Trains.com

Breakup Railroads That Lie!

2533 views
38 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 22, 2006 4:55 PM
Time to kill this mind-numbingly stupid thread.
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 965 posts
Posted by Lyon_Wonder on Sunday, January 22, 2006 4:26 PM
Several years back around 1999-2000 BNSF contemplated a merger with CN, which the STB rejected, though in recent months I’ve seen CN engines along with CN/IC rolling stock using BNSF trackage here in central Illinois on the Beardstown sub, which includes black-painted IC engines and even maroon WC SD45s.
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 965 posts
Posted by Lyon_Wonder on Sunday, January 22, 2006 4:11 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by BNSFrailfan.

QUOTE: Originally posted by K. P. Harrier

I believe a railroad that lies through its teeth should be broken up into two or more railroads. Because of railroading’s nature and importance to America, the natural process of ELIMINATING unscrupulous businesses through awareness is NOT practical. But government ordered breakups is practical, and very safe! A serious threat of THAT could orientate matters aright within shady companies that happen to be super important to the continued economic well being of the nation.

You mean like the Union Pacific that lied about forceing Model Railroaders to pay for stupid fee's over their Jack a** Swoosh Logo.


Bring back the CN&W!
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Sunday, January 22, 2006 4:06 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by BNSFrailfan.

QUOTE: Originally posted by K. P. Harrier

I believe a railroad that lies through its teeth should be broken up into two or more railroads. Because of railroading’s nature and importance to America, the natural process of ELIMINATING unscrupulous businesses through awareness is NOT practical. But government ordered breakups is practical, and very safe! A serious threat of THAT could orientate matters aright within shady companies that happen to be super important to the continued economic well being of the nation.

You mean like the Union Pacific that lied about forceing Model Railroaders to pay for stupid fee's over their Jack a** Swoosh Logo.

That idiotic swoosh logo belongs to BNSF,not the stUPid RR!
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Robe Valley, Wa.
  • 719 posts
Posted by GN-Rick on Sunday, January 22, 2006 4:01 PM
"Lunatic fringe . . . .we all know you're out there . . . . . '
Rick Bolger Great Northern Railway Cascade Division-Lines West
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 22, 2006 3:04 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by K. P. Harrier

I believe a railroad that lies through its teeth should be broken up into two or more railroads. Because of railroading’s nature and importance to America, the natural process of ELIMINATING unscrupulous businesses through awareness is NOT practical. But government ordered breakups is practical, and very safe! A serious threat of THAT could orientate matters aright within shady companies that happen to be super important to the continued economic well being of the nation.

You mean like the Union Pacific that lied about forceing Model Railroaders to pay for stupid fee's over their Jack a** Swoosh Logo.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 22, 2006 1:04 PM
It will take an economic crisis to get Congress to finally act. As I stated before, according to energy sector analysts, 2006 may be the year when it all comes crumbling down, as railroads have not kept up with demands for coal deliveries in 2005, and demand for coal is supposed to skyrocket in 2006, yet there has been little if any in railroad capacity improvements on coal hauling corridors. The railroads seem to think that increasing capacity on the import intermodal corridors is a priority. Combine that poor service with the current round of rate gouging imposed upon domestic producers, and it is easy to predict that legislative action is inevitable. The only question is if it takes place before the 2006 elections, which assumes the Republicans will take the lead on breaking up the rail oligarchy (less likely), or after the 2006 elections, which assumes the lack of action on behalf of the Republicans will result in the Democrats taking back the House or Senate (more likely).
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 22, 2006 10:35 AM
liar liar pants on fire...
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Sunday, January 22, 2006 10:11 AM
so what are you going to call these railroads. I have yet to see one that dont lie. look for the shake down near you
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 7,968 posts
Breakup Railroads That Lie!
Posted by K. P. Harrier on Sunday, January 22, 2006 8:02 AM
I believe a railroad that lies through its teeth should be broken up into two or more railroads. Because of railroading’s nature and importance to America, the natural process of ELIMINATING unscrupulous businesses through awareness is NOT practical. But government ordered breakups is practical, and very safe! A serious threat of THAT could orientate matters aright within shady companies that happen to be super important to the continued economic well being of the nation.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.P.’s absolute “theorem” from early, early childhood that he has seen over and over and over again: Those that CAUSE a problem in the first place will act the most violently if questioned or exposed.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy