TheAntiGates wrote: solzrules wrote: Yeah but that was a great movie!!!!! Sure fire ways to incite a riot:1) drive through a trailer park, diss'n Walmart2) Start a thread here about the Milwaukee Road3) CSX paint your bridge(s)!(last one edited to avoid offending young eyes)
solzrules wrote: Yeah but that was a great movie!!!!!
Yeah but that was a great movie!!!!!
Those are a riot! So far can't dissagree with anything AG has said, Wally World sux, and IS bad for America...just creating generations of cheap crap junkies
Quality? Whats that?
edit PS: AG I'm really curious now about that last one...
Have fun with your trains
vsmith wrote: TheAntiGates wrote: solzrules wrote: Yeah but that was a great movie!!!!! Sure fire ways to incite a riot:1) drive through a trailer park, diss'n Walmart2) Start a thread here about the Milwaukee Road3) CSX paint your bridge(s)!(last one edited to avoid offending young eyes) Those are a riot! So far can't dissagree with anything AG has said, Wally World sux, and IS bad for America...just creating generations of cheap crap junkies Quality? Whats that? edit PS: AG I'm really curious now about that last one...
So is that the only reason you guys hate Wal-Mart? They sell cheap crap? What if you are of limited income and all you can afford is cheap crap? Wal-Mart is the best store in the world in that scenario. I still don't see how a store that makes things affordable for low-income people is such a terrible thing. If the biggest reason is that they are non-union and sell cheap crap, then they must have a really good thing going on. If they pay their workers so poorly (according to the unions) than why is it so many people are applying there?
vsmith wrote: So far can't dissagree with anything AG has said, Wally World sux, and IS bad for America...just creating generations of cheap crap junkies Quality? Whats that? edit PS: AG I'm really curious now about that last one...
....Walmart....I really don't know what will be the long term benefit or detriment to our general buying public....Too early yet to tell. They sure are getting bigger each year....One of the largest co's {maybe the largest}, in America.
It does displace local businesses that were established in our local towns.
The products they sell for the most part is benefitting {China}, and other countries and not much for manufactures in our country.
Don't know how the quality issue is going to sort out overall....
Of course people flock to W M for employment....Our manufacturing base is slipping out of the country month by month, year by year...People have to go somewhere for their employment.
And now....with their super stores that include grocery stores...the assault has begun on grocery chains, not to mention all the marginal smaller stores in nearby towns, etc. We have a rather large {somewhat local chain}, that started in Muncie but branched out to wider areas and now they are in economic trouble and most likely will be sold and possibly broken up into pieces and who knows what the end result will be.
Just my contributing
Quentin
TheAntiGates wrote: while I get a good week (+/-) out of each roll.
while I get a good week (+/-) out of each roll.
I am so tempted.......you left yourself open to a barrage of witty repartee!
However, since it is Sunday.....
TheAntiGates wrote: vsmith wrote: So far can't dissagree with anything AG has said, Wally World sux, and IS bad for America...just creating generations of cheap crap junkies Quality? Whats that? edit PS: AG I'm really curious now about that last one... I can see the argument Solzrules wants to make, "if consumers are buying it, why blame Walmart for meeting their needs?" (or something along those lines, seems to be the way the Walmart appologists usually arrange their position)And while there is more validity than not to that argument, I give Walmart credit (the blame in other words) for pioneering in that field, I think they have made that paradigm work, to the extent their competitors have but 2 choices, get buried, or follow suit.The demon (such as the case may be) is "the walmart mentality" . And as the name would indicate, the parental lineage is pretty obvious.Now, most places you go, you find 2 things, cheap walmart like merchandise, and Americans who used to work in manufacturing.That last picture btw actually has Walmart suing the source. I guess that even the great goliath has seen the imperative to circle the wagons.Whether that means I'm Walmartophobic, or Walmartmisic remains to be proven...
If a store comes in (putting on my Wal-Mart apologist hat here....hee hee hee) and undercuts the competition by underpricing their products who is that hurting exactly? It sure doesn't hurt me! It sure doesn't hurt those on a low income budget either. (Isn't that the same group of people the democrats are 'for'?) The only people they are hurting is the stores that were selling their products at a higher price, right? But isn't that the joy of our captialist economy? I can tell you for certain that somebody growing their business by out-selling and out-pricing the competition is not exclusive to Wal-Mart. Business have been doing that for hundreds (thousands?) of years. In a free market, there isn't anything wrong with that. Just like there isn't anything wrong with you chosing not to shop there. That's your business. If Wal-Mart wants to sell a lot of stuff at low prices to a lot of people and make some money while they are at it isn't that their business? Yes they buy their products from China, but according to the pro-union propaganda telling me what car I should buy to support the American worker most of our atuomobiles are from foregin countries as well. I think that is just the nature of the game.
If somebody has the extra cash to spend living out their ideals and philosophy, hey that's great! More power to ya, brother! Fight the power! But if these businesses benefit people who do not have the luxury of extra money, I really don't think they should be made to feel bad for shopping at a store that can provide them with the cheapest everyday items.
As for the decline of American manufacturing, why not ask our union friends why that is happening? I guess some companies found out the hard way that you can pay someone in Mexico 2 dollars a day to punch a button instead of paying a guy 90,000 dollars a year to punch a button here in the USA. If you don't believe me, read up on the Delphi-GM fiasco. That is a direct result of overpriced-underworked people burying a company. Unions are not bad, but they can take on the heir of a large, greedy company. The same companies (such as Wal-Mart) they are supposed to be against.
zardoz wrote:I am so tempted.......you left yourself open to a barrage of witty repartee! However, since it is Sunday.....
solzrules wrote:If somebody has the extra cash to spend living out their ideals and philosophy, hey that's great! More power to ya, brother! Fight the power! But if these businesses benefit people who do not have the luxury of extra money, I really don't think they should be made to feel bad for shopping at a store that can provide them with the cheapest everyday items. .
.
alcodave wrote:While shopping at Walmart tonight i discovered a new train related toy. Unfortunatly this toy represents a negative part of railroading. The toy im talking about is a series of railcars covered in graffiti,
While shopping at Walmart tonight i discovered a new train related toy. Unfortunatly this toy represents a negative part of railroading. The toy im talking about is a series of railcars covered in graffiti,
TheAntiGates wrote: solzrules wrote: If somebody has the extra cash to spend living out their ideals and philosophy, hey that's great! More power to ya, brother! Fight the power! But if these businesses benefit people who do not have the luxury of extra money, I really don't think they should be made to feel bad for shopping at a store that can provide them with the cheapest everyday items. . See, there in is the TRUE beauty of America, You have the right to be wrong, and I'd defend to the death your right to feel that way. Appology accepted.
solzrules wrote: If somebody has the extra cash to spend living out their ideals and philosophy, hey that's great! More power to ya, brother! Fight the power! But if these businesses benefit people who do not have the luxury of extra money, I really don't think they should be made to feel bad for shopping at a store that can provide them with the cheapest everyday items. .
But I didn't apologize I just ........oh wait. Saracsm. I get it now....
Well anyhoo, I need to go use the bathroom with my cheap wal mart toilet paper that was probably made by gay chinese-mexicans in India who were whipped wile making 80 cents a year. At least I can smile and think about all the money I saved!!!!!!
It be such a nice day out I think I shall chase a few trains around the great state of WI.
Awhile back I read an article that claimed Walmart was bad because they have pay low wages and have poor benefits. It claimed a study proved that they were a burden on the enonomy and the government because their employees need goverment assistance to survive.
Nonsense!
The alternatives for most of their employees are is job with lower pay and benefits if they can find one. In my area there are two Walmart superstores. It is overall a low income, high unemployment area. One benifit of living hear is that it is less expensive than more affulent areas 40-50 miles away. Many employees are older people suplimenting their income, others are young people just starting out and a few are people who made a mess out of their lives and are trying to straighten up. If it wern't for Walmart they would have had to commute or leave the area to find a steady job (which probably would, at best, only pay as well as Walmart).
Cheap products?
Most Walmart products are not cheap. Most are the same brands and models sold at other stores.
When I bought a digital camera a few years ago, I could have gotten it at Walmart, but found it for less, on the internet, from a New York Camera store.
Their groceries and sundries are the same brands as other stores sale (usually at a higher price). Even so no grocery stores or supermarkets , in the area, have closed since the Walmart superstores opened.
I recently bought a bedroom dresser and table (assemble yourself). They are sturdy and atractive BTW, They were maufactured in the USA.
Because of Walmart and other businesses (many national names) locating near Walmart, hundreds of new jobs have been created in my community.
I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.
I don't have a leg to stand on.
It's about pricing.... I do my grocery shopping, mostly, at my local SuperTarget... why? Because my grocery dollar goes about 30 to 35% farther there... Simple price comparison.... When a box of cereal, is 4.99 at my local Jewel (large chain grocery store in Chicago, employing union workers) regular price and the same box of cereal is 2.54 (regular price) at Super Target, guess where I am going?? Super Target sells many national brands at prices 10 to 40% lower than my local Jewel. So, for most of my groceries (except deli meats, Jewel has better meats) I am going to Super Target....
But, so far, the Jewel hasn't shut it's doors... so I guess there is room for both in this market. But, I am going where my dollar goes farther, period.
My problem with Wal-Mart, is the fact that they have so much for such low prices...I wind up spending more than I planned on.... But, in all seriousness. I am not a big fan of Wal-Mart either, but, over by me, the store is clean, the prices are low.... and, well... that decides it.
TheAntiGates wrote:One can only wonder how many of those poor low income people who can only afford to shop at walmart, are in fact poor because their previous job manufacturing store merchandise, was offshored? a self feeding decline in action.
Where I live virtually none. We were once a manufacturing and shipping center, but those jobs disappeared when the California gold rush ended. In the economy, nothing is forever..
DSchmitt wrote: We were once a manufacturing and shipping center, but those jobs disappeared when the California gold rush ended.
We were once a manufacturing and shipping center, but those jobs disappeared when the California gold rush ended.
The charge that Walmart is responsible for all the outsourcing is a red herring. Manufacturing goes offshore because trade policies let it. Jobs will continue to go to China and India until their cost of overhead rises to equilibrium with ours. Because they have so many more people than we do, that equalization is a long way off. It's far enough off to give time for all U.S. manufacturing to go there. Businesses have no choice. If your competitor goes to China, you have to go there or somewhere equivalent. It's not just manufacturing assembly and production jobs being lost. Engineering and design jobs are flying out the door as well.
The controversy over Walmart is entirely political. It's run by conservatives and is non-union, so liberals hate it. Everybody who hates Walmart is not liberal, but all liberals hate Walmart. It's a fashion. With the exception of oil companies, Walmart is the most un-politically correct company. (The most P.C. company is Google). But I don't want to get too political here.
...When we finally reach a point where people of all stripes find their employement headed for the far east, etc....and we start reaching a point our populous can't afford even the "Walmarts" of the business world and it starts to affect Conservitives as well.....Then I wonder what will be the next move.....
Not a good thought to have much of our miltiary electronics and various other hardware supply from abroad either....Much of our manufacturing having moved off shore in my way of thinking is not putting us {America}, in a comfortable position.
Modelcar wrote: Not a good thought to have much of our miltiary electronics and various other hardware supply from abroad either....
Not a good thought to have much of our miltiary electronics and various other hardware supply from abroad either....
Brian (IA) http://blhanel.rrpicturearchives.net.
Modelcar wrote:...Perhaps you missed the announcement not too long ago of our military giving a contract to an offshore facility to supply some high tech helicopters for us.....
And that is a bit of circular reasoning don't you think? They are poor because Wal-Mart drove their former employers overseas and now they have to shop at Wal-Mart?
Actually, Wal-Mart started their coporate tyrannical quest for profits in the eighties and perfected it in the nineties right? Most heavy industry and manufacturing began their flight from the cities in the mid to late seventies (the Milwaukee Road fell victim to this). I don't think Wal-Mart even existed in the seventies.
Not only that, it seems to me that Wal-Mart is actually a pretty big customer of the railroads, aren't they?
solzrules wrote: Most heavy industry and manufacturing began their flight from the cities in the mid to late seventies Not only that, it seems to me that Wal-Mart is actually a pretty big customer of the railroads, aren't they?
Most heavy industry and manufacturing began their flight from the cities in the mid to late seventies
TheAntiGates wrote:Maybe I should review all my purchases, and cut out the items transported by CSX, until they pull their heads out of their collective rears and paint some bridges?
But........if CSX bought their "krappe", cheap paint at Walmart, maybe they could afford to paint those bridges?
Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
TheAntiGates wrote:From the cities? Are you trying to play some "pizz him off and hope he trips himself up wrestling with semantics" playground game here?That's an interesting choice of wording there. Yeah it's the factories moving to old mcdonalds farm that bothers me.
No I gave up on that game a while ago.
Many of the factories in the city that I am referring to (Milwaukee) went out of business in the 70's due to un-competitive labor practices. Others left for the union free areas of the state, and when the taxes caught up with them they left for me-hi-co. The ones that survived to this day survive only because they own or contract with companies overseas to do a big chunk of their manufacturing. One example is Allen-Bradly. They started in Milwaukee in the 1920's (I think). Today they do most of their R and D and administration in Wisconsin, but the majority of their manufacturing is in Mexico and China. There is a small amount of production in their original facility downtown, but not what there used to be. It is a similar situation with A.O. Smith. Their coporate offices are here but their manufacturing is in Mexico. They did this to remain competitive. And the only way to be competitive and survive is to make profits.
I dunno about you, but among my friends who lost their jobs to outsourcing, the vast lions share lost their jobs in the 90's
I am not familiar with the situation of your friends, I am only referring to my limited knowledge of Milwaukee's history. What were your friends involved in?
As far as Walmart being a big customer of the railroads.....so? Is that supposed to influence where I buy my toothpaste?Maybe I should review all my purchases, and cut out the items transported by CSX, until they pull their heads out of their collective rears and paint some bridges?
No, Wal-Mart's use of the RR's wouldn't affect my shopping there, either. But think of all the work that moving Wal-Mart's merchandise from China to distribution centers in the US is giving to unionized RR workers and teamsters? Think of the jobs that the dock workers are getting and the longshoremen. These are all high paying union jobs. So were one industry suffers and downsizes another industry expands and hires. Being that the railroads are benefitting from increased intermodal and freight in general, I think it is great! There isn't a better time to watch trains. When manufacturing left this country the RR's suffered, but now that we are buying Chinese goods like they are going out of style the railroads are having a field day. Boo-ya! Okay, I go to bed now.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.