Trains.com

Tesla Semi in action

5494 views
79 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, November 16, 2018 11:46 AM

(deleted)

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Friday, November 16, 2018 11:49 AM

zugmann
China has buses that are doing something like that. https://youtu.be/t3rg-SsPJuU

But as noted these are supercaps, not batteries -- I don't think the cost advantages for the required supercap provision even as 'charge management' for an associated chemical battery are "there" yet, and supercaps to my knowledge remain exquisitely sensitive to consequences of even very short overvoltage.

Switzerland (?) years ago had a similar system to recharge a flywheel-generation KERS system, but that is only useful for loads with repeated cycling within a short time, like buses or delivery/garbage trucks.  By the time you get significant buildout of the 'recharge points' you're into the same economic issues as for incremental catenary or inductive-loop charging ... and you still have the problems of steady-state range and weather/climate conditions to address.

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Friday, November 16, 2018 12:07 PM

Deleted. Posted in wrong spot.

 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, November 16, 2018 6:21 PM

Not a Tesla - VW Pikes Peak record setter.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Rhododendron, OR
  • 1,516 posts
Posted by challenger3980 on Saturday, November 17, 2018 1:03 PM

Well, the Portland, OR to Boise, ID route won't be seeing these replace the conventional Diesel powered Tractor any time soon. Approximately 450 miles with many grades of 2-7 Miles of near continuous 6% climbs, even with regenerative braking, it will be a LOOONG time before a 100% electric power replaces internal combustion there.

Add in the effects of single digit temps, that on occasion go negative, and frequent road closures that have vehicles stopped for many hours, while the Driver still needs heat, I don't see Electric tractors being realistic replacements outside of short haul in temperate climates, in the Blue Mountains during the winter, I see electric tractors as a Safety Liability, not a Business advantage. How many compannies will justify two separate fleets for seasonal useage?

 

Doug

30+ years, 3,000,000 miles of moving America's Freight from "Point A" to "Point B"

May your flanges always stay BETWEEN the rails

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Saturday, November 17, 2018 1:17 PM

[quote user="BaltACD"]

Can it operate 10 hours over the road on a single charge?  

[/quote]  BaltACD  is exactly right with that question.

  The Tesla Truck's charged battery should be able to outlast the current window, for legal operationl hours for the truck's driver. 

   That 'fail' would be a tremendous stumbling block for Tesla; to be able to market their truck to the using Industry.     The (possibly(?) inability of the Tesla's batteries to support an operationally, functional demand within the 'normal' drivers scheduling; makes all questions [economics] about use of the Tesla Truck moot, and turns it into not much more than an academic exercise.

 

 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • 1,447 posts
Posted by Shadow the Cats owner on Saturday, November 17, 2018 2:57 PM

I looked at some of my boys logs this week.  Tesla better be able to have a range of over 700 miles without needing a charge for a normal day.  That's right most of my drivers if they are not at a customers drive 700 miles or more in a day.  We have a team running 6 rounds every 2 weeks between SLC and Peru on a daily delivery schedule.  Yeah thats how hard a good team can run legally.  After they run those rounds they take 3 days off and start their next 6 rounds.  I highly doubt Tesla can ever come up with a battery pack that can stand up to that schedule.  

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Rhododendron, OR
  • 1,516 posts
Posted by challenger3980 on Saturday, November 17, 2018 8:41 PM

The TOW companies stand to make a Fortune though, towing all the stranded trucks, with dead batteries to charging stations.

 

Doug

May your flanges always stay BETWEEN the rails

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • 1,447 posts
Posted by Shadow the Cats owner on Saturday, November 17, 2018 9:19 PM

Yes they're going to make a fortune. Can you imagine the chaos if one of Tesla's wonderful trucks has a load of hazmat on and gets into an accident where the battery catches fire.  I don't want to be Tesla after that one. The carnage if hydrochloric acid and burning lithium batteries combined. God forbid he's hauling flammable goods.  Tesla is clueless on what his truck is going to face.  Certain things you want to keep as far away from lithium ion batteries as possible and he puts hundreds in a package under the truck and it's made from aluminum.  

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Rhododendron, OR
  • 1,516 posts
Posted by challenger3980 on Sunday, November 18, 2018 10:53 PM

Oh the Electric trucks and Driverless trucks, heck maybe even Driverless Electric Trucks may some day be on the Highways, but I'm not concerned about having to deal with any of them in the 12-15 years that I have left in MY driving career.

The Gadget Geeks and Techno Nerds Love to predict how they will put drivers out of work in the next 5 years, after 30 years in the business, I don't see it happening, any more than the Flying "Jetson's Cars" that we were supposed to see by the magical year 2000, that hasn't happened yet, and I don't expect to see driverless trucks replace my job while I'm still working. 

But this is still America, so anyone is still welcome to whatever Delusion excites them.

 

Doug

May your flanges always stay BETWEEN the rails

  • Member since
    November 2012
  • From: Kokomo, Indiana
  • 1,463 posts
Posted by emdmike on Monday, November 19, 2018 8:18 PM

I believe Walmart has a sizable order for these new fangled trucks for use in thier regional operations for thier grocery division here in Indiana, shorter runs, with recharging at both ends of the run.  I can see this being more popular in places with high polution like out in California.  While it might not have the range for OTR yet, someone has to take the lead and push the envelope so within a few years as battery technoligy improves, we can move away from diesel and gas powered vehicles.  Both for our health and the sake of the planet long term        Mike

Silly NT's, I have Asperger's Syndrome

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Monday, November 19, 2018 8:27 PM

emdmike

I believe Walmart has a sizable order for these new fangled trucks for use in thier regional operations for thier grocery division here in Indiana, shorter runs, with recharging at both ends of the run.  I can see this being more popular in places with high polution like out in California.  While it might not have the range for OTR yet, someone has to take the lead and push the envelope so within a few years as battery technoligy improves, we can move away from diesel and gas powered vehicles.  Both for our health and the sake of the planet long term        Mike

One might wonder if they plan to have more than one tractor for a given route.  That way the tractor can be dropped to recharge and a "new" tractor picked up for the next leg of the run.  

Many of their rigs make multiple stops in this area.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
Posted by rdamon on Tuesday, November 20, 2018 8:37 AM
If there is a charging station at the store, they can get a pretty good charge while they are unloading and setting.
 
Couple that with a solar array on the roof …
 
I am sure the WalMart bean counters would not be doing this unless it showed value for them.
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Tuesday, November 20, 2018 8:50 AM

 

I'm pretty sure the modern, cutting edge solution to transportation will be the Driverless Chinese Straddling Bus.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpiFJsWdCuY

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,879 posts
Posted by YoHo1975 on Tuesday, November 20, 2018 1:10 PM

emdmike

I believe Walmart has a sizable order for these new fangled trucks for use in thier regional operations for thier grocery division here in Indiana, shorter runs, with recharging at both ends of the run.  I can see this being more popular in places with high polution like out in California.  While it might not have the range for OTR yet, someone has to take the lead and push the envelope so within a few years as battery technoligy improves, we can move away from diesel and gas powered vehicles.  Both for our health and the sake of the planet long term        Mike

 

 

This is the point I was going to make. It seems rather pointless to focus on Long distance OTR with this product. It is clearly going to struggle there, but regional distribution for Walmart, Target, Amazon. Drayage in Chicago. Local transport in the LA Basin.

Etc etc etc. I have acquantences that make their living moving goods all through the San Joaquin/Sacramento River Delta and Bay area. This truck could do wonders in the LA Basin, the Ca. Central Valley and the Bay. And if it only ever had an impact in those markets it would be an incredible product. To say nothing of say the Chemical coast in Texas, or again Chicago and environs. Twin Cities/Milwaukee/Chicago/Saint Louis anyone?

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,819 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Tuesday, November 20, 2018 1:32 PM

Electric vehicles today are (in terms of development) where gas powered vehicles were a hundred years ago. Driving a gas powered car across the US in 1918 would have been next to impossible.. even if the car was semi reliable.. there were simply no gas stations or even decent roads along most of the route.   

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, November 20, 2018 4:19 PM

I suspect it pays to keep up on the 'state of the art' both in battery research and incipient construction and marketing.  As one entry point:

https://www.powerelectronics.com/automotive/who-will-win-race-ev-solid-state-battery

Much further effect was gained from active voltage-to-voltage conversion allowing "more" of a given battery's capacity to be extracted at lower charge states ... apparently at least occasionally in ignorance, or at best wishful assumption, about damage occurring from repeated effective deep cycling ... especially at high effective discharge rates.  (But then again, why bring up the service bill when trying to sell something new and shiny?)

I'm still waiting for someone to build an effective railroad BEV, or even one that runs with a minimum sustainer engine (like a workable version of the Green Goat).  A Class 8 truck is a less extreme version of that kind of powertrain, but still partakes of many of the special conditions and situations that have kept BEV locomotives so far out of real contention as marketable equipment ... even in states like California, with special conditions almost the inverse of "if they can make it there, they could make it anywhere"

A pure BEV relying on computerized trip atlases that dynamically calculate route based on anticipated recharges is better than one that just subs for a conventional truck.  But it is also NOT better than the same truck with some kind of sustainer engine, or even emergency 'pop' mobility charge, using a higher energy density fuel, or more easily sourced fuel, or "GRAS" (or at least safer than lithium compounds!) fuel.

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • 1,447 posts
Posted by Shadow the Cats owner on Tuesday, November 20, 2018 7:15 PM

Let's look at this truck from a carriers persective shall we.  It's to heavy to run drayage if your carrier has IM operations it can not run local or regional as it is to long for local they normally run day cabs and regional trucks are built lighter to handle heavier loads.  Way to heavy for tanker fleets we will not order anything over 19K wet weight at all.  It can not run long distances in winter so running it up north is OUT it requires expensive parts from one source and the internet is full of reports on Tesla's build quality in their cars when it comes to their motors and electronic controls.  All body repairs must be done by the manufactor not by my own guys so my insurance is going to jump thru the roof.  I have a brother that bought a Model 3 last year.  He sold it this year and got a Mustang GT 5.0 Coyote engined model.  Guess which one was more to insure.  The Tesla by almost 2 grand every 6 months.  Why Tesla and their insistance on requiring all bodywork be done by them and only them.  So where does that leave this truck for the OTR industry.  Basically yard dogs and linehauls between terminals 300 miles or less apart for carriers.  Beyond that they are going to be yard ornaments.

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,392 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Tuesday, November 20, 2018 8:08 PM

Lots of half-truths and downright incorrect information in the OP's post. Let's take a look at it...

Shadow the Cats owner
It can not run long distances in winter so running it up north is OUT

This is a misconception. In winter it will use more energy per mile than in summer, just like a diesel truck or any automobile. IF it starts the day out with the battery conditioned, it isn't that much more energy - maybe 110-120% of summer watts per mile drain on dry roads. If the battery has to cannibalize it's own charge to warm itself to optimum temperature, then it could use up to about 150% of its summer average watts per mile. You will have to charge somewaht more frequently than in the summer. Oh darn. Have to stop at one extra megacharger every day.

it requires expensive parts from one source

Yes, but those parts don't wear out like those in an ICE vehicle, and maintenance is a small fraction of what an ICE truck requires. About all that's required is to change headlights and wipers as needed, plus fill the washer fluid reservoir. You also need to keep air in the tires and replace them when they wear out. No oil changes, no coolant system flushes, no glow plugs to change, and no issue with fuel that gels up when it gets cold. Cost of ownership of an electric vehicle is amply demonstrated to be less than the cost of an ICE vehicle. No real data on semi's, but probably will be similar. Time will tell on that.

the internet is full of reports on Tesla's build quality in their cars when it comes to their motors and electronic controls.

Which is why the drive train and battery in their vehicles are warrented for eight years with UNLIMITED miles. And those issues were mostly resolved by 2015. Occasionally a relatively new drivetrain needs replaced, and it happens at no cost to the vehicle owner. ICE engine and transmission failures while still under warranty should be as easy!

All body repairs must be done by the manufactor

Absolutely FALSE. Tesla does require that repairs be done by certified shops, but not by Tesla itself. In fact, they aren't even set up tyo do that kind of work.

my insurance is going to jump thru the roof.

This is a supposition, and quite likely not a good one. Tesla automobile insurance is generally no more expensive than a like-value ICE - Tesla Model S vs. Mercedes Benz S-Class, for example.

I have a brother that bought a Model 3 last year.  He sold it this year and got a Mustang GT 5.0 Coyote engined model.  Guess which one was more to insure.  The Tesla by almost 2 grand every 6 months.

Well, maybe your brother should have shopped around for different insurance. Some companies charge a real premium for Teslas. Not all of them do.

Why Tesla and their insistance on requiring all bodywork be done by them and only them.

As I said, this is flatly untrue. 

So where does that leave this truck for the OTR industry.  Basically yard dogs and linehauls between terminals 300 miles or less apart for carriers.  Beyond that they are going to be yard ornaments.

Time will tell. Maybe overall you're right. But I'd put my money on the Tesla Semi's operating cost putting those who run with ICE trucks at a significant disadvantage over the long haul (pardon the pun).

So who the heck am I to be challenging your statements? A 2016 Tesla Model S owner. 55,000 miles over 2 1/2 years and no major repairs - just the annual service that costs only a few hundred dollars. I have to keep up on tire inflation, but I'm still running on the original set (need replacement soon, though). I also needed the windshield replaced twice for rock chips, and that was covered by insurance at no cost to me, just like any other non-commercial vehicle (that varies by state). Despite it being a high-powered vehicle (0-60 in just over 4 seconds), my insurance is significantly less than it would be for a $100k ICEmobile, in part because Teslas are, according to crash tests, one of the safest vehicles on the road. 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Rhododendron, OR
  • 1,516 posts
Posted by challenger3980 on Tuesday, November 20, 2018 11:06 PM

Mark P, the operating enviroments and requirements are way beyond Apple/Orange comparing the Tesla "S" and a Tractor Trailer, I just don't see an electric Tractor trailer being practical any time soon.

So who the heck am I to challenge Your statements? I have been driving Tractor Trailer for over 30 years, and approximately 3,000,000 miles.

As to EMD Mike's concern about the planet, yep a legitimate concern, but all too often the EV proponents like to sing about the highway results pollution wise, where is that electricty coming from, not MAGIC, a coal fired power plant, a Nuclear power plant? those are real popular, try getting a few of either built right now. Solar?, Wind? obviously Solar is only an option part of the day. Wind? even in the Columbia River Gorge, think West Coast Chicago, the wind is unreliable.

If we get even a fraction of the EV's that people claim are needed, that is going to require a Substantial increase in electrical production, That hasn't been solved yet.

What are the enviromental impacts of the battery and electrical components production, and disposal? 

The infrastructure to support EV's is a Long way from being more than a dream.

Heck when DEF became mandatory, you couldn't believe the Pita in finding a DEF pump, HAD to buy way too many 2.5 gallon jugs and manually fill the DEF tank, and in the jugs rather than at a bulk pump, figure triple the cost. Now 8 years or so later 95+% of truck stops only have drivers side DEF pumps, and the truck MFR's still put the DEF tank on the passenger side way too often, I deal with that all the time with my 2016 KW 680. And these are headaches with a very similar infrastructure as has been in place for how many decades?, not too much difference between a Diesel pump and a DEF pump, other than what comes out of it. I don't even want to think about the headaches in bringing an entirely different bit of infrastructure into the mix, I pray that the Electric Trucks don't happen during the remainder of my career, the Damned ELD/OBC's are enough headache for a Dinosaur like me.

 

Doug

May your flanges always stay BETWEEN the rails

  • Member since
    July 2016
  • 2,631 posts
Posted by Backshop on Wednesday, November 21, 2018 7:48 AM

Pruitt, you need to do some research on how many miles/hours a day an OTR semi runs and government hours of service regulations.

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • 1,447 posts
Posted by Shadow the Cats owner on Wednesday, November 21, 2018 8:31 AM

Pruitt you think Tesla is going to be wanting to warrenty a truck that after 8 years is approaching over 1.2 million miles on its battery pack and motor unit.  Also there is a reason why SWIFT in the industry stands of  See Why I Should have Finished Training.  We have 2 trailers vans luckily and 3 tractors in the body and fender works due to Swift in truckstop accidents that do not appear on their SAFER metrics since they are private property.  Those 3 trucks right now they are going to cost Swift right at 80 grand to put back together.  The trailers they played bumper cars with one was a right off broke the bottom rail and structure collasped common problem with the new stress skin construction.  The other one well their driver hooked his ICC bumper onto its suspension and ripped an axle out from under the trailer.

 

Tesla has no clue how bad some of these drivers are that run these rigs.  So if he thinks his company is going to get away with his usual BULL on the only place repairs can get done is at a Tesla garage he is going to be run out of this industry on rails faster than his proposed Hyperloops ever are.  When things in this industry get broke or quit working we as carriers do not give a rats butt who fixes the dang things just get them up and running again.  

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Wednesday, November 21, 2018 11:12 AM

challenger3980
So who the heck am I to challenge Your statements? I have been driving Tractor Trailer for over 30 years, and approximately 3,000,000 miles.

But you're not going to be the one deciding what the fleets purchase next (or the time after that).  The people who handle the money do that. 

Technology moves fast.  Transportation will not be immune.   I think we may see some major changes happening in our lifetimes. Good, bad, or indifferent - it is foolish to think the status quo will stay. 

 

Enjoy the show.

 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, November 21, 2018 12:09 PM

Shadow the Cats owner
...approaching over 1.2 million miles on its battery pack...

I suspect that will be battery packs - not many people get the much use out of the standard 12V battery in their vehicles.  And that may end up being a make-or-break item in the equation.

The electric motors will have to be a wait and see - with proper maintenance, they should last that long, barring a built-in flaw (ie, sub-standard bearings, etc).

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, November 21, 2018 12:43 PM

tree68
I suspect that will be battery packs - not many people get the much use out of the standard 12V battery in their vehicles.  And that may end up being a make-or-break item in the equation.

The electric motors will have to be a wait and see - with proper maintenance, they should last that long, barring a built-in flaw (ie, sub-standard bearings, etc).

Electric motors - are not indestructable - they will fail in any number of ways, bearings, windings - it is made by man - it will fail.

In my working life I had to deal with way too many traction motor failures on both DC and AC traction locomotives.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, November 21, 2018 1:16 PM

BaltACD
Electric motors - are not indestructable - they will fail in any number of ways, bearings, windings - it is made by man - it will fail.

Hence the proper maintenance.

Perhaps there will be a market for rebuilding those electric motors.  As you note, the railroads have been dealing with that for years.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Wednesday, November 21, 2018 2:08 PM

BaltACD
In my working life I had to deal with way too many traction motor failures on both DC and AC traction locomotives.

Doesn't seem to happen as often here anymore.  I know they had a crappy supply of traction motor leads for a while.  Was rare to go a week without a set roasting, but not so much lately.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
Posted by rdamon on Wednesday, November 21, 2018 4:10 PM

Cabin comfort also impacts range. Durning a test drive I watched the range drop when turning on the AC, but it was even worse with the heater.

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,392 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Wednesday, November 21, 2018 5:55 PM

challenger3980
Mark P, the operating enviroments and requirements are way beyond Apple/Orange comparing the Tesla "S" and a Tractor Trailer, I just don't see an electric Tractor trailer being practical any time soon.

I wasn't comparing an electric sedan to an ICE tractor-trailer, though I can see how that misperception could easily be made. I'm comparing ICE passenger vehicles to electric passenger vehicles, and positing that comparison would be similar for large trucks. That was probably not clear at all in my earlier post - sorry about that.

So who the heck am I to challenge Your statements? I have been driving Tractor Trailer for over 30 years, and approximately 3,000,000 miles.

Fair enough. I have nearly 50 years driving on American roads and highways, close to a million aggregate miles. This includes cars, pickups, and several thousand miles in large trucks (not tractor-trailers, however). All in ICE vehicles except for about 55,000 miles in a Tesla. And in all conditions. This includes several dozen cross-country marathons over the years, including one in the Tesla (and more to come). 

Okay, not the same as driving a big rig for a living, but it's still wheels and hours on the road. Having a father who worked for the Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety and uncles who did drive semi's for a living, I know that there are both big differences and some similarities between what you do and what I do on the road. I don't know everything about what life driving a semi is like, but I'm not totally ignorant, either.

The infrastructure to support EV's is a Long way from being more than a dream.

The thrust of this comment is very valid, but the infrastructure planning is a lot more than a dream. Like the Tesla automobile infrastruture development (the Supercharger network - still not complete, but pretty good now), it will take some years to fully implement the Megachargers for the electric trucks. Meanwhile, practical routes will be severely limited, easing only slowly as more chargers come online.

I pray that the Electric Trucks don't happen during the remainder of my career...

This is really the heart of it right here. Certainly there will be ICE trucks for years to come, so you don't have to be one of the people who adopt the electric truck early, or at all if you prefer. . 

But for those who want to accept the challenge, with all the downright PITA inconvenience and unanticipated problems that will no doubt show up as the technology matures, why not let them do so?

Shadow the Cats owner
Pruitt you think Tesla is going to be wanting to warrenty a truck that after 8 years is approaching over 1.2 million miles on its battery pack and motor unit.

I don't know. The battery maybe close to that in order to ease concerns of failure, since that will probably be the highest cost replacement item on the vehicle (at least it is on the cars - over 30% of my Model S's sticker price). The motors maybe not, but I'd be willing to bet it will far outstrip ICE drivetrain component warranties.

...the only place repairs can get done is at a Tesla garage he is going to be run out of this industry on rails faster than his proposed Hyperloops ever are.

Maybe so. The differences between passenger car and semi's may make the Tesla tractor-trailer a more difficult sell than the cars. But folks were saying the exact same thing about the Tesla cars just a few years ago (and some still are). Meanwhile, Tesla is driving the entire electric car industry ahead just by showing that the technology is practical.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:23 PM

tree68
I suspect that will be battery packs - not many people get the much use out of the standard 12V battery in their vehicles. And that may end up being a make-or-break item in the equation.

Even the current battery chemistry and structure used in Semi batteries has nothing to do with that in current 12V batteries.  Note that even in locomotive batteries, the preferred Siemens supplier only started offering Li-ion construction in late 2017.  You might as well bring up valve and ring job costs in F-head engines.

In addition, the person in charge of the Semi development effort is a truck guy, and knows quite a bit about practical trucking requirements regardless of any issues that may emerge early with 'hype-spinning'.  It would be interesting to see if the acceleration/speed figures quoted for a 'full 80,000lb load' at the Tesla rollout a year ago applied to a legal maximum loadout in a truck with full battery pack, in other words to gross legal weight configuration and axle loadings (which would address one of Shadow's issues).

I see nothing inherent in the Megacharger as proposed (4x parallel charge at twice Supercharger standard voltage) that does not give the proposed energy density required for 2kW-hr/mi (yes, I know it's convoluted units!) given for average overall consumption.  The key, as noted, is to build out the Megachargers in sufficient density, and with sufficient assured supply at that density, to allow reasonable use of the tractors in 'general' service -- it will be interesting to see if California, in particular, subsidizes construction of the megacharging facilities as well as provides special tax or operating amenities for electric trucks (straight and artic) ... I strongly suspect Elon will NOT be repeating the free-fuel-for-early-adopters fiasco.

The thing I have been concerned about since before the days of Ludicrous+ is the effective longevity of powertrain components with repeated use of the high-drain facilities, or with frequent use of voltage conversion to extract deep-cycle capacity out of the strings in the battery.  Is the energy draw from forced cooling included in the transient-power estimates?

I am a bit amused to see Shadow complaining about the high prospective cost of electric transmission when we've had such an education from her about the practical gotchas applying to present and prospective diesel, for instance legal NOx reduction 'strategies' ... which have pointedly been left out of this discussion so far.

Do I think Semi owners will get a million miles out of the first battery pack?  Personally, I'd doubt it.  If Tesla offers that kind of warranty they're likely to discover the same economics that sank the Ford version of the VT365 Power Cerebrovascular Accident engine, and the Roadmaster corporation when they decided exercise treadmills would be a fun profit center in the '90s.  On the other hand, setting something up to amortize the cost of required battery upgrading or maintenance, including what I suspect will include embedded supercap banks by the time they get properly commercial-operations-ready, ought to be workable.  Especially if trucking companies and state governments can collude to make it something for which a surcharge can apply ...

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy