Penny TrainsOrchestras, dramatic readings, color. It's easy to see that many of the ideas we have about old films are misconceptions of hindsight.
Absolutely true! Toward the end of the silent era many of those films hit an amazing level of technical sophistication.
Sound put a cramp on everyone's style for a time as the camera became a slave to the microphone, but that didn't last too long.
Paul of Covington Flintlock76 Yeah, I'd say Mel's film was the last silent, at least the last major silent. OK, it's time to start a feud. Silent Movie does not qualify as a silent movie because there was one word spoken in it.
Flintlock76 Yeah, I'd say Mel's film was the last silent, at least the last major silent.
OK, it's time to start a feud. Silent Movie does not qualify as a silent movie because there was one word spoken in it.
Yep! Spoken by Marcel Marceau!
Mind you, that condition should also disqualify "Modern Times" due to Chaplin's song and dance routine, but most film historians would disagree.
Here's Charlie's routine from "Modern Times." He gives himself a lot more spoken words than Marcel Marceau got in "Silent Movie!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FIt4g9fgcg
Flintlock76Yeah, I'd say Mel's film was the last silent, at least the last major silent.
_____________
"A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner
The trains of Metropolis:
It's interresting to note that for major films such as Metropolis, there was a full orchestra playing the music and the actors were there performing their film lines in front of the screen at the film's premier. January 10, 1927 in Berlin:
Local theaters didn't really exist in those days, at least not everywhere. Here's Munich in August of 27:
It's also interresting to note that this film was one of the first done in black and white. Previously most movies released in Germany had all been hand tinted color films.
Orchestras, dramatic readings, color. It's easy to see that many of the ideas we have about old films are misconceptions of hindsight.
Trains, trains, wonderful trains. The more you get, the more you toot!
Chaplin's last silent film was "Modern Times," which was done in 1936, although Chaplin does a brief sound musical number toward the end of the film. I'm pretty sure "Modern Times" was the last silent film until Mel Brooks' movie came along.
Yeah, I'd say Mel's film was the last silent, at least the last major silent. Who knows how many indie films were done silent that no-one remembers?
I've always wondered when the last real silent movie was made. I know Chaplin still made silents I think almost until he made The Great Dictator. Would Mel Brook's Silent Movie count?
Thank You.
P.S.
There is another filmed on the Southern Pacific when showing the Obligatory Cab Scene, the Fireman is Hand Firing an Oil Burner.
It's a bit of a misnomer to call "The Jazz Singer" the first "talkie," in reality it was a "semi-talkie." Jolson's musical numbers had sound, with some spoken dialog, but the film was mostly silent otherwise. More semi-talkies followed.
The first all-talking film was "Lights Of New York," released by Warner Brothers in 1928.
NP Eddie I saw the "Jazz Singer" last week. There are two great shots of two ATSF passenger locomotives passing Al Jolson in a passenger station. Ed Burns
I saw the "Jazz Singer" last week. There are two great shots of two ATSF passenger locomotives passing Al Jolson in a passenger station.
Ed Burns
I remember the scene with the great big beautiful locomotive passing by, spouting steam and smoke, but not making a sound. This being an early "talkie", I figured it didn't occur to them to include the sound. There was just music playing.
I've mentioned this in another thread, but I watched "Death of Stalin" last night.
Trains play an important part in the plot, but are represented only by a static shot of a train hauled by an Su 2-6-2 with mourners boarding to go to Moscow.
It is a very funny movie but appears to be historically correct
https://www.imdb.com/video/vi4196972825?playlistId=tt4686844&ref_=vp_rv_ap_0
I'd seen it before, but I was able to pick up many points I'd missed on the first viewing.
Peter
CSSHEGEWISCHThe best variation on "everybody did it" was on "CSI" a number of years ago. A washed-up old pug was found dead of apparent foul play in a Wild West theme park. The investigation found that the victim had been beat up, knifed and a few other things by a number of people individually and independently at separate times. Nobody could be charged with homicide since each act was not fatal in and of itself but the string of acts taken collectively killed him.
The episode was titles "Ending Happy",and I like your definition of "Wild West theme park".
Years ago a friend rode the train from eastern Europe to Italy, and the Orient Express to Paris. She then flew to the U.S. on the Concorde.
Somewhere in Italy or Paris, there was an Orient Express shop of some kind. She had them send these two Orient Express lamps to us.
I've looked at pictures, and it looks like the lamps are close to what was on the trains at that time, but not quite the same. I don't normally like this kind of style, but I like these.
York1 John
I asked my doctor if I gave up delicious food and all alcohol, would I live longer? He said, "No, but it will seem longer."
CSSHEGEWISCHNobody could be charged with homicide since each act was not fatal in and of itself but the string of acts taken collectively killed him.
I believe in some jurisdictions each and every 'perpetrator' contributing to what eventuates as a death can equally be charged with homicide or manslaughter as appropriate. I remember offhand a number of cases where someone who only 'watched' a triggerman or other such person actually kill were prosecuted, and perhaps sentenced to execution, despite not even laying a hand on the victim; contributing to battery is surely less exemptive a test than that.
The best variation on "everybody did it" was on "CSI" a number of years ago. A washed-up old pug was found dead of apparent foul play in a Wild West theme park. The investigation found that the victim had been beat up, knifed and a few other things by a number of people individually and independently at separate times. Nobody could be charged with homicide since each act was not fatal in and of itself but the string of acts taken collectively killed him.
Penny Trains Murder on the Orient Express spoiler alert! EVERYBODY DID IT!
Murder on the Orient Express spoiler alert!
EVERYBODY DID IT!
Kind of like one of the best "NCIS" episodes ever a few years back! ALL the "red herrings" did it!
Hey, wait a minute! Didn't Monsieur Poirot also say there was the possibility an assassin stowed away on the train and wasted Richard Widmark's character, an American gangster on the run, and then jumped off when the train was stalled by the heavy snow? Hmmmmm...
I sure as hell didn't know that about KAOS- pretty cool, I'd say. Get Smart was funny as hell. Whenever Maxwell Smart was up against a "Mr. Big," it was either a woman or a midget.
I could have a Murder on the Orient Express on my layout- I have a train of those "Wagon Lits" coaches. Also the earlier version of the OE similar to the one dining car where the armistice was signed in 1918.
Check out the 1974 version of "Murder On The Orient Express" for some outstanding "out the window" shots.
And no damn CGI locomotive in that one either!
M636C BaltACD Overmod The problem is in tight alternating dialogue shots where one 'view' is out the train window. When the director doesn't pay attention to what is outside the window during takes, you're like as not to see boxcars speeding past, then one remark later, nothing; then 15 seconds later speeding passenger cars... it gets to the point VERY quickly not just that your attention seizes on the 'backdrop' action, but you actually start dreading what you will see and how it's an artifact of poor production rather than clever train operation or the chance to see historical railroad details. That screws up virtually every scene where movement of a vehicle is a part of the scene - no matter the form of movement - walking, running, being in a motor vehicle, train or for that matter airplanes. Continuity directors have to be on the top of their game to keep the scenes 'continuous' especially when it has taken more that a single take to get the overall scene accomplished. One movie where the out of window shots seemed good to me was Hitchcock's North by Northwest where they even had a recognisable correct route. However in the arrival scenes at Chicago the stars end up walking past the E units at the head of the train at least twice with quite a lot of dialogue between. Peter
BaltACD Overmod The problem is in tight alternating dialogue shots where one 'view' is out the train window. When the director doesn't pay attention to what is outside the window during takes, you're like as not to see boxcars speeding past, then one remark later, nothing; then 15 seconds later speeding passenger cars... it gets to the point VERY quickly not just that your attention seizes on the 'backdrop' action, but you actually start dreading what you will see and how it's an artifact of poor production rather than clever train operation or the chance to see historical railroad details. That screws up virtually every scene where movement of a vehicle is a part of the scene - no matter the form of movement - walking, running, being in a motor vehicle, train or for that matter airplanes. Continuity directors have to be on the top of their game to keep the scenes 'continuous' especially when it has taken more that a single take to get the overall scene accomplished.
Overmod The problem is in tight alternating dialogue shots where one 'view' is out the train window. When the director doesn't pay attention to what is outside the window during takes, you're like as not to see boxcars speeding past, then one remark later, nothing; then 15 seconds later speeding passenger cars... it gets to the point VERY quickly not just that your attention seizes on the 'backdrop' action, but you actually start dreading what you will see and how it's an artifact of poor production rather than clever train operation or the chance to see historical railroad details.
That screws up virtually every scene where movement of a vehicle is a part of the scene - no matter the form of movement - walking, running, being in a motor vehicle, train or for that matter airplanes. Continuity directors have to be on the top of their game to keep the scenes 'continuous' especially when it has taken more that a single take to get the overall scene accomplished.
One movie where the out of window shots seemed good to me was Hitchcock's North by Northwest where they even had a recognisable correct route. However in the arrival scenes at Chicago the stars end up walking past the E units at the head of the train at least twice with quite a lot of dialogue between.
Great observation of detail. One of my favorites of Hitch.
KAOS has no periods. Think of it as a clever marketing name like Boxpok.
Betcha didn't know it is a Delaware corporation for tax purposes...
Back to "Get Smart." His arch-enemy, Ziegfried worked for an evil group called, "K.A.O.S." What did that stand for, if anything?
OvermodThe problem is in tight alternating dialogue shots where one 'view' is out the train window. When the director doesn't pay attention to what is outside the window during takes, you're like as not to see boxcars speeding past, then one remark later, nothing; then 15 seconds later speeding passenger cars... it gets to the point VERY quickly not just that your attention seizes on the 'backdrop' action, but you actually start dreading what you will see and how it's an artifact of poor production rather than clever train operation or the chance to see historical railroad details.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
BaltACDMy biggest complaint with railroads being shown in any kind of movie or video. Continuity - either the railroad is from some other area or time frame than the story that is being told.
A different kind of continuity problem drives me wilder -- mercifully, one that is limited to a comparatively small number of production years, roughly from the point that SMPTE developed cameras, lighting, and emulsions permitting 'feature' filming on board moving trains to the point that movies no longer treated 'train travel' as the normal way people got somewhere.
The problem is in tight alternating dialogue shots where one 'view' is out the train window. When the director doesn't pay attention to what is outside the window during takes, you're like as not to see boxcars speeding past, then one remark later, nothing; then 15 seconds later speeding passenger cars... it gets to the point VERY quickly not just that your attention seizes on the 'backdrop' action, but you actually start dreading what you will see and how it's an artifact of poor production rather than clever train operation or the chance to see historical railroad details.
My biggest complaint with railroads being shown in any kind of movie or video. Continuity - either the railroad is from some other area or time frame than the story that is being told. A WW II film HQ'd in Europe and the rail shots are of SP's Sunset Limited moving through the desert SW being diesel power as a GLARING example.
Yes - I am a nit picker when that kind discontinuity gets displayed.
54light15 I'm inclined to think that the "Trailer" video was recorded entirely in Australia. Some of the cars are vintage Holdens and the semphore signals show British practice which was common in Oz. The four-wheel boxcars, maybe, maybe not.
I'm inclined to think that the "Trailer" video was recorded entirely in Australia. Some of the cars are vintage Holdens and the semphore signals show British practice which was common in Oz. The four-wheel boxcars, maybe, maybe not.
The four wheel boxcars have the lettering "R.N.", an abbreviation of RENFE.
The diesel railcar passing the two performers is definitely Spanish.
The other rail scenes are definitely shot around Junee NSW before the semaphore signals were replaced by colour lights.
M636CCoastal Railways (Scotland East Coast) 2230-2330
We are getting this series on one of our channels here. I haven't watched it yet.
Again, not strictly on topic...
In the absence of live sport, rail documentaries have become prolific in Australia.
Today we have one hour of Michael Portillo's Great Continental Rail Journeys (Germany) on one network 1630-1730, and on another network Mighty Trains (Rocky Mountaineer) 2030-2130, Railway Restorations with Peter Snow (Isle of Wight Coach) 2130-2230, Coastal Railways (Scotland East Coast) 2230-2330 and Paddington Station 24/7 2330-0030....
I don't know what to say...
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.