Trains.com

PRR Madison Hill

20289 views
40 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
PRR Madison Hill
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 7, 2006 3:51 PM
Can anyone fill me in about this? I know the the Pennsy had two SD specially built for the grade and that it was 5.71% if I remember correctly. But where is it and is someone still using it?
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, August 7, 2006 4:12 PM
....I don't know how well the "search feature" is operating now under this new system but oh...about a year ago we had that subject going rather extensive on here and we brought out a lot of info regarding that "hill"...You might try to find some of that data via the "search".

Quentin

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Monday, August 7, 2006 4:36 PM
5.89%.  I just looked it up.  Madison is on the Ohio river (hence the grade) and is in the southeast portion of Indiana probably 3/4 of the way acrross to Ohio.  Yes it is still operated sporadically and the short line owns both engines.  Before the SD-7s the PRR used 2-8-0s that were required to back down the hill to keep water on the crown sheet.
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Indianapolis, Indiana
  • 2,434 posts
Posted by gabe on Monday, August 7, 2006 5:29 PM

 ndbprr wrote:
5.89%.  I just looked it up.  Madison is on the Ohio river (hence the grade) and is in the southeast portion of Indiana probably 3/4 of the way acrross to Ohio.  Yes it is still operated sporadically and the short line owns both engines.  Before the SD-7s the PRR used 2-8-0s that were required to back down the hill to keep water on the crown sheet.

This is the second time I have heard that the hill is operational.  I do not believe it is.  The tracks look pretty bad.  I have visited it twice, and it truly is an impressive sight.  It is amazing how quickly you are staring at rail level with your head.  I (estimate) it is only about a little over a half mile long though. 

There is a power plant at the bottom of the hill, but it is served via river. 

I am more interested in what industries the line serves in Madison--I assume it serves industries in Madision, as the line looks to be in pretty good shape (for a shortline) until you get to the hill (probably more aptly described as a pit).  But it is far from obvious what industry it serves.

There is a military base nearby, and I have a hunch that is what keeps it in business.  Somebody could tell me about this . . . buy then they would have to kill me . . .

Gabe

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, August 7, 2006 6:11 PM
....Trying to remember...I believe that stretch of railroad was a "cog" railroad at one time....

Quentin

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Louisville,Ky.
  • 5,077 posts
Posted by locomutt on Monday, August 7, 2006 6:50 PM
 gabe wrote:

 ndbprr wrote:
5.89%.  I just looked it up.  Madison is on the Ohio river (hence the grade) and is in the southeast portion of Indiana probably 3/4 of the way acrross to Ohio.  Yes it is still operated sporadically and the short line owns both engines.  Before the SD-7s the PRR used 2-8-0s that were required to back down the hill to keep water on the crown sheet.

This is the second time I have heard that the hill is operational.  I do not believe it is.  The tracks look pretty bad.  I have visited it twice, and it truly is an impressive sight.  It is amazing how quickly you are staring at rail level with your head.  I (estimate) it is only about a little over a half mile long though. 

There is a power plant at the bottom of the hill, but it is served via river. 

I am more interested in what industries the line serves in Madison--I assume it serves industries in Madision, as the line looks to be in pretty good shape (for a shortline) until you get to the hill (probably more aptly described as a pit).  But it is far from obvious what industry it serves.

There is a military base nearby, and I have a hunch that is what keeps it in business.  Somebody could tell me about this . . . buy then they would have to kill me . . .

Gabe



To the best of my knowledge,the "Hill" has not been used for quite a few years;any rail traffic
that comes into Madison,is to North Madison at the top of the hill.

The Military installation in that area is Jefferson Proving Ground and I believe it's close
to being shut down.

Being Crazy,keeps you from going "INSANE" !! "The light at the end of the tunnel,has been turned off due to budget cuts" NOT AFRAID A Vet., and PROUD OF IT!!

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 2,366 posts
Posted by timz on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 6:29 PM

" I (estimate) it is only about a little over a half mile long though."

As I recall it's about 7000 ft long.

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Cincinnati, OH
  • 174 posts
Posted by Cheviot Hill on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 8:03 PM

 neil300 wrote:
Can anyone fill me in about this? I know the the Pennsy had two SD specially built for the grade and that it was 5.71% if I remember correctly. But where is it and is someone still using it?

Yes there were 2 SD7s 6998 and 6999 (class ER15ax, with 65:12 gear ratios, six cylinder compressors, and rail washers with heaters). To my knowledge, the line has not been used in almost 30 years. The 1.3 mile hill still has the track in place. There was some talk of the City of Madison restoring the line for a tourist attraction, within the last few years, but quickly dropped those plans when they realized what it would cost. Side note. The steam engine that ran on that hill still survives. It's at the Indianapolis Childrens Musium on display. It's name escapes me now.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 8:12 PM
IIRC, It's called the Reuben Wells.  My kids are older now, so it's been a few years since I visited the museum.
Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Cincinnati, OH
  • 174 posts
Posted by Cheviot Hill on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 8:19 PM

 rrnut282 wrote:
IIRC, It's called the Reuben Wells.  My kids are older now, so it's been a few years since I visited the museum.

Thats it, the Reuben Wells. I was banging my head against the wall over that one. I was just about ready to look it up on the musium site. Thanks rrnut282!

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 8:37 PM
It was an ugly little thing, too.
Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Cincinnati, OH
  • 174 posts
Posted by Cheviot Hill on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 8:49 PM

Yes it is. The sound effects were pretty lame too. My oldest daughter had nightmares about the engine. I still kid her about it.

Has anybody heard of the story about those 2 SD7s? From what I remember, when one or both of those engines were getting shopped, they sent a normal geared SD7 to operate the hill. I don't think it went off the tracks but it was sure one hell of an adventure for the crew. Does anybody know of the story?

  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: St. Louis Area, Florrisant to be specific!!!!!!!!!
  • 1,134 posts
Posted by bnsfkline on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 9:07 PM
I don't know the story, but I do know that at least one of the two SD7's survive as a working unit. I believe the 6999 is now TRRA 1751. It was rebuilt by the Manufactures Railway in '99 with a chopped nose, delivered to the TRRA, sent back, they lowered the nose another 6 inches, then redelivered. The unit is not in everyday use, as it is a back up unit, it can be seen sitting in front of the engine house basically anyday, The last time it was used was in October of 2005, right around my Birthday, Saw it leading a transfur to the NS's Luther Yard
Jim Tiroch RIP Saveria DiBlasi - My First True Love and a Great Railfanning Companion Saveria Danielle DiBlasi Feb 5th, 1986 - Nov 4th, 2008 Check em out! My photos that is: http://bnsfkline.rrpicturearchives.net and ALS2001 Productions http://www.youtube.com/ALS2001
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Cincinnati, OH
  • 174 posts
Posted by Cheviot Hill on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 9:13 PM

I hope they changed the gearing.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 9:50 PM
 Cheviot Hill wrote:

 neil300 wrote:
Can anyone fill me in about this? I know the the Pennsy had two SD specially built for the grade and that it was 5.71% if I remember correctly. But where is it and is someone still using it?

Yes there were 2 SD7s 6998 and 6999 (class ER15ax, with 65:12 gear ratios, six cylinder compressors, and rail washers with heaters). To my knowledge, the line has not been used in almost 30 years. The 1.3 mile hill still has the track in place. There was some talk of the City of Madison restoring the line for a tourist attraction, within the last few years, but quickly dropped those plans when they realized what it would cost. Side note. The steam engine that ran on that hill still survives. It's at the Indianapolis Childrens Musium on display. It's name escapes me now.

     What's a rail washer?  For traction, wouldn't you want the rails to be sanded?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Wednesday, August 9, 2006 10:12 PM

 neil300 wrote:
Can anyone fill me in about this? I know the the Pennsy had two SD specially built for the grade and that it was 5.71% if I remember correctly. But where is it and is someone still using it?

Reference: TRAINS, July 1962{ The Issue with the W&A "General" on the cover].

     "America's Steepest Railroad: Pennsy's Madison Hill takes honors at 5.89 percent" Elmer G.Sulzer

7012 ft of track, climbs 412ft for a grade of 5.89%. The Madison & Indianapolis RR, 1st in Indiana, was plotted to go straight without tangents, the inclined plain was completed in 1841. was completed with State money by the State which transferred the line to the M&I organized Feb. 03,1843. First train to Indianapolis ran Oct. 1,1847. The State had laid rails rolled in Wales[England] 45# , in 15'9" and 18' lengths between Madison and Griffith's[ Queensland].The balance laid by the M&I to Indianapolis was strap rails.

 Original transit uphill was with eight horses in four teams attached to one wagon. Down grade was by gravity drop, speed controlled by hand brakes, a practice that is reported to have continued until 1880.  Apparently the one accident is reported to have been a runaway of several wagons of hogs destined for slaughter in a packing house in Madison, were drowned in the Ohio River, when the runaway failed to make the curve at the bottom of the grade and went into the river. Somewhat delaying their eventual arrival and processing at the packing house at Madison.

 "The first successful steam engine on the encline was the MC Bright[0-8-0 type] built by Baldwin. 5 cylinders, 2 inclined 15.5"x20" to power eight 42" Driving wheels. 2 cylinders 17"x18" placed verticall over the boiler, midway between the firebox and the smokebox, the connecting rods worked by these cylinders joined with cranks on a shaft under the boiler, thgis shaft carried a single cog wheel which engaged another of about twice its diameter on a second shaft adjacent to it , and in the same plane. The cog wheel on this latter shaft worked in a rackrail placed in the center of the track. The fifth cylinder by means of a Rube Goldberg rrangement, raised and lowered the cog wheel that engaged the rackrail." This arrangement was used from 1848 to 1868.

The Reuben Wells was originally built as an 0-8-0, JM&I #645 was rebuilt as an 0-10-0, in 1910 another 0-8-0 was added to assist the Reuben Wells.

On Nov.9,1953 two EMD's took over, #8588 and 8589, C-C type, weighted to 360,000# each.Equipped with railwashing devices, wheel slip controls and automatic sanding systems, and dynamic brakes, They were referred to as the "Cadilacs". Train limit was 15 cars, gross weight 350 tons, exclusive of the engine weight.

The information is as reported in Sulzer's article. E-mail me if there is any other info desired.

 

 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 11, 2006 8:28 PM
The Madison depot is still in use as the local historical society's museum. Lot's of RR stuff there. Madison is a neat town in its own right. There is a restored saddle tree factory in town also. The tracks are still there on the incline (awsome!) but are not connected at the top.

After Conrail, those 2 SD7s were used as hump pushers at Allentown PA.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: indiana
  • 792 posts
Posted by joseph2 on Friday, August 11, 2006 10:40 PM
Rail washers were used to get leaves off of the track,wet leaves are slippery.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 14, 2006 3:35 PM
 Cheviot Hill wrote:

Yes it is. The sound effects were pretty lame too. My oldest daughter had nightmares about the engine. I still kid her about it.

Has anybody heard of the story about those 2 SD7s? From what I remember, when one or both of those engines were getting shopped, they sent a normal geared SD7 to operate the hill. I don't think it went off the tracks but it was sure one hell of an adventure for the crew. Does anybody know of the story?

They had that story in the RR readind section of Trains a few years back. I said that the locos had been shopped at an ex-NYC shop and they removed any "foreign components", or anything that the others didn't have. So it came back to the hill with no d/b so it almost ran away.

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Cincinnati, OH
  • 174 posts
Posted by Cheviot Hill on Monday, August 14, 2006 10:06 PM
I thought there was a story about it somewhere that I read once. You wouldn't happen to know what trains edition that it was in would you?
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Sunday, August 9, 2009 4:18 PM

rrnut282
IIRC, It's called the Reuben Wells.  My kids are older now, so it's been a few years since I visited the museum.

 

Here is a link to the Wells and the "Hill". Before the Wells, there was a rack for a few years but the Wells was not a rack loco. I wonder how much wood the Wells used when working?

http://www.oldmadison.com/madview2.html

Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,264 posts
Posted by CAZEPHYR on Sunday, August 9, 2009 5:05 PM

 

Murphy Siding
  Cheviot Hill wrote:

 

  neil300 wrote:
Can anyone fill me in about this? I know the the Pennsy had two SD specially built for the grade and that it was 5.71% if I remember correctly. But where is it and is someone still using it?

Yes there were 2 SD7s 6998 and 6999 (class ER15ax, with 65:12 gear ratios, six cylinder compressors, and rail washers with heaters). To my knowledge, the line has not been used in almost 30 years. The 1.3 mile hill still has the track in place. There was some talk of the City of Madison restoring the line for a tourist attraction, within the last few years, but quickly dropped those plans when they realized what it would cost. Side note. The steam engine that ran on that hill still survives. It's at the Indianapolis Childrens Musium on display. It's name escapes me now.

 

     What's a rail washer?  For traction, wouldn't you want the rails to be sanded?

 

The rail washer is used on the rear of the engine behind the drive wheels to remove the sand and allow the cars to roll better.   Yes, you would probably need a lot of sand under the driving wheels and a rail washer to remove the sand. 

CZ

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Sunday, August 9, 2009 5:49 PM

Murphy Siding
  Cheviot Hill wrote:
  neil300 wrote:
Can anyone fill me in about this? I know the the Pennsy had two SD specially built for the grade and that it was 5.71% if I remember correctly. But where is it and is someone still using it?

 

Yes there were 2 SD7s 6998 and 6999 (class ER15ax, with 65:12 gear ratios, six cylinder compressors, and rail washers with heaters). To my knowledge, the line has not been used in almost 30 years. The 1.3 mile hill still has the track in place. There was some talk of the City of Madison restoring the line for a tourist attraction, within the last few years, but quickly dropped those plans when they realized what it would cost. Side note. The steam engine that ran on that hill still survives. It's at the Indianapolis Childrens Musium on display. It's name escapes me now.

 

 

     What's a rail washer?  For traction, wouldn't you want the rails to be sanded?

IIRC in such instances, rail washers are utilized to wash grease and oil, etc. off the rails...then sand is applied and together those two operations maximize adhesion.
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: Bloom County
  • 390 posts
Posted by potlatcher on Monday, August 10, 2009 4:42 PM

ndbprr
Before the SD-7s the PRR used 2-8-0s that were required to back down the hill to keep water on the crown sheet.

I don't know a whole lot about steam locomotives, but wouldn't the steam engine need to run backwards UP the hill to keep water on the crown sheet?  That way the water level in the tender stays above the crown sheet.

Just curious whether I'm missing something here.

Tom

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Monday, August 10, 2009 5:09 PM

potlatcher

ndbprr
Before the SD-7s the PRR used 2-8-0s that were required to back down the hill to keep water on the crown sheet.

I don't know a whole lot about steam locomotives, but wouldn't the steam engine need to run backwards UP the hill to keep water on the crown sheet?  That way the water level in the tender stays above the crown sheet.

Just curious whether I'm missing something here.

Tom

 

I do not know which way they ran but here is a link I posted a couple messages before. Read about one loco after the Wells that exploded. My understanding is they pushed using the front of the loco. It was up to the engineer to keep enough water in the boiler.

http://www.oldmadison.com/madview2.html

Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    August 2009
  • 3 posts
Posted by PRRrailfan on Monday, August 10, 2009 6:50 PM

 

Locomotives 8588 and 8589 were specially built SD-7 locomotives built for use on the Madison grade.  Only one was used at a time, and the other worked the hump at Hawthorne yard when not at Madison grade.  Pennsy shops added the rail washers to clean the leaves and other debris off the rails when pulling uphill.  Because of the severe grade, special rules applied to operation on this section of track.  I doubt that any regular SD-7 operated on this grade, since Pennsy did not own any other SD-7's although they had 25 SD-9 locomotives.  For more details, see an article by Dan Davidson in Vol 4, No 1 Buckeye Chapter of PRRTHS newsletter.  
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 21 posts
Posted by phbrown on Monday, August 10, 2009 7:41 PM

You want the firebox at the low end of the boiler.  You can pump water from the tender into the boiler (locomotives did so anyway), but the boiler doesn't have internal baffles to keep the water from sloshing end-to-end.  So if the firebox is at the high end of the boiler, the water tends to run down to the other end of the boiler, potentially causing the crown sheet (top of the firebox) to be above the water level.  Since the fire's hot enough to make the crown sheet fail if there's no water on it, and failure of the crown sheet means a catastrophic boiler explosion—well, you get the picture.

If you keep the nose of the engine pointed uphill, you avoid that problem.

Hope this helps!

Peace,
—Peter

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: Bloom County
  • 390 posts
Posted by potlatcher on Tuesday, August 11, 2009 9:45 AM

phbrown

You want the firebox at the low end of the boiler.  You can pump water from the tender into the boiler (locomotives did so anyway), but the boiler doesn't have internal baffles to keep the water from sloshing end-to-end.  So if the firebox is at the high end of the boiler, the water tends to run down to the other end of the boiler, potentially causing the crown sheet (top of the firebox) to be above the water level.  Since the fire's hot enough to make the crown sheet fail if there's no water on it, and failure of the crown sheet means a catastrophic boiler explosion—well, you get the picture.

If you keep the nose of the engine pointed uphill, you avoid that problem.

Hope this helps!

Peace,
—Peter

Wow, that makes perfect sense.  Like I said, I don't know much about steam, but now I know a little more.  Thanks Peter!

Tom

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:00 AM

I remember that story, too.  I looked in the ''Index to Magazines'' at the bottom of the page / below last night, but couldn't find it that way.  If I run across it and remember, I'll post it here - if no one else does so first.

- PDN.

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:03 AM

Cheviot Hill
I thought there was a story about it somewhere that I read once. You wouldn't happen to know what trains edition that it was in would you?

Got it !! 

Selected Railroad Reading: Is this Train in emergency?
Trains, April 2001 page 58
Runaway, kind of, on Madison Hill
( "CLARK, WARNER J.", INDIANA, PC, REMINISCENCE, TRN )

- PDN.

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy