Trains.com

CP is buying KCS

12114 views
112 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2017
  • 128 posts
CP is buying KCS
Posted by RailEagle on Saturday, March 20, 2021 11:26 PM
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Brooklyn Center, MN.
  • 702 posts
Posted by Los Angeles Rams Guy on Saturday, March 20, 2021 11:43 PM

YESSSSS!!!!!  Finally!!!  

"Beating 'SC is not a matter of life or death. It's more important than that." Former UCLA Head Football Coach Red Sanders
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Saturday, March 20, 2021 11:44 PM

Bloomberg article.

Canadian Pacific Said Near $25 Billion Kansas City Southern Deal - Bloomberg

The first post link said STB already approved purchase.  Rail eagle ""IMO  no way.

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Brooklyn Center, MN.
  • 702 posts
Posted by Los Angeles Rams Guy on Saturday, March 20, 2021 11:45 PM

And from Financial Times as well.  Just didn't expect this to happen late on a Saturday night though.  https://www.ft.com/content/9d4c383a-b3ee-415d-beaf-3cc7a6dc5993

"Beating 'SC is not a matter of life or death. It's more important than that." Former UCLA Head Football Coach Red Sanders
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Sunday, March 21, 2021 12:23 AM

How can STB approve if (as of Friday) there isn't a finance docket (FD-) yet? 

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Sterling Heights, Michigan
  • 1,691 posts
Posted by SD60MAC9500 on Sunday, March 21, 2021 12:24 AM
 

This looks like a April fools that leaked too early...

 
 
Rahhhhhhhhh!!!!
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Sunday, March 21, 2021 2:43 AM

This purchase does make sense.

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 599 posts
Posted by azrail on Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:30 AM

KCS operates in Mexico also, and I imagine they will say no.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, March 21, 2021 7:23 AM

Will STB consider this a 'Major' tranaction?

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Sunday, March 21, 2021 8:23 AM

Big news maybe but likely just wishful thinking until STB grants approval. Government approval with strings attached won't come quickly.. 

  • Member since
    August 2009
  • 322 posts
Posted by BLS53 on Sunday, March 21, 2021 8:24 AM

I've wondered how KCS managed to remain a survivor, when all other similar sized Class I's have been absorbed decades ago.

Given the similarities with KCS and the IC, this seems to have been the perfect move for CP right after the CN/IC merger. Don't know why it took so long. 

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Sunday, March 21, 2021 9:48 AM

Great news and I kind of suspected it earlier as Milwaukee Road had a relationship with KCS in KC that Soo Line and then CP kind of inherited.    CP will give KCS the Capital it needs to continue to upgrade it's line in South Texas as well.    Texas will become a trading gateway for North-South trade for U.S. and Canada, more jobs for Texas.

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Sunday, March 21, 2021 9:50 AM

BLS53
I've wondered how KCS managed to remain a survivor, when all other similar sized Class I's have been absorbed decades ago.

KCS used their heavy debt and then their increased size (KCS de Mexico) as kind of a poison pill takeover defense.    CP just gained so much access to capital the debt and size obstacles were no longer an impediment.

  • Member since
    June 2019
  • 313 posts
Posted by Juniata Man on Sunday, March 21, 2021 10:13 AM

I'm gonna surmise that anyone commenting "great news" has never been a rail shipper during a merger. If promises of merger related improvements were currency, shippers would have been millionaires after the last round of Class 1 mergers.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Sunday, March 21, 2021 10:26 AM

Balt, back in the day when the STB revamped merger rules as a result of the proposed Santa Fe-CN merger, they left KCS in the "old rules" category. The old rules, if I remember correctly, were geared toward merger approval, while the new rules were more stringent.

At the same time, both carrriers are Class I so it will almost assuredly have to be a major transaction.

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Sterling Heights, Michigan
  • 1,691 posts
Posted by SD60MAC9500 on Sunday, March 21, 2021 10:51 AM
 

Now that this is official. CP will be a force to reckon with in Automotive. The Big 3 now have access to single line service from the Midwest to Mexico. This part is what I'm most curious, and excited about with this combination. CP will more than likely make a move on CSX's Grand Rapids Line between Porter, IN and Detroit. They'll need their own RoW now between Chicago and Detroit. Expect a future annoucnement on a new Detroit-Windsor Rail Tunnel.

 
 
Rahhhhhhhhh!!!!
  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Sunday, March 21, 2021 10:52 AM

azrail

KCS operates in Mexico also, and I imagine they will say no.

KCS bought out the Mexican share of KCS de Mexico in 2005.   So if your referring to the Mexican government blocking the merger.     Not sure on what grounds they would do so because the Merged track or track consolidation would be entirely outside of Mexico.    And had they wanted to object they would have objected to the 2005 buy out but they did not.   The merged system is in the national interest of Mexico as well in regards to lengthening their reach into the U.S. and Canada.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Sunday, March 21, 2021 11:18 AM

Will NS try to acquire full ownership of the Meridian speedway ?

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, March 21, 2021 11:40 AM

Juniata Man
I'm gonna surmise that anyone commenting "great news" has never been a rail shipper during a merger. If promises of merger related improvements were currency, shippers would have been millionaires after the last round of Class 1 mergers.

CP-KCS is basically a end to end merger, so there is not much in the way of duplicate lines to be eliminated as there were in most of the rest of the Class 1 mergers.  The elimination of duplicate lines and thus competition at locations those lines served.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    June 2019
  • 313 posts
Posted by Juniata Man on Sunday, March 21, 2021 11:58 AM

Balt:

"End to end" isn't what it used to be.

Where this will have a negative competitive impact is at Canadian origins with interswitching that ship to KCS destinations in the south central US. 

Under the current environment, a Canadian shipper can use either CP or CN to handle the first half to two thirds of a linehaul to say a point in Arkansas, Louisiana, Texas or Mississippi. If CP controls KCS, that option goes away as CP will insist on a maximum linehaul. 

Of course, the reverse is true for a US shipper originating on KCS going to Canadian destinations at which they currently can negotiate with both CP and CN and select the better option.

CW

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 599 posts
Posted by azrail on Sunday, March 21, 2021 1:15 PM

The combined parent company will be called "Canadian Pacific Kansas City"(?)

It sounds like CP and KCS will be kept as separate companies, due to different labor laws/Union agreements between the 3 countries 

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Sunday, March 21, 2021 1:33 PM

CP gets a second trancontinental out of the deal too... across Panama. No mention of this in any article I've seen thus far. KCS currently owns 50% of the Panama Canal Railway.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Sunday, March 21, 2021 1:50 PM

azrail

The combined parent company will be called "Canadian Pacific Kansas City"(?)

It sounds like CP and KCS will be kept as separate companies, due to different labor laws/Union agreements between the 3 countries 

 

Actually Soo Line, DM&E and IC&E still exist on paper under the CP corporate umbrella.

KCS is likely to be acquired in a similar fashion.

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,283 posts
Posted by n012944 on Sunday, March 21, 2021 2:14 PM

SD60MAC9500
 

 CP will more than likely make a move on CSX's Grand Rapids Line between Porter, IN and Detroit. They'll need their own RoW now between Chicago and Detroit. 

 

Except the PM won't get them what the "need".  First, I doubt the line from Plymouth to Detroit is for sale.  Second, as you state, the westbound end of the line is in Porter In.  So CP "needs" their own right a way between Chicago and Detroit, so it buys a railroad from NW Indiana to Plymouth Michigan?  Such a route would still require trackage rights between Porter and Chicago over the NS, which is the busiest portion of the route.  Such a route would still require rights over CSX from Plymouth to Detroit, which can be congested at times.

 

One also has to ask if the portion from Porter to Holland is even for sale?  West Olive is supposed to be in operation until 2030, which on average takes one coal train a day.  That is a lot of revenue to get rid of.

 

It also overlooks the fact that it really is not a good route.  Short sidings, a hill that requires east bounds to have a helper if over 10k tons (12k if 1+1 DP), and an ancient signal system.  I think the CP will keep the route they have, trackage rights over the NS via Elkhart will serve the well.

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Sunday, March 21, 2021 5:36 PM

This could possibly be another of those scenarios that was [played put in the 1980's....  [Possibly remember the "Koda chrome SP/AT&SF era"?  That one got stepped on pretty hard by STB and 'denied'; leaving the scene with  yellow and red  fleets, some with big SP's, and some with SF's for identifications....SighWhistling

So don't get too anxious....After all, "....It ain't over til the fat lady sings..."

Everyone seems to be cncerned that the current major concern, being what'll happen in the PNW, and down the Left Coast?  

Do npt forget that KCS Rwy may be a 'center of the Country' Operation, connecting Choicago, St. Louis and NOLA;   It also within its 'system' accesses a half dozen Gulf Coast Ports, Deep Sea River access points, and has lines all the way to Central Mexico. Not to also mention the mexican port of Lorenzo Cardenas, on the West Coast of Mexico.     And then, there is 1/2 ownership(?) of the 'Meridian Speedway' with NS; which then gets them into  Central Tennessee, Mississippi and Alabama Gulf ports, and also western Florida (@ Pensacola). 

 So that $ 25 B price tag begins to look like a pretty good deal?  Cool   

 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Sunday, March 21, 2021 5:50 PM

How about a "Wabash Speedway" deal with NS to Detroit and bypass Chicago?

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Sunday, March 21, 2021 7:54 PM

I was looking at their roster curious how the dominos might fall there if this is successful, and saw that they were apparently down to six SD60's on the Panama Canal Railway. When did their sizeable SD60 fleet go?

Will be odd potentially seeing a GP40-2LW in CPR colors. 

 

 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Sunday, March 21, 2021 10:24 PM

kgbw49

 

 
azrail

The combined parent company will be called "Canadian Pacific Kansas City"(?)

It sounds like CP and KCS will be kept as separate companies, due to different labor laws/Union agreements between the 3 countries 

 

 

 

Actually Soo Line, DM&E and IC&E still exist on paper under the CP corporate umbrella.

KCS is likely to be acquired in a similar fashion.

 

I think IC&E was combined into DM&E and no longer exists, even on paper.  I remember reading a request submitted to the STB by CPRS to allow SOO and DM&E to have trackage rights over each other between physical interchange points to various points on each railroad.  Some of the points were former IC&E locations.   

CPRS said it was to improve customer service.  Many took it to mean letting lower paid DM&E crews to run farther instead of higher paid SOO crews.

Jeff 

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Sterling Heights, Michigan
  • 1,691 posts
Posted by SD60MAC9500 on Sunday, March 21, 2021 11:35 PM
 

n012944

 

 
SD60MAC9500
 

 CP will more than likely make a move on CSX's Grand Rapids Line between Porter, IN and Detroit. They'll need their own RoW now between Chicago and Detroit. 

 

 

 

Except the PM won't get them what the "need".  First, I doubt the line from Plymouth to Detroit is for sale.  Second, as you state, the westbound end of the line is in Porter In.  So CP "needs" their own right a way between Chicago and Detroit, so it buys a railroad from NW Indiana to Plymouth Michigan?  Such a route would still require trackage rights between Porter and Chicago over the NS, which is the busiest portion of the route.  Such a route would still require rights over CSX from Plymouth to Detroit, which can be congested at times.

 

One also has to ask if the portion from Porter to Holland is even for sale?  West Olive is supposed to be in operation until 2030, which on average takes one coal train a day.  That is a lot of revenue to get rid of.

 

It also overlooks the fact that it really is not a good route.  Short sidings, a hill that requires east bounds to have a helper if over 10k tons (12k if 1+1 DP), and an ancient signal system.  I think the CP will keep the route they have, trackage rights over the NS via Elkhart will serve the well.

 

I didn't realize the Campbell plant would be in operation till 2030. I had to do some catching up. They're expecting unit #3 the last after 2031 to shut down in 2040. In that regard coal is paying the bills until then. 

I forgot about the hill at I think Saugatuck?

 

 
Rahhhhhhhhh!!!!
  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Monday, March 22, 2021 12:46 AM

Given the potential for increased traffic from Canada to Mexico through KC, does anyone have any thoughts as to where 15,000-foot sidings can be installed between La Crescent, MN and Bettendorf, IA?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy