nanaimo73 wrote:Well said, Anti. The Ilks drove arbfbe off of the forum with their constant bitter attacks on Sol and FM, can anyone find another CMO to replace him ? Several other posters stopped posting so they would not become targets. One is an engineer running steam in western Canada.
Aw admit it AG, You just love to stick your neck out.
TheAntiGates wrote:LOL, I've been blessed with the "medusa's curse"
And a welth of funny images to post.
TheAntiGates wrote:...efforts to channel independent thought into pre-approved master threads...
I've always thought of some of those "master threads" as a way to gather like-thinking people into one place. I care little about XYZ Railroad, but some people are passionate about it - let 'em go, I'll spend my time elsewhere. I may read it for the amusement it brings, but...
Probably one of the most productive threads ever to visit the Forum was the silly-sounding "Stupid Question Thread." A lot of people learned a lot there, and, since more questions were asked as time went on, the thread stayed on page one for a long time. Eventually, though, the new questions petered out, and the thread sank out of sight.
I've asked questions in "new" threads from time to time, and the thread went to page infinity, along with any answers, within days.
As I mentioned before, however, we've asked a lot of the questions, and talked over most of the issues, sometimes ad nauseum. Sometimes those threads brought out the worst in people, and maybe we don't want a repeat.
Larry Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date Come ride the rails with me! There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...
TheAntiGates wrote: Which to a n00b coming here for the first time, could be interpreted as intimidating.
Which brings up the question, do you look like your avatar ?
nanaimo73 wrote: TheAntiGates wrote: Which to a n00b coming here for the first time, could be interpreted as intimidating. Which brings up the question, do you look like your avatar ?
I have the same haircut as his avatar. Shaved my head to the skin a few days ago. It's just too hot for all that hair these days.
tree68 wrote: TheAntiGates wrote:...efforts to channel independent thought into pre-approved master threads... I've always thought of some of those "master threads" as a way to gather like-thinking people into one place. I care little about XYZ Railroad, but some people are passionate about it - let 'em go, I'll spend my time elsewhere. I may read it for the amusement it brings, but... Probably one of the most productive threads ever to visit the Forum was the silly-sounding "Stupid Question Thread." A lot of people learned a lot there, and, since more questions were asked as time went on, the thread stayed on page one for a long time. Eventually, though, the new questions petered out, and the thread sank out of sight. I've asked questions in "new" threads from time to time, and the thread went to page infinity, along with any answers, within days. As I mentioned before, however, we've asked a lot of the questions, and talked over most of the issues, sometimes ad nauseum. Sometimes those threads brought out the worst in people, and maybe we don't want a repeat.
My guess as to what happened to the thread recently; "Change" With a Capital C.
It may have ultimately been a good thing. Sometimes we get complaicent with the normal expected way of doing things. The format change was not unannounced, Bergie, saw to that. What got everyone's bloomers in a bunch was the changes to the forum and the interactions or lack there of in those changes threw us off our usual game, like playing with someone else's set of golf clubs.
Making the "Newswire" a subscriber only feature, got a number of individuals to make a stand, and then give themselve no way out," the my way or the highway approach." That dropped several folks out. Then came the glitches in working of the forum. the jump links that would not work, or when they did they were interminably slow; even for those with high speed connections. Not to mention the new format idiosyncrasies. Only time will tell how well they will last.
My biggest gripe was the NEGATIVITY that seemed to escape out into the threads and responses. A couple of folks stand out from the crowd. No point in naming them, most regular readers know who they are. Some of the back and forths, UP SUCKS, NS SUCKS,CSX SUCKS, BNSF SUCKS, really did turn a number of participants off. As Gabe said, some of the arguments really produced most of the learning, you really have to have a thick skin when you jump inot one of those threads. Some can take the heat and understand and others cannot and they have to react by going for an emotional jugular.
I want to chalk it up to the heat and the dog days of summer, and look forward to seeing what we find. Hopefully, those friends who have taken some time out for the summer and stepped back top take a deep breath and plung back in for the winter. There have been some real highpoint for this summer. Dale's piece on the Bridges over the Mississippi, as I mentioned earlier is a very worthwhile read and well worth the time. He and his contributors have done a marvelous job on it. Ed Blysard's pictures of the Chinese Steam Engines, posted with an assist from Chris [Copcar ss] are better than any others I'v seen posted, and Zaks pictures of train watching in California were very nice.
TheAntiGates wrote:What I was trying to point out is that by their very nature, they lend an aura of rigidity, an amost militarylike obsession with order. Which to a n00b coming here for the first time, could be interpreted as intimidating. Do people come here to have a good time? or to be reprimanded for failing to find the proper pigeon hole before contributing? Me? we'll I've got thick skin, If I ask a question and someone elsetells me where to put it, I usually return the "favor" and that is that. But, the more easily intimidated might not fare so well. (KEY POINT----->) Especially if they have to worry about first looking for a possible "all questions for oil fired steamers may only be posted here" thread, ..before asking their question. and facing possible ridicule if they don't. In a nut shell, policy designed by a few and intended to make their experience more to their liking, may have unintended consequences...And I think this might be one such area.
So, then it is quite OK for Mike and Dave to insult folks, and if anyone has the nerve to reply in kind, then they are labled trouble makers....?
But find any thread where Mike or Dave didnt throw out the first insult...you would be hard pressed to do so. I am sure there might be one or two, but compared to the sheer volume of their other posts, the amount would be so small as to be meaningless.
Your allowed to "return the favor" but no one else is?
Your flavor, or none at all?
Funny, I respect your opinion on just about anything to do with a computer or robotics, after all, it is your field of employement.
If you told me this works that way, I would accept it as a fact, knowing you have done the work or designed the program yourself.
But to have a fabricated persona named Dave tell me how wrong I am in the field I have worked in for the past ten years, all the while having never touched a piece of the equipment himself is somewhat aggravating.
Somewhat along the lines of me telling you that Windows is the only real operating system, even though you know better, and calling you a rude name when fail to agree completly with me.
Between the two of them, they would argue to death with anyone the concept that the background color for the forum is not white, but a shade of grey.
And somewhere in there, Mike would point out the correct word, according to some graph or book he has, is gray.
Then they would argue the pixel counts, tonal shades, and somewhere along in there, slip in open access, BNSF is evil, and Mike's financial genius.
For a guy who claims to have such a tremendous knowledge of the stock market and financial performance, he seems pretty broke to me.
Point is, you at least have the nuts to say outright what you think...but Dave seems incapable of saying he is really pissed off the faimly farm went down the tubes because BN pulled out of town...instead, he goes about his vendetta under the pretense that he has real, functional knowledge of how and what railroads do...and then resorts to sideways insults if anyone calls him down on his silliness.
If the sneak attack dosnt work, then he resorts to just plain rudeness and insults...and when it is given back, he plays the injured party and quits the fight...what a child, cant even face the music he started playing.
Paper tigers, the pair of them.
And on purpose, to boot, because you cant really win an arguement with a non-person.
They hide behind pretense and bull...t, and like most trolls, are afraid to let anyone know who they are.
If you knew the qualifications, and quality of some of the folks who seem to bear the brunt of Mike and Dave's distain, you might rethink your version of bright...
So far, they both have told the former chief engineer and surveyor of the ATSF he was stupid, informed a stock broker he knew nothing about the stock market, although the man makes quite a good living at it, managed to get his kids through Harvard, and told the owner and president of a succesful short line he knew nothing about railroads...not to mention all the blue collar guys like me who do this every day being told we are dumb and useless...somehow that dosnt qualify either one of them as bright wicks in my book...
If they seem that way to you...man I am sorry, but it must be awful dark at your house.
TheAntiGates wrote:Me? we'll I've got thick skin, If I ask a question and someone elsetells me where to put it, I usually return the "favor" and that is that. (KEY POINT----->)
23 17 46 11
OK, I'm wearing my flak jacket. For those of us who don't know, who [forum IDs] are the aforementioned Mike and Dave? You can send it to me in an email if you want.
Add: Got it from several members. Thanks.
TheAntiGates wrote:My comment was not intended as a condemnation of JJHtrainplanes, or of his intentions in creating them. What I was trying to point out is that by their very nature, they lend an aura of rigidity, an amost militarylike obsession with order. Which to a n00b coming here for the first time, could be interpreted as intimidating. Do people come here to have a good time? or to be reprimanded for failing to find the proper pigeon hole before contributing? Me? we'll I've got thick skin, If I ask a question and someone elsetells me where to put it, I usually return the "favor" and that is that. But, the more easily intimidated might not fare so well. (KEY POINT----->) Especially if they have to worry about first looking for a possible "all questions for oil fired steamers may only be posted here" thread, ..before asking their question. and facing possible ridicule if they don't. In a nut shell, policy designed by a few and intended to make their experience more to their liking, may have unintended consequences...And I think this might be one such area.
As one the nOOb's AG refers to, I have not had much of a problem here. Since the forum owners/mods will not organize this very well, and the search function is not very helpful, I will not go sorting through pages and pages of posts on my own looking for something, I will just post my question/comment and let the chips fall as they fall.
Compared to other forums I am on, the way this one is set up is rather intimidating for a newbie as it is very difficult to find info and there appears to be little or no active moderation. But there is lots of good info here and some funny stuff as well. I do environmental audits for a living, so I have a pretty thick skin, that helps I guess.
And all forums go through low/slow periods, not unusual in summer when it is nice outside.
I spend a fair bit of time in the Model Railroader forum since I don't work in the field but enjoy trains and having something that looks like them in my basement. The fellows over there are down in the dumps, but mostly because they can't get some of the tools to work. One huge P.O. is image codes not working for Mac users, of whom there are quite a number. Others don't like the lower volume of threads, some feel that the site has drawn a lot of new folks who need a lot of nurturing to get into the hobby (puzzles the heck out of me, but that is their beef).
So, I thought I would point out that all is not well in Kalmbach land.
Do any of you gents and lady (?) spend time on another forum related to real-world trains? This question is also currently in circulation next door...some folks are as mad a heck and are leaving for greener pastures.
-Crandell
selector wrote: So, I thought I would point out that all is not well in Kalmbach land ... some folks are as mad a heck and are leaving for greener pastures. -Crandell
So, I thought I would point out that all is not well in Kalmbach land ... some folks are as mad a heck and are leaving for greener pastures.
I guess the ultimate gauge of the success of these forums is determined by Kalmbach, and I'm sure maintaining/increasing circulation numbers and interest in its publications is a major part of that goal. You make an interesting point. Let me submit that I just looked at the home page and got some interesting food for thought. It said:
738 guests currently online
62 members online
151 new users were added today
Looks like there is an overwhelming number of non-members who visit the forums and use them as a resource or entertainment or both. I'm also mildly surprised that 151 new people signed up today, as well. Any open forum is always in a constant state of flux, with people constantly coming and going.
It is my opinion that while suggestions and constructive criticism are acceptable, the forums are what Kalmbach decides they are. Since none of us pays for the experience, the right to complain is practically nil. I think Kalmbach expected some exodus when the changeover took place; free lunches are always take it or leave it.
edblysard wrote: But find any thread where Mike or Dave didnt throw out the first insult...you would be hard pressed to do so.
But find any thread where Mike or Dave didnt throw out the first insult...you would be hard pressed to do so.
This is, what, the third, maybe fifth recent thread in which I have not posted at all, in which Blysard has launched one of his highly personal attacks on me.
I suppose if there were an award for irony on Trains forums, edblysard, laucher of personal attacks, might win hands down for his accusation that others "are first."
I was glad to see the moderator finally take action against one such thread and delete it entirely; no doubt to Blysard's consternation, but I think as a useful warning about his type of continued personal vendettas. And there are four or five people who consistently troll from thread to thread just to call a couple of other people some names. These people's posts are finally being deleted outright.
The usual, however, is for Blysard to appear on a thread he has nothing to offer, only to offer a personal attack, usually in the form as it appears on this thread: a diatribe, maybe a sarcastic remark, sometimes as here, that his friends know more than anyone, so there.
However, I see now he even claims personal knowledge of my finances:
News to me, but I do think Blysard takes far too much interest in where people live and their bank accounts, to be truly interested in honest discussion.
And of course, the usual clincher:
You see, there is always something wrong with you if you disagree with him.
If others are tired of it on forums, believe me, so am I.
edblysard wrote: Funny, I respect your opinion on just about anything to do with a computer or robotics, after all, it is your field of employement. If you told me this works that way, I would accept it as a fact, knowing you have done the work or designed the program yourself. But to have a fabricated persona named Dave tell me how wrong I am in the field I have worked in for the past ten years, all the while having never touched a piece of the equipment himself is somewhat aggravating.
fuzzybroken wrote:though some of the more technology-related forums that I occasionally visit are much, much worse! "Please look to see if the answer to your question has already been asked, and post in the appropriate thread..." Yeah, right, I'm going to go nosing through eleventeen thousand different threads looking for the answer to my question that I probably don't even know how to ask!
TheAntiGates wrote: nanaimo73 wrote: TheAntiGates wrote: Which to a n00b coming here for the first time, could be interpreted as intimidating. Which brings up the question, do you look like your avatar ? Heh heh heh,do YOU look like YOURS? Actually, I'm a 97 lb limp wristed, pencil necked milquetoast who is afraid of the dark.But I've got a BIG ford pickup truck that makes up for it.
I couldn't resist. Go Cheve! BTW, I may not agree with all the things you post, but your avatar has to be the best on the forum.
The professional(paid) lurker,
Doghouse.
edblysard wrote: …ask about running really hairy big freight trains, he has you covered.
…ask about running really hairy big freight trains, he has you covered.
I'd like to know more about these hairy trains.....grafitti is bad enough...........
zardoz wrote: edblysard wrote: …ask about running really hairy big freight trains, he has you covered. I'd like to know more about these hairy trains.....grafitti is bad enough...........
edblysard wrote:Ever try and comb out a boxcar...talk about your big time hairball! zardoz wrote: edblysard wrote: …ask about running really hairy big freight trains, he has you covered. I'd like to know more about these hairy trains.....grafitti is bad enough...........
Some of the rolling stock around Chicago is so old, it's bald on top.
edblysard wrote: So, then it is quite OK for Mike and Dave to insult folks, and if anyone has the nerve to reply in kind, then they are labled trouble makers....? But find any thread where Mike or Dave didnt throw out the first insult...you would be hard pressed to do so. I am sure there might be one or two, but compared to the sheer volume of their other posts, the amount would be so small as to be meaningless. Your allowed to "return the favor" but no one else is? Your flavor, or none at all? Funny, I respect your opinion on just about anything to do with a computer or robotics, after all, it is your field of employement. If you told me this works that way, I would accept it as a fact, knowing you have done the work or designed the program yourself. But to have a fabricated persona named Dave tell me how wrong I am in the field I have worked in for the past ten years, all the while having never touched a piece of the equipment himself is somewhat aggravating. Somewhat along the lines of me telling you that Windows is the only real operating system, even though you know better, and calling you a rude name when fail to agree completly with me. Between the two of them, they would argue to death with anyone the concept that the background color for the forum is not white, but a shade of grey. And somewhere in there, Mike would point out the correct word, according to some graph or book he has, is gray. Then they would argue the pixel counts, tonal shades, and somewhere along in there, slip in open access, BNSF is evil, and Mike's financial genius. For a guy who claims to have such a tremendous knowledge of the stock market and financial performance, he seems pretty broke to me. Point is, you at least have the nuts to say outright what you think...but Dave seems incapable of saying he is really pissed off the faimly farm went down the tubes because BN pulled out of town...instead, he goes about his vendetta under the pretense that he has real, functional knowledge of how and what railroads do...and then resorts to sideways insults if anyone calls him down on his silliness. If the sneak attack dosnt work, then he resorts to just plain rudeness and insults...and when it is given back, he plays the injured party and quits the fight...what a child, cant even face the music he started playing. Paper tigers, the pair of them. And on purpose, to boot, because you cant really win an arguement with a non-person. They hide behind pretense and bull...t, and like most trolls, are afraid to let anyone know who they are. If you knew the qualifications, and quality of some of the folks who seem to bear the brunt of Mike and Dave's distain, you might rethink your version of bright... So far, they both have told the former chief engineer and surveyor of the ATSF he was stupid, informed a stock broker he knew nothing about the stock market, although the man makes quite a good living at it, managed to get his kids through Harvard, and told the owner and president of a succesful short line he knew nothing about railroads...not to mention all the blue collar guys like me who do this every day being told we are dumb and useless...somehow that dosnt qualify either one of them as bright wicks in my book... If they seem that way to you...man I am sorry, but it must be awful dark at your house.
This latest falsehood-laden tirade from EdBlysard is a joke, right? Otherwise, we have a new champion for bottom scraping forum posts.
If I may, a few points to ponder....
1. Working for a railroad does not make one an expert on transportation economics, on the contrary it probably makes one less adept at economic postulation than one who has the chance to step back and observe via contrast and comparison independent of work day influences. And usually, to be considered an "expert" in an economic field, you first have to have the economics degree.
2. Most of the grain in this area is either trucked down to the barge ports or shipped via UP. BNSF has rendered itself impotent in the PNW grain trade for the most part.
3. Ed, if you had any evidence of Mike or myself throwing out the first insult, you should've presented it. You didn't, because such does not exist. Which proves you are a liar.
4. The only folks who have said that "BNSF is evil" is yourself and TomDiehl. I have never said it. Mike has never said it. Again, you are a liar for making such an accusation.
5. Yes, Dave is my real name. You are a liar for stating that it is a "fabricated persona".
6. The family farm is doing just fine, and it's success has nothing to do with BNSF's actions one way or the other. Again, for most folks around here, BNSF is irrelevent by it's own actions.
7. Speaking of paper tigers, you still haven't apologized for berating my statement regarding the hypothetical situation of a derailed car being pulled 20 miles along the track, even after I posted the recent news item regarding a BNSF coal train doing just that, albeit for 30 miles. I guess you're still scraping the egg off your face on that one, huh Ed?
Dave:
Since my advice to you in the past has been ignored for reasons known only to you, I'm probably wasting my breath but I'll try again.
You appear to me (and probably most other people) as being a self-righteous prig who claims to have all the answers and believes that the world would be a perfect place if it only heeded his advice. This is a common attitude of youth, they believe they know it all and don't realize until they get older, gain some experience and find out how little they actually know. I was young and unrealistically idealistic at one time so I know whereof I speak.
The unceasing denigration of those who disagree with you (myself included) will cause you to be marginalized as others realize that you are a zealot and refuse to consider other points of view that may add to your experience and wisdom. You will be viewed as an unrealistic person of no consequence who has nothing to offer.
Quentin
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.