Trains.com

For anyone in or around Pottstown PA!

5954 views
65 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
For anyone in or around Pottstown PA!
Posted by Mookie on Monday, September 22, 2003 12:10 PM
You made Paul Harvey News! Guess an engineer died on time, in town, across a grade crossing. He got off and walked away - leaving the xing closed for 2 hours!

Anyone have details? Skeets, don't know where you are, but think you are just ornery enough to do this! So don't read this; don't want to give you any ideas!

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, September 22, 2003 12:53 PM
Silvio510 has hogger-cousins downstate?
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, September 22, 2003 12:53 PM
Silvio510 has hogger-cousins downstate?
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, September 22, 2003 1:02 PM
I forgot all about him being in PA! Thanx for the memory jog. Hmmm - the plot thickens!

La M

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, September 22, 2003 1:02 PM
I forgot all about him being in PA! Thanx for the memory jog. Hmmm - the plot thickens!

La M

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 22, 2003 2:21 PM
ha ha very funny, too bad I have had noting to do with this one, and I feel stupid I don't even know where pottstown is located ? ? ?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 22, 2003 2:21 PM
ha ha very funny, too bad I have had noting to do with this one, and I feel stupid I don't even know where pottstown is located ? ? ?
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, September 22, 2003 2:23 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Silvio510

ha ha very funny, too bad I have had noting to do with this one, and I feel stupid I don't even know where pottstown is located ? ? ?
Pennsylvania maybe?

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, September 22, 2003 2:23 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Silvio510

ha ha very funny, too bad I have had noting to do with this one, and I feel stupid I don't even know where pottstown is located ? ? ?
Pennsylvania maybe?

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Monday, September 22, 2003 2:28 PM
I had to check it out...here's the rest of the story, so to speak. From the Pottstwon Mercury website:


POTTSTOWN -- A freight train stymied traffic on Hanover Street for about two hours Friday after the engineer stopped the train and refused to move it, according to police.

The incident was not related to Hurricane Isabel or its aftermath, although a gate in the same area was damaged by high winds.

The engineer, whose name was not released by police, told officers he had exceeded the federal mandate for the maximum number of hours an engineer is allowed to operate a train without being replaced, police said.

The engineer then said he was instructed by his supervisor to stop the train after passing the Hanover Street intersection and wait for his replacement to arrive, according to police.

But the crossing gates dropped to block traffic as the train passed, and the engineer did not pull the train far enough forward to trigger them to go back up, according to police.

Two police officers and members of Pottstown’s fire police had to direct traffic around the gates in both directions in the early afternoon hours as everyone waited for a second engineer to arrive and move the train.

Traffic was snarled for about two hours on Hanover Street between High Street and the Schuylkill River bridge.

©The Mercury 2003




  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Monday, September 22, 2003 2:28 PM
I had to check it out...here's the rest of the story, so to speak. From the Pottstwon Mercury website:


POTTSTOWN -- A freight train stymied traffic on Hanover Street for about two hours Friday after the engineer stopped the train and refused to move it, according to police.

The incident was not related to Hurricane Isabel or its aftermath, although a gate in the same area was damaged by high winds.

The engineer, whose name was not released by police, told officers he had exceeded the federal mandate for the maximum number of hours an engineer is allowed to operate a train without being replaced, police said.

The engineer then said he was instructed by his supervisor to stop the train after passing the Hanover Street intersection and wait for his replacement to arrive, according to police.

But the crossing gates dropped to block traffic as the train passed, and the engineer did not pull the train far enough forward to trigger them to go back up, according to police.

Two police officers and members of Pottstown’s fire police had to direct traffic around the gates in both directions in the early afternoon hours as everyone waited for a second engineer to arrive and move the train.

Traffic was snarled for about two hours on Hanover Street between High Street and the Schuylkill River bridge.

©The Mercury 2003




  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 22, 2003 2:54 PM
man wish i heard about that before but that is interesting
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 22, 2003 2:54 PM
man wish i heard about that before but that is interesting
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 22, 2003 2:54 PM
Hmmm. An Engineer on the NS died on the law and the DS told him not to move. So he didn't move. Probably a good idea on his part as I'm sure he would be home relying on his job insurance otherwise, perhaps he is now anyhow since it made CNN last night...amazing...

Couldn't happen to a nicer company...

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 22, 2003 2:54 PM
Hmmm. An Engineer on the NS died on the law and the DS told him not to move. So he didn't move. Probably a good idea on his part as I'm sure he would be home relying on his job insurance otherwise, perhaps he is now anyhow since it made CNN last night...amazing...

Couldn't happen to a nicer company...

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
GP9
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 22, 2003 3:02 PM
im detailing a Southern Pacific GP9 black widow can someone help me with details as to what the 5670-5673 looked like i can not find any info on what type of horns they had or antennas thanx

callinwood
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
GP9
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 22, 2003 3:02 PM
im detailing a Southern Pacific GP9 black widow can someone help me with details as to what the 5670-5673 looked like i can not find any info on what type of horns they had or antennas thanx

callinwood
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, September 22, 2003 3:36 PM
....Something is clearly out of line that prevents a train from moving just far enough to clear an in town intersection....Someone needs help in creating rulings and regulations that generates such circumstances.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, September 22, 2003 3:36 PM
....Something is clearly out of line that prevents a train from moving just far enough to clear an in town intersection....Someone needs help in creating rulings and regulations that generates such circumstances.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,319 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Monday, September 22, 2003 4:25 PM
wow! can't blame a guy for following the rules.you think that if he was close to a crossing he'd stop just before it though.
stay safe
joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,319 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Monday, September 22, 2003 4:25 PM
wow! can't blame a guy for following the rules.you think that if he was close to a crossing he'd stop just before it though.
stay safe
joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, September 22, 2003 4:32 PM
Federal Hours of Service Law prohibit a train crew from operating a train in excess of 12 hours except in case of emergency. The Federal Gov't does not consider a blocked crossing an "emergency".

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, September 22, 2003 4:32 PM
Federal Hours of Service Law prohibit a train crew from operating a train in excess of 12 hours except in case of emergency. The Federal Gov't does not consider a blocked crossing an "emergency".

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, September 22, 2003 5:21 PM
....How about installing a clause of common sense. Some human[s], are negotiating these rules and regs....

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, September 22, 2003 5:21 PM
....How about installing a clause of common sense. Some human[s], are negotiating these rules and regs....

Quentin

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 6:24 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Modelcar

....How about installing a clause of common sense. Some human[s], are negotiating these rules and regs....
There is that darn common sense again. The bureaucrats keep trying to kill it off and it keeps coming back!

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 6:24 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Modelcar

....How about installing a clause of common sense. Some human[s], are negotiating these rules and regs....
There is that darn common sense again. The bureaucrats keep trying to kill it off and it keeps coming back!

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,319 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 7:07 AM
yeah you'd think they would check out the book by thomas paine.
stay safe
joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,319 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 7:07 AM
yeah you'd think they would check out the book by thomas paine.
stay safe
joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:48 AM
"Good afternoon Ladies and gentlemen, this is your Captain speaking....Due to weather conditions at Newark we are going to have to go into holding for a couple of hours while we get sequenced. Unfortunately, because of this delay the First Officer and I will run out of crew day and will be bailing out now. We have set the autopilot, and if any of you have any large aircraft experience, we have left the manual in the cockpit if you want to give landing a try. You may experience a little discomfort when we depressurize, but if someone will close the main cabin door behind us, conditions should return to normal shortly, and again thank you for flying the friendly skies."
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:48 AM
"Good afternoon Ladies and gentlemen, this is your Captain speaking....Due to weather conditions at Newark we are going to have to go into holding for a couple of hours while we get sequenced. Unfortunately, because of this delay the First Officer and I will run out of crew day and will be bailing out now. We have set the autopilot, and if any of you have any large aircraft experience, we have left the manual in the cockpit if you want to give landing a try. You may experience a little discomfort when we depressurize, but if someone will close the main cabin door behind us, conditions should return to normal shortly, and again thank you for flying the friendly skies."
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:58 AM
.....That's about as ridiculous as it really is.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:58 AM
.....That's about as ridiculous as it really is.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:01 AM
....Sorry...Jen for bringing up that nasty old "common sense" again...

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:01 AM
....Sorry...Jen for bringing up that nasty old "common sense" again...

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:03 AM
....Also, if a major fire erupted in the downtown business district I'll wager someone would think it would be an emergency if fire equipment was located on the "other" side of the tracks.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:03 AM
....Also, if a major fire erupted in the downtown business district I'll wager someone would think it would be an emergency if fire equipment was located on the "other" side of the tracks.

Quentin

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 6:05 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dharmon

"Good afternoon Ladies and gentlemen, this is your Captain speaking....Due to weather conditions at Newark we are going to have to go into holding for a couple of hours while we get sequenced. Unfortunately, because of this delay the First Officer and I will run out of crew day and will be bailing out now. We have set the autopilot, and if any of you have any large aircraft experience, we have left the manual in the cockpit if you want to give landing a try. You may experience a little discomfort when we depressurize, but if someone will close the main cabin door behind us, conditions should return to normal shortly, and again thank you for flying the friendly skies."
[:D] this is so funny!!

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 6:05 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dharmon

"Good afternoon Ladies and gentlemen, this is your Captain speaking....Due to weather conditions at Newark we are going to have to go into holding for a couple of hours while we get sequenced. Unfortunately, because of this delay the First Officer and I will run out of crew day and will be bailing out now. We have set the autopilot, and if any of you have any large aircraft experience, we have left the manual in the cockpit if you want to give landing a try. You may experience a little discomfort when we depressurize, but if someone will close the main cabin door behind us, conditions should return to normal shortly, and again thank you for flying the friendly skies."
[:D] this is so funny!!

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:00 AM
First off, I'm not familiar with Pottstown, NS, or any of the principal players in this drama, but there are a couple of things that make one go "Hmmm" here.

First of all, the engineer is getting a bad rap here. There was probably a conductor on board who died at about the same time. Nobody mentions him.

I doubt that they were told to "clear the crossing and wait". More likely, they were told to proceed to a point where a new crew could relieve them, and had to determine on their own where to stop to clear the crossing. A faulty wheel report could cause a miscalculation like that...one car that didn't show on the wheel would have been enough.

And, if I'm not mistaken, there is some edict in place that says the crew has to leave the cab when their time is up. I heard something about that a while back, but not lately. Nobody would just "walk off" with nowhere to go. They would have (and legally should have) had no communication with anyone, so they probably didn't know the crossing was blocked.

So instead of getting all huffy and riled and taking traffic matters into their own hands, shouldn't the locals have called the phone number shown by the crossing? I assume NS does this; the other three big railroads have such a number. A signal maintainer could have raised the gates and/or provided flag protection, with the help of the dispatcher. I'm sure it wouldn't have taken two hours.

I hope this is investigated...someone might get canned over it, but it shouldn't be the crew. I'd be more concerned with prevention of future occurrences.

Carl

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:00 AM
First off, I'm not familiar with Pottstown, NS, or any of the principal players in this drama, but there are a couple of things that make one go "Hmmm" here.

First of all, the engineer is getting a bad rap here. There was probably a conductor on board who died at about the same time. Nobody mentions him.

I doubt that they were told to "clear the crossing and wait". More likely, they were told to proceed to a point where a new crew could relieve them, and had to determine on their own where to stop to clear the crossing. A faulty wheel report could cause a miscalculation like that...one car that didn't show on the wheel would have been enough.

And, if I'm not mistaken, there is some edict in place that says the crew has to leave the cab when their time is up. I heard something about that a while back, but not lately. Nobody would just "walk off" with nowhere to go. They would have (and legally should have) had no communication with anyone, so they probably didn't know the crossing was blocked.

So instead of getting all huffy and riled and taking traffic matters into their own hands, shouldn't the locals have called the phone number shown by the crossing? I assume NS does this; the other three big railroads have such a number. A signal maintainer could have raised the gates and/or provided flag protection, with the help of the dispatcher. I'm sure it wouldn't have taken two hours.

I hope this is investigated...someone might get canned over it, but it shouldn't be the crew. I'd be more concerned with prevention of future occurrences.

Carl

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:47 AM
I'm sure there is more to the story, I don't think a crew (conducter included) would abandon their train. But just as the pilot is the focal point for anything that happens on a plane or the captain on a ship, the engineer, as the driver becomes the focal point here. Right or wrong he is the representative of the RR at that moment. Did the police try to call the number on the crossing sign, we'll probably never know. I think we're (at least I was) pokin' fun at the situation, not an individual. Flight crews are equally rigid about manditory hours, however, when an unforseen instance arises that makes them go over, they can't park the plane...usually. I did not mean to offend REAL train dudes.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 10:47 AM
I'm sure there is more to the story, I don't think a crew (conducter included) would abandon their train. But just as the pilot is the focal point for anything that happens on a plane or the captain on a ship, the engineer, as the driver becomes the focal point here. Right or wrong he is the representative of the RR at that moment. Did the police try to call the number on the crossing sign, we'll probably never know. I think we're (at least I was) pokin' fun at the situation, not an individual. Flight crews are equally rigid about manditory hours, however, when an unforseen instance arises that makes them go over, they can't park the plane...usually. I did not mean to offend REAL train dudes.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:11 PM
...In our fair city here of Muncie we have a problem with NS on a line running in from the northwest. Too often they block traffic and it is for some considerable time and it really causes traffic problems in our west side of town. I don't know what is the reason the train is stationary for sometimes an hour or more but it really causes problems. Police have been involved at times but I don't know of what results it has produced. Moving fire equipment is a concern when required to pass over the track and it is blocked making them go out of their way, etc....I don't know if it has anything to do with a "dead" crew in some of the traffic tieups but wheither it is that or not, it really creates a problem.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:11 PM
...In our fair city here of Muncie we have a problem with NS on a line running in from the northwest. Too often they block traffic and it is for some considerable time and it really causes traffic problems in our west side of town. I don't know what is the reason the train is stationary for sometimes an hour or more but it really causes problems. Police have been involved at times but I don't know of what results it has produced. Moving fire equipment is a concern when required to pass over the track and it is blocked making them go out of their way, etc....I don't know if it has anything to do with a "dead" crew in some of the traffic tieups but wheither it is that or not, it really creates a problem.

Quentin

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:34 PM
C'mon people - I bet a lot of you know why the crossings are blocked. Also bet there is a little human influence not on the engine that is the problem. So give us the real scoop!

Mz Moo

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:34 PM
C'mon people - I bet a lot of you know why the crossings are blocked. Also bet there is a little human influence not on the engine that is the problem. So give us the real scoop!

Mz Moo

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 26, 2003 7:02 PM
I LIVE OUTSIDE OF POTTSTOWN. DO YOU KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT WHO RUNS AND WHEN TRAINS GO ON THE OLD COLBROOKDALE BRANCH LINE
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 26, 2003 7:02 PM
I LIVE OUTSIDE OF POTTSTOWN. DO YOU KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT WHO RUNS AND WHEN TRAINS GO ON THE OLD COLBROOKDALE BRANCH LINE
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 27, 2003 6:52 AM
Madam DA Mook and all, it is a violation of the Federal Hours of Service Act for any train or engineman to exceed 12 hours on duty. If the emgineer wants to be a good guy and pull the locos up to clear the circuit, and a Fed inspector is watching, he can be fined up to $10,000; not the Company, but the engineer out of his own pocket! If the dispatcher orders the crew to pull up to clear in violation, the dispatcher can be fined up to yada yada. Hence, none of these guys are going to stick their necks out. Some years back, an engineer was called to work a baseball special after the game. He warned the boss he wouldn't make it, and he didn't. He outlawed halfway to his destination, and the train full of hot, tired ball fans sat there until a relief engineer was called out. That made the news, too. The engineer later received a letter from a Company VP exonerating him. I once was outlawing on a westbound. We were in the middle of nowhere, and I told the trainman that my watch showed we still had 3 minutes to work. We then pulled up to clear an important crossing in town where we walked up and bought a breakfast while waiting for the taxi. No, I didn't block the road. Probably, the guy in Pottstown should have stopped short of the road and waited there, notifying the DS he had no time. But I don't expect he is in any great trouble. And Mook...I'm not "ornery". Usually.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 27, 2003 6:52 AM
Madam DA Mook and all, it is a violation of the Federal Hours of Service Act for any train or engineman to exceed 12 hours on duty. If the emgineer wants to be a good guy and pull the locos up to clear the circuit, and a Fed inspector is watching, he can be fined up to $10,000; not the Company, but the engineer out of his own pocket! If the dispatcher orders the crew to pull up to clear in violation, the dispatcher can be fined up to yada yada. Hence, none of these guys are going to stick their necks out. Some years back, an engineer was called to work a baseball special after the game. He warned the boss he wouldn't make it, and he didn't. He outlawed halfway to his destination, and the train full of hot, tired ball fans sat there until a relief engineer was called out. That made the news, too. The engineer later received a letter from a Company VP exonerating him. I once was outlawing on a westbound. We were in the middle of nowhere, and I told the trainman that my watch showed we still had 3 minutes to work. We then pulled up to clear an important crossing in town where we walked up and bought a breakfast while waiting for the taxi. No, I didn't block the road. Probably, the guy in Pottstown should have stopped short of the road and waited there, notifying the DS he had no time. But I don't expect he is in any great trouble. And Mook...I'm not "ornery". Usually.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 27, 2003 7:02 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

Skeets, don't know where you are, but think you are just ornery enough to do this! So don't read this; don't want to give you any ideas!

Mookie
Want to see ornery, Ook? Check out the "Two trains running" thread down below. My story is TRUE, no porches there. BTW, what happened to your green stars? You likely over reached demanding a tiara too.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 27, 2003 7:02 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

Skeets, don't know where you are, but think you are just ornery enough to do this! So don't read this; don't want to give you any ideas!

Mookie
Want to see ornery, Ook? Check out the "Two trains running" thread down below. My story is TRUE, no porches there. BTW, what happened to your green stars? You likely over reached demanding a tiara too.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Sunday, September 28, 2003 1:54 AM
Okay, first I gotta put the disclaimer out there -- we all gotta live by the rules that are set down for your particular profession. Whatever the job, you got some rules, and you knew that goin' into it. You know how to work it and you know how to break it and get away with it. My book has a catchall statement that covers me to the effect of ".....no rule shall be interpreted such that it takes the place of good judgment..." I have had to exercise that clause a few times, and explain why in a particular situation I did X or Y with the taxpayers very expensive asset. But I made damn sure if I was going to use it, I could defend it.
Given the same example in aviation.......if I take off near the end of crew day for something other than "operational neccessity" (we don't go there unless someone's gonna get hurt) and I knowingly violate crew day, I'm screwed. Now if if take off and there is a reasonable expectation that I can conduct the mission (peacetime rules only here folks, you get your money's worth plus during the bad times) and return or get to my destination within 18 hours of my original brief time and for some reason in the flight I am delayed (weather, holding, malfunction) its cool, as long as there was a reasonable expectation I could do it.....not down to gnats &*^ (behind), and it was beyond my control.

If a train has to stop in the middle of a town because of crew day, then something's wrong with your system. Either you get to where you're going (within reason) or you fine the railroad not the crew for pushing it.

I AM NOT saying this crew did the wrong thing. Sounds like they thought they were clear,but weren't. It happens. I just think this system is messed up if there is no common sense clause. If I ran a railroad, and the choice was pull forward and make sure you are clear of all crossings and I' ll pay the fine should you get one for exceeding crew day or the possibility of having to pay out liability because someone died becaue a fire truck or ambulance couldn' t pass....I'd rather go to court over the crew day issue

Now as public servant, I say if you don't like what you get, vote to change it. as RR employees, if you don't like it, get us to vote to change it. I Railfan and I Vote....how's that for a bumper sticker?

Dan
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Sunday, September 28, 2003 1:54 AM
Okay, first I gotta put the disclaimer out there -- we all gotta live by the rules that are set down for your particular profession. Whatever the job, you got some rules, and you knew that goin' into it. You know how to work it and you know how to break it and get away with it. My book has a catchall statement that covers me to the effect of ".....no rule shall be interpreted such that it takes the place of good judgment..." I have had to exercise that clause a few times, and explain why in a particular situation I did X or Y with the taxpayers very expensive asset. But I made damn sure if I was going to use it, I could defend it.
Given the same example in aviation.......if I take off near the end of crew day for something other than "operational neccessity" (we don't go there unless someone's gonna get hurt) and I knowingly violate crew day, I'm screwed. Now if if take off and there is a reasonable expectation that I can conduct the mission (peacetime rules only here folks, you get your money's worth plus during the bad times) and return or get to my destination within 18 hours of my original brief time and for some reason in the flight I am delayed (weather, holding, malfunction) its cool, as long as there was a reasonable expectation I could do it.....not down to gnats &*^ (behind), and it was beyond my control.

If a train has to stop in the middle of a town because of crew day, then something's wrong with your system. Either you get to where you're going (within reason) or you fine the railroad not the crew for pushing it.

I AM NOT saying this crew did the wrong thing. Sounds like they thought they were clear,but weren't. It happens. I just think this system is messed up if there is no common sense clause. If I ran a railroad, and the choice was pull forward and make sure you are clear of all crossings and I' ll pay the fine should you get one for exceeding crew day or the possibility of having to pay out liability because someone died becaue a fire truck or ambulance couldn' t pass....I'd rather go to court over the crew day issue

Now as public servant, I say if you don't like what you get, vote to change it. as RR employees, if you don't like it, get us to vote to change it. I Railfan and I Vote....how's that for a bumper sticker?

Dan
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, September 28, 2003 7:32 AM
.....Sounds like great logic to me Dan. Jen, there's that "common sense" clause again...See it's not dead. There is hope.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, September 28, 2003 7:32 AM
.....Sounds like great logic to me Dan. Jen, there's that "common sense" clause again...See it's not dead. There is hope.

Quentin

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Sunday, September 28, 2003 8:02 AM
First off if you actually read the posts above about what actually happened, the train did not stop on the crossing. The train stopped on the crossing circuit so the lights and gate came on, but the train itself was not on the crossing. The police flagged the cars around the gates. No fire truck was blocked or would have been blocked. No ambulance was blocked or would have been blocked. There was no emergency. If the crew exceeds the hours of service to move the train, they could be fined personally by the FRA, and the railroad could be fined by the FRA and if a superior told them to move the train the superior could be fined personally by the FRA.

One cure would be to install motion sensing crossing equipment. The gates come down, the system "sees" the trains is not moving toward the crossing and after a minute or so lifts the gates. Another train shows up or the train starts moving toward the crossing, the gates come back down. All it takes is your state highway dept to ante up the bucks.

If the train stops the crew is supposed to try and stay off the crossings. If they can't and won't be moving soon, they are supposed to cut the crossing. A good crew will sometimes purposely block a crossing if its going to meet several trains in a row, just to keep people from crossing in front of it and being hit by a train on the other track.

If all else fails and the crew does reach their hours of service with a crossing blocked, Federal Law prohibits them from moving the train unless there is an immediate emergency. Period.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Sunday, September 28, 2003 8:02 AM
First off if you actually read the posts above about what actually happened, the train did not stop on the crossing. The train stopped on the crossing circuit so the lights and gate came on, but the train itself was not on the crossing. The police flagged the cars around the gates. No fire truck was blocked or would have been blocked. No ambulance was blocked or would have been blocked. There was no emergency. If the crew exceeds the hours of service to move the train, they could be fined personally by the FRA, and the railroad could be fined by the FRA and if a superior told them to move the train the superior could be fined personally by the FRA.

One cure would be to install motion sensing crossing equipment. The gates come down, the system "sees" the trains is not moving toward the crossing and after a minute or so lifts the gates. Another train shows up or the train starts moving toward the crossing, the gates come back down. All it takes is your state highway dept to ante up the bucks.

If the train stops the crew is supposed to try and stay off the crossings. If they can't and won't be moving soon, they are supposed to cut the crossing. A good crew will sometimes purposely block a crossing if its going to meet several trains in a row, just to keep people from crossing in front of it and being hit by a train on the other track.

If all else fails and the crew does reach their hours of service with a crossing blocked, Federal Law prohibits them from moving the train unless there is an immediate emergency. Period.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, September 28, 2003 8:40 AM
...Understand all you have said and it is sensible.....Fact is, if a train is moving through a town or city and it must stop because of expired work time.....Anyone surely will agree, don't stop it across a crossing or even close enough to allow the gates to remain down to disrupt traffic, emergency or not...Clear the crossing.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, September 28, 2003 8:40 AM
...Understand all you have said and it is sensible.....Fact is, if a train is moving through a town or city and it must stop because of expired work time.....Anyone surely will agree, don't stop it across a crossing or even close enough to allow the gates to remain down to disrupt traffic, emergency or not...Clear the crossing.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 28, 2003 10:02 AM
It could be the engineer stopped a little long, over the crossing circuit. He doesn't want to back up over crossings behind him or pedestrians on the track if he can't see. There's no time to protect the rear, so he stays put. We aren't even supposed to use the radio after we have outlawed. That might be interpreted as "performing duty. If the police were directing traffic around him, he wasn't blocking emergency vehicles. And probably there weren't any Federals around, but just the same, YOU pay the fines if you knowingly violate the law. Help yourself...
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 28, 2003 10:02 AM
It could be the engineer stopped a little long, over the crossing circuit. He doesn't want to back up over crossings behind him or pedestrians on the track if he can't see. There's no time to protect the rear, so he stays put. We aren't even supposed to use the radio after we have outlawed. That might be interpreted as "performing duty. If the police were directing traffic around him, he wasn't blocking emergency vehicles. And probably there weren't any Federals around, but just the same, YOU pay the fines if you knowingly violate the law. Help yourself...
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, September 29, 2003 6:10 AM
Skeets - my tiara is evidently hanging in the trains "Magee's Closet". It was a little gaudy anyway. But I still think the green was pretty. Think emeralds!

Going to go look at the thread you mentioned. And I think you are a little ornery like Da Mook is.... it is all good!

For the rest - I know we have an ordinance here in Lincoln - that a train shall not block the crossing for more than 10 min. Since the train runs right through the heart of the university parking and used to run through a lot of residentials, it was a good law. And the CBQ, BN and BNSF have been pretty good about observing it. There is a little overtime sometimes involved, but mostly, they get things moving out of the way. And if the engine wasn't blocking the crossing, why didn't someone open the gates? Were they so far out in the boonies, that no one from either maintenance or yard master - someone couldn't come out and lift the gates. If maintenance isn't closer than that, they have real problems in that town. My understanding is a key on the engine will do it. Can't the yardmaster do it?

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, September 29, 2003 6:10 AM
Skeets - my tiara is evidently hanging in the trains "Magee's Closet". It was a little gaudy anyway. But I still think the green was pretty. Think emeralds!

Going to go look at the thread you mentioned. And I think you are a little ornery like Da Mook is.... it is all good!

For the rest - I know we have an ordinance here in Lincoln - that a train shall not block the crossing for more than 10 min. Since the train runs right through the heart of the university parking and used to run through a lot of residentials, it was a good law. And the CBQ, BN and BNSF have been pretty good about observing it. There is a little overtime sometimes involved, but mostly, they get things moving out of the way. And if the engine wasn't blocking the crossing, why didn't someone open the gates? Were they so far out in the boonies, that no one from either maintenance or yard master - someone couldn't come out and lift the gates. If maintenance isn't closer than that, they have real problems in that town. My understanding is a key on the engine will do it. Can't the yardmaster do it?

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Monday, September 29, 2003 9:37 AM
My "tirade" was not directed at this incident or at this or any crew. What I was saying that the RR (not the crew) should be liable for dispatching a crew if they cannot accompli***he task without violating crew day. If they could have reasonably accomplished the job in the timeframe, but because of unforseen circumsatnces can't, then prudence would dictate that they land at the nearest suitable airfield (in this case siding, yard, etc).....not in the middle of town, where there may exist a greater than average chance of causing a roadway to blocked, by the train itself or by gates.

Apparently the rules do not account for this, I presume to keep the RRs from abusing the crews.

Hey, I'm with you guys......I ain't the artist formerly known as Missouri
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Monday, September 29, 2003 9:37 AM
My "tirade" was not directed at this incident or at this or any crew. What I was saying that the RR (not the crew) should be liable for dispatching a crew if they cannot accompli***he task without violating crew day. If they could have reasonably accomplished the job in the timeframe, but because of unforseen circumsatnces can't, then prudence would dictate that they land at the nearest suitable airfield (in this case siding, yard, etc).....not in the middle of town, where there may exist a greater than average chance of causing a roadway to blocked, by the train itself or by gates.

Apparently the rules do not account for this, I presume to keep the RRs from abusing the crews.

Hey, I'm with you guys......I ain't the artist formerly known as Missouri
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, September 29, 2003 11:28 AM
Hi Dan,
The hours of service law is a two edged sword.
It was put in place not only to prevent the carrier from abusing crews, but because there are some railroaders who would work 24 hours at a pop, if they got paid.
Anything beyond 8 hours on duty is overtime pay, not yur standard 40 hours a week then overtime.
A 12 hour day is 8 straight pay hours, and 4hours overtime pay.
Some guys are that hungry.
As for the common sense point, I dont have the GCOR right here with me, but the hours of service law contains your common sense clause, in that it allows the crew to continue to move the train if stopping it where they are presents a clear and present danger to the public, the carrier or another train.
In other words, if you have twenty cyanide tankcars blocking a ungated at grade public crossing, the crew would continue to move the train till those cars were no longer in danger of being hit.
The reason we dont even contact the carrier via radio is because they already know how long we have been working, (they called us, remember?), and we have already notified the dispatcher in advance that we are close to dieing on the law, (the rules say we must notify the DS in advance)
If we did contact the carrier,or perform any service to the carrier after 12 hours, then next time they will expect us to do so again, but this time, it will be along the lines of "why dont you just take it on up to milepost **** for the crew change, or some thing along those lines.
In the end, that carrier will expect you to continue to viloate the law to benefit them, and when the Feds start handing out fines, the carrier will say you performed the work on your own, without their knowledge.
Most crews are very aware of the local terrain, the number of crossings and their location, and where the circuts start and stop.
We plan ahead for the hours of service, by the 11th hour, you know if you can or cant get to where you need to.
I would bet, like Carl said, they got a bad wheel report, or, if they were using a counter, it was set wrong.
The newspaper story said they had pulled forward enough to clear the crossing, not the gate circut, and yes, one car too many will do that.
I would bet they had a minute or two left, so they stopped, tied the motors down, isolated them, the engineer removed the reverser, (the keys, if you will) and stuck it in his grip, and they walked to a local diner to wait for the cab, all of this pre arranged before hand with the dispatcher, crew caller and the trainmaster, totally unaware they were still in the circut for the crossing mentioned.
If we know we will block a crossing, and we know its a major crossing, the likes of which emergency personel would have to use, or if we know it is the only crossing for miles, we make plans to drop the conductor or brakeman off, and we will cut the crossing in the clear.
The idea that we just run until we are out of time, and then stop where ever we might be, public be dammed is silly.
Most cities and towns have a local ordanince concerning the amout of time a train may block a public crossing without moving.
Here in Houston, its 5 minutes for a "standing" train. If the train moves, even a car length, the clock starts over.
In Houston, its impossible to stop and not block a crossing somewhere.
And every so often, circumstances are beyond anyones control.
We had a automobile accident at a tee intersection, the main road tangent to our main line.
Auto traffic had backed up from the intersection on to and across our crossing, and so far back from there as to make it impossible for the morons who stopped on the crossing to back up.
Add to that the fact that they had pulled up to the intersection side by side, trying to cut into line.
We came around a curve, looking at six autos stopped on the crossing, with no where for them to go.
We stopped, and waited. And waited, and waited.
Before you ask, no, we couldnt back up, the DS had run another grain train right up behind us, less than a mile, and backing up that mile wouldnt clear anything up. So along comes a HPD Sargent, who decides to give us a ticket for blocking the crossings over five minutes.
Now, he can see the reason we are stopped, and instead of going to the crossing and making the morons move, he decides to give me a ticket.
He demands my drivers license, which I refuse to give him, mostly because I dont have it with me, all I carry on duty is my switchmans license,(a lost wallet on a railroad is lost forever).
So now he is pretty hot, wants to arrest me for failing to produce my drivers license, even though such a license dosnt give me the right to operate a locomotive, and I am the conductor, not the engineer.
Buy the way, the law says you only have to have a drivers liecense if you are opperating a motorized vehicle on public property, its a license only, not a required ID, you dont have to carry it with you all the time.
But I am the guy in charge, and he refuses to accept my switchmans license,
and he decides I am going to jail for not giving him my drivers license.
We ended up calling our railroad cops, who brough a trainmaster with them, and after several minutes of very heated argument, it came down to the trainmaster accepting, as a agent of the carrier, a traffic ticket for blocking a public crossing.
Now, had the cop excersised the rule of common sense, he would have cleared the crossing so we could have moved, instead he decided to play macho super cop.
Common sense?
Uh Huh!
Stay Frosty,
Ed



23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, September 29, 2003 11:28 AM
Hi Dan,
The hours of service law is a two edged sword.
It was put in place not only to prevent the carrier from abusing crews, but because there are some railroaders who would work 24 hours at a pop, if they got paid.
Anything beyond 8 hours on duty is overtime pay, not yur standard 40 hours a week then overtime.
A 12 hour day is 8 straight pay hours, and 4hours overtime pay.
Some guys are that hungry.
As for the common sense point, I dont have the GCOR right here with me, but the hours of service law contains your common sense clause, in that it allows the crew to continue to move the train if stopping it where they are presents a clear and present danger to the public, the carrier or another train.
In other words, if you have twenty cyanide tankcars blocking a ungated at grade public crossing, the crew would continue to move the train till those cars were no longer in danger of being hit.
The reason we dont even contact the carrier via radio is because they already know how long we have been working, (they called us, remember?), and we have already notified the dispatcher in advance that we are close to dieing on the law, (the rules say we must notify the DS in advance)
If we did contact the carrier,or perform any service to the carrier after 12 hours, then next time they will expect us to do so again, but this time, it will be along the lines of "why dont you just take it on up to milepost **** for the crew change, or some thing along those lines.
In the end, that carrier will expect you to continue to viloate the law to benefit them, and when the Feds start handing out fines, the carrier will say you performed the work on your own, without their knowledge.
Most crews are very aware of the local terrain, the number of crossings and their location, and where the circuts start and stop.
We plan ahead for the hours of service, by the 11th hour, you know if you can or cant get to where you need to.
I would bet, like Carl said, they got a bad wheel report, or, if they were using a counter, it was set wrong.
The newspaper story said they had pulled forward enough to clear the crossing, not the gate circut, and yes, one car too many will do that.
I would bet they had a minute or two left, so they stopped, tied the motors down, isolated them, the engineer removed the reverser, (the keys, if you will) and stuck it in his grip, and they walked to a local diner to wait for the cab, all of this pre arranged before hand with the dispatcher, crew caller and the trainmaster, totally unaware they were still in the circut for the crossing mentioned.
If we know we will block a crossing, and we know its a major crossing, the likes of which emergency personel would have to use, or if we know it is the only crossing for miles, we make plans to drop the conductor or brakeman off, and we will cut the crossing in the clear.
The idea that we just run until we are out of time, and then stop where ever we might be, public be dammed is silly.
Most cities and towns have a local ordanince concerning the amout of time a train may block a public crossing without moving.
Here in Houston, its 5 minutes for a "standing" train. If the train moves, even a car length, the clock starts over.
In Houston, its impossible to stop and not block a crossing somewhere.
And every so often, circumstances are beyond anyones control.
We had a automobile accident at a tee intersection, the main road tangent to our main line.
Auto traffic had backed up from the intersection on to and across our crossing, and so far back from there as to make it impossible for the morons who stopped on the crossing to back up.
Add to that the fact that they had pulled up to the intersection side by side, trying to cut into line.
We came around a curve, looking at six autos stopped on the crossing, with no where for them to go.
We stopped, and waited. And waited, and waited.
Before you ask, no, we couldnt back up, the DS had run another grain train right up behind us, less than a mile, and backing up that mile wouldnt clear anything up. So along comes a HPD Sargent, who decides to give us a ticket for blocking the crossings over five minutes.
Now, he can see the reason we are stopped, and instead of going to the crossing and making the morons move, he decides to give me a ticket.
He demands my drivers license, which I refuse to give him, mostly because I dont have it with me, all I carry on duty is my switchmans license,(a lost wallet on a railroad is lost forever).
So now he is pretty hot, wants to arrest me for failing to produce my drivers license, even though such a license dosnt give me the right to operate a locomotive, and I am the conductor, not the engineer.
Buy the way, the law says you only have to have a drivers liecense if you are opperating a motorized vehicle on public property, its a license only, not a required ID, you dont have to carry it with you all the time.
But I am the guy in charge, and he refuses to accept my switchmans license,
and he decides I am going to jail for not giving him my drivers license.
We ended up calling our railroad cops, who brough a trainmaster with them, and after several minutes of very heated argument, it came down to the trainmaster accepting, as a agent of the carrier, a traffic ticket for blocking a public crossing.
Now, had the cop excersised the rule of common sense, he would have cleared the crossing so we could have moved, instead he decided to play macho super cop.
Common sense?
Uh Huh!
Stay Frosty,
Ed



23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 725 posts
Posted by Puckdropper on Monday, September 29, 2003 11:52 AM
Common sense fails when you start talking money. A ticket is a ticket, and tickets mean fines. That means money for the goverments whose official writes it.

It would be better if common sense was common... ;-)
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 725 posts
Posted by Puckdropper on Monday, September 29, 2003 11:52 AM
Common sense fails when you start talking money. A ticket is a ticket, and tickets mean fines. That means money for the goverments whose official writes it.

It would be better if common sense was common... ;-)
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Monday, September 29, 2003 12:10 PM
Ahh yes, HPD the epicenter of rationality and common sense.

Like I said, I'm not out to blame the crews. They have a job to do and unfortunately will get the blame either way.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Monday, September 29, 2003 12:10 PM
Ahh yes, HPD the epicenter of rationality and common sense.

Like I said, I'm not out to blame the crews. They have a job to do and unfortunately will get the blame either way.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, September 29, 2003 12:28 PM
And common sense takes one step backwards! Again!

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, September 29, 2003 12:28 PM
And common sense takes one step backwards! Again!

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, September 29, 2003 4:52 PM
...."Pottstown in the boonies"....It's in the metropolitan area of Philadelphia..! Not quite the boonies.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, September 29, 2003 4:52 PM
...."Pottstown in the boonies"....It's in the metropolitan area of Philadelphia..! Not quite the boonies.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, September 29, 2003 9:44 PM
....Jen, we must fight for the "commorn sense" value no matter what the subject.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, September 29, 2003 9:44 PM
....Jen, we must fight for the "commorn sense" value no matter what the subject.

Quentin

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 6:41 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Modelcar

....Jen, we must fight for the "commorn sense" value no matter what the subject.
I'm right in there fightin' with you. It is a real uphill battle.

I read two papers in the morning and have to stop that. My blood pressure can't take that kind of abuse!

Jen

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 6:41 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Modelcar

....Jen, we must fight for the "commorn sense" value no matter what the subject.
I'm right in there fightin' with you. It is a real uphill battle.

I read two papers in the morning and have to stop that. My blood pressure can't take that kind of abuse!

Jen

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:19 AM
MlaM,

You read and you don't have a computer at home?????

Is this some sorta communist conspiracy?
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:19 AM
MlaM,

You read and you don't have a computer at home?????

Is this some sorta communist conspiracy?
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:08 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dharmon

MlaM,

You read and you don't have a computer at home?????

Is this some sorta communist conspiracy?
I don't know - do the communists read?

duh Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:08 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dharmon

MlaM,

You read and you don't have a computer at home?????

Is this some sorta communist conspiracy?
I don't know - do the communists read?

duh Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 1:36 PM
Sure they read--but everything they read is read (red). Get it? HaHa.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 1:36 PM
Sure they read--but everything they read is read (red). Get it? HaHa.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 1:53 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

QUOTE: Originally posted by dharmon

MlaM,

You read and you don't have a computer at home?????

Is this some sorta communist conspiracy?
I don't know - do the communists read?

duh Mook



we had to make a deal at home with the kids that x amount of bonafide reading (books with more words than pictures) would earn y amount of time playing on the computer or video games, of course after homework and chores are done. We are the meanest and most unfair parents in the world, because NO ONE, NOT ONE OF THEIR FREINDS has to do chores or is restricted in their internet use by their parents. We are treating them like communist slaves.......we have been told.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 1:53 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

QUOTE: Originally posted by dharmon

MlaM,

You read and you don't have a computer at home?????

Is this some sorta communist conspiracy?
I don't know - do the communists read?

duh Mook



we had to make a deal at home with the kids that x amount of bonafide reading (books with more words than pictures) would earn y amount of time playing on the computer or video games, of course after homework and chores are done. We are the meanest and most unfair parents in the world, because NO ONE, NOT ONE OF THEIR FREINDS has to do chores or is restricted in their internet use by their parents. We are treating them like communist slaves.......we have been told.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:27 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by zardoz

Sure they read--but everything they read is read (red). Get it? HaHa.
[V] Hiss.......

La Moo

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:27 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by zardoz

Sure they read--but everything they read is read (red). Get it? HaHa.
[V] Hiss.......

La Moo

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:28 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dharmon

QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

QUOTE: Originally posted by dharmon

MlaM,

You read and you don't have a computer at home?????

Is this some sorta communist conspiracy?
I don't know - do the communists read?

duh Mook



we had to make a deal at home with the kids that x amount of bonafide reading (books with more words than pictures) would earn y amount of time playing on the computer or video games, of course after homework and chores are done. We are the meanest and most unfair parents in the world, because NO ONE, NOT ONE OF THEIR FREINDS has to do chores or is restricted in their internet use by their parents. We are treating them like communist slaves.......we have been told.
Isn't it funny - after 3 generations - only the terminology has changed!

[8D]

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:28 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dharmon

QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

QUOTE: Originally posted by dharmon

MlaM,

You read and you don't have a computer at home?????

Is this some sorta communist conspiracy?
I don't know - do the communists read?

duh Mook



we had to make a deal at home with the kids that x amount of bonafide reading (books with more words than pictures) would earn y amount of time playing on the computer or video games, of course after homework and chores are done. We are the meanest and most unfair parents in the world, because NO ONE, NOT ONE OF THEIR FREINDS has to do chores or is restricted in their internet use by their parents. We are treating them like communist slaves.......we have been told.
Isn't it funny - after 3 generations - only the terminology has changed!

[8D]

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 9:51 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

QUOTE: Originally posted by zardoz

Sure they read--but everything they read is read (red). Get it? HaHa.
[V] Hiss.......

La Moo



Somebody get some patches to Mookie, for it appears she has sprung a leak....[;)]
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 9:51 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie

QUOTE: Originally posted by zardoz

Sure they read--but everything they read is read (red). Get it? HaHa.
[V] Hiss.......

La Moo



Somebody get some patches to Mookie, for it appears she has sprung a leak....[;)]
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 725 posts
Posted by Puckdropper on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:35 PM
If she's not patched up, do you think she'll start going all over the place like a balloon?
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 725 posts
Posted by Puckdropper on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:35 PM
If she's not patched up, do you think she'll start going all over the place like a balloon?
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 6:24 AM
Zardoz - are we having a relationship? Is this going to become the J Lo/Ben of the trains forum? When will you give me my patch? (Xmas is coming) You better hurry - since I hissed at you on another thread.

Spitfire

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 6:24 AM
Zardoz - are we having a relationship? Is this going to become the J Lo/Ben of the trains forum? When will you give me my patch? (Xmas is coming) You better hurry - since I hissed at you on another thread.

Spitfire

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 9:07 AM
Spitfire? Yikes!! I guess I better get you some asbestos patches. Now I must go and find your other leak.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 9:07 AM
Spitfire? Yikes!! I guess I better get you some asbestos patches. Now I must go and find your other leak.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 9:27 AM
Uummmmm...
never mind.

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 9:27 AM
Uummmmm...
never mind.

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,319 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 9:35 AM
um yeah ok (i think)
stay safe
joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,319 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 9:35 AM
um yeah ok (i think)
stay safe
joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 9:39 AM
Ed-
Now that you mention it..........
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 9:39 AM
Ed-
Now that you mention it..........
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 12:11 PM
Real thread stopper wasn't it!

Moo

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 12:11 PM
Real thread stopper wasn't it!

Moo

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 3:04 PM
Ook, don't you worry little yourself. Zardoz is at fault for the awful pun. I suppose it is indelicate to react to the pun; we are required by convention to ignore such transgressions. [In other words, it's okay to HISS!]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 3:04 PM
Ook, don't you worry little yourself. Zardoz is at fault for the awful pun. I suppose it is indelicate to react to the pun; we are required by convention to ignore such transgressions. [In other words, it's okay to HISS!]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 6:24 PM
spitfire.. as in one of thsoe low to the ground rat trap cars?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 6:24 PM
spitfire.. as in one of thsoe low to the ground rat trap cars?
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 7:39 PM
Oh, come on skeets, it wasn't all THAT bad. Was it? And it was made in total innocence, as Mook had said that she hissed at me on another thread; that is what I was refering to (more or less).
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 7:39 PM
Oh, come on skeets, it wasn't all THAT bad. Was it? And it was made in total innocence, as Mook had said that she hissed at me on another thread; that is what I was refering to (more or less).
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 10:33 PM
I will lend him the shovel, skeets can get him a pickaxe, and joe and matt can bring the hoe.
Wonder how deep he will dig himself in?
Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, October 1, 2003 10:33 PM
I will lend him the shovel, skeets can get him a pickaxe, and joe and matt can bring the hoe.
Wonder how deep he will dig himself in?
Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, October 2, 2003 6:12 AM
Zardoz - you need to "patch" things up with Mookie!

Kevin - instead of a small car, I was thinking more of a fiery, green-eyed woman with a soft touch and sharp claws..... for bigger rats!

This is almost too much even for the Mook!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, October 2, 2003 6:12 AM
Zardoz - you need to "patch" things up with Mookie!

Kevin - instead of a small car, I was thinking more of a fiery, green-eyed woman with a soft touch and sharp claws..... for bigger rats!

This is almost too much even for the Mook!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, October 2, 2003 10:17 AM
Ed - Perhaps you could lend me a backhoe.

Or course, a hoe by any other name would not work as well. Or smell as sweet.

And I am not refering to any particular hoe, just hoes in general.

I think I need some sleep.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, October 2, 2003 10:17 AM
Ed - Perhaps you could lend me a backhoe.

Or course, a hoe by any other name would not work as well. Or smell as sweet.

And I am not refering to any particular hoe, just hoes in general.

I think I need some sleep.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, October 2, 2003 10:31 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by zardoz

Ed - Perhaps you could lend me a backhoe.

Or course, a hoe by any other name would not work as well. Or smell as sweet.

And I am not refering to any particular hoe, just hoes in general.

I think I need some sleep.
[:D] I have tears in my eyes!

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, October 2, 2003 10:31 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by zardoz

Ed - Perhaps you could lend me a backhoe.

Or course, a hoe by any other name would not work as well. Or smell as sweet.

And I am not refering to any particular hoe, just hoes in general.

I think I need some sleep.
[:D] I have tears in my eyes!

Mookie

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, October 2, 2003 10:39 AM
Mookie -

Please forgive me.
Absolve me of my sins.
I ask for clemency.
I plead for pity.
I beg for mercy.
I request absolution.
I hope for exoneration.
I anticipate your leniency.
I crave forgiveness.
I anticipate compassion.
I wish for a reprieve.
I need a pardon.
I desire liberation.
I beseech you, grant me freedom.
Give me liberty, or give me death!
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, October 2, 2003 10:39 AM
Mookie -

Please forgive me.
Absolve me of my sins.
I ask for clemency.
I plead for pity.
I beg for mercy.
I request absolution.
I hope for exoneration.
I anticipate your leniency.
I crave forgiveness.
I anticipate compassion.
I wish for a reprieve.
I need a pardon.
I desire liberation.
I beseech you, grant me freedom.
Give me liberty, or give me death!
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, October 2, 2003 12:02 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by zardoz

Mookie -

Please forgive me.
Absolve me of my sins.
I ask for clemency.
I plead for pity.
I beg for mercy.
I request absolution.
I hope for exoneration.
I anticipate your leniency.
I crave forgiveness.
I anticipate compassion.
I wish for a reprieve.
I need a pardon.
I desire liberation.
I beseech you, grant me freedom.
Give me liberty, or give me death!
I can't do anything - I am laughing to hard!

Moo

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, October 2, 2003 12:02 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by zardoz

Mookie -

Please forgive me.
Absolve me of my sins.
I ask for clemency.
I plead for pity.
I beg for mercy.
I request absolution.
I hope for exoneration.
I anticipate your leniency.
I crave forgiveness.
I anticipate compassion.
I wish for a reprieve.
I need a pardon.
I desire liberation.
I beseech you, grant me freedom.
Give me liberty, or give me death!
I can't do anything - I am laughing to hard!

Moo

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Thursday, October 2, 2003 6:15 PM
Hark, what light in yonder tunnel shines, thy fair train yonder be.


Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Thursday, October 2, 2003 6:15 PM
Hark, what light in yonder tunnel shines, thy fair train yonder be.


Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 2, 2003 8:43 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by zardoz

Mookie -

Please forgive me.
Absolve me of my sins.
I ask for clemency.
I plead for pity.
I beg for mercy.
I request absolution.
I hope for exoneration.
I anticipate your leniency.
I crave forgiveness.
I anticipate compassion.
I wish for a reprieve.
I need a pardon.
I desire liberation.
I beseech you, grant me freedom.
Give me liberty, or give me death!
Until the NEXT time, Z! 8^(
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 2, 2003 8:43 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by zardoz

Mookie -

Please forgive me.
Absolve me of my sins.
I ask for clemency.
I plead for pity.
I beg for mercy.
I request absolution.
I hope for exoneration.
I anticipate your leniency.
I crave forgiveness.
I anticipate compassion.
I wish for a reprieve.
I need a pardon.
I desire liberation.
I beseech you, grant me freedom.
Give me liberty, or give me death!
Until the NEXT time, Z! 8^(

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy