I know that on a number of the Class one railroads the SD40-2 fleets are having a longer life than any of the 50 series engines. This is due to the "Forty Dash Twos" being more reliable and having lower maintenance costs than the 645 F powered locos.
It is true that the big carriers have been steadily trading them in on new power, though....
"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock
UP just retired a bunch of SD40-2s in the last month or so. Maybe a few willl make it over to the WSOR, and other smaller roads... I read BNSF has also retired a slug of them.
CSX seems to be holding on to theirs, and maintaining them with the goal of zero failures. The shops are filled with blowed GEs. CSX is also working on the SD50s, derating to 3000 hp, basically a SD40-2 with better wheelslip control. They are classed as SD50-2s.
Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com
Today I was surprised to see a pair of UNION PACIFIC SD40-2s pulling a train west on the CN.
Are they among the last operating on a Class 1?
Andrew
Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer
My Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/JR7582 My Flickr Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/wcfan/
I see them daily in Austin, too. Most are UP (it's their track) but UP leases a few of them too. The SD40-2s have no problem pulling auto racks up from Mexico and two of them can pull long trains.
Of course one can see almost any type of locomotive here in any one day.
Interestingly, I see a genset almost every day too, going North from San Antonio. I kinda thought they were switchers.
Yes we are on time but this is yesterdays train
theres so many SD-40's out there i doubt my children (who range from 20 to 3) will be missing them....heres a unit in Owosso MI around 1993...the TSBY was contracted to rebuild this one and others...the day i took this shot there was 3 more under load tests parked outside behind 4 TSBY units either to dampen the sound or keep prying eyes away...point is they're still being rebuilt and will be around long after im gone
they will slowly faid them off the rosters as the EPA clean air restrictions get tighter and tighter as time rolls on...
the major railroads getting tax breaks to buy new engins that are lower emistions engins and ones that get better fuel milage becouse of the "green" movement they will either be rebuilt with emistions equipment to meet the newer emistions standerds (which could cost more in the long run then to just buy new "clean" power from EMD GE and the new comers to the market that make gensets and other low emistions power)... its all about the bottom line when it comes to anything with the carriers..and when the expeces of upgradeing..fuel costs.. and they have made purches of what they think is a is the magic number of new units on the proporty to fill the power needs..you will see more and more of them being retired...
csx engineer
J. Edgar wrote: theres so many SD-40's out there i doubt my children (who range from 20 to 3) will be missing them....heres a unit in Owosso MI around 1993...the TSBY was contracted to rebuild this one and others...the day i took this shot there was 3 more under load tests parked outside behind 4 TSBY units either to dampen the sound or keep prying eyes away...point is they're still being rebuilt and will be around long after im gone
Today's SD40-2's are yesterday's F-units. Someday, we'll all be chasing around the last of 'em.
Someday for me is everyday. Today I caught a good amount of them that I didn't have on my roster yet. Im not going to wait till' the last minute to really appreciate them.
Alec
route_rock wrote: Our yard power consists of an SD-40-2 and a gp 38. The other night that set was taken already and the other gp junkers were lost somewhere. So what do I get to switch with? You got it a one year old SD-70 ACe. Not fun in the least.Granted I could have puled the yard around but pinning the cars ws a pain in the rear.
No the jobs were flat switch jobs. To us a trimmer job is something in a hump yard. Back n Galesburg the trimmer jobs were remote SD 40-2 ( some were SF motors and some nitpicker is going to go all postal cause it isnt a 40 well to us it is )
I got to run a 40 on the BWWLAU the other night!! Was great even though it was hot as hell and when we got off we looked like a steam crew lol.Had it an SD60 and a GP60M in the old warbonnet scheme. When I gave her hte gas going through boulder we looked like a triple headed steam consist not diesels. SO I had a ball with that all the way to cheyenne. That Gp60 was the worst, clouds and clouds of smoke whenever youd advance the throttle and on grades my goodnes they were all puring it out.
fredswain wrote:What makes an engine a good one to use for switching? In other words why was an SD70 bad?
I'm not an engineer so I'm just guessing. I would think that the ability to load quickly is a major factor since that's needed for kicking cars when flat switching.
If I where an engineer I don't think I'd like a SD70 for switching because of the very long hood. You can't see very well around it. For an SD70ACe, you have the large radiator that in somewhat in your way. That's my guess
.
You guys hit the nail on the head. The 70s are slow to load. When i want to kick I want to kick NOW lol.
Same thing with ust giving a light pin.come out to notch two on a 40 and your going to start moving right now. On the 70 ace its like a darned old GE, gotta mail the request back to the plant for power. It just slows the operation is all.
Not to mention the fact of why I like 40's is I grew up with them. SO I prefer them (unless its hot out then give me a comfort cab lol)
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.