QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol Well, honest people don't need to hide their identities.
She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw
QUOTE: Originally posted by futuremodal QUOTE: Originally posted by edblysard And the sidekick makes his timed appearance, right on cue! Ed You are truly nothing but human debris. I guess Bergie gives you a pass since you sent some steam engine photos to the mag, but eventually the staff at Kalmbach will figure out having a clinical psychopath as a *contributor* does not reflect well on a national publication.
QUOTE: Originally posted by edblysard And the sidekick makes his timed appearance, right on cue! Ed
QUOTE: Originally posted by Character QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol QUOTE: Originally posted by Character QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol QUOTE: Originally posed by Character A quick Google of Mr. Sol ... Based upon that and another entry showing ... QUOTE: Originally posted by Character And you still haven't come forward with the facts or challenged the ones I found about you. Hmmm. Perhaps I need to fire my investigator.... Your investigator is "Google"? A lawyer that does his research using Google then represents, oh, uh, er, "my investigator"... By all means, "fire" Google. The stories don't mesh already, this one fell apart pretty fast. Can't reveal your name because we might think you are someone else. You do legal research using Google, uh, an "investigator"... are you on probation for something? There is a BIG difference between light factual research on Google and "Legal Research" but perhaps that isn't a term of art you understand out there under the "Big Sky"... As to my investigator, he is a perfectly capable state licensed P.I., but of course you already knew that... Just going by what you actually stated, I guess the story is changing... but then again it wasn't under oath, since you have no name and nothing is verifiable. Maybe the witness protection program? No, no, you're thinking of yourself and Dave again, the Witless protection program is just for you two...
QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol QUOTE: Originally posted by Character QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol QUOTE: Originally posed by Character A quick Google of Mr. Sol ... Based upon that and another entry showing ... QUOTE: Originally posted by Character And you still haven't come forward with the facts or challenged the ones I found about you. Hmmm. Perhaps I need to fire my investigator.... Your investigator is "Google"? A lawyer that does his research using Google then represents, oh, uh, er, "my investigator"... By all means, "fire" Google. The stories don't mesh already, this one fell apart pretty fast. Can't reveal your name because we might think you are someone else. You do legal research using Google, uh, an "investigator"... are you on probation for something? There is a BIG difference between light factual research on Google and "Legal Research" but perhaps that isn't a term of art you understand out there under the "Big Sky"... As to my investigator, he is a perfectly capable state licensed P.I., but of course you already knew that... Just going by what you actually stated, I guess the story is changing... but then again it wasn't under oath, since you have no name and nothing is verifiable. Maybe the witness protection program?
QUOTE: Originally posted by Character QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol QUOTE: Originally posed by Character A quick Google of Mr. Sol ... Based upon that and another entry showing ... QUOTE: Originally posted by Character And you still haven't come forward with the facts or challenged the ones I found about you. Hmmm. Perhaps I need to fire my investigator.... Your investigator is "Google"? A lawyer that does his research using Google then represents, oh, uh, er, "my investigator"... By all means, "fire" Google. The stories don't mesh already, this one fell apart pretty fast. Can't reveal your name because we might think you are someone else. You do legal research using Google, uh, an "investigator"... are you on probation for something? There is a BIG difference between light factual research on Google and "Legal Research" but perhaps that isn't a term of art you understand out there under the "Big Sky"... As to my investigator, he is a perfectly capable state licensed P.I., but of course you already knew that...
QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol QUOTE: Originally posed by Character A quick Google of Mr. Sol ... Based upon that and another entry showing ... QUOTE: Originally posted by Character And you still haven't come forward with the facts or challenged the ones I found about you. Hmmm. Perhaps I need to fire my investigator.... Your investigator is "Google"? A lawyer that does his research using Google then represents, oh, uh, er, "my investigator"... By all means, "fire" Google. The stories don't mesh already, this one fell apart pretty fast. Can't reveal your name because we might think you are someone else. You do legal research using Google, uh, an "investigator"... are you on probation for something?
QUOTE: Originally posed by Character A quick Google of Mr. Sol ... Based upon that and another entry showing ...
QUOTE: Originally posted by Character And you still haven't come forward with the facts or challenged the ones I found about you. Hmmm. Perhaps I need to fire my investigator....
QUOTE: Originally posted by Character QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol Well, honest people don't need to hide their identities. Honest people who don't want their words published need to protect themselves and their companies and use good judgement in dealing with third parties, particularly plaintiffs counsel from the west. How is my ol' buddy Gerry Spence these days?? (And no, I don't really know him)
QUOTE: Originally posted by futuremodal QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie Yeah - it's Idaho! We here in the straight-up-and-down are ok. Mook Well, I see you've capitulated to the fecal orgy along with Ed, Tom, and little Bert. So much for your claims of wanting a non-insulting discussion.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie Yeah - it's Idaho! We here in the straight-up-and-down are ok. Mook
An "expensive model collector"
QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol QUOTE: Originally posted by Character QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol Well, honest people don't need to hide their identities. Honest people who don't want their words published need to protect themselves and their companies and use good judgement in dealing with third parties, particularly plaintiffs counsel from the west. How is my ol' buddy Gerry Spence these days?? (And no, I don't really know him) It is professional misconduct under RPC 8.4(c) for an attorney to "engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation." Publicly representing one's self as an attorney while using a false name is a violation of the rules of professional conduct. An attorney would have known that.
QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol QUOTE: Originally posted by Character QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol Sorry, Clark Kent, the BS meter pegged on this one. "I prefer to come here and not reveal my actual identity as others might construe my own thoughts as speaking on behalf of another person or entity" You can say it as many times as you like. I'm not the one who needs credibility to support his fallacious arguments... Oh, and I suppose you feel that great compulsion to have the last word, so feel free, it won't convince me, or anyone else. Your BS meter pegged a long time ago... Well, then why don't you stick to discussing those fallacious arguments, demonstrating why you think they are so, rather than using strictly ad hominmen attacks? Seems like you don't have much to offer on the very rationale that you say compels you.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Character QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol Sorry, Clark Kent, the BS meter pegged on this one. "I prefer to come here and not reveal my actual identity as others might construe my own thoughts as speaking on behalf of another person or entity" You can say it as many times as you like. I'm not the one who needs credibility to support his fallacious arguments... Oh, and I suppose you feel that great compulsion to have the last word, so feel free, it won't convince me, or anyone else. Your BS meter pegged a long time ago...
QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol Sorry, Clark Kent, the BS meter pegged on this one. "I prefer to come here and not reveal my actual identity as others might construe my own thoughts as speaking on behalf of another person or entity"
23 17 46 11
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.