Trains.com

What engine will the Friends of the 261 pick to replace 261?

17296 views
35 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: South Dakota
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Dakguy201 on Tuesday, December 1, 2009 7:41 AM

Since (from their viewpoint) FO261 were not reasonably treated by the NRM, it will be very interesting to see where the title to any new engine resides.  In any case, I suspect excursions in the near term will be done with borrowed power such as the fall trip with SP4449.   

On a slightly different topic, how reasonable is the 15 year boiler inspection/rebuild requirement in the case of an engine that is only fired a few times each year?     

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,853 posts
Posted by wjstix on Monday, November 30, 2009 8:47 AM

One issue would have to be size and speed (or is that two issues?). Part of the reason 261 worked so well was that it could haul a sizeable passenger train (10-14 cars) at mainline speed, so it wasn't backing up traffic on the CP mainline down the Mississippi River's west bank. A smaller engine or a freight engine might not be able to pull that many cars, or not do it fast enough.

The second issue would be related to how much work it would take to restore an engine, including how many environmental issues (like asbestos problems) were involved. Part of why 261 was chosen to be restored was it was a relatively new engine (built in 1944 IIRC) and didn't have too many environmental problems compared to some other engines they look at.

Stix
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Mobile Alabama
  • 694 posts
Posted by carknocker1 on Monday, November 30, 2009 8:38 AM

How about SR 4501? Since she was the queen of excusions in the 1970's

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: US
  • 71 posts
Posted by nwo4rf on Monday, November 30, 2009 7:53 AM

I would really like to see the "Q" hudson. But I beleive there is a FRISCO 2-8-2 in southern Illinois that is 1/2 restored . They ran out of money. So 1/2 the work is done so maybe they could finish that one?

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 2,844 posts
Posted by dinwitty on Sunday, November 29, 2009 10:25 PM

 265 is the only alternative to doing a milwaukee engine of its size and type.

 

261 was an unexpected newly restored engine to me, perhaps they should look for a completely different engine never restored before.

 

maybe look for the 643  Bessemer and Lake Erie 2-10-4?

 Located at Glenn Campbell, vacant warehouse, "bottoms" section of, McKees Rocks, PA

unedited note, looks like someone is already working on that engine for restoration!

http://www.rr-roadtrip.com/BLE1.htm

 

maybe try for the C&O 2-6-6-2 at the B&O museum in Maryland.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Canada
  • 509 posts
Posted by cprted on Sunday, November 29, 2009 10:10 PM

 They'll probably pick the one that best suits their operational needs, that is in the best condition, and made available for the right price.

The grey box represents what the world would look like without the arts. Don't Torch The Arts--Culture Matters http://www.allianceforarts.com/
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 14 posts
What engine will the Friends of the 261 pick to replace 261?
Posted by steam611 on Sunday, November 29, 2009 9:23 PM

Assuming the Friends of the 261 elects to rebuild another engine in the next couple of years, any guesses as to what they might decide to rebuild next? Here are a few engines to chew on, feel free to add your own.

A GN engine

A Burlington engine (preferably a Hudson type)

Milwaukee Road 265

Frisco 1522

N&W 611

Others?

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy