Trains.com

New Photo (Had to cheer things up)

6282 views
97 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
New Photo (Had to cheer things up)
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:49 PM
Well, here goes. Bergie probably won't like it, so look NOW!!

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
New Photo (Had to cheer things up)
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:49 PM
Well, here goes. Bergie probably won't like it, so look NOW!!

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:00 PM
So who likes it?

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:00 PM
So who likes it?

LC
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:22 PM
When I get home the wife is going to have ALOT of explaining to do....LOL

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:22 PM
When I get home the wife is going to have ALOT of explaining to do....LOL

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: Joliet, Illinois
  • 256 posts
Posted by David3 on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:28 PM
Well I really like it!!!!!!!!!!
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: Joliet, Illinois
  • 256 posts
Posted by David3 on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:28 PM
Well I really like it!!!!!!!!!!
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MA
  • 562 posts
Posted by dmoore74 on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:11 PM
Sort of reminds one of the Freeman Hubbard photographs in Railroad Magazine. Only difference is you can actually see some of the rails and locomotive in this picture.[;)][;)][;)]
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MA
  • 562 posts
Posted by dmoore74 on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:11 PM
Sort of reminds one of the Freeman Hubbard photographs in Railroad Magazine. Only difference is you can actually see some of the rails and locomotive in this picture.[;)][;)][;)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:29 PM
Something has to be done about her sitting on the rail. That is a clear violation of the safety rules! I will go spank her.........hehehe
Ken
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:29 PM
Something has to be done about her sitting on the rail. That is a clear violation of the safety rules! I will go spank her.........hehehe
Ken
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:25 AM
Hope she is using a lot of SP30!

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:25 AM
Hope she is using a lot of SP30!

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,309 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:43 AM
thanks lc
stay safe
joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,309 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:43 AM
thanks lc
stay safe
joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:24 AM
YEAH BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:24 AM
YEAH BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:32 AM
Can't see how he could find fault with this one. Racier images can be seen on daytime tv or in underwear ads.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:32 AM
Can't see how he could find fault with this one. Racier images can be seen on daytime tv or in underwear ads.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:44 AM
What's not to like? This photo obviously shows a hard working MOW employee who has just tarred a problem joint in the rails (why?) and in so doing, must have spilled the product on her clothes, thus causing her to remove these soiled garments to maintain the highly profesional (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) appearance of her position.

Jeff

PS is that an Alco SW1200 in the background?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:44 AM
What's not to like? This photo obviously shows a hard working MOW employee who has just tarred a problem joint in the rails (why?) and in so doing, must have spilled the product on her clothes, thus causing her to remove these soiled garments to maintain the highly profesional (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) appearance of her position.

Jeff

PS is that an Alco SW1200 in the background?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:34 PM
Nothin beats ( I don't like to use the word "HOT" or "CHICK" so..) Nothing beats a Super Attractive women combined with metallic rails!

Oh, and YES Ken, thats Defenately a violation of Safety laws.. International safety laws at that.. so double the spanking! [:p][:D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:34 PM
Nothin beats ( I don't like to use the word "HOT" or "CHICK" so..) Nothing beats a Super Attractive women combined with metallic rails!

Oh, and YES Ken, thats Defenately a violation of Safety laws.. International safety laws at that.. so double the spanking! [:p][:D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 28, 2003 8:22 PM
So Kev, you don't like to use the words HOT CHICK. How bout "female with excessive temperature." or "one bad Betty."
Ken
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 28, 2003 8:22 PM
So Kev, you don't like to use the words HOT CHICK. How bout "female with excessive temperature." or "one bad Betty."
Ken
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • 1,009 posts
Posted by GDRMCo on Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:10 PM
Get her to bend over!!!!!!!! Triple spanking for not having clothes on over sexy parts!!!!!!!!!!

ML

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • 1,009 posts
Posted by GDRMCo on Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:10 PM
Get her to bend over!!!!!!!! Triple spanking for not having clothes on over sexy parts!!!!!!!!!!

ML

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:13 PM
What picture? It's gone.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:13 PM
What picture? It's gone.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy