Trains.com

Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 66

5797 views
46 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,431 posts
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 66
Posted by Bergie on Monday, February 19, 2007 1:19 PM
I just posted the latest installment of Trackside with Erik and Mike in our new section within the Railroad Reference area of TrainsMag.com. 

Read Trackside with Erik and Mike Volume 66

Voting for Trackside with Erik and Mike now occures at the top of the Trackside with Erik and Mike section. Click here to vote.

Please add your comments regarding this week's photos here.

Thanks, Erik

Erik Bergstrom
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, February 19, 2007 1:55 PM

 

....Cast my vote for Erik's corn field scene....Believe both photos are equal in quality.

Choose Eriks photo as it seems to be a bit unusual in content, especially the color of the field and sky combination.  {Even with the crooked corn rows, ha].

Quentin

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Monday, February 19, 2007 1:59 PM

Nice shots, guys!!!  Both are very, very good.  For me, this was one of the more difficult choices. 

I really liked the rural setting of Erik's image; it seems so peaceful, unhurried, and simple, with the train adding a sense of action and urgency...going somewhere while all around remains stationary...very nice.  It just sort of seemed like something was missing, but I'm not sure what.  Maybe it needed a few clouds.

Mike's image, however, somehow evoked a more dynamic response from me.  The fancy, clean locomotive, with the backdrop of the deep-blue cccccold Lake Michigan waters, the white snow, the bare trees......also very nice.

 

By a margin of barely 1%, I voted for Mike's.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Aledo IL
  • 1,728 posts
Posted by spokyone on Monday, February 19, 2007 2:20 PM
Mike has my vote. I always go for a body of water in the background.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Wisconsin, land o' cows
  • 207 posts
Posted by mikeyuhas on Monday, February 19, 2007 2:25 PM

Hi,

In case anyone wants to see more of the Union Pacific Shoreline Subdivision, there are over 160 photos in the Shoreline Sub album on my website. Thanks.

 

Thank you for reading Trains magazine! click here if you dare
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Monday, February 19, 2007 3:22 PM
 mikeyuhas wrote:

Hi,

In case anyone wants to see more of the Union Pacific Shoreline Subdivision, there are over 160 photos in the Shoreline Sub album on my website. Thanks.

Mike,

I like your site.  Lots of nice images.  But what I really liked was the maps showing where the image was captured; that is WAY COOL!!!

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Louisville, KY
  • 9,002 posts
Posted by cherokee woman on Monday, February 19, 2007 3:26 PM
Well, couldn't vote, because looks like the voting has ended; but, I "vote" for Erik's photo this week.  There's just something about a farm scene, with a train going by, that just gets to this ole country girl.  The background just looks so peaceful to me.
Angel cherokee woman "O'Toole's law: Murphy was an optimist."
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Monday, February 19, 2007 3:55 PM
I'd try again, CW.  I didn't have a problem voting- went with Erik's shot this week.  Tough choice, though.  Either one is very 'cool'.
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: In the New York Soviet Socialist Republic!
  • 1,391 posts
Posted by PBenham on Monday, February 19, 2007 3:58 PM
Well, I had to go to the Vermont quarter system here. The lone BNSF SD40-2 in a cornfield had a model like quality to it. Mike's shot of the UP ES45AC was nice, too, what with the background. But, I liked the grade crossing shot best of all those shown, even though it wasn't in the competition. I liked the composition of it and I'll look in my Logan boxes, me thinks I have a shot of some B&M GP40-2s running toward Mudville on the old Erie with a similar set up near Attica, NYSSR.
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Reedsburg WI (near Wisconsin Dells)
  • 3,370 posts
Posted by Noah Hofrichter on Monday, February 19, 2007 4:24 PM

I agree, both shots are very good again this week. In the end I went with Erik's by a nose (pun intended). Between the snoot nose unit, the corn feild, and the barn, it's a great photo. Mike's is good too, but I like Eriks just slightly better.

Noah

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, February 19, 2007 4:40 PM

Erik's...

The composition is not only unusual, but works great to draw you eye to the locomotive.

And the background farm buildings against the dark sky add further impact.

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Mt. Fuji
  • 1,840 posts
Posted by Datafever on Monday, February 19, 2007 6:05 PM
Both very good shots.  I voted for Mike's (cuz he's such a great guy and all), but Erik's was every bit as good (and he's a fairly decent guy himself).
"I'm sittin' in a railway station, Got a ticket for my destination..."
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, February 19, 2007 6:53 PM
Just had to go with erik's shot this time... very clean... as he said, the rows f scythed grain-field just draws your eyes to the train in the distance...but you're definately right mike, that water DOES look cold!Captain [4:-)]
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,431 posts
Posted by Bergie on Monday, February 19, 2007 7:20 PM

 cherokee woman wrote:
Well, couldn't vote, because looks like the voting has ended; but, I "vote" for Erik's photo this week.  There's just something about a farm scene, with a train going by, that just gets to this ole country girl.  The background just looks so peaceful to me.

Hmmm... that's odd. Voting is open until next Monday. 

Bergie

Erik Bergstrom
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: PACIFIC NORTHWEST
  • 118 posts
Posted by LVJJJ on Monday, February 19, 2007 7:37 PM
ERIK, GOOD JOB, MIKE, GOOD JOB, VOTED FOR ERIK'S PHOTO CAUSE IT'S ON TOP.  REMINDS ME OF THE GOLF COURSE SHOT A WHILE BACK.  LARRY OF THE PACIFIC NW (IT'S RAINING, GO FIGURE).
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Columbus NC
  • 45 posts
Posted by Chris Owens on Monday, February 19, 2007 7:46 PM
Both were Good Shots !! I voted for Mikes
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Monday, February 19, 2007 8:40 PM

Again, I'm going with Mike's. 

It was a hard choice this time, because I have some good memories of pacing freights with a cornfield between us and the tracks (between Rochelle and DeKalb--try it, you'll like it!), but the lake is an influential factor for me, as is the prospect of a train bigger than the single-unit BNSF shot is providing.

You know, of course, that those Alliant Energy cars are lettered EDGX specifically for the Edgewater plant, right?  That's the truth.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • 55 posts
Posted by DICKK on Monday, February 19, 2007 8:53 PM
Voted for Mike thid time.  Too much farm and not enough train in Eriks photo.
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Monday, February 19, 2007 9:02 PM
Ran with Mike's shot this week.  It seemed...somehow...more...something than Bergie's shot.

Dan

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 115 posts
Posted by lhtalbot on Monday, February 19, 2007 9:05 PM

Hi guys,

I like both shots. Not sure I can analyze why?? So I will just vote.....it's Erik's this time.

Larry in Wauwatosa

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Northwest Washington State
  • 58 posts
Posted by gemotor on Monday, February 19, 2007 9:29 PM
Both very good photos, gentlemen.  This was one of the tougher calls, but I went with Erik's BNSF shot.  I like the mood, the cornfield, everything fits - a single locomotive out in agricultural land.  Great composition, the convergence of the cornrows is perfect.  Long light - I like that.  I liked Mike's UP shot also, just not quite as much.  I'm glad to see Mike's decision to shoot just part of the locomotive while allowing the landscape to carry the scene.  The yellow/blue opposites on the color wheel is a nice touch.  Nice work, both of you. 
NYC
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 19 posts
Posted by NYC on Monday, February 19, 2007 9:33 PM

Two fantastic shots.  Mike by 50.1% to 49.9%.  Corn rows, clouds, cold water, snow, yellow engines, real, real close to chose.   Keep up the great work.

 Other great shot of the UP consist at the grade crossing.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Wisconsin, land o' cows
  • 207 posts
Posted by mikeyuhas on Monday, February 19, 2007 10:11 PM
 CShaveRR wrote:
You know, of course, that those Alliant Energy cars are lettered EDGX specifically for the Edgewater plant, right?  That's the truth.


Sure is! Parent company Alliant Energy (NYSE: LNT) just took delivery of 100 new aluminum cars, numbered EDGX 3601 through 3700 inclusive. On rare occasions some IESX and LNTX cars have been used. They're also leased to Alliant Energy.
Thank you for reading Trains magazine! click here if you dare
  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Centennial, CO
  • 82 posts
Posted by Rocket Man on Monday, February 19, 2007 10:45 PM
Bergie, your shot took me right back to my youth in Iowa... too bad the SD-40 wasn't the maroon and gold of the Rock Island!

You are TRULY outstanding in your field!


Get it...


Out standing in your field!
The Rock Island Line is a mighty fine line...
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Monday, February 19, 2007 11:19 PM
 lhtalbot wrote:

Hi guys,

I like both shots. Not sure I can analyze why?? So I will just vote.....it's Erik's this time.

Larry in Wauwatosa

 

********************************************************************
Grab shot or not, I wish Mike had submitted the impromptu photo of the train crossing the highway.  I thought it was more visually interesting than either of the two photos submitted. 
Since I have no strong opinion either way about what was submitted, I'm withholding my vote this time. 
al
al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • 1 posts
Posted by toprail on Tuesday, February 20, 2007 12:09 AM

You guys never make it easy to choose, do you?

Anyway, the reason I chose the Sheboygan shot was that it is from Wisconsin, where as Eric's is from Illinois.

If you are from Wisconsin, you hate "flatlanders," and visa versa.

My best rail fan friend is from Wisconsin, but he lives in Illinois!

We disagree on politics, as well.

Technically, as a photographer, I prefer the Illinois shot.  As Eric points out, the total effect of the shot is just damn impressive!

 But Mike's shot has Lake Michigan in the background.

I really want to thank you for letting me see what is going on around Milwaukee.  I particularly loved when you mentioned Saukville, where I lived until I was in first grade.

If you could start shooting northward, that would suit me fine!

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Long Island
  • 121 posts
Posted by mandelswamp on Tuesday, February 20, 2007 7:43 AM
It was a very tough choice this week.  Mike's photo of the UP engine against the backdrop of Lake Michigan was quite nice although I liked his road crossing shot even better.  Had Mike went with the latter picture, it would have won my vote.  However, I felt Erik's grain train photo to be a better composition mainly for the reasons that Erik mentions.  So I voted for Erik this week.
  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Grand Canyon
  • 18 posts
Posted by Augusta Station Master on Tuesday, February 20, 2007 8:04 AM
I voted for Erik's precisely because it wasn't just another locomotive shot. Mike's shot was pretty but Erik's told a story.
Jerry Smith Augusta Station Master http://augustastationmaster.tripod.com/stationmasterjournal/
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Roanoke, TX
  • 7 posts
Posted by abandonedrails on Tuesday, February 20, 2007 8:28 AM

Good job once again, guys. I voted for Bergie's photo for the same reason as others have posted -- the serene setting and a typical scene from rural America. The angle presented in Mike's photo seemed to throw me off a bit.

Hey, have you guys ever considered doing a "On the Road With Erik and Mike"? I'm sure you're aware of Trains publishing a recent issue containing articles on railroading in all 50 states. Maybe you could travel to the top 10 states listed and send us your pictures to vote on from each.

While you're at it, mosey on down here to Texas (#17 in the list) to take pictures of railroads in the Lone Star State.

(Apologies if this topic has already been visited in a previous forum post.)

Greg
http://www.abandonedrails.com

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Tuesday, February 20, 2007 8:40 AM
 mikeyuhas wrote:

Hi,

In case anyone wants to see more of the Union Pacific Shoreline Subdivision, there are over 160 photos in the Shoreline Sub album on my website. Thanks.

A bit of a history lesson on the shoreline sub.

One of Mike's shots

 http://www.mikeyuhas.org/albums/upshorelinesub/20050070.php

is in Fox Point WI (where I happen to live) and as it happens he caught the spot where up to the late 1920s a spur line connected up the track to a line coming from the Milwaukee lakefront depot, so that C&NW passenger trains could head north to Sheboygan

 http://www.cnwhs.org/memberphotos/displayimage.php?album=21&pos=112

(and beyond) all the way to Green Bay

http://www.cnwhs.org/memberphotos/displayimage.php?album=21&pos=72

without having to go through Wiscona,

 http://www.cnwhs.org/memberphotos/displayimage.php?album=search&cat=0&pos=51

an interchange several miles to the west.

From Don Ross's website:

Prior to 1927, the line north from the Milwaukee depot split at Lake Shore Junction which was just south of Capital Drive. One branch went to Wiscona and then up the Fox Valley. The other line went north up the Lake Shore. The trackage from Lake Shore Junction to Fox Point was abandoned, and trains were routed via Wiscona. Dean Segal found this old photo of the station.

http://donsdepot.donrossgroup.net/dr0001/cnwls.jpg

If you walk the line in the area covered by Mike's photo you can very slightly make out the spot where the lines merged, even though the track was torn up in, I think, 1929 and no trains ran after, I think, 1927.  Much of that line went right through what is now a totally residential part of Whitefish Bay WI, a very nice and expensive suburb.

Dave Nelson

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy