Trains.com

Why the UP 4014/844 doubleheader?

6988 views
31 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2017
  • 2,671 posts
Why the UP 4014/844 doubleheader?
Posted by Lithonia Operator on Saturday, May 4, 2019 7:24 AM

Does anyone know why UP decided to doublehead the steam locomotives?

And, should we expect a diesel in the consist also?

Still in training.


  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, May 4, 2019 7:47 AM

LithoniaOperator
Does anyone know why UP decided to doublehead the steam locomotives?

And, should we expect a diesel in the consist also?

Highly likely that it is 'sensible insurance' in case anything strange happens with 4014 in its necessarily-abbreviated break-in.  As noted, the new train length is within 844's capacity if 4014 is operating under less than 'her own power' at any point and has to be 'carried' also (even though in steam).

I'd expect at least one protection diesel just for 'rapid response', rather than have the protect power set up 'invisibly' as done for the Bush train.  I suspect this depends in no small part on what department(s) at UP deem important, which is something I do not know firsthand.

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Saturday, May 4, 2019 8:08 AM

I bet it's not, but the accompanying diesel really should be the 6936.

Understandably lost in all the great Big Boy news with this is discussion or public plans for the attendance in Ogden of the last operating member of this class of power. A class that of course was named in honor of the previous major celebration of this event, 50 years ago.

While the 6900 that was in attendance for the 100th anniversary isn't easily accessible today (Although 10 years ago or so when she had to be relocated, she made at least one trip doubleheaded with the 6936 before her new home was ready, albeit just for show since she wasn't operational), the 6936 would've been the next best thing. 

Just doesn't seem right for a Centennial to not be present for the Sesquicentennial. But my impression has been that the Centennial and E9's mostly have just sat the past 8 years, victims of the focus on rebuilding the #844 and the amazing return of a Big Boy to steam.

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Saturday, May 4, 2019 9:26 AM

Not unusual for UP to double head steam locomotives when going to a big "do," they did it quite often years back when 844 and 3985 were putting in appearances at rail festivals and celebrations.  And frequently there was a diesel in the consist, sometimes one from the historic collection.  

It made sense.  If both steamers were heading there anyway it made sense to team them up.  Made for a good show anyway.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, May 4, 2019 10:21 AM

Flintlock76
Not unusual for UP to double head steam locomotives when going to a big "do," they did it quite often years back when 844 and 3985 were putting in appearances at rail festivals and celebrations.  And frequently there was a diesel in the consist, sometimes one from the historic collection.  

It made sense.  If both steamers were heading there anyway it made sense to team them up.  Made for a good show anyway.

I suspect it is a pragmatic consideration.  There is only one 'steam team' to care for all the steam engines 844 - 3985 - 4014.  Spitting the engines up on separate trips between the same O-D pairs would spread the team thin in case there was trouble.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Saturday, May 4, 2019 10:25 AM

That makes sense too.

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 780 posts
Posted by SPSOT fan on Saturday, May 4, 2019 11:48 AM

Do we need any reason except that a double headed steam power lashup looks AWESOME!

Perhaps also for liability reasons, if the Big Boy breaks down we still go one steamer running, and also it’s an easy way to transport both locomotives to places they need to be.

Regards, Isaac

I model my railroad and you model yours! I model my way and you model yours!

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Saturday, May 4, 2019 1:13 PM

SPSOT fan
Do we need any reason except that a double headed steam power lashup looks AWESOME!

   That was pretty close to my first thought when I read the title:  FOR FUN!

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Saturday, May 4, 2019 1:34 PM

Both are the current in-use steamers under the UP banner, so why not showcase them?  If one goes lame, the other can be a 'steam' stand-in.  And, with both locos on location, the awesomeness of the Big Boy can be demonstrated; a direct comparison for the enthusiasts.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Saturday, May 4, 2019 3:34 PM

Once again, BaltACD is on the advertised!

It is my understanding from reading various other sources that the qualified steam engineers are also part of the steam crew members who were working on Big Boy, and the race to get him finished in time for May 4 required "all hands on deck".

If the 844 had left a week earlier as originally planned, half the steam crew would have been out of town with 844.

Doubleheading them instead kept all the crew in town to help in the race to finish Big Boy, and then be together on the road if, heaven forbid, Big Boy would throw a shoe. (This being Kentucky Derby day, I always thought Big Boy would be a great name for a race horse.)

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, May 4, 2019 5:29 PM

kgbw49
Once again, BaltACD is on the advertised!

It is my understanding from reading various other sources that the qualified steam engineers are also part of the steam crew members who were working on Big Boy, and the race to get him finished in time for May 4 required "all hands on deck".

If the 844 had left a week earlier as originally planned, half the steam crew would have been out of town with 844.

Doubleheading them instead kept all the crew in town to help in the race to finish Big Boy, and then be together on the road if, heaven forbid, Big Boy would throw a shoe. (This being Kentucky Derby day, I always thought Big Boy would be a great name for a race horse.)

Hope 844 & 4014 don't have to run the Sloppy Track that the horses will in the Kentucky Derby!

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Saturday, May 4, 2019 6:23 PM

Looks like a modern EMD, I believe a SD70ACe, is tagging along with the #844 and #4014.

Looking at popular railfan picture upload sites, it doesn't look like their Centennial has had an outing since July 2014.

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • 14 posts
Posted by blue68camaro on Saturday, May 4, 2019 6:44 PM

I read a wile back, when paired with 844, that the diesel loco had a duel purpose. One was to give a nuge when needed on hills but the most important reason was to supply electricity to the passenger cars. 

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Saturday, May 4, 2019 6:49 PM

No, at least in this particular instance (Although I believe you'd often be right, such as when Amtrak power tags along on a steam excursion for other mainline operators). They don't have freight power equipped to provide HEP and I think only the E9B is equipped in their heritage fleet of locomotives with a HEP generator (Or at least was when it left VMV after its 1993 rebuilding).

They're bringing a dedicated power car along for HEP. It's an ACF built boiler dormitory car that was rebuilt to provide HEP and water for UP's passenger cars and is named in honor of artist Howard Fogg (A much appropriate name since Union Pacific's 25 Big Boys were a favorite subject of his). You can hear it running in YouTube videos from today's departure. Edit: Two power cars, to be exact. Just noticed the #207 is also in the consist.

Will there be any tunnels? They coast through long tunnels so as to not essentially steam clean the roof of the tunnel, washing decades of diesel exhaust grime on to the train. And when that happens they need a diesel helper ready to go online to pull the train in those instances.

 

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Hotchkiss, Colorado
  • 294 posts
Posted by steve24944 on Sunday, May 5, 2019 1:23 AM

Steam Power ran from what ?  1830s to well into the 1950s   And  now today they have to have Diesel for what ?  Back up ?   In the years that UP Steam Program has run, have they ever had a problem with the Steam Power fail ?  Norfolk Western 611 runs like a Bat out of Hell, no diesel.

I would like to see UP run 4014 with a 100 car freight like he was designed to do.  Let him earn his keep.

Steve

  • Member since
    July 2016
  • 2,631 posts
Posted by Backshop on Sunday, May 5, 2019 7:21 AM

steve24944

 

I would like to see UP run 4014 with a 100 car freight like he was designed to do.  Let him earn his keep.

Steve

 

100 car freights of 40ft boxcars and 100 car freights today are two entirely different things.

  • Member since
    April 2019
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 780 posts
Posted by SPSOT fan on Sunday, May 5, 2019 8:01 AM

Is UP’s challenger running at the moment? If it is is it also in the area? I wouldn’t know, I don’t really keep up on UP steam stuff...

If the challenger is running we could have it pair up with the others, and TRIPLE head a train!

Reason why you ask? Answer; because we can!

Regards, Isaac

I model my railroad and you model yours! I model my way and you model yours!

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, May 5, 2019 8:24 AM

SPSOT fan
Is UP’s challenger running at the moment? If it is is it also in the area? I wouldn’t know, I don’t really keep up on UP steam stuff...

If the challenger is running we could have it pair up with the others, and TRIPLE head a train!

Reason why you ask? Answer; because we can!

3985 is not running at present.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Sunday, May 5, 2019 8:26 AM

Challenger 3985 isn't running at the moment.  It's in need of a good overhaul but the focus of the steam team for the past several years has been getting 4014 up and running, so 3985 has had to wait.

Work on 3985 should start after the steam team has a well-deserved breather.  

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • 1,447 posts
Posted by Shadow the Cats owner on Sunday, May 5, 2019 8:48 AM

From my hubby's buddy in the steam program.  3985 along with 4014's tender will be started on this Summer after they get back from the trip to CA with the 4014.  Yep she is going to California and up and over Cajon Pass according to our friend and might come back via Techaphi pass to Donner.  They are still trying to get the logistics worked out on crews and such.  

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Hotchkiss, Colorado
  • 294 posts
Posted by steve24944 on Sunday, May 5, 2019 11:39 AM

OK  Point taken.    Still, how about a 65 car train.

Steve

 

 
steve24944

 

I would like to see UP run 4014 with a 100 car freight like he was designed to do.  Let him earn his keep.

Steve

 

 

 

100 car freights of 40ft boxcars and 100 car freights today are two entirely different things.

 

 

[/quote]

Backshop

 

 
steve24944

 

I would like to see UP run 4014 with a 100 car freight like he was designed to do.  Let him earn his keep.

Steve

 

 

 

100 car freights of 40ft boxcars and 100 car freights today are two entirely different things.

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Sunday, May 5, 2019 1:12 PM

Flintlock76
Work on 3985 should start after the steam team has a well-deserved breather.

With the PSR syndrome, I don't know if I'd lay a hefty amount on that bet.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Sunday, May 5, 2019 2:04 PM

zugmann

Anyhing's possible Zug, and nothing's graven in stone.  Still, I'd tell folks waiting for 3985's return what I told them when the 4014 restoration began...

"Put it on the back-burner of your mind.  Forget it exists.  It'll be ready when it's ready."

 

 
Flintlock76
Work on 3985 should start after the steam team has a well-deserved breather.

 

With the PSR syndrome, I don't know if I'd lay a hefty amount on that bet.

 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Tuesday, May 14, 2019 6:54 PM

One thought about the 4014-844 doubleheader is that the Big Boy is enormous, and the enormity of 4014 actually highlights the fact that 844 is pretty gosh-darn big in its own right!

UP and its big steam power - to quote Tim the Toolman Taylor: "Argh, argh, argh!!!"

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, May 14, 2019 8:53 PM

kgbw49
UP and its big steam power - to quote Tim the Toolman Taylor: "Argh, argh, argh!!!"

to quote Tim the Toolman Taylor:  MORE POWER!

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 12:24 PM

zugmann
Flintlock76
Work on 3985 should start after the steam team has a well-deserved breather.
With the PSR syndrome, I don't know if I'd lay a hefty amount on that bet.

 
 I would.  The UP crew has repeatedly said that 3985 is 'next' (and hasn't had the 'quality treatment' rebuild) and UP funds their historic preservation outside of the 'operations' related departments that would be affected by PSR lite or whatever flavor of the thing UP cares to try.
 
How hefty a bet would you consider? 
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 12:27 PM

Backshop
steve24944

I would like to see UP run 4014 with a 100 car freight like he was designed to do.  Let him earn his keep.

100 car freights of 40ft boxcars and 100 car freights today are two entirely different things.

And a 100-car-equivalent singlestack consist of articulated equipment, let's say equivalent by length, is ... more or less difficult than the 'legacy' train?

Even with doublestacks I see no reason why 4014 wouldn't do at least as well as 3985 did on similar intermodal equipment a couple of decades ago (has it really been that long???)

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 1:39 PM

And if nothing's changed since 2008 the UP steam program is under the auspices and funding of the executive department, not operations. 

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 2:16 PM

Overmod
How hefty a bet would you consider?

We've all seen a railroad in the east have a decent excursion program with steam, only to quickly and quietly shut it down with the changing of the executive guard. Executives have to answer to shareholders, and with PSR, will those shareholders be happy with money poured into a steam program (even if it is outside of operations)?

Esp. if BNSF jumps on the PSR train.

 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, May 15, 2019 2:38 PM

zugmann
We've all seen a railroad in the east have a decent excursion program with steam, only to quickly and quietly shut it down with the changing of the executive guard. Executives have to answer to shareholders, and with PSR, will those shareholders be happy with money poured into a steam program (even if it is outside of operations)?

UP has always had a different culture, and while that might change I think their market cap is sufficiently great that no group of Children's-Fund-like weasels could acquire enough influence to overcome it with misguided 'shareholder wealth' proxy-fight action.

Also important is that the steam shop is officially overseen by the VP in charge of quality management (which in case you were wondering accounts in large part for the aircraft-like documentation and specification methodology) and this has large support in UP management.  Of course that might change if 'the men who manage money' want it to, but it's often less expensive to tolerate this sort of expenditure than to replace all the people who support it.

Something I'm far more concerned about than activist shareholder Scrooging, though, is the thing that nominally killed the NS program in the Nineties: consequences from accidents or incidents in operation, or vastly bloated 'nominal' insurance coverage requirements.  While I don't see Union Pacific imposing on itself the same very high policy limits that killed the 765 trip for Steamtown recently -- it would not take too many fatalities to bring about some pressure to reduce or even curtail excursions.  (Now, I don't think this would compromise maintenance on the two operating locomotives, or particularly delay the scheduled rebuilding of 3985, but it might well put all three in the same effective status as Cotton Belt 819 when she was 'all dressed up with no place to go' courtesy of a previous Union Pacific ukase.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy