K. P. Harrier Who in their right mind would submit a screwed up photo?
Well, the otherside of that is that the JPEG format utilizes a "lossy" compression method that places artifacts, i.e. degradation, into every image converted into that format. So it begs the question "why would trains want to encourage people to submit degraded photos for inclusion in their magazine?"
So by your own rationale, it makes little sense to include photos that have issues built in.
Personally, I prefer to use the *.png image format on my personal collections, the file size is notably larger but the image quality is noticeably better, especially after being copyied and saved multiple times.
The new tech is great but in many ways leaves much to be desired. I can hear consideable difference between music on my old phonograph records and the very same songs in the *.mp3 format. There is less "umph" and less presence in recordings made into MP3s.....no small margin, either. I have all the "cool" toys, and enjoy them, portability being a big plus of the new tech. For instance I sure wouldn't care to strap a phonograph onto my bicycle for a trip through the park, but I recognize that the benefit of a small MP3 player comes with built in limitations. I see the magazine's requirement as a recognition of that reality, and not the oppressive gesture you seem to see. (FWIW)
It occurs to me that the most useful 'metric' for this situation could likely be easily provided, by Kalmbach, with little or no breach-of-privacy concern: what percentage of 'accepted' photos were JPEG compressed submissions?
A slightly more expanded view would be whether JPEGs are relatively more accepted in some categories, or if 'stylistic' modifications or other darkroom-post-style manipulations get special attention ... pro or con ... in the assessment-for-publication process.
The existing guidelines are, or might as well be, silent on these points, but should not be.
Miningman Well they finally changed the 'Photo of the Day' and it's ....it's ....what? Fog with some lights.
Well they finally changed the 'Photo of the Day' and it's ....it's ....what?
Fog with some lights.
Regarding the comments from Convicted one regarding the artifacts in a JPG image (to which I agree), I wonder if photos in the TIFF format would be acceptable; it is lossless, but the file size can become some rather large.
zardozPerhaps Trains has run out of photos to use.
More likely they just haven't had the time to pick one out and get it on-line.
Perhaps someone has left the organization and there's work to be picked up by others until they are replaced. Or something like that...
Larry Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date Come ride the rails with me! There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...
It's a URO.
Unidentified Rail Object
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.