Trains.com

Train Consists Should Take Aesthetics Into Consideration

3608 views
36 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,754 posts
Posted by diningcar on Thursday, December 24, 2020 1:54 PM

Likely that most of those coal cars are owned by the utility company. Same for the boxes in wells on the long container trains. The railroads are owning fewer of the cars or boxes that makeup their trains.  

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Thursday, December 24, 2020 1:46 PM

Shock Control

...

I think the railroads need to be a little more adventurous and imaginitive in their consists.

What do you think?

Happy Holidays!

 

It would be nice, along with everyone being multimillionaires, all homes with a large SUV for everyone in a garage large enough to house them, all homes with 100" OLED televisions, all people getting guaranteed income from a most beneficent government of, say, USD$100K.  Wouldn't that be nice?

Merry Christmas!

  • Member since
    December 2016
  • 554 posts
Posted by Shock Control on Thursday, December 24, 2020 1:43 PM

Semper Vaporo
... It'll sure be nice to see neatly tailored trains (with a little red caboose on the end!)....

A kindred spirit!  Yeah I started a separate thread on the potential of our rail-friendly president to reinstate the caboose!  Yes

http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/111/t/285618.aspx

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, December 24, 2020 1:26 PM

Semper Vaporo
Thank you for volunteering to foot the bill the RRs will have making up trains to fit your esthetic notions.  I am sure there are others that will be happy to enjoy what you are paying for.

Thanks, again.  It'll sure be nice to see neatly tailored trains (with a little red caboose on the end!).  And all because of your generosity.

One thing many railfans overlook in their fandom - railroads exist for the economic equation of making money from what shipper/consignees pay for having goods transported between them.  They are not paid for 'artistic' appearance of the freight trains they operate.

Personally, when the railroads were operating their own passenger trains, I viewed trains that weren't consistent in their livery as being 'sub-standard' aesthetically, how dare they interrupt the beauty of the trains paint schemes with cars that actually paid the bills for the trains to operate, express cars, baggage cars RPO's and worst of all heavyweight cars.  The thoughts of a child.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Thursday, December 24, 2020 12:24 PM

Thank you for volunteering to foot the bill the RRs will have making up trains to fit your esthetic notions.  I am sure there are others that will be happy to enjoy what you are paying for.

Thanks, again.  It'll sure be nice to see neatly tailored trains (with a little red caboose on the end!).  And all because of your generosity.

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, December 24, 2020 11:34 AM

There's something fascinating about 100+ identical cars rolling past, too.  A full train of auto racks is something to behold, as well.  A moving wall.

As Flintlock said, the days of billboard boxcars are long gone.  

Still, there can be substantial variations in manifest freights, and sometimes the "bonus art" can be entertaining.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Thursday, December 24, 2020 11:31 AM

I think, as the saying goes, "Them days is gone!"  Although I'd love to see a long train of classic billboard boxcars the only place I'm ever going to see that now is on the O gauge layout.

I'm willing to settle for clean well-kept locomotives and let it go at that. 

  • Member since
    December 2016
  • 554 posts
Train Consists Should Take Aesthetics Into Consideration
Posted by Shock Control on Thursday, December 24, 2020 11:20 AM

Why don't railroads add more variety to their train consists, for aesthetic appeal?

For example, If I'm watching a coal train - or Coltrane, where I come from - it gets boring to watch a string of identical coal hoppers one after another after another.

Why not spice it up a little with, say, a brightly painted box car with a brush-script slogan on the side, like "Everywhere West" or "The Route of Phoebe Snow?"  Or perhaps a Diamond chemical car, or a flat car carrying a missile or satellite?

I think the railroads need to be a little more adventurous and imaginitive in their consists.

What do you think?

Happy Holidays!

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy