A long running feud between W&S president and a RR commissioner comes to a head:
http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthsuperior/news/local/15178538.htm?source=rss&channel=duluthsuperior_local
dd
I don't know...it sounds that way from the report, but at the same time, it can be hard to judge a story like this without being an insider (and even then it can be tough). A similar deal that comes to mind is the CHS / GLRR battle of a couple years ago. It's easy (especially as railfans) to paint the governmental representative as the bad guy, and perhaps in both cases it may be true.
However, listening to the railroad's perspective in both cases can seem like they're completely innocent (which also may be true, but seems a bit unlikely). Personally, I think in both cases, personal feelings may be getting (or may have gotten in the case of the GLRR battle) in the way of dealing with matters in a business-like manner.
I'm not sure what the whole truth is here, but as it involves matters of safety, I certainly hope that the parties involved can get things straightened out.
-ChrisWest Chicago, ILChristopher May Fine Art Photography"In wisdom gathered over time I have found that every experience is a form of exploration." ~Ansel Adams
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
BaltACD wrote:Give small people a little power and it goes to thier heads.
BaltACD wrote:Give small people a little power and it goes to their heads.
While we do not yet have all of the details on this fiasco, I'd say that the fact the commissioner is a political appointee speaks untold volumes. It is good that the writer included this information.
It's also not strange how stories seem to change after people read in print what they are alleged to have said verbally.
And from the Bureau of Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting: Nowhere in the article does it say what credentials the commissioner has to be making such subjective decisions. I think it would be important to include those qualifications as part of this story, or note that there are none, if that is indeed the case.
Pop Z
chad thomas wrote:I agree Chris, That's why I said "sounds like" rather than "is". The picture the article painted in my head of the commissioner is closer to a cartoon character then a person of such position.
Have fun with your trains
CopCarSS wrote: I don't know...it sounds that way from the report, but at the same time, it can be hard to judge a story like this without being an insider (and even then it can be tough). A similar deal that comes to mind is the CHS / GLRR battle of a couple years ago. It's easy (especially as railfans) to paint the governmental representative as the bad guy, and perhaps in both cases it may be true. However, listening to the railroad's perspective in both cases can seem like they're completely innocent (which also may be true, but seems a bit unlikely). Personally, I think in both cases, personal feelings may be getting (or may have gotten in the case of the GLRR battle) in the way of dealing with matters in a business-like manner. I'm not sure what the whole truth is here, but as it involves matters of safety, I certainly hope that the parties involved can get things straightened out.
Gotta agree with Chris;
And I think Randy is right about the State of Wisconsin owning 99% of WSOR's track, but it does not excuse this politician from letting his authority go to his head. Had he a reasonable relationship with the railroad's President he could have asked and probably been given permission to ride in the cab to observe the crossings. Instead he chose to be confrontational.
My question what is happening there in Wisconsin; first you have a college professor who is teaching his students that the 9/11 attack was planned and STAGED by the US Govt? Then you have a 6 year appointee[second term?] who thinks he 'owns' a railroad because he is a Railroad Commissioner? It brings a whole new meaning to the term " Cheese Head." What's up Wisconsin?
This commissioners actions remind me of a line in a song from the movie Man of La Mancha.
"The cucoo bird is singing in the cucaberra tree,If he insists that that's a helmet.I suggest that you agree".
samfp1943 wrote: CopCarSS wrote: I don't know...it sounds that way from the report, but at the same time, it can be hard to judge a story like this without being an insider (and even then it can be tough). A similar deal that comes to mind is the CHS / GLRR battle of a couple years ago. It's easy (especially as railfans) to paint the governmental representative as the bad guy, and perhaps in both cases it may be true. However, listening to the railroad's perspective in both cases can seem like they're completely innocent (which also may be true, but seems a bit unlikely). Personally, I think in both cases, personal feelings may be getting (or may have gotten in the case of the GLRR battle) in the way of dealing with matters in a business-like manner. I'm not sure what the whole truth is here, but as it involves matters of safety, I certainly hope that the parties involved can get things straightened out. Gotta agree with Chris; And I think Randy is right about the State of Wisconsin owning 99% of WSOR's track, but it does not excuse this politician from letting his authority go to his head. Had he a reasonable relationship with the railroad's President he could have asked and probably been given permission to ride in the cab to observe the crossings. Instead he chose to be confrontational. My question what is happening there in Wisconsin; first you have a college professor who is teaching his students that the 9/11 attack was planned and STAGED by the US Govt? Then you have a 6 year appointee[second term?] who thinks he 'owns' a railroad because he is a Railroad Commissioner? It brings a whole new meaning to the term " Cheese Head." What's up Wisconsin?
Don't forget , Jeff Dahmer is/was a cheesehead......
Be careful, Sam. You may find yourself reassigned.
CINCSCOCOM
"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics
I think that this 'Comissioner' is pretty much toast, was a political hack appointed by a previous administration, and so far not reappointed by the present administration. Anyway, this is a cut and pasted from 2 Aug 2006 TRAINS NEWSWIRE which says pretty much the same ting as the original posted article, and confirmed in the threads comments;
"Colorful quotes and sometimes flamboyant behavior..." Boy, now that's putting it mildly -- like calling Ali vs. Frazier a "disagreement." From his actions, sounds like this guy is a misguided railfan on a power trip. I wonder if he has a badge in his wallet. Maybe the Wisconsin attorney general needs to examine his outrageous behavior.
Time for Rodney to find himself a real job, methinks. Who does he think he is, a Chicago alderman?
Randy Stahl wrote: Don't forget , Jeff Dahmer is/was a cheesehead......
If memory serves, so are/were you.
As was Ed Gein.
As is most of the staff at Kalmbach.
As am I. And not very proud of it, either.
zardoz wrote: Randy Stahl wrote: Don't forget , Jeff Dahmer is/was a cheesehead...... If memory serves, so are/were you.
Oh .... ummmm ..... yea ( imagine my sheepishness )
Dan
Randy Stahl wrote:Doesn't the State of Wisconsin own about 99% of the track that the WSOR operates on ?
I think that you are right about that. I remember reading somewhere that WSOR leases most of the track from the state.
Bert
An "expensive model collector"
The State owns most of the track that the WSOR leases, however, I'd say approx 75 miles (one subdivison, a yard, and a relatively short spur) of the 600 miles the WSOR runs on is leased from the UP too. So 99% probably isn't as accurate, but about 90% probably would be. They also have about 100 miles in trackage rights on various other railroads in Wisconsin and Illinois.
The WI Railroad Comissioner is one really odd duck, and the articles that have been posted explain most of it. A little more of the fun of having him as comissioner can be explained in there articles on the incident as well. To save space I'll simply post the links:
http://www.madison.com/tct/mad/topstories/index.php?ntid=93172&ntpid=1
http://www.wkowtv.com/index.php/news/story/p/pkid/24564
And I have confirmed from a very reliable inside soruce at the WSOR that all of the events written in those two articles did indeed happen, and many more. Pretty weird guy alright....
Noah Hofrichter
Fellow Cheesehead
Let's take a closer look at a couple of things that jump out of The Capital Times story, excerpts in italic:
Kruenen also disputed threatening Gardner with retaliation.
"I stated that we're going to spend a lot less time on his railroad and that would affect his safety funds," Kreunen said. "But I did not threaten to cut off safety funds. I said we're not going to spend much time on them if we didn't get cooperation."
Sounds like a threat to me. Since when should an official's personal views have an effect on inspection time?
"Neither this office nor the state of Wisconsin, is going to be bullied by any rail baron," Kreunen declared.
Translation: I have a huge ego, and I'm not gonna take any crap from a taxpaying railroad owner who won't kiss me on my wallet.
As the commissioner of railroad, Kreunen is responsible for safety issues on the state's rail lines.
He has been commissioner since 1996 when he was appointed to his first two-year term by then Gov. Tommy Thompson. His last term expired in March 2005 and Gov. Jim Doyle has not submitted his name to the state Senate for confirmation.
Whoops! Since his term expired over 16 months ago, he no longer has any statutory authority. Why are they still issuing him paychecks?
In his ethics complaint, Gardner says that Kreunen pressured him to hire a friend in 1998 to serve as a political liaison for the railroad. Gardner said he hired this individual at an annual salary of $36,000, but fired him after nine months due to "incompetence."
The implication here is that "the friend" would somehow -- for $36,000 a year -- get Kreunen to do his state job more efficiently for one "special" taxpayer, the Wisconsin & Southern. "We treat everyone fairly," once said a Chicago alderman convicted of taking bribes for political favors. "We just treat some people more fairly than others."
He also said that between 2000 and 2002, Kreunen would invite himself and several guests to ride the Circus Train and expect his guests to get free meals and beverages. He also said Kreunen once flagged a train to come to an emergency stop simply because he wanted to get on board.
How is any of this related to the job?
Kreunen ... denies exacting special favors for himself or his guests on Wisconsin & Southern trains.
"When I've had any meals on board, which was infrequent, I would always pay for it," Kreunen said. "I was very specific about that."
This one is easy. Let's see the receipts, Rodney.
Poppa_Zit wrote: He has been commissioner since 1996 when he was appointed to his first two-year term by then Gov. Tommy Thompson. His last term expired in March 2005 and Gov. Jim Doyle has not submitted his name to the state Senate for confirmation. Whoops! Since his term expired over 16 months ago, he no longer has any statutory authority. Why are they still issuing him paychecks?
I'm glad I'm not the only one who caught that. If he's not working for the WIDOT, WTF is he doing acting like this?
CNW 6000 wrote: Poppa_Zit wrote: He has been commissioner since 1996 when he was appointed to his first two-year term by then Gov. Tommy Thompson. His last term expired in March 2005 and Gov. Jim Doyle has not submitted his name to the state Senate for confirmation. Whoops! Since his term expired over 16 months ago, he no longer has any statutory authority. Why are they still issuing him paychecks? I'm glad I'm not the only one who caught that. If he's not working for the WIDOT, WTF is he doing acting like this?
Well, if I lived in Wisconsin and was a curious taxpayer, I'd want to know exactly from where in the state budget the money to continue funding the job of this public official is coming [please see Freedom of Information Act]. I mean, what are we supposed to believe here? That even though his position, technically created by law, has not been renewed, he just keeps showing up and picking up a paycheck for almost a year and a half? How much is he costing taxpayers? Who does he account to? Who originally sponsored him for the job? Would anyone here like to apply for a job like this?
Consider this: he has no current official standing as a state employee, which means any of his official actions would probably not be upheld in any court of law. Is that how they want the regulatory process to work in Wisconsin? It leaves the state wide-open for appeals on anything he's done in the last 16 months. Guess who'll pay for the lawyers?
Plus, he really must be quite dense. Despite skating on both legal and ethical "thin ice" he continues not only to throw his weight around, but he does it in a highly questionable fashion that calls way too much attention to himself -- and creates nasty headlines. This does not make the state of Wisconsin -- or its leaders -- look good.
Time for the current governor to do the right thing and surgically remove this bozo from the public trough immediately. And if his job needs to be filled, put someone in there who is more low-key.
Frankly, I'm also surprised no Wisconsin-based newspaper journalist isn't all over this story beyond the superfluous reports. Does this guy have that many friends?
Poppa_Zit wrote: CNW 6000 wrote: Poppa_Zit wrote: He has been commissioner since 1996 when he was appointed to his first two-year term by then Gov. Tommy Thompson. His last term expired in March 2005 and Gov. Jim Doyle has not submitted his name to the state Senate for confirmation. Whoops! Since his term expired over 16 months ago, he no longer has any statutory authority. Why are they still issuing him paychecks? I'm glad I'm not the only one who caught that. If he's not working for the WIDOT, WTF is he doing acting like this? Well, if I lived in Wisconsin and was a curious taxpayer, I'd want to know exactly from where in the state budget the money to continue funding the job of this public official is coming [please see Freedom of Information Act]. I mean, what are we supposed to believe here? That even though his position, technically created by law, has not been renewed, he just keeps showing up and picking up a paycheck for almost a year and a half? How much is he costing taxpayers? Who does he account to? Who originally sponsored him for the job? Would anyone here like to apply for a job like this? Consider this: he has no current official standing as a state employee, which means any of his official actions would probably not be upheld in any court of law. Is that how they want the regulatory process to work in Wisconsin? It leaves the state wide-open for appeals on anything he's done in the last 16 months. Guess who'll pay for the lawyers? Plus, he really must be quite dense. Despite skating on both legal and ethical "thin ice" he continues not only to throw his weight around, but he does it in a highly questionable fashion that calls way too much attention to himself -- and creates nasty headlines. This does not make the state of Wisconsin -- or its leaders -- look good. Time for the current governor to do the right thing and surgically remove this bozo from the public trough immediately. And if his job needs to be filled, put someone in there who is more low-key. Frankly, I'm also surprised no Wisconsin-based newspaper journalist isn't all over this story beyond the superfluous reports. Does this guy have that many friends?
Poppa Z
Believe me these are all important questions. Our governor, however, is currently embroiled in scandal due to his unique talent of taking the term "pay to play" to new levels. His political appointees are questionable (and that's after a strong bottle of scotch). Our A.G. (we actually voted this 'gem' into office) showed up at an illegal immigrant rally to declare that she will not enforce WI law with regards to illegal immigration. This from the chief law enforcement officer of the state. Doyle's administration has suffered increased scrutiny after it was revealed that the state's travel agency contract was directed to a travel agency that made substantial campaign contributions before and after the contract was rewarded - and they weren't the lowest bidder. (By law government agencies in Wisconsin have to accept the lowest reasonable bid on contract work).
As for this Doyle appointee - rest assured he will keep his job. As long as he remains a 'yes' man for Diamond Jim Doyle he will keep his job. Screw ups like this will blow over in a week or two. It is already out of the news cycle. Doyle has a history of backing anyone who agrees with him to the end, no matter how embarassing that is.
State politics here are deplorable, and both parties are to blame. The current democratic government has a great number of problems, but past republican administrations have had an equal number of difficulties at leading. I guess this state is poor at turning out potential political leaders. Our senator Russ Feingold, althought I disagree with him one thousand percent of the time, at least is able to say what he really believes. I guess in a state where there is a such a lack of capable leaders in our government at least that is one of a very few admirable qualities.
When political favors are fulfilled with perceived meanial appointments (like the state RR comissioner) this is the quality of leadership we should expect. The sad thing is that railroad safety at WSOR and accross the state on the publicly owned tracks will potentially suffer, just because this guy has a screw loose.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.