Trains.com

Short Line Investment?

4066 views
132 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 7, 2006 8:10 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tormadel

QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear

Michael -

Yeah, your numbers aren't too terribly out there, but I think we can still make it go. We could come in at $1.2M perhaps a little higher or lower. Again, the management team is talented enough to make it go and won't shy from hard work. Gotta be a GOOD deal to get me out from behind my control stand. This thing could have real legs and not be a highly leveraged house of cards like some short line groups...

LC


Ok, so $1.2 million a year in operating costs that's good to know, and I believe in LC and Ed that it can be done. But I would like to better grasp what the projected carloadings translate to in estimated income. Doesn't have to be hard facts just ballpark.


Take a look at my revenue numbers above. Its all there. Same post as the expenses and EBITDA projection (cashflow) as well.

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 7, 2006 3:36 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tormadel

QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear

Michael -

Concerning locomotives.



This almost makes me wish SD59's had been produced at all. 3000hp from a 12cyl gas meiser sounds like an awesome idea. But they didn't go over. There are what? 10 GP59's all in posession of Norfolk Southern?


I don't want to get into about locos, because some people like Fords and Chevys, well I'm into SD38/39s, SD40-2s, 6-axle Alcos, and anything with a 12 cyl 645 in it( turbo'd or othewise). And I can babble on for hours and hours of fun bs about locos. But I've always wished there would have been a market for an SD59 model. Thing could have looked like a SD40-2 too. Same concept as with the SD38/39/40/SD45 scenario. Big porches for the 12 & 16 cyls, big hood for the 20 cyl obviously. Same with a SD59/60 combo: big hood for the SD60, big porches for the SD59. And all vanity aside, a SD59 could have been a modern age/ fuel mizing/cost concious mean & lean freight lugging / hauling machine. A third gen SD39 on steroids of 710 pills. Plop some HTCRs under it, and it's even more on the side of saving dollars. Alright, enough of my loco bs. Back to the regular program.....
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 7, 2006 3:14 AM
then there is the issue of escrow for those rainy days of future maintenance projects like track /bridge structure upgrades( those dangblasted axle loadings ), engine overhauls, wheels, tractions motors, more blah blah blah
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 7, 2006 2:47 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by kenneo

This is an interesting thread.

Lastly, double your cost of operations figure. You won't exceed that, but you will certainly exceed the numbers talked about above. You have taxes, insurances, bonds yada-yada that will cost you big bucks and you won't even think about before hand. Until you can get a good credit rating, you will be required to pay deposits in advance for supplies, for example.


Yep yep, very interesting thread, I know for this lifelong shortline rail to read. I used to do cost sheets like this. I'd get all the est. expenses wrapped together for operating costs, and then double it. Yep, thats right, DOUBLE IT! That would then be the est. operating cost. YES INDEED, due to taxes taxes taxes( diesel fuel and payroll just to name a few! ), pesky variable costs / and unforeseen expenditure changes from the original spread sheets, blah blah blah the works. Shortline railroading can be done. And I'm psyched about the new Evansville Western. So phsyched, I already put together a EW yahoogroup. Although, the EW has the P & L backing it, so it's kind of out of league for this thread. Heres the link if anyone wants to join.: http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/EvansvilleWesternRailway/
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Appleton, WI
  • 275 posts
Posted by tormadel on Tuesday, March 7, 2006 2:03 AM
This is great! [:D] Just what we need all these people who have been there to bring this knowledge together. These are some great things going on in this thread, I'm glad to be a part of it.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Upper Left Coast
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by kenneo on Tuesday, March 7, 2006 1:41 AM
This is an interesting thread.

I would have just one or two suggestions.

Contract out the MofW unless you can keep a "full M of W crew" busy at least 4 days a week. You can have your train crews assist, but I would not wi***o depend on them to handle most of these jobs. If you are going to need to use two train crews, I doubt that they will have much time to work on the track.

The engine and train crews will also be needed to assist your Round House Forman in the maintainence of your motors. Your RHF will also need to be versed in diesel electronics and electrical applications. Like how to locate and fix ground faults, etc.

The Bridge work requires a certified bridge engineer. I would think that you would have to hire this out to a contractor which specializes in bridges.

With careful planning, you can operate a unit train fo 10 cars. This should be considered if you can get trackage rights to the off-line destination of the coal (is it the mine or the plant that is off line?) or get an agreement with the union folk for a wage cost that you can afford and have your Class 1 provide your coal crew. You may be able to operate such a train 3 days per week (36 crew hours).

Your local crews could go on duty at "HQ", get their cars from the Class 1's, and head out for the paper mills and do thier shucking and jiving for 12 hours. Then, the second crew goes on duty at "HQ" and auto's out to the local, the crews exchange vehicles, the early crew drives home, the late crew finishes up the work and motors home to "HQ". If you can actually keep each crew to 8 hours, then the auto would be kept out at a tie-up point to auto back to "HQ" to make the crew change.

Lastly, double your cost of operations figure. You won't exceed that, but you will certainly exceed the numbers talked about above. You have taxes, insurances, bonds yada-yada that will cost you big bucks and you won't even think about before hand. Until you can get a good credit rating, you will be required to pay deposits in advance for supplies, for example.

I helped start up a short line in the early 1990's. I had been a RR for nearly 30 years by then and had diligently learned my craft (station services), dispatching, train and engine duties to name a few. I had proposed, costed and sold interline unit train services. I was not prepared for what ended up happening.
Eric
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Appleton, WI
  • 275 posts
Posted by tormadel on Tuesday, March 7, 2006 12:58 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear

Michael -

Concerning locomotives.

B23-7s. I can lease these units (due to industry connections) at $40/day/unit or $14,600/unit annually. Total $29,200.

SD40-2 or SD50. I can lease these units from a friendly source for $200/day or $146,000 for two annually. As mentioned above, I will likely be able to trade horsepower hours with the Class 1 involved as part of the deal meaning I will effectively be getting the equivalent of 5 locomotives for my investment of 2 to haul the coal. This multiple keeps rising the more coal I move until I max out the capability of the available locomotives.

LC


This almost makes me wish SD59's had been produced at all. 3000hp from a 12cyl gas meiser sounds like an awesome idea. But they didn't go over. There are what? 10 GP59's all in posession of Norfolk Southern?
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Appleton, WI
  • 275 posts
Posted by tormadel on Tuesday, March 7, 2006 12:40 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mudchicken

Hydraulic or Air tools / I-R Compressor or Hydraulic Power Unit? (Off the truck please) - Oh man have I seen the falacy of just two men, a truck and a backhoe....The small tool availability issue gets scary, especially with those who don't take care of the equipment.

Surfacing Gang every 30 Mos? (rent/subcontract?) Availability of TSR or TKO machine? How fast does it fall apart?

Qualified Welder or are we parts changers & cannibals? (Kills your supply materials budget)

Speed? (You guys with the mirriors always wanna go faster)...Track class 1 0r 2?


I would push for at least class 2 track. Not only to go alittle faster but for the increased safety and reduced chances of pesky derailments and such. I'm a believer in keeping the physical plant in the best shape that is economically practical. I know my father in law is a qualifed welder with 30yrs experiance who's looking for a new job but dunno if he'd want that kind of relocation <smile>. (alot of welders in my wife's side of the family actually)

And I should say this thread gets my excitement up just talking about it.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 3,190 posts
Posted by MichaelSol on Tuesday, March 7, 2006 12:03 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear

Michael -

Yeah, your numbers aren't too terribly out there, but I think we can still make it go. We could come in at $1.2M perhaps a little higher or lower. Again, the management team is talented enough to make it go and won't shy from hard work. Gotta be a GOOD deal to get me out from behind my control stand. This thing could have real legs and not be a highly leveraged house of cards like some short line groups...

LC

Wouldn't it be fun though ...

Best regards, Michael Sol
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 6, 2006 11:41 PM
Michael -

Yeah, your numbers aren't too terribly out there, but I think we can still make it go. We could come in at $1.2M perhaps a little higher or lower. Again, the management team is talented enough to make it go and won't shy from hard work. Gotta be a GOOD deal to get me out from behind my control stand. This thing could have real legs and not be a highly leveraged house of cards like some short line groups...

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 6, 2006 11:37 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mudchicken

Hydraulic or Air tools / I-R Compressor or Hydraulic Power Unit? (Off the truck please) - Oh man have I seen the falacy of just two men, a truck and a backhoe....The small tool availability issue gets scary, especially with those who don't take care of the equipment.

Surfacing Gang every 30 Mos? (rent/subcontract?) Availability of TSR or TKO machine? How fast does it fall apart?

Qualified Welder or are we parts changers & cannibals? (Kills your supply materials budget)

Speed? (You guys with the mirriors always wanna go faster)...Track class 1 0r 2?


About half is Class 2 the rest is class 1 currently. We have gone the compressor route in the past. I haven't had problems getting that gear resonably. I prefer 3 men. I usually cross train as trainmen as soon as I can. I also expect everyone to pitch in on the track to a degree (I know many of my fellow T&E folks hate it, but, cry me a river). I am a stickler on equipment. Those who don't take care of company material and equipment, don't last.

Surfacing gang, what's that?! Seriously, that will depend. We will be putting in a good number of ties out of the gate and repairing a couple of small washouts on the OOS portion. Remember that initially we should have the better part of a year to reopen about half of the line and that is where we will focus. That will mean contractors and machines on the property and a good chance to get off to a great start.

We have had good luck hiring welders locally in the past. If that is not possible we have people we can send.

LC
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 3,190 posts
Posted by MichaelSol on Monday, March 6, 2006 11:17 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear
As far as the payroll goes, I make it to be a total ... $529,950.

Well, that's close enough to my $592,000 estimate that regional variations in pay certainly makes $529,950 reasonable enough. Still seems like a lot of managers.

QUOTE:
Concerning Locomotives.

B23-7s. I can lease these units (due to industry connections) at $40/day/unit or $14,600/unit annually. Total $29,200.

SD40-2 or SD50. I can lease these units from a friendly source for $200/day or $146,000 for two annually.

My estimate was $313,230.51 annual lease charges for all of your estimated motive power, yours for four SD-40s and 2, 2000 hp units is $321,200. Pretty close.

QUOTE:
MOW Equipment

Boomtruck, Backhoe and trailer should be a total of about $75,000 from the right suppliers in good shape. Hirail inspection truck will be another $30,000 assuming good used vehicle with hirail mounted and FRA certified. I'd buy these with cash from the invested capital unless I was offered excellent lease terms.

Well, I estimated $150,000 for the lot, a $21,356 annual cost if financed or part of a financing package.

QUOTE:
So far, I'm only at $705,150 and I've covered many of my largest costs. I think $1.2M is not only doable, but I might have a few bucks left over, depending upon fuel costs, but as I intend to be junction settlement I'll ask for a cut of the Class 1 surcharge.

Fuel is a little tough to estimate because of the off-property use, but I would bet annual costs at between $110,00 and $156,000. Not sure if the estimated revenue includes or excludes a surcharge. I estimated $126,366 in annual fuel costs using a $1.76 per gallon figure.

I just got done with a business plan estimate that has generalized operating expenses at about $94,000; insurance, garbage, utilities, permits, licenses, the usual etc etc. It's always a surprise how fast those add up. I would guess, for hypothetical purposes, the general operating costs of a 30 mile railroad, including shop utility bills, parts/maintenance, insurance, lubricants, legal, professional, MOW supplies, garbage, licenses, permits, etc, at about $180,000 per year.

Still not sure about the extent of deferred maintenance, if any. How would heavy track work be done?

Based on my estimates,I get $1,232,952 in overall operating expenses. Pretty close to yours. Without knowing more, it does appear that you might well be able to beat those costs.

Still seems like a lot of managers.

Good luck.

Best regards, Michael Sol
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Monday, March 6, 2006 10:32 PM
Hydraulic or Air tools / I-R Compressor or Hydraulic Power Unit? (Off the truck please) - Oh man have I seen the falacy of just two men, a truck and a backhoe....The small tool availability issue gets scary, especially with those who don't take care of the equipment.

Surfacing Gang every 30 Mos? (rent/subcontract?) Availability of TSR or TKO machine? How fast does it fall apart?

Qualified Welder or are we parts changers & cannibals? (Kills your supply materials budget)

Speed? (You guys with the mirriors always wanna go faster)...Track class 1 0r 2?
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, March 6, 2006 10:14 PM
Mike...
Yes, two trains a day.
If you are switching out local plants, in this case, a woodchip and a cardboard plant, you have two choices...send the crew with a locomotive out from the "home" terminal to the plants, or park the locomotive out near one or the other and cab the crew back and forth...handled by one of the management folks.
At some point, you will have to bring some of those cars into and out of your yard for interchange...cardboard plants need more than just wood chips.

So who pulls and spots your interchange with the class 1s assuming you generate enough cars for a daily or every other day interchange?

Even if you don’t, you still have to serve the woodchip/cardboard guys, along with any other customers, and if you throw in a coal drag, you could have the interchange crew drag out the outbound to the interchange, leave them, pick up the coal at the interchange point, take the load to the plant, and pull the empty, return to the interchange point, leave the outbound empty coal, pick up any inbound freight and head back in to the yard...someone has to switch out the inbounds...more work than one crew could do in a 8 or a 12 hour shift.

Either way, you are going to need two crews/train a day to keep everyone happy.

Assume you can use the Class 1 power that arrives on the coal train to go spot the plant, and pull the empties, perform an initial terminal air test, hang the Fred, take the whole deal to the interchange point, write the air test slip, and leave the intact train for NS or CSX to pick up at their leisure, get on your power and return with any cars they left for you.

We do somewhat the same thing with grain trains, saves swapping power, doing more than one air test, keeps thing flowing.

Another concept would be the crew that does the coal move, on the days there is no coal, works the yard, switching and lining up spots for the local, blocking out the NS and CSX cars, while the local does their thing...still need two crews a day... even if your a 8am to 4pm five day a week operation.

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 6, 2006 8:43 PM
Michael -

With respect to your pay scale and payroll calculations they are very high. This is Appalachia we are talking about so your payroll numbers are also high. One other point. I'd probably start with my GM and Mechanical guy being among my 7 employees for the first line. Also, senior management will likely have to make concessions initially in exchange for later gains. The Board Member and perhaps Sr. Mgt will receive part or all of their compernsation in stock. Again, the financial structure is open for the time being.

As far as the payroll goes, I make it to be a total of $448,950 including full Railroad Retirement (Tier 1 and Tier 2). An additional $81,000 would give all employees full medical coverage. Total $529,950. People love to work for an employer with great retirement and medical benefits even if the wages are a bit lower.

Concerning locomotives.

B23-7s. I can lease these units (due to industry connections) at $40/day/unit or $14,600/unit annually. Total $29,200.

SD40-2 or SD50. I can lease these units from a friendly source for $200/day or $146,000 for two annually. As mentioned above, I will likely be able to trade horsepower hours with the Class 1 involved as part of the deal meaning I will effectively be getting the equivalent of 5 locomotives for my investment of 2 to haul the coal. This multiple keeps rising the more coal I move until I max out the capability of the available locomotives.

MOW Equipment

Boomtruck, Backhoe and trailer should be a total of about $75,000 from the right suppliers in good shape. Hirail inspection truck will be another $30,000 assuming good used vehicle with hirail mounted and FRA certified. I'd buy these with cash from the invested capital unless I was offered excellent lease terms.

So far, I'm only at $705,150 and I've covered many of my largest costs. I think $1.2M is not only doable, but I might have a few bucks left over, depending upon fuel costs, but as I intend to be junction settlement I'll ask for a cut of the Class 1 surcharge.

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 6, 2006 8:35 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by MichaelSol

QUOTE: Originally posted by edblysard
6 locomotives and 4 T&E...guessing two trains a day working as a turn plus a twice weekly coal drag....

Currently handling an average of 15 carloads a day.

At twice a week, each "coal drag" would average 23 carloads.

The rest of the traffic would generate 8.2 carloads per day, 11.5 per day if its a five day-a-week railroad.

"Two trains a day" sounds high ... and a bit expensive.

QUOTE:
Locomotives: 2 4 axle units(2000hp) and 4 six axle units (3,000+hp)

That's 16,000 available horsepower for something between 11 and 34 carloads a day. The proposal suggests a substantially "over-powered" railroad. Is there a reason for that much available horsepower for these size trains?

Best regards, Michael Sol


Michael -

You can't apply big road metrics to a short line of this size. Too few resources. See my comments below concerning locomotive reliability and the need to pool power to offline destinations. I'm not sure where the two trains daily is coming from. I'd see a local plus coal trains as needed. Coal trains now are typically once weekly and are 80 cars. Obviously, the trains will grow as the customers do. Given that this line is much closer to the coal than the loadouts that the two new customers are currently trucking to it seems likely they will use it. You'll notice our projections are at the low end of the range given that customers tend to inflate numbers.

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 6, 2006 8:20 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tormadel

I'm assuming the debt load is 0 because it's being had off a class 1. As to why they would want to get rid of it when it has blooming potential, don't know about that one........


As I said, the financial structure is not set. Management might choose to take on some debt. Is there debt coming in the acquisition, no.

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 6, 2006 8:14 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edblysard

Retired or second hand/third hand SD40s...a few GP38s...Models were not listed....you buy or lease what you can get for the money you have, weather it "overpowers" your needs or not.

Before we purchased the MK1500Ds, you would find us flat yard switching with SD9s, SD40-2s, GP 30s, 38s, U30s...just about anything we could beg, borrow or lease...even had one of the last UP rebuilt SW10s for a few years...little rascal worked great, till the electrical cabinet caught on fire!

Ed


Exactly. Given what I know is available out there right now I'd be looking for B23-7s for the 4 axles (12cyl fuel misers) and perhaps SD40-2s for the 6 axles or possibly GEs, but I don't care much for C30s. I have found them to not be terribly reliable.

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 6, 2006 8:08 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edblysard

Good so far...
Interchange points, single yard or multiple points?
Last bridge inspections were done when?
And next ones are due?

6 locomotives and 4 T&E...guessing two trains a day working as a turn plus a twice weekly coal drag....
What is the current debt load, and last, why is current owner getting rid of it?

Ed



Interchange points are at a runaround and a small yard respectively. You are correct two crews. Probably 1-2 jobs daily depending upon coal flows.

Locomotives were projected at six for two reasons. One is there is a local currently that spends a great deal of its time shuttling woodchips and cardboard between a couple of plants. This would likely be one or both 4 axle units. As to the six axles there is the coal. The thought with the six axles is they are cheap now and good protect power and there is a significant possibility of pooling power with one of the Class 1s which would take 2 units off the property for a week at a time. This can create a very favorable horsepower hours situation and will help avoid downtime due to locomotive failures. The offlline move is longer than the online for these coal trains and as such these units should quickly pay for themselves. Also, not all the locomotives are needed immediately. You'd probably want 2 4axles and 2 6 axles to start and grow from there.

Owner is seeking to abandon part of this property to salvage rail. The short line makes sense only if you get the entire line. The purchase price represents a slight discout on the NLV.

LC
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 3,190 posts
Posted by MichaelSol on Monday, March 6, 2006 7:34 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear
Proposed Management Team:

1. President.
2. Vice President.
3. Board Member.
4. Controller
5. Manager Mechanical.
6. General Manager .
7. 4 T&E
8. 3 MOW

Employees: 4 T&E; 3 MOW. To be adjusted as required by growth.

That's about one management level employee per "worker" bee.

I created an Excel model that shows the following payscales:
1. $70,000
2. $60,000
3. $5,000
4. $50,000
5. $50,000
6. $50,000
7. $40,000
8. $30,000

Total payroll including FICA, FUTA and SUTA is $592,000. Assuming little or no deferred maintenance, that cost should run about $6,451 per mile, maybe less, or about $206,451. $21,000 to finance hyrail and other operating equipment, that leaves the locomotives to be financed over 10 years and that would have to be at $100,000 for each 2,000 hp unit, and about $500,000 for each 3,000 hp unit.

Have to do some real bargain hunting to get under $1.2 million in operating costs.

Best regards, Michael Sol
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, March 6, 2006 5:10 PM
Retired or second hand/third hand SD40s...a few GP38s...Models were not listed....you buy or lease what you can get for the money you have, weather it "overpowers" your needs or not.

Before we purchased the MK1500Ds, you would find us flat yard switching with SD9s, SD40-2s, GP 30s, 38s, U30s...just about anything we could beg, borrow or lease...even had one of the last UP rebuilt SW10s for a few years...little rascal worked great, till the electrical cabinet caught on fire!

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Monday, March 6, 2006 4:35 PM
I agree with Michael, sounds like a lot more power than required. Like your experience level for President and Board. It is more than I would expect.

I am constitutionally skeptical of growth projections. Shippers lie. Traffic is where my research efforts would go.

Mac
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • 3,190 posts
Posted by MichaelSol on Monday, March 6, 2006 4:11 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edblysard
6 locomotives and 4 T&E...guessing two trains a day working as a turn plus a twice weekly coal drag....

Currently handling an average of 15 carloads a day.

At twice a week, each "coal drag" would average 23 carloads.

The rest of the traffic would generate 8.2 carloads per day, 11.5 per day if its a five day-a-week railroad.

"Two trains a day" sounds high ... and a bit expensive.

QUOTE:
Locomotives: 2 4 axle units(2000hp) and 4 six axle units (3,000+hp)

That's 16,000 available horsepower for something between 11 and 34 carloads a day. The proposal suggests a substantially "over-powered" railroad. Is there a reason for that much available horsepower for these size trains?

Best regards, Michael Sol
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Appleton, WI
  • 275 posts
Posted by tormadel on Monday, March 6, 2006 2:45 PM
I'm assuming the debt load is 0 because it's being had off a class 1. As to why they would want to get rid of it when it has blooming potential, don't know about that one........
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, March 6, 2006 2:43 PM
Good so far...
Interchange points, single yard or multiple points?
Last bridge inspections were done when?
And next ones are due?

6 locomotives and 4 T&E...guessing two trains a day working as a turn plus a twice weekly coal drag....
What is the current debt load, and last, why is current owner getting rid of it?

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Appleton, WI
  • 275 posts
Posted by tormadel on Monday, March 6, 2006 2:40 PM
Yeah I think Guilford is a good example of what can go wrong when you have someone with money buy into the industry who doesn't really seem to understand it. Guilford has been the black sheep of the family for as long as I can remember now.
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 592 posts
Posted by 88gta350 on Monday, March 6, 2006 2:32 PM
I wouldn't want to buy a share or two just to say I owned it, but if I had the money to buy a sizeable stake (say at least 10 shares or 1%) and was reasonably assured that I could see a nice return on my investment, then sure, I'm always looking for new investment opportunities.
Dave M
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Appleton, WI
  • 275 posts
Posted by tormadel on Monday, March 6, 2006 2:26 PM
yeah, dang this money thing eh Jodom?
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: Northern Florida
  • 1,429 posts
Posted by SALfan on Monday, March 6, 2006 10:56 AM
Other than the coal mines, sure sounds a lot like the Chattahoochee Industrial Railroad.

I'd be interested in making the investment, if I had the money.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Monday, March 6, 2006 9:25 AM
I wouldn't sell the farm to make the investment, but I would consider adding some share of the railroad to a diversified portfolio.

If I was younger, I might consider taking more shares, thus increasing my level of risk, but I would also be looking for some form of active participation in the venture.

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy