Trains.com

PRR Madison Hill

20291 views
40 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2008
  • 1,243 posts
Posted by Sunnyland on Wednesday, August 10, 2016 12:01 PM

Never heard of this Hill, sounds like another steep one.  Friends and I recently returned from trip to NC and stopped at Saluda Grade, which is no longer used, and saw pics in museum of wrecks on that hill.  We also saw Old Fort Loops which is used, NS train had just come off the loops when we saw it. And #611 used it on recent excursion. 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 45 posts
Posted by CHIPSTRAINS on Monday, August 1, 2016 4:06 PM

The "Hill" is still there, and the tracks are rusty, [as of last week]... The" Madison Hill", is in Madison Indiana, and runs along Ind. Rt. 7 down the hill. They used to serve an old "SHELL OIL" place along the "Ohio River" along with several other industries along the river. I used to live about 49 miles away, and remember the old "SD7"s that worked that hill. Once they switched "Madison  Grocery" they would head down the hill.

 

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Monday, July 25, 2016 10:40 PM

tree68

 

 
NP Eddie
So, what were vacuum booster brakes?

 

Likely a variation on the Eames Vacuum Brake.  Eames was located in Watertown, NY and was purchased in total by New York Air Brake.

 

  The Vacuum Booster brake was a precursor to air brakes, and as tree68 indicated, they were mfg in Watertown,NY.. Company was founded in 1890.        See link  @   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Air_Brake

I am unsure of the reference to Vacuum Booster brake in the comment about the PRR's Madison Hill Incline; The only thing it might refer to(?) is possibly the braking on the steam engines used on the 'Hill' : some 0-8-0's, the Reuben Wells (an 0-8-0, later rebuilt as a 0-10-0 ). Or possibly a very early diesel that might have been used there at some time?

CatFood Flambe added the following: "...The government facility is/was the Jefferson Proving Ground, built during WWII to test primarily artillery ordiance.    It's now an industrial park - I don't beleive they have any active shippers or consignees in the park, but the rail line is making a very nice income on car storage.  

The Indiana Railroad Bull Session site has an active thread on the railroad happening that includes just about anything you'd like to know about the line - it's a great bunch of folks.  { Note: this linked site has quite a few comments and a number of photos of the Madison Hill Incline; as well as the Jefferson Proving Grounds property at the top of the Incline...}

http://indianarailroads.org/board/index.php?topic=3531.0 

Link to page 1 of several pages on that Forum.

And this from a previous Post :

"...Reference: TRAINS, July 1962{ The Issue with the W&A "General" on the cover].

     "America's Steepest Railroad: Pennsy's Madison Hill takes honors at 5.89 percent" Elmer G.Sulzer

7012 ft of track, climbs 412ft for a grade of 5.89%. The Madison & Indianapolis RR, 1st in Indiana, was plotted to go straight without tangents, the inclined plain was completed in 1841. was completed with State money by the State which transferred the line to the M&I organized Feb. 03,1843. First train to Indianapolis ran Oct. 1,1847. The State had laid rails rolled in Wales[England] 45# , in 15'9" and 18' lengths between Madison and Griffith's[ Queensland].The balance laid by the M&I to Indianapolis was strap rails..."

"...On Nov.9,1953 two EMD's took over, #8588 and 8589, C-C type, weighted to 360,000# each.Equipped with railwashing devices, wheel slip controls and automatic sanding systems, and dynamic brakes, They were referred to as the "Cadilacs". Train limit was 15 cars, gross weight 350 tons, exclusive of the engine weight..."

P.S. My understanding that the Two SD units 8858 and 8859 were eventually sold to the TRRA of St. Louis, after being disposed of in the aftermath of the Conrail/PC merger(?)

 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Monday, July 25, 2016 8:16 PM

NP Eddie
So, what were vacuum booster brakes?

Likely a variation on the Eames Vacuum Brake.  Eames was located in Watertown, NY and was purchased in total by New York Air Brake.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 267 posts
Posted by CatFoodFlambe on Monday, July 25, 2016 8:15 PM

The government facility is/was the Jefferson Proving Ground, built during WWII to test primarily artillery ordiance.    It's now an industrial park - I don't beleive they have any active shippers or consignees in the park, but the rail line is making a very nice income on car storage.  

The Indiana Railroad Bull Session site has an active thread on the railroad happening that includes just about anything you'd like to know about the line - it's a great bunch of folks.

http://indianarailroads.org/board/index.php?topic=3531.0

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • 1,002 posts
Posted by NP Eddie on Monday, July 25, 2016 7:34 PM

ALL:

Is the Madison, Ind. hill track still used or has it been taken up? Is it a trail?

I remember reading an ICC accident report (can't locate it) about an accident on that line involving a steam engine. That engine had vacuum booster brakes. So, what were vacuum booster brakes?

Ed Burns

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Monday, March 14, 2016 7:22 PM

rrnut282

Something that story never explained (at least so I could understand it, anyway) is HOW did the engineer recover without dynamic brakes after the conductor "big holed"  the air.  As they gained speed, the time to the bottom was significantly shorter than the time it would normally take to recharge the air.

 

   I may not remember correctly, but I think with the brakes in emergency, the wheels had locked up and were sliding.   The engineer radioed the conductor to close the air, and he was able to regain control of the train with service application of the brakes.  Like I said, I may not remember correctly, or I may be confusing this incident with another story.

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 45 posts
Posted by CHIPSTRAINS on Monday, March 14, 2016 5:47 PM
TRAINS MAGAZINE, OR CLASSIC TRAINS HAD AN ARTICLE ON THIS NEAR TRAGEDY. THEY SENT A N Y C SD7 W/O DYNAMICS TO DO THE REPLACEMENT. LUCKILY NO ONE WAS KILLED OR INJURED
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 45 posts
Posted by CHIPSTRAINS on Monday, March 14, 2016 5:17 PM
TRAINS OR CLASSIC TRAINS HAD A STORY ON THE SD7 THEY SENT . ALMOST A TRAGEDY. BELIEVE IT WAS A N Y C UNIT, W/O DYNAMIC BRAKES.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: WSOR Northern Div.
  • 1,559 posts
Posted by WSOR 3801 on Friday, August 14, 2009 1:48 AM

 

rrnut282
Something that story never explained (at least so I could understand it, anyway) is HOW did the engineer recover without dynamic brakes after the conductor "big holed"  the air.  As they gained speed, the time to the bottom was significantly shorter than the time it would normally take to recharge the air.

I'm not quite sure either.  Older air systems worked different than what I am used to, and the emergency was from the rear end, not the engine.  Probably no PCS on the engine either.  Maybe the engine just kept pumping into the trainline... 

Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Tuesday, August 11, 2009 6:31 PM

Something that story never explained (at least so I could understand it, anyway) is HOW did the engineer recover without dynamic brakes after the conductor "big holed"  the air.  As they gained speed, the time to the bottom was significantly shorter than the time it would normally take to recharge the air.

Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:03 AM

Cheviot Hill
I thought there was a story about it somewhere that I read once. You wouldn't happen to know what trains edition that it was in would you?

Got it !! 

Selected Railroad Reading: Is this Train in emergency?
Trains, April 2001 page 58
Runaway, kind of, on Madison Hill
( "CLARK, WARNER J.", INDIANA, PC, REMINISCENCE, TRN )

- PDN.

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:00 AM

I remember that story, too.  I looked in the ''Index to Magazines'' at the bottom of the page / below last night, but couldn't find it that way.  If I run across it and remember, I'll post it here - if no one else does so first.

- PDN.

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: Bloom County
  • 390 posts
Posted by potlatcher on Tuesday, August 11, 2009 9:45 AM

phbrown

You want the firebox at the low end of the boiler.  You can pump water from the tender into the boiler (locomotives did so anyway), but the boiler doesn't have internal baffles to keep the water from sloshing end-to-end.  So if the firebox is at the high end of the boiler, the water tends to run down to the other end of the boiler, potentially causing the crown sheet (top of the firebox) to be above the water level.  Since the fire's hot enough to make the crown sheet fail if there's no water on it, and failure of the crown sheet means a catastrophic boiler explosion—well, you get the picture.

If you keep the nose of the engine pointed uphill, you avoid that problem.

Hope this helps!

Peace,
—Peter

Wow, that makes perfect sense.  Like I said, I don't know much about steam, but now I know a little more.  Thanks Peter!

Tom

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 21 posts
Posted by phbrown on Monday, August 10, 2009 7:41 PM

You want the firebox at the low end of the boiler.  You can pump water from the tender into the boiler (locomotives did so anyway), but the boiler doesn't have internal baffles to keep the water from sloshing end-to-end.  So if the firebox is at the high end of the boiler, the water tends to run down to the other end of the boiler, potentially causing the crown sheet (top of the firebox) to be above the water level.  Since the fire's hot enough to make the crown sheet fail if there's no water on it, and failure of the crown sheet means a catastrophic boiler explosion—well, you get the picture.

If you keep the nose of the engine pointed uphill, you avoid that problem.

Hope this helps!

Peace,
—Peter

  • Member since
    August 2009
  • 3 posts
Posted by PRRrailfan on Monday, August 10, 2009 6:50 PM

 

Locomotives 8588 and 8589 were specially built SD-7 locomotives built for use on the Madison grade.  Only one was used at a time, and the other worked the hump at Hawthorne yard when not at Madison grade.  Pennsy shops added the rail washers to clean the leaves and other debris off the rails when pulling uphill.  Because of the severe grade, special rules applied to operation on this section of track.  I doubt that any regular SD-7 operated on this grade, since Pennsy did not own any other SD-7's although they had 25 SD-9 locomotives.  For more details, see an article by Dan Davidson in Vol 4, No 1 Buckeye Chapter of PRRTHS newsletter.  
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Monday, August 10, 2009 5:09 PM

potlatcher

ndbprr
Before the SD-7s the PRR used 2-8-0s that were required to back down the hill to keep water on the crown sheet.

I don't know a whole lot about steam locomotives, but wouldn't the steam engine need to run backwards UP the hill to keep water on the crown sheet?  That way the water level in the tender stays above the crown sheet.

Just curious whether I'm missing something here.

Tom

 

I do not know which way they ran but here is a link I posted a couple messages before. Read about one loco after the Wells that exploded. My understanding is they pushed using the front of the loco. It was up to the engineer to keep enough water in the boiler.

http://www.oldmadison.com/madview2.html

Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: Bloom County
  • 390 posts
Posted by potlatcher on Monday, August 10, 2009 4:42 PM

ndbprr
Before the SD-7s the PRR used 2-8-0s that were required to back down the hill to keep water on the crown sheet.

I don't know a whole lot about steam locomotives, but wouldn't the steam engine need to run backwards UP the hill to keep water on the crown sheet?  That way the water level in the tender stays above the crown sheet.

Just curious whether I'm missing something here.

Tom

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Sunday, August 9, 2009 5:49 PM

Murphy Siding
  Cheviot Hill wrote:
  neil300 wrote:
Can anyone fill me in about this? I know the the Pennsy had two SD specially built for the grade and that it was 5.71% if I remember correctly. But where is it and is someone still using it?

 

Yes there were 2 SD7s 6998 and 6999 (class ER15ax, with 65:12 gear ratios, six cylinder compressors, and rail washers with heaters). To my knowledge, the line has not been used in almost 30 years. The 1.3 mile hill still has the track in place. There was some talk of the City of Madison restoring the line for a tourist attraction, within the last few years, but quickly dropped those plans when they realized what it would cost. Side note. The steam engine that ran on that hill still survives. It's at the Indianapolis Childrens Musium on display. It's name escapes me now.

 

 

     What's a rail washer?  For traction, wouldn't you want the rails to be sanded?

IIRC in such instances, rail washers are utilized to wash grease and oil, etc. off the rails...then sand is applied and together those two operations maximize adhesion.
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,264 posts
Posted by CAZEPHYR on Sunday, August 9, 2009 5:05 PM

 

Murphy Siding
  Cheviot Hill wrote:

 

  neil300 wrote:
Can anyone fill me in about this? I know the the Pennsy had two SD specially built for the grade and that it was 5.71% if I remember correctly. But where is it and is someone still using it?

Yes there were 2 SD7s 6998 and 6999 (class ER15ax, with 65:12 gear ratios, six cylinder compressors, and rail washers with heaters). To my knowledge, the line has not been used in almost 30 years. The 1.3 mile hill still has the track in place. There was some talk of the City of Madison restoring the line for a tourist attraction, within the last few years, but quickly dropped those plans when they realized what it would cost. Side note. The steam engine that ran on that hill still survives. It's at the Indianapolis Childrens Musium on display. It's name escapes me now.

 

     What's a rail washer?  For traction, wouldn't you want the rails to be sanded?

 

The rail washer is used on the rear of the engine behind the drive wheels to remove the sand and allow the cars to roll better.   Yes, you would probably need a lot of sand under the driving wheels and a rail washer to remove the sand. 

CZ

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Sunday, August 9, 2009 4:18 PM

rrnut282
IIRC, It's called the Reuben Wells.  My kids are older now, so it's been a few years since I visited the museum.

 

Here is a link to the Wells and the "Hill". Before the Wells, there was a rack for a few years but the Wells was not a rack loco. I wonder how much wood the Wells used when working?

http://www.oldmadison.com/madview2.html

Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Cincinnati, OH
  • 174 posts
Posted by Cheviot Hill on Monday, August 14, 2006 10:06 PM
I thought there was a story about it somewhere that I read once. You wouldn't happen to know what trains edition that it was in would you?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 14, 2006 3:35 PM
 Cheviot Hill wrote:

Yes it is. The sound effects were pretty lame too. My oldest daughter had nightmares about the engine. I still kid her about it.

Has anybody heard of the story about those 2 SD7s? From what I remember, when one or both of those engines were getting shopped, they sent a normal geared SD7 to operate the hill. I don't think it went off the tracks but it was sure one hell of an adventure for the crew. Does anybody know of the story?

They had that story in the RR readind section of Trains a few years back. I said that the locos had been shopped at an ex-NYC shop and they removed any "foreign components", or anything that the others didn't have. So it came back to the hill with no d/b so it almost ran away.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: indiana
  • 792 posts
Posted by joseph2 on Friday, August 11, 2006 10:40 PM
Rail washers were used to get leaves off of the track,wet leaves are slippery.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 11, 2006 8:28 PM
The Madison depot is still in use as the local historical society's museum. Lot's of RR stuff there. Madison is a neat town in its own right. There is a restored saddle tree factory in town also. The tracks are still there on the incline (awsome!) but are not connected at the top.

After Conrail, those 2 SD7s were used as hump pushers at Allentown PA.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 10:12 PM

 neil300 wrote:
Can anyone fill me in about this? I know the the Pennsy had two SD specially built for the grade and that it was 5.71% if I remember correctly. But where is it and is someone still using it?

Reference: TRAINS, July 1962{ The Issue with the W&A "General" on the cover].

     "America's Steepest Railroad: Pennsy's Madison Hill takes honors at 5.89 percent" Elmer G.Sulzer

7012 ft of track, climbs 412ft for a grade of 5.89%. The Madison & Indianapolis RR, 1st in Indiana, was plotted to go straight without tangents, the inclined plain was completed in 1841. was completed with State money by the State which transferred the line to the M&I organized Feb. 03,1843. First train to Indianapolis ran Oct. 1,1847. The State had laid rails rolled in Wales[England] 45# , in 15'9" and 18' lengths between Madison and Griffith's[ Queensland].The balance laid by the M&I to Indianapolis was strap rails.

 Original transit uphill was with eight horses in four teams attached to one wagon. Down grade was by gravity drop, speed controlled by hand brakes, a practice that is reported to have continued until 1880.  Apparently the one accident is reported to have been a runaway of several wagons of hogs destined for slaughter in a packing house in Madison, were drowned in the Ohio River, when the runaway failed to make the curve at the bottom of the grade and went into the river. Somewhat delaying their eventual arrival and processing at the packing house at Madison.

 "The first successful steam engine on the encline was the MC Bright[0-8-0 type] built by Baldwin. 5 cylinders, 2 inclined 15.5"x20" to power eight 42" Driving wheels. 2 cylinders 17"x18" placed verticall over the boiler, midway between the firebox and the smokebox, the connecting rods worked by these cylinders joined with cranks on a shaft under the boiler, thgis shaft carried a single cog wheel which engaged another of about twice its diameter on a second shaft adjacent to it , and in the same plane. The cog wheel on this latter shaft worked in a rackrail placed in the center of the track. The fifth cylinder by means of a Rube Goldberg rrangement, raised and lowered the cog wheel that engaged the rackrail." This arrangement was used from 1848 to 1868.

The Reuben Wells was originally built as an 0-8-0, JM&I #645 was rebuilt as an 0-10-0, in 1910 another 0-8-0 was added to assist the Reuben Wells.

On Nov.9,1953 two EMD's took over, #8588 and 8589, C-C type, weighted to 360,000# each.Equipped with railwashing devices, wheel slip controls and automatic sanding systems, and dynamic brakes, They were referred to as the "Cadilacs". Train limit was 15 cars, gross weight 350 tons, exclusive of the engine weight.

The information is as reported in Sulzer's article. E-mail me if there is any other info desired.

 

 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 9:50 PM
 Cheviot Hill wrote:

 neil300 wrote:
Can anyone fill me in about this? I know the the Pennsy had two SD specially built for the grade and that it was 5.71% if I remember correctly. But where is it and is someone still using it?

Yes there were 2 SD7s 6998 and 6999 (class ER15ax, with 65:12 gear ratios, six cylinder compressors, and rail washers with heaters). To my knowledge, the line has not been used in almost 30 years. The 1.3 mile hill still has the track in place. There was some talk of the City of Madison restoring the line for a tourist attraction, within the last few years, but quickly dropped those plans when they realized what it would cost. Side note. The steam engine that ran on that hill still survives. It's at the Indianapolis Childrens Musium on display. It's name escapes me now.

     What's a rail washer?  For traction, wouldn't you want the rails to be sanded?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Cincinnati, OH
  • 174 posts
Posted by Cheviot Hill on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 9:13 PM

I hope they changed the gearing.

  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: St. Louis Area, Florrisant to be specific!!!!!!!!!
  • 1,134 posts
Posted by bnsfkline on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 9:07 PM
I don't know the story, but I do know that at least one of the two SD7's survive as a working unit. I believe the 6999 is now TRRA 1751. It was rebuilt by the Manufactures Railway in '99 with a chopped nose, delivered to the TRRA, sent back, they lowered the nose another 6 inches, then redelivered. The unit is not in everyday use, as it is a back up unit, it can be seen sitting in front of the engine house basically anyday, The last time it was used was in October of 2005, right around my Birthday, Saw it leading a transfur to the NS's Luther Yard
Jim Tiroch RIP Saveria DiBlasi - My First True Love and a Great Railfanning Companion Saveria Danielle DiBlasi Feb 5th, 1986 - Nov 4th, 2008 Check em out! My photos that is: http://bnsfkline.rrpicturearchives.net and ALS2001 Productions http://www.youtube.com/ALS2001

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy