Trains.com

What engine will the Friends of the 261 pick to replace 261?

17286 views
35 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 14 posts
What engine will the Friends of the 261 pick to replace 261?
Posted by steam611 on Sunday, November 29, 2009 9:23 PM

Assuming the Friends of the 261 elects to rebuild another engine in the next couple of years, any guesses as to what they might decide to rebuild next? Here are a few engines to chew on, feel free to add your own.

A GN engine

A Burlington engine (preferably a Hudson type)

Milwaukee Road 265

Frisco 1522

N&W 611

Others?

 

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Canada
  • 509 posts
Posted by cprted on Sunday, November 29, 2009 10:10 PM

 They'll probably pick the one that best suits their operational needs, that is in the best condition, and made available for the right price.

The grey box represents what the world would look like without the arts. Don't Torch The Arts--Culture Matters http://www.allianceforarts.com/
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 2,844 posts
Posted by dinwitty on Sunday, November 29, 2009 10:25 PM

 265 is the only alternative to doing a milwaukee engine of its size and type.

 

261 was an unexpected newly restored engine to me, perhaps they should look for a completely different engine never restored before.

 

maybe look for the 643  Bessemer and Lake Erie 2-10-4?

 Located at Glenn Campbell, vacant warehouse, "bottoms" section of, McKees Rocks, PA

unedited note, looks like someone is already working on that engine for restoration!

http://www.rr-roadtrip.com/BLE1.htm

 

maybe try for the C&O 2-6-6-2 at the B&O museum in Maryland.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: US
  • 71 posts
Posted by nwo4rf on Monday, November 30, 2009 7:53 AM

I would really like to see the "Q" hudson. But I beleive there is a FRISCO 2-8-2 in southern Illinois that is 1/2 restored . They ran out of money. So 1/2 the work is done so maybe they could finish that one?

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Mobile Alabama
  • 694 posts
Posted by carknocker1 on Monday, November 30, 2009 8:38 AM

How about SR 4501? Since she was the queen of excusions in the 1970's

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,840 posts
Posted by wjstix on Monday, November 30, 2009 8:47 AM

One issue would have to be size and speed (or is that two issues?). Part of the reason 261 worked so well was that it could haul a sizeable passenger train (10-14 cars) at mainline speed, so it wasn't backing up traffic on the CP mainline down the Mississippi River's west bank. A smaller engine or a freight engine might not be able to pull that many cars, or not do it fast enough.

The second issue would be related to how much work it would take to restore an engine, including how many environmental issues (like asbestos problems) were involved. Part of why 261 was chosen to be restored was it was a relatively new engine (built in 1944 IIRC) and didn't have too many environmental problems compared to some other engines they look at.

Stix
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: South Dakota
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Dakguy201 on Tuesday, December 1, 2009 7:41 AM

Since (from their viewpoint) FO261 were not reasonably treated by the NRM, it will be very interesting to see where the title to any new engine resides.  In any case, I suspect excursions in the near term will be done with borrowed power such as the fall trip with SP4449.   

On a slightly different topic, how reasonable is the 15 year boiler inspection/rebuild requirement in the case of an engine that is only fired a few times each year?     

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 2,844 posts
Posted by dinwitty on Tuesday, December 1, 2009 11:23 PM

 The real steam time the engines were never cooled down kept hot. This contracts the boiler connections and so on, so that sounds reasonable, the real mainline engine may actually been outshopped more often or scheduled more often.

 

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Joliet, IL
  • 1,646 posts
Posted by EJE818 on Monday, December 7, 2009 6:41 PM

1522 has been stored under a shed in St. Louis since the previous group that operated it was forced to shut it down after they pretty much ran out of money. It appears to be well kept at the museum currently. It would probably need to go through the FRA teardown before operating again. I believe SSW 819 is another possibility, as it is pretty much stranded because UP won't let it run on their tracks.

Robby Gragg - EJ&E fan Railpictures photos: http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=5292 Flickr photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/24084206@N08/ Youtube videos: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=EJE665 R-V videos: http://www.rail-videos.net/showvideos.php?userid=5292
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,840 posts
Posted by wjstix on Monday, December 21, 2009 9:52 AM

I don't know that there's an immediate need for the Friends of 261 to get another steam engine. As I understand it, they have a pretty good "business" leasing out their passenger cars for fantrips to other organizations and could probably go on doing that indefinetely. Their cars are all converted to HEP and are up to Amtrak standards, so can really go pretty much anywhere.

As I recall a talk I heard one of their folks made a year or so ago, even when 261 was still expected to return to service for them, they were thinking of getting some diesels as sort of a back-up. For the excursions they run I think they could use restored E or F units and still get people to buy tickets, and would be less of a maintenance problem. Most if not all of their cars are post-war cars that would normally have been pulled by diesels anyway.

Stix
  • Member since
    January 2010
  • 1 posts
Posted by TVRM2594 on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 6:00 PM

 I work at the Tennessee Valley Railroad, home of Southern #4501, and we are trying to decide whether to restore it or not. Plus, the #819 or the #1522 might be a good candidate to use, as would the C.B.& Q 4-8-4, # unknown/

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • 126 posts
Posted by LWales on Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:05 PM

In the December 2009 issue of "Northern Lines" (the newsletter from the old "Friends of the 261" group), an article by Steve Sandberg goes into this exact topic.

 He states that the "Friends" group has had some preliminary discussions with several museums and municipalities. If they decide to rebuild another steam loco, they will do it with one to ties to the Midwest. They specifically eliminate candidates such as the Frisco 1522, the C&O 614 and both the Norfolk & Western 611 and 1218.

 However locomotives that served the Midwest such as those from the Burlington, Milwaukee Road, New York Central and others might be considered. Then again it bears repeating that they use the specific term, "if we decide to restore another locomotive."

In addition, the group is changing its name to "Railroading Heritage of Midwest America" to reflect their new direction without 261.

Lance

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Illinois
  • 255 posts
Posted by onequiknova on Friday, January 22, 2010 1:59 AM

Rumor has it that the next engine the friends of 261 will restore will be...... Mlw 261.

 http://www.sterlingrail.com/547/class.php?id=107

http://rypn.sunserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=28781

 261 was supossedly recently sold to someone out west.  Rumors around the web say the new owner will be leaseing it back to the friends of 261. Time will tell if these rumors are true or not.

 I don't know what to think about this. I was really hopeing they'd restore a CB&Q Hudson or Northern.

John.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • 3 posts
Posted by Steaminfo on Friday, January 22, 2010 7:17 AM

For whatever it may be worth, Steve Sandberg said yesterday that he has no plans to lease the 261 from its new owner. There have been discussions between the two, but leasing the locomotive from the owner was not a topic of conversation.

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 14 posts
Posted by steam611 on Friday, January 22, 2010 2:45 PM

Welcome to the forums Doug.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,264 posts
Posted by CAZEPHYR on Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:17 PM

steam611

Assuming the Friends of the 261 elects to rebuild another engine in the next couple of years, any guesses as to what they might decide to rebuild next? Here are a few engines to chew on, feel free to add your own.

A GN engine

A Burlington engine (preferably a Hudson type)

Milwaukee Road 265

Frisco 1522

N&W 611

Others?

 

 

The good news about the story of the Friends of the 261 is they are looking for another locomotive to run.  Unlike the NS steam program or the 1522 group that just stopped running anything.   The amount of work that is required to keep a steam locomotive running is just not possible today unless many sacrifies are made by the workers.

Check out the 2926 progress over the past several years and it still has three more to go.   We should all appreciate their work and donate to the project so the work can go on.    

 CZ

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Eau Claire, WI
  • 1,882 posts
Posted by Lord Atmo on Tuesday, February 16, 2010 2:35 PM

Steaminfo

For whatever it may be worth, Steve Sandberg said yesterday that he has no plans to lease the 261 from its new owner. There have been discussions between the two, but leasing the locomotive from the owner was not a topic of conversation.

 

Aw really? Is it too much to ask that 261 runs again? Ugh...Sigh

Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,264 posts
Posted by CAZEPHYR on Wednesday, February 17, 2010 2:57 PM

Lord Atmo

Steaminfo

For whatever it may be worth, Steve Sandberg said yesterday that he has no plans to lease the 261 from its new owner. There have been discussions between the two, but leasing the locomotive from the owner was not a topic of conversation.

 

Aw really? Is it too much to ask that 261 runs again? Ugh...Sigh

I read a post that the deal to purchase the 261 did not happen.  Anyone know if that is true??

CZ

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Central New York
  • 335 posts
Posted by MJChittick on Friday, February 19, 2010 11:38 PM

CAZEPHYR

I read a post that the deal to purchase the 261 did not happen.  Anyone know if that is true??

See the following Trains Newswire story:

CORRECTED: 261 sale still pending

Print article Print article E-mail article to a friend E-mail article to a friend var addthis_pub="trainsmag"; Bookmark and Share -->
Published: Thursday, February 18, 2010
GREEN BAY, Wis. — In a correction to the News Wire story of Feb. 17, the sale of Milwaukee Road No. 261 is still pending and may be completed by mid-March 2010. Bob Mertz, president of Sterling Rail, the broker offering the locomotive for sale, told TRAINS News Wire that the deal to sell the locomotive is still going forward.

The buyer has been granted a 30-day extension to allow time to travel to Minneapolis to inspect the locomotive, Mertz said. The buyer, who lives in California, is also in discussions with Railroading Heritage of Midwest America, the former Friends of the 261, about a possible lease of the locomotive for continued operation, but these discussions are ongoing and have not been concluded.

The famous excursion locomotive, which is owned by the National Railroad Museum of Green Bay, was operated between 1993 and 2008 by the non-profit "Friends of the 261," which leased the engine from the Museum. The two organizations were unable to reach an agreement to extend the lease on the locomotive, which is due for its mandated federal inspection.

In November 2009 the organizations announced that negotiations had failed and the engine would return to Green Bay for display. Subsequently NRM decided to put the locomotive up for sale through Sterling Rail. — Steve Glischinski

Mike

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Eau Claire, WI
  • 1,882 posts
Posted by Lord Atmo on Saturday, February 20, 2010 1:57 PM

 I just read that a few minutes ago. I can hope for the best out of this deal then. It would be nice if the same group ended up running the locomotive again. I'm guessing lease agreements with one person are probably much easier than with a whole museum?

Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,016 posts
Posted by BigJim on Saturday, February 20, 2010 2:52 PM

 

.

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • 5 posts
Posted by NewYorkCentral on Thursday, February 25, 2010 10:11 PM

Wel If you ask me Steve Sandsberg and the Friends of 261 should restore that New York Central Engine #3001. That would be a good engine I would like to see running.

P.S. my first time on the Trains forums

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, February 26, 2010 11:09 AM

I understand that #261 needs $500,000-700,000 worth of boiler work to be recertified for operation.  The engine could be purchased as is for $225,000. 

 

Considering the intent of the Sandberg group to acquire another engine for operation, which of the possible candidates could be purchased and made operational for under $925,000?

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • 5 posts
Posted by NewYorkCentral on Friday, February 26, 2010 11:32 AM

Well one thing is for certian we are going to miss Milwaukee Road 261. As for the Friends of 261 and Steve Sandsberg I wish them alot of luck finding another engine to run again.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, February 26, 2010 5:50 PM

Well, to answer my own question two posts up, I would speculate that there is no locomotive available as an alternate to #261 that could be purchased and put into operation for under $925,000.  Therefore, since #261 is for sale for $225,000, why doesn’t the Sandberg group just buy it, put the $700,000 into the boiler work that it needs, and run it?

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • 5 posts
Posted by NewYorkCentral on Friday, February 26, 2010 8:22 PM

Bucyrus

Well, to answer my own question two posts up, I would speculate that there is no locomotive available as an alternate to #261 that could be purchased and put into operation for under $925,000.  Therefore, since #261 is for sale for $225,000, why doesn’t the Sandberg group just buy it, put the $700,000 into the boiler work that it needs, and run it?

Well if you ask me thats a question I think every Railfan should be asking Steve Sandsberg About.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Canada
  • 509 posts
Posted by cprted on Saturday, February 27, 2010 2:58 AM

NewYorkCentral

Bucyrus

Well, to answer my own question two posts up, I would speculate that there is no locomotive available as an alternate to #261 that could be purchased and put into operation for under $925,000.  Therefore, since #261 is for sale for $225,000, why doesn’t the Sandberg group just buy it, put the $700,000 into the boiler work that it needs, and run it?

Well if you ask me thats a question I think every Railfan should be asking Steve Sandsberg About.

 

You're assuming that they are looking into operating another steam locomotive ...

The grey box represents what the world would look like without the arts. Don't Torch The Arts--Culture Matters http://www.allianceforarts.com/
  • Member since
    February 2016
  • 176 posts
Posted by Tugboat Tony on Saturday, February 27, 2010 4:45 AM

Bucyrus

Well, to answer my own question two posts up, I would speculate that there is no locomotive available as an alternate to #261 that could be purchased and put into operation for under $925,000.  Therefore, since #261 is for sale for $225,000, why doesn’t the Sandberg group just buy it, put the $700,000 into the boiler work that it needs, and run it?

 

Need the $925,000 plus anything else you run into first.

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: South Dakota
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Dakguy201 on Saturday, February 27, 2010 5:32 AM

The group has changed its name due to the change of circumstances.  It is now "Railroading Heritage of Midwest America" if I remember correctly.  I wonder how many years it will take before the old name disappears from common usage. 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, February 27, 2010 11:52 AM

Tugboat Tony

Bucyrus

Well, to answer my own question two posts up, I would speculate that there is no locomotive available as an alternate to #261 that could be purchased and put into operation for under $925,000.  Therefore, since #261 is for sale for $225,000, why doesn’t the Sandberg group just buy it, put the $700,000 into the boiler work that it needs, and run it?

 

Need the $925,000 plus anything else you run into first.

I understand what you mean, but with #261, they have already covered all that other ground.  It only needs the boiler work for recertification to be ready to work. 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy