33 cars back?

they were the rear two! All the way on the rear of a 100 car train!

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Western Wyoming
  • 162 posts
Posted by UPRR engineer on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:00 PM

 transitrapid wrote:
No its when a Stack Train is about to pull out of the yard,,,Each couple has a cushion spring and it seems that the train is using the combined pushing power of 200 of those springs to push the train forward kinda of like those toy cars that you pull and push forward

What your thinking is wrong, there not using the drawbars to "spring" forward. If they have enough horse power (a mainline train not a switch engine) to move the train which ever way its left for them, bunched or streched, they shouldnt be getting slack to yank the train out. What ever there doing (or did) they shouldnt be moving like that.

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Western Wyoming
  • 162 posts
Posted by UPRR engineer on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:00 PM

 transitrapid wrote:
No its when a Stack Train is about to pull out of the yard,,,Each couple has a cushion spring and it seems that the train is using the combined pushing power of 200 of those springs to push the train forward kinda of like those toy cars that you pull and push forward

What your thinking is wrong, there not using the drawbars to "spring" forward. If they have enough horse power (a mainline train not a switch engine) to move the train which ever way its left for them, bunched or streched, they shouldnt be getting slack to yank the train out. What ever there doing (or did) they shouldnt be moving like that.

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,019 posts
Posted by BigJim on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 3:36 PM

Dynamic brakes dont work as well at speeds above about 35 or 40-ish with any kind of train, its even worse on a grade.

I would like to clear one thing up.
While it is true that the dynamic brake gets less effect the higher the speed goes over 30, its effectiveness is related just as much to the trailing tonnage and the decending gradient. The three, speed, tonnage and grade are all related very much like OHM's Law. Just like the units will only pull so much so fast up a certain grade, they also will only hold back so much at a certain speed on a certain grade. So don't read the above quote and get to thinking that the dynamic brake won't hold above 40mph. It just depends on the grade and tonnage how well it will hold.

.

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Western Wyoming
  • 162 posts
Posted by UPRR engineer on Wednesday, April 30, 2008 3:56 PM

Yep....Now that i've read part of my own post again, the part thats in bold, i ment, with a real train.... one with some tonnage. All thats all true tho buddy.

Working with younger, cut back engineers, had more then one freak out on a big double stack with me as i passed a flasher at 70 (or more), looking to hit some 40mph cross overs up ahead. Passing that first mile seems like she's not gonna sit down. Last time my heater didnt work, i couldnt even see out my window... "air is what slows this thing down."

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy