mudchicken (5*) Deadwood, SD (CB&Q)
(5*) Deadwood, SD (CB&Q)
Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
tree68 A long defunct railroad in the Adirondacks had both a loop, and a wye, at opposite ends of the 17 mile line. The Racquette Lake Railroad was built by the rich and famous (Collis Huntington was a founder) for the rich and famous (it's said that Huntington's wife said she wouldn't go to their "camp" in the Adirondacks unless she could get their by train). The connection with the NYC at Carter included a wye, but only one end connected to the NYC - the other end was simply the tail track. The Racquette Lake station was on a loop. NYC took huge amounts of ice out of the area for it's icing facilities. https://www.adirondackalmanack.com/2014/03/life-times-raquette-lake-railway.html
A long defunct railroad in the Adirondacks had both a loop, and a wye, at opposite ends of the 17 mile line.
The Racquette Lake Railroad was built by the rich and famous (Collis Huntington was a founder) for the rich and famous (it's said that Huntington's wife said she wouldn't go to their "camp" in the Adirondacks unless she could get their by train).
The connection with the NYC at Carter included a wye, but only one end connected to the NYC - the other end was simply the tail track.
The Racquette Lake station was on a loop.
NYC took huge amounts of ice out of the area for it's icing facilities.
https://www.adirondackalmanack.com/2014/03/life-times-raquette-lake-railway.html
Larry Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date Come ride the rails with me! There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...
mudchicken IF the loop was big enough or the train was short enough.
IF the loop was big enough or the train was short enough.
Don't think the length of loop would be an issue for typical passenger train to a national park. The Gardiner MT loop looks to have been a 15 degree curvature, so overall loop length would have been 2,000' feet or so.
(loops are big real estate hogs)
La Junta yard went from wye to turntable to bigger turntable (after Dec 1903 RH fire) to wye to loop (1986). There also is a main track wye there, unchanged in almost 120 years.
Erik_MagI also would assume that it was faster to turn a train on a loop than a wye.
MidlandMike UP seemed to have a thing for loops at some of their branch terminals. There was one at Cedar City, UT, gateway to Zion and Bryce Canyon National Parks.
UP seemed to have a thing for loops at some of their branch terminals. There was one at Cedar City, UT, gateway to Zion and Bryce Canyon National Parks.
UP's West Yellowstone line used a wye, with the stub doing double duty in serving a lumber mill. NP's Yellowstone (Gardiner MT) terminated in a loop.
I also would assume that it was faster to turn a train on a loop than a wye.
Paul Milenkovic At the end of their service lives, and for the ones that survive, they may have only been mostly grain gathering lines. When they were built, the railroad was the only long distance transportation available for most. Just about everything needed that couldn't be produced locally came in by rail. Many lines, including main lines weren't built to the standards of later years. Those that showed the economic justification would get improvements; like line changes, better bridges, upgraded depots, etc. Those that didn't would not get such improvements and end their days just as they had orginally laid down. Jeff BaltACD Murphy Siding Thanks for the info and the links guys. I'm spending some quality time falling down ratholes chasing 100 year old rail lines. Is it still OK to talk about trains and railroads on thsi forum?I've noticed by looking at old maps, Google Earth images, photos and also by observation in the field that Rock Island built their lines to a lot lower standards in my area than the Milwaukee, CNW, Great Northern and even Illinois Central. Most times I can follow where an old line used to be. The Rock Island lines around here (SD, MN, IA area) were mostly grain gathering branch lines. They are the ones most likely to have reverted to farmland. It looks like they did minimal cut and fill, so the trains 100 years ago must have been roller coasters. Railroads were built to the level of financing the companies building them had. If the company had a sound financial base the line would be constructed to a higher level of engineering and execution. If the company was chicken scratching for every nickel and dime it could find the line was laid on top of the ground in the cheapest way possible. Can one suppose that the level of financing had something to do with the projected level of financial returns? That if there were strong prospects for railroad traffic that there would be incentive to spend the money to build the line to a standard allowing movement of that traffic at a lower operating cost? The grain-gathering branch lines are problematic in that regard inasmuch as the traffic is largely that one bulk commodity, and the traffic is highly seasonal, with the investment in roadbed along with rolling stock being idle much of the time?
At the end of their service lives, and for the ones that survive, they may have only been mostly grain gathering lines. When they were built, the railroad was the only long distance transportation available for most. Just about everything needed that couldn't be produced locally came in by rail.
Many lines, including main lines weren't built to the standards of later years. Those that showed the economic justification would get improvements; like line changes, better bridges, upgraded depots, etc. Those that didn't would not get such improvements and end their days just as they had orginally laid down.
Jeff
BaltACD Murphy Siding Thanks for the info and the links guys. I'm spending some quality time falling down ratholes chasing 100 year old rail lines. Is it still OK to talk about trains and railroads on thsi forum?I've noticed by looking at old maps, Google Earth images, photos and also by observation in the field that Rock Island built their lines to a lot lower standards in my area than the Milwaukee, CNW, Great Northern and even Illinois Central. Most times I can follow where an old line used to be. The Rock Island lines around here (SD, MN, IA area) were mostly grain gathering branch lines. They are the ones most likely to have reverted to farmland. It looks like they did minimal cut and fill, so the trains 100 years ago must have been roller coasters. Railroads were built to the level of financing the companies building them had. If the company had a sound financial base the line would be constructed to a higher level of engineering and execution. If the company was chicken scratching for every nickel and dime it could find the line was laid on top of the ground in the cheapest way possible.
Murphy Siding Thanks for the info and the links guys. I'm spending some quality time falling down ratholes chasing 100 year old rail lines. Is it still OK to talk about trains and railroads on thsi forum?I've noticed by looking at old maps, Google Earth images, photos and also by observation in the field that Rock Island built their lines to a lot lower standards in my area than the Milwaukee, CNW, Great Northern and even Illinois Central. Most times I can follow where an old line used to be. The Rock Island lines around here (SD, MN, IA area) were mostly grain gathering branch lines. They are the ones most likely to have reverted to farmland. It looks like they did minimal cut and fill, so the trains 100 years ago must have been roller coasters.
Is it still OK to talk about trains and railroads on thsi forum?I've noticed by looking at old maps, Google Earth images, photos and also by observation in the field that Rock Island built their lines to a lot lower standards in my area than the Milwaukee, CNW, Great Northern and even Illinois Central. Most times I can follow where an old line used to be. The Rock Island lines around here (SD, MN, IA area) were mostly grain gathering branch lines. They are the ones most likely to have reverted to farmland. It looks like they did minimal cut and fill, so the trains 100 years ago must have been roller coasters.
Railroads were built to the level of financing the companies building them had. If the company had a sound financial base the line would be constructed to a higher level of engineering and execution. If the company was chicken scratching for every nickel and dime it could find the line was laid on top of the ground in the cheapest way possible.
Can one suppose that the level of financing had something to do with the projected level of financial returns? That if there were strong prospects for railroad traffic that there would be incentive to spend the money to build the line to a standard allowing movement of that traffic at a lower operating cost?
The grain-gathering branch lines are problematic in that regard inasmuch as the traffic is largely that one bulk commodity, and the traffic is highly seasonal, with the investment in roadbed along with rolling stock being idle much of the time?
Ketchum, ID, started out with a wye, but eventually got a loop, some time after they built Sun Valley resort. I guess the loops facilitated turning the passenger trains to these tourist spots.
timz A branch line with a turntable at the end of the branch... can anyone think of one, anywhere in the US?
A branch line with a turntable at the end of the branch... can anyone think of one, anywhere in the US?
Ouray, CO on the D&RGW had a turntable. It's in a somewhat box canyon.
(2) Fulton County Narrow Gage/ CB&Q ...end of a coal branch near Fairview, IL...[Parrville].... that turntable is now the one you see at Colorado RR Museum - Golden Roundhouse (The one you are seeing RGS-20 ride on in Jim Wrinn's latest blog)... It also spent time at St. Francis, KS (almost at the end of the line there)
(3) Elkhart, KS (DC&CV/ATSF) before the railroad built onwards to Boise City, OK (and the ill-fated Boise City Terminal complex)...Was there less than 20 years.
(4*) Grafton, IL (IT)
-cheap real estate and room to put a wye in would always trump the expense of a bridge steel fabricator designing and building one of those rascals.
There used to be a MILW branch in southwestern Wisconsin that ended at Benton at a turntable.
Paul MilenkovicCan one suppose that the level of financing had something to do with the projected level of financial returns?
Very common was the idea of building the line as cheaply and expeditiously as possible, just to get it open (whereupon it would be vastly superior, even rickety, to the previous alternatives) and then devote some of the revenue stream to continuous improvement of one meaningful kind or another ... rather than dividends. There is a strong line of argument that this is the approach the Chicago- New York Air Line should have pursued ... laying interurban track and preserving the faster ROW for build-out as finances improved after 1907, while preferentially building the 'telpher' part of the system which required much less heroic engineering. (It would be highly interesting to see the market for robot package express in the modern age...)
People who understood practical possibilities of railroading better, like Jim Hill, could take 'two streaks of rust' systems, update them in particular cost-effective ways, and then combine them effectively. Say what you want about some of the robber barons, they knew how to build systems that could run trains well enough to make consistent money for the shareholders even in competitive conditions.
Most of the 'highly seasonal' traffic was developed when there was no practical alternative to steam railroading to give it access to shipping. You will note how devastating the effect of motor-vehicle development was to that in the agricultural market, and the development of alternative heating fuels was in the mineral market. There are some similarities with commuter service, but also some differences, one of them being the practical political value of subsidy vs. service compulsion for 'common carriers'.
There were very intricate formulas used to calculate both the overall worth of improvements and the means to finance them best. Some of these are probably far more developed than the ones used at present, which themselves can be models for riddles wrapped in mysteries inside enigmata. And all too often advances in railroad plant were accompanied by relatively frequent bankruptcies, forced sales, and the like, stripping out 'excessive capitalization' of early adopters and readying the financial structure for the next round.
If GM "killed the electric car", what am I doing standing next to an EV-1, a half a block from the WSOR tracks?
Murphy SidingThanks for the info and the links guys. I'm spending some quality time falling down ratholes chasing 100 year old rail lines. Is it still OK to talk about trains and railroads on thsi forum?I've noticed by looking at old maps, Google Earth images, photos and also by observation in the field that Rock Island built their lines to a lot lower standards in my area than the Milwaukee, CNW, Great Northern and even Illinois Central. Most times I can follow where an old line used to be. The Rock Island lines around here (SD, MN, IA area) were mostly grain gathering branch lines. They are the ones most likely to have reverted to farmland. It looks like they did minimal cut and fill, so the trains 100 years ago must have been roller coasters.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
Thanks for the info and the links guys. I'm spending some quality time falling down ratholes chasing 100 year old rail lines. Is it still OK to talk about trains and railroads on thsi forum?I've noticed by looking at old maps, Google Earth images, photos and also by observation in the field that Rock Island built their lines to a lot lower standards in my area than the Milwaukee, CNW, Great Northern and even Illinois Central. Most times I can follow where an old line used to be. The Rock Island lines around here (SD, MN, IA area) were mostly grain gathering branch lines. They are the ones most likely to have reverted to farmland. It looks like they did minimal cut and fill, so the trains 100 years ago must have been roller coasters.
(The CB&Q track charts / Lines West start to peter out right where Murphy is at....also on the Multimodalways site)
Murphy Siding Erik_Mag Looking at track charts and topos of branch lines in Montana, the WYE was the most common method for turning. Makes sense in flat farm country. Does anybody know an easy way to find track charts and topos of branch lines in eastern South Dakota on the CNW, Milwaukee Road and Rock Island? I do a lot of exploring in small towns. I like poking around to figure out where the railroad operated and how it affected the layout of the town, things like that.
Erik_Mag Looking at track charts and topos of branch lines in Montana, the WYE was the most common method for turning.
Looking at track charts and topos of branch lines in Montana, the WYE was the most common method for turning.
Makes sense in flat farm country. Does anybody know an easy way to find track charts and topos of branch lines in eastern South Dakota on the CNW, Milwaukee Road and Rock Island? I do a lot of exploring in small towns. I like poking around to figure out where the railroad operated and how it affected the layout of the town, things like that.
Rock Island track charts. You would want the Northern Division for your area
http://www.multimodalways.org/archives/rrs/CRI&P/CRI&P%20Track%20Charts/CRI&P%20Track%20Charts.html
C&NW track charts.
http://www.multimodalways.org/archives/rrs/C&NW/C&NW%20Track%20Charts/C&NW%20Track%20Charts.html
Milwaukee Road track charts.
https://milwaukeeroadarchives.com/Construction/TrackProfiles.htm
Erik_MagThe USGS website has a topo finder that will allow you to download current and historic topos.
Here is the historic topo website:
https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#4/40.01/-100.06
Murphy Siding Makes sense in flat farm country. Does anybody know an easy way to find track charts and topos of branch lines in eastern South Dakota on the CNW, Milwaukee Road and Rock Island? I do a lot of exploring in small towns. I like poking around to figure out where the railroad operated and how it affected the layout of the town, things like that.
The USGS website has a topo finder that will allow you to download current and historic topos. Michael Sol's webiste has track charts for most of the Milwaukee Rd lines.
Wye tracks far outnumber turntables.
I saw a Santa Fe turntable in Kansas that was built on flat ground without a pit at the end of a branch. The approach track ramped up to get to the turntable.I forget what town it was in, but it was along the Union Pacific west of Ft. Riley.
Mark Vinski
There were wyes all over the place in western Canada, in addition to the ends of branchlines most junctions had them, as did most larger terminals that also had roundhouses and turntables.
In addition to the snow concerns with a turntable pit, a wye with a 5-10 car long tail could be used to turn an entire plow train or branchline passenger consist. And they are low maintenance compared to a turntable, with all its bearings and perhaps an air or electric motor.
Greetings from Alberta
-an Articulate Malcontent
Murphy,
I know the Great Northern strongly favored wyes at the end of branch lines. Even if a two or three stall engine house was involved, all it takes is one less switch than stalls.
Mac McCulloch
While Dining Car's assessment is undoubtedly accurate, I, too, would suspect that wyes would be most common when it was necessary to turn equipment.
Constructing the pit, the table itself, and keeping it working (including removing snow) as compared to three very common switches and a few hundred feet of inert track would make me lean toward the wye as a first choice.
I expect that a run around on the siding and then operate backward on fairly short branch lines. Kind of the reverse from SP's cab forwards.
I would assume that an Armstrong turntable would be more likely. The road power was usually light and careful placement made the turnaround a bit easier to accomplish.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.