QUOTE: Originally posted by TomDiehl QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele The choice of emotions for this situation comes down to a simple little question: Did the mother intent for the child to lose her arm? of course not. maybe she is not a good parent because she doesn't pay attention to some things, maybe it is even better for the girl to live with someone else who can take care of her, but non of that means we should be angry at the mother. And why not? Her extreme stupidity is what caused her daughter to lose her arm. Intended to or not has nothing to do with emotions. She obviously isn't fit to raise childern and have them live to adulthood.
QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele The choice of emotions for this situation comes down to a simple little question: Did the mother intent for the child to lose her arm? of course not. maybe she is not a good parent because she doesn't pay attention to some things, maybe it is even better for the girl to live with someone else who can take care of her, but non of that means we should be angry at the mother.
QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele QUOTE: Originally posted by TomDiehl QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele QUOTE: Originally posted by farmer03 maybe someone already suggested this but i'm too lazy to read thru every post which is usually the same. but a crime should be 'repaid' eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth. run the mom's arm over with a train to even the score for effin up her daughter. the mother obviously must not be all that great if the kids live with their father and he has primary custody (dunno if that's a proper term or not but you get the idea). What happened to christian values of turning the other cheek? Well, Jesus must have been a fool then... Jesus wasn't stupid or lazy enough to lead small children through such a dangerous situation when the safe way of passage wasn't that far away. Well I didn't have Jesus in mind as an examplary parent, but as an examplary judge
QUOTE: Originally posted by TomDiehl QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele QUOTE: Originally posted by farmer03 maybe someone already suggested this but i'm too lazy to read thru every post which is usually the same. but a crime should be 'repaid' eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth. run the mom's arm over with a train to even the score for effin up her daughter. the mother obviously must not be all that great if the kids live with their father and he has primary custody (dunno if that's a proper term or not but you get the idea). What happened to christian values of turning the other cheek? Well, Jesus must have been a fool then... Jesus wasn't stupid or lazy enough to lead small children through such a dangerous situation when the safe way of passage wasn't that far away.
QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele QUOTE: Originally posted by farmer03 maybe someone already suggested this but i'm too lazy to read thru every post which is usually the same. but a crime should be 'repaid' eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth. run the mom's arm over with a train to even the score for effin up her daughter. the mother obviously must not be all that great if the kids live with their father and he has primary custody (dunno if that's a proper term or not but you get the idea). What happened to christian values of turning the other cheek? Well, Jesus must have been a fool then...
QUOTE: Originally posted by farmer03 maybe someone already suggested this but i'm too lazy to read thru every post which is usually the same. but a crime should be 'repaid' eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth. run the mom's arm over with a train to even the score for effin up her daughter. the mother obviously must not be all that great if the kids live with their father and he has primary custody (dunno if that's a proper term or not but you get the idea).
QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele QUOTE: Originally posted by TomDiehl QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele QUOTE: Originally posted by espeefoamer The boyfriend should have been charged too,and both should have been thrown in jail immediately[:(!]! and how would this help them and the child? For one thing, it would remove this child and any other childeren she has from such dangerous custody. Almost any foster parents would be smarter than this moron. Well, why don't we ask the child with whoom would she rather live. I know I soure wouldn't like someone I don't even know decide where I'm going to live.
QUOTE: Originally posted by TomDiehl QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele QUOTE: Originally posted by espeefoamer The boyfriend should have been charged too,and both should have been thrown in jail immediately[:(!]! and how would this help them and the child? For one thing, it would remove this child and any other childeren she has from such dangerous custody. Almost any foster parents would be smarter than this moron.
QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele QUOTE: Originally posted by espeefoamer The boyfriend should have been charged too,and both should have been thrown in jail immediately[:(!]! and how would this help them and the child?
QUOTE: Originally posted by espeefoamer The boyfriend should have been charged too,and both should have been thrown in jail immediately[:(!]!
QUOTE: Originally posted by CANADIANPACIFIC2816 QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele so much anger in you people Hey, some of us have a right to be angry. Within the last hour I came close to witnessing another traggedy much like this one. I was out photographing some cars on one of the BNSF's siding a few blocks from my home. About the time I had finished taking pictures and was ready to head for home, a couple engines coupled onto one end of this cut of cars out of my line of sight, and I am talking of at least 20 cars here. I could hear the brake line being charged with air throughout the entire string of cars. Just as I was about to head for home, I watched two adults come walking off the bike trail and they headed straight for this cut of cars. I instinctively knew what they had in mind and I warned them not to do it. They crawled underneath a covered hopper and were gone. Hardly a minute later that train started moving!! This scared the HELL out of me and I was not prepared for what might have happened! I do not carry a cell phone so I could not have called the police or the railroad authorities to warn them! None of us who are witnesses to things like this need to have our days ruined by people who should know better. I would not sleep very well at all if these two individuals had ended up badly hurt or at worse, killed right in front of me. CANADIANPACIFIC2816
QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele so much anger in you people
QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele QUOTE: Originally posted by BaltACD My sympathies to the girl.....the mother and boyfriend shoud get to place thier necks on the rail under a train and wait.....and wait.....and wait....and wonder when it is going to start moving....AND IT WILL. Darwin Award candidates, unfortunately endangering the lives of defenseless children, who if they follow the family role models will never become adults. the child could not have understood the danger and could not calculate or judge the situation, but you are forgetting that many grownups are like that too. Just because someone is older than 16,18,20, o 30 or whatever doesn't mean he is capable of making intelligent judgements. To use simpler words, many people are plainly stupid. And you can't really blaim someone for being stupid, just like you can't blaim a child for being less aware and intelligent than some (!) grownups
QUOTE: Originally posted by BaltACD My sympathies to the girl.....the mother and boyfriend shoud get to place thier necks on the rail under a train and wait.....and wait.....and wait....and wonder when it is going to start moving....AND IT WILL. Darwin Award candidates, unfortunately endangering the lives of defenseless children, who if they follow the family role models will never become adults.
23 17 46 11
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
QUOTE: Originally posted by mehrlich QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele so much anger in you people Not me.[;)][:D][8D] Me either. Getting angy isn't going to fix what happened. Calling people names isn't going to fix what happened. Thinking of appropriate punishment to the (insert name of guilty party here...) isn't going to change what happened. How about we not bring up crossing accidents any more? The responses are the same over and over again. Or better yet, how about a new forum just for crossing accidents or people going around crossing arms? mike
QUOTE: Originally posted by chad thomas QUOTE: Originally posted by electro-ortcele so much anger in you people Not me.[;)][:D][8D]
QUOTE: Originally posted by tree68 But.... It can't happen to ME!
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.