Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
QUOTE: Crack passenger trains brought in a lot of money back then.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan Really if you think about it, the long distance Amtrak stuff should be third in priority because it is more of a leisure ride then a commuter run. Commuter traffic should be first either Amtrak commuter or Metrolink type then Z class intermodal and then Amtrak long distance service.
QUOTE: Originally posted by dinwitty used to be crack passenger trains had priority over any other class of train. generally the train priorities went 1st class passenger/2nd class pasenger/mail/1st class scheduled freight, 2nd/3rd class freights/extra - peddle freights with low priority a nd if there were arguements, the lower class train was to take siding to let the higher class pass. and eastbound or westbound would have priority over the opposing directing... this helps make operations organized and without arguements. now what.....
QUOTE: Originally posted by BNSF4ever Yes facts. If I saw one or two freights at a standstill I might not think much of it. But I saw this time and again. UP has no incentive for giving Amtrak higher priority. However, Amtrak was formed at a time when the government still regulated the railroads. I am surprised that some language was not put in the National Rail Passenger Act that guaranteed Amtrak priority. What was in it for the railroads? Those that joined Amtrak (for a fee, yes), were immediately freed from money losing passenger trains. Again, we're not talking a huge number of passenger trains. But the act is written, what's done is done and it appears Amtrak's western intercity trains are at the mercy of the freight railroads.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.