QUOTE: We took the Southwest Chief east bound from LA to Chicago 2 years ago. I did not observe any delays from UP feight trains. In fact, we arrived in Chicago ON TIME.
Originally posted by BNSF4ever Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply ericsp Member sinceMay 2015 5,134 posts Posted by ericsp on Sunday, July 17, 2005 11:52 PM I think that UP's top priority right now is reducing the congestion. "No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld) Reply joegreen Member sinceApril 2004 From: Illinois 484 posts Posted by joegreen on Sunday, July 17, 2005 6:49 PM Well thats UP for ya.;) A year ago when they were replacing the CP bridge in Lacrosse CP rerouted its Amtrak trains on the BNSF........BNSF parked all the freights,stack trains,Z-trains on the sidings while the Amtrak trains just flew by. I thought that was nice since the trains were reroute trains.I've seen other railroads just side all the reroute trains for hours to let their own trains by first...........selfish,selfish,selfish;) www.12ozprophet.com Reply BNSF4ever Member sinceDecember 2004 380 posts BNSF vs UP Posted by BNSF4ever on Sunday, July 17, 2005 5:57 PM Not wanting to annoy the UP fans who were graciousness enough to post to my UP topic, I present these facts. Fair or unfair, it contributes to public perception. Perhaps, as some on this forum have said, that public opinion of a railroad doesn't matter (I disagree but that's another topic). I took Amtrak California #714 from Oakland to Bakersfield yesterday and when we got onto BNSF tracks I began noticing a curious phenomenon: BNSF freights at a standstill. It then dawned on me that they were taking a siding for us. We must have passed eight BNSF freights that were pulled over for us. The only time we took a siding or came to a stop was for #11 at Martinez or two northbound San Joaquins. Returning same day on #703 to Sacramento, this string of luck began to fizzle. I still saw BNSF freights taking a siding for us, but two times we took a siding for them. As soon as we reached Stockton, our Conductor came over the intercom: "Folks we have left the BNSF Railway and are now on Union Pacific (pause) Hoo-wee! We're now having to wait for a freight ahead uf us." I was surprised to hear the Conductor take a dig at UP (most probably did not understand). As I got off in Stockton, I asked him whether my eyes were correct: that BNSF had given us priority and that as soon as we entered UP track, we were shunted aside. The Conductor's friendly face hardened a bit--almost as if he had remembered some Amtrak California memo ("Please do not criticize Union Pacific to passengers, that does not help things."'). "Sometimes" he answered to both of my questions. Imagine if all Class Is gave Amtrak's intercity trains (not many in the grand scheme) priority. As Louis Armstrong sang "What a wonderful world this would be..." PS--Side note, it was GLORIOUS to be on BNSF track with Warbonnets, Yellowbonnets, Cascade Green, Heritage I, Heritage II, NS run-throughs, ex-LMX, and Montana Rail Link all in evidence. Reply 12 Join our Community! Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account. Login » Register » Search the Community Newsletter Sign-Up By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy More great sites from Kalmbach Media Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy
Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub
"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.