Modelcar wrote:....And now in the morning paper we see our government has agreed to open the U S Strategic Oil Reserve to replace the loss from Alaska while that problem is being handled. So if that is the case, why would the world market shove the price higher since we would not be drawing any more crude from that market....Once again, greed rears it's ughly head...What else... And of course the article also indicated that would translate to 6 to 10 cents a gal increase in retail price...All the better to add to their wonderful profits.
....And now in the morning paper we see our government has agreed to open the U S Strategic Oil Reserve to replace the loss from Alaska while that problem is being handled.
So if that is the case, why would the world market shove the price higher since we would not be drawing any more crude from that market....Once again, greed rears it's ughly head...What else...
And of course the article also indicated that would translate to 6 to 10 cents a gal increase in retail price...All the better to add to their wonderful profits.
Quentin
Have U seen this report yet?
http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?view=CN&storyID=2006-08-08T163120Z_01_SP179724_RTRIDST_0_MARKETS-OIL-UPDATE-8.XML&rpc=66&type=qcna
BNSFrailfan wrote:I AM SO TIRED OF THE SERIOUS PRICE GOUGEING AT THE PUMP. WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS. ALLAN.
Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub
....Let me jump in with my figures for comparison of some wild gasoline prices....In the last 24 hrs or so prices for N L regular here in the Indy / Muncie area made a real nice jump to support their profits...{Whatever they earned over this last quarter}...One day a low of 2.69 and yesterday jumped to 3.19...!! Now I believe that's a bit much....50 cents a gallon in 24 is something other than normal business practice....
That seems to be just a bit much...Call it what you will but somewhere someplace something is going way out of line...and we, the consumers are of course the victims.....
As for the comment above again of Europe paying X amount for fuel...Apples and oranges again....Much of social structure being paid with excessive taxes over there which is much different than here in our country.
BNSFrailfan wrote:The price of gas is now $3.09. And that's Regular. E10 is much higher. Yesterday it was $2.99. A 10 cent jump in just one day. I went to Fremont today where gas is still $2.99 in some places. Totaly unreal. I think that someone should go to prison for this price gouging none sence. Big oil continues to make billions and billons while we suffer.
ExxonMobil earned 18.35% on sales before taxes in the 2nd Q.
BNSF earned 19.83%.
Shippers are facing very much what you are facing, even a little worse. Except when they have to cut back, people lose their jobs and families are in jeopardy. Not like you, who can't take as many pictures.
But, do you really think Matt Rose ought to go to jail?
Or get a raise?
This may be a dumb question but I'll ask anyway:
Do you have any evidence that gas stations are price gouging? Or is it just because gas is over 3 dollars a gallon? In Europe the fix must be in because they are paying in the neighborhood of 7 bucks a gallon. Maybe everyone should go to prison?
Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.
Tell it to my 6-year old diehard railfan of a son who would like nothing better than to spend all day at the train yard chasing trains. I have had to tell him a number of times we cant go because gas is too expensive right now. Well at least when we go on vacation we will be stopping in Rochelle for a day and a half to watch the trains. That should satisfy him for a little while.
chad thomas wrote: BTW- Some people don't have to worry about high gas prices. Some of us drive company vehicles.
BTW- Some people don't have to worry about high gas prices. Some of us drive company vehicles.
I hear ya, man!
So you are saying your employer is allowing you to use a company car & paid for the gas to train watch?
n012944 wrote: And still he never said that it stopped or prohibited people from going fanning. Bert
And still he never said that it stopped or prohibited people from going fanning.
Bert
Don't waste your time Bert. Disinformation central never gets it right.
An "expensive model collector"
This is asking for peoples thoughts?
ARE YOU STUPID. I JUST TOLD YOU. IT MAKES IT HARDER FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO GO RAILFANNING. MAN.....SOME PEOPLE! YOU HAVE THE GULL TO SAY THAT." src="/trccs/emoticons/icon_smile_angry.gif">
Before speaking for me he should have check out if higher gas prices make it harder for me to rail fan. To speak for all without asking there particular situation is quite silly IMHO. It appears he is assuming cause the hi gas price is going to restrict his train watching that everybody else trains watching is also being restricted by the hi price which I am sure you know is not the case.
n012944 wrote: spbed wrote: I think that where BNSRrailfan derailed is ASSUMING that hi gas prices is prohibiting EVERYBODY from rail fanning. WRONG He asked for peoples thoughts, he never said it prohibited people from going out railfanning. Bert
spbed wrote: I think that where BNSRrailfan derailed is ASSUMING that hi gas prices is prohibiting EVERYBODY from rail fanning.
I think that where BNSRrailfan derailed is ASSUMING that hi gas prices is prohibiting EVERYBODY from rail fanning.
WRONG
He asked for peoples thoughts, he never said it prohibited people from going out railfanning.
Has not stopped me either & I have 2 cars
james saunders wrote:I see, well it hasn't stopped me, don't have a car
James, Brisbane Australia
Modelling AT&SF in the 90s
james saunders wrote:I know BNSFrailfan posted this meaning well, but twits who flame him for just trying to have a say... is well...silly.. maybe buy a bike? good exercise, and you can get places quicker where a car can't get you
Modelcar wrote:...My intent here is not to get political....I do want to enter my thought of the '73-74 economic fiasco caused in large part by our mid east oil supplying Arab friends....Stopping the supply, etc and all the rest resulting in a dumping of the world economy. Economics spiraled out of control...! Can't lay all of that blame with President Carter.
True, very true....
zinker wrote: chicagorails wrote:all the white house should have done something during last oil crisis of 70s. crisis what crisis? no one person is responsible for all oil problems we face. i take my mountain bike with me for resturant fare, a snack at caseys, library internet,weather,news,trains line. its nothing to ride 10 miles straight when its 95 degrees.i get online for cheapest gas prices at towns i go thru to the jctn. i dive 5 mph slower to save oil. buy everything at walmart inc. groceries. afew ways to save a green buckeroo. You may remember that there was a President back then by the name of Jimmy Carter who implemented the countries first Energy Policy. Here is a snippit of his speach to the nation announcing that policy. "Point one: I am tonight setting a clear goal for the energy policy of the United States. Beginning this moment, this nation will never use more foreign oil than we did in 1977 -- never. From now on, every new addition to our demand for energy will be met from our own production and our own conservation. The generation-long growth in our dependence on foreign oil will be stopped dead in its tracks right now and then reversed as we move through the 1980s, for I am tonight setting the further goal of cutting our dependence on foreign oil by one-half by the end of the next decade -- a saving of over 4-1/2 million barrels of imported oil per day. Point two: To ensure that we meet these targets, I will use my presidential authority to set import quotas. I'm announcing tonight that for 1979 and 1980, I will forbid the entry into this country of one drop of foreign oil more than these goals allow. These quotas will ensure a reduction in imports even below the ambitious levels we set at the recent Tokyo summit. Point three: To give us energy security, I am asking for the most massive peacetime commitment of funds and resources in our nation's history to develop America's own alternative sources of fuel -- from coal, from oil shale, from plant products for gasohol, from unconventional gas, from the sun." You can read the entire speach here: So what happened? Ronald Reagen. One of Regan's first acts when he entered the White house was to rip Carter's solar panels off the White House roof and reverse Carter's energy policy. And so here we are all these years later with Carter's predictions coming true.
chicagorails wrote:all the white house should have done something during last oil crisis of 70s. crisis what crisis? no one person is responsible for all oil problems we face. i take my mountain bike with me for resturant fare, a snack at caseys, library internet,weather,news,trains line. its nothing to ride 10 miles straight when its 95 degrees.i get online for cheapest gas prices at towns i go thru to the jctn. i dive 5 mph slower to save oil. buy everything at walmart inc. groceries. afew ways to save a green buckeroo.
One result of Carter's 'energy' policy was double digit inflation. Only a millionare could take out a mortgage as a result. I suppose, in a way, this was VERY effective at cutting our dependence on foregin oil. Plunging the economy into a recession is a good way to cut back on all kinds of economic activity. (Seems to me the railroads suffered a good deal because of this too.)
BNSFrailfan wrote:Oh I do go Railfanning. I go local.
It's been fun. But it isn't much fun anymore. Signing off for now.
The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any
zugmann wrote:Honestly,If you can't afford the gas, then don't go railfanning. It is that simple. The world won't end if you can't drive to see trains.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.