Trains.com

Milwaukee Road Pacific Coast Extension - it seems to have sucked

15936 views
79 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 602 posts
Posted by Bruce Kelly on Monday, February 6, 2017 3:07 PM

Mr. Meyer has indeed produced a treasure trove of info. Would make a wonderful story, complete with maps and photos, in a certain rail publication that used to provide the space necessary for subjects of this magnitude.

The comment about MILW having a "high degree of exclusivity" in northern Idaho because "there was little reason for other railroads to build there" might leave some folks to forget that NP, GN, and SI (now UP) built main lines and branches in the Idaho panhandle as well. Perhaps the reference was meant to highlight the fact that where MILW did go in northern Idaho, it had little to no paralleling competition. Aside from Coeur d'Alene, that was truly the case.

MILW's branch to Metaline Falls (built by the Idaho & Washington Northern 1909-11, later acquired by MILW) did probe into areas where the other major roads generally stayed away. Same thing for the Elk River branch south of St. Maries. Worth noting that the Metaline Falls branch exited Idaho northwest of Blanchard and remained in Washington the rest of the way up through Newport.

But elsewhere in northern Idaho there were/are plenty of non-MILW branches including (but not limited to) GN's reach from Bonners Ferry northward to the Canadian border at Porthill; the UP/NP/Camas Prairie cluster of branches (unless we're not counting the Lewiston area as part of northern Idaho); the NP, GN, and SI branches to Coeur d'Alene, all three of which reached that city before MILW did; UP's branch through Plummer and on east to Wallace as well as up the North Fork of the CdA River into the CdA mining district; and NP's branch over Lookout Pass to reach Mullan and Wallace. Sadly, the vast majority of the branch lines I just described are long gone.

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Monday, February 6, 2017 12:06 PM

Murphy S.; Are you braggin' or complaining? Whistling  For years the rumor was that Elvis was working in a McDonalds in Kalamazoo...

Off Topic  Sorta, had I not watched my neighbor's nephew get 'cuffed and stuffed' back in August of '77 (for his part in a plot to dig Elvis up, and hold his body for ransome); I would have bought into that too.  Elvis, his mother Gladys, and father Vernon, and his maternal gran'maw, are all firmly ensconsced in the garden at Graceland. 

   Ask me,sometime, about Jerry Lee, (and the time he drove his Caddy into the Front Gate at Graceland.)    Sigh    Smile, Wink & Grin

Enough HISTORY for now....

 

 


 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Monday, February 6, 2017 10:42 AM

 

Wait a cotton-pickin' minute. I used to live in a double wide trailer near The Milwaukee Road that's now abandoned........and I'm all shook up! Music

 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Monday, February 6, 2017 10:39 AM

Victrola1

...............Elvis Presley is alive and well and living in double wide in Montana along the abandon Milwaukee Road Pacific Coast Extension. 

 

What's his screen name on the forum?Mischief

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
Posted by Victrola1 on Monday, February 6, 2017 8:58 AM

 The Rockefellers were connected to the Union Pacific Railroad company of E.H. Harriman. They were involved in the sponsorship of the Kuhn & Loeb bank in the United Kingdom and they had numerous business deals with Hitler’s Nazi regime in Germany.

http://theshamecampaign.com/category/bilderberg/

Conspiracy most foul is to blame. 

The Milwaukee Road's Pacific Coast Externsion was not killed by the Burlington Nothern (BN) conspiracy. The Bilderberger Illuminati (BI) conspiracy killed the Milwaukee Road's Pacific Coast Extension. 

Elvis Presley is alive and well and living in double wide in Montana along the abandon Milwaukee Road Pacific Coast Extension. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Sunday, February 5, 2017 9:34 PM

ATSFGuy

No kidding Milwakee's PCE sucked! Not only did paralleling the NP main line affect thier profits, the route bypassed major population centers,  had steep mountain grades and branch lines in extremely remote locations. In fact I once read a doucument that said MILW has been paying for the PCE since 1909!!!

Plus, MILW was not given land grants like the GN and NP and had to purchase the land from private owners or take over them somehow.

 

ATSFGuy

No kidding Milwakee's PCE sucked! Not only did paralleling the NP main line affect thier profits, the route bypassed major population centers,  had steep mountain grades and branch lines in extremely remote locations. In fact I once read a doucument that said MILW has been paying for the PCE since 1909!!!

Plus, MILW was not given land grants like the GN and NP and had to purchase the land from private owners or take over them somehow.

 

Careful there Chico's Bud....MILW had 1875 grant R/W, but no checkerboard (pre-1872 grant R/W)....conversely, by the time MILW got out there, a lot more time had passed and a lot more patents had been granted which left not that much vacant real estate to claim from GLO under the terms of the grant act.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,449 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Sunday, February 5, 2017 9:24 PM

On the second to last page of the linked paper, it lists Snoqualmie Pass at 2852'.  Topo maps show the MILW tunnel to be below the 2600' contour line.

http://www.mytopo.com/maps/?lat=47.3947&lon=-121.4183&z=14

 

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Cardiff, CA
  • 2,930 posts
Posted by erikem on Sunday, February 5, 2017 7:09 PM

kgbw49

Are there are there any other segments of the PCE that is still being utilized west of Terry MT?

 

A couple of might have beens:

The Milw line between Forsythe and Terry was a bit straighter than the NP line, recall hearing some talk about the BN utilizing that line as a second track.

The line east of Roundup would have been good for routing coal eastbound - ruling grade about 0.6% except for a short segment in North Dakota. The 30% severance tax that Montana imposed on coal shipped out of state was likely the nail in the coffin for the Roundup - Mile City segment.

A few nit-picks on the central Montana discussion (Lewisto to Roy, Winifred and Winnett). The ruling grade from Grass Range and Winnett to Lewiston was 1% with the exception of 2 miles of 2% (should have been easy to double the hill). The line from Winifred was 1% with a 3 mile stretch of 1.5%. The GN line between Lewiston and Grass Range was graded but not track was laid - the better gradient of this line was due to two tunnels. The Grass Range to Winnett section would have been jointly operated by GN and the Milw.

The Winnett area was a significant oiil producing area in the 1920's prior to the discovery of the west Texas oil fields.

Finally a comment on why the PCE was built (as opposed to whether it should have been built). The Board of Directors for the Milw included several men who were also on the board of Anaconda Copper Mining - Stan Johnson's book on the PCE mentioned this as well as discussions about increasing competition for service to Butte and Anaconda which reminded me of the story of the El Paso & Southwestern as covered by Myrick. Demonstrating the benefits of RR electrification was also a consideration, as it presented a large market for copper.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Sunday, February 5, 2017 4:57 PM

The Great Northern Railway was entirely privately funded--unlike all the lines that had already been built to the west coast, it made use of no land grants.

Johnny

  • Member since
    November 2015
  • 1,345 posts
Posted by ATSFGuy on Sunday, February 5, 2017 4:00 PM

No kidding Milwakee's PCE sucked! Not only did paralleling the NP main line affect thier profits, the route bypassed major population centers,  had steep mountain grades and branch lines in extremely remote locations. In fact I once read a doucument that said MILW has been paying for the PCE since 1909!!!

Plus, MILW was not given land grants like the GN and NP and had to purchase the land from private owners or take over them somehow.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Sunday, February 5, 2017 3:39 PM

kgbw49

Question for my knowledge database on the PCE regarding segments that made sense to keep:

I know the PCE across South Dakota from Appleton MN to Terry MT is owned by BNSF and is still being utilized, having originally been purchased by the State of SD and then in turn sold to BN.

Are there are there any other segments of the PCE that is still being utilized west of Terry MT?

 

  kgbw49: I would suggest that you take the time to read the PDF posted on the linked site by greyhounds:

"...In contrast, I think this is a good and reasoned analysis.  

http://www.gngoat.org/MILW2014.pdf

The Milwaukee's PCE flat out sucked and we're well rid of it..."

If really interested in the PCE  you will find a very through study by a very knowledgeable individual.. At the end of the PDF is a name, and link to ask the author directly... ENJOY !

 

 


 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Sunday, February 5, 2017 3:01 PM

St Paul Pass is now a bike trail including the 1.7 mile St Paul Pass (or Taft) Tunnel...

click to open a printable map (2.3 MB PDF) in a separate window

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Sunday, February 5, 2017 2:55 PM

Question for my knowledge database on the PCE regarding segments that made sense to keep:

I know the PCE across South Dakota from Appleton MN to Terry MT is owned by BNSF and is still being utilized, having originally been purchased by the State of SD and then in turn sold to BN.

Are there are there any other segments of the PCE that is still being utilized west of Terry MT?

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Sunday, February 5, 2017 2:42 PM

greyhounds

Years ago there were some people here who had a veritable, almost religious, belief that the Milwaukee's Pacific Coast Extension was THE superior rail route to the Pacific Northwest.  They fervently argued that the rail line was done in by skullduggery and dirty deads ranging from government corruption to most foul play by the BN.  I came to regard them as basically a cult.

In contrast, I think this is a good and reasoned analysis.  

http://www.gngoat.org/MILW2014.pdf

The Milwaukee's PCE flat out sucked and we're well rid of it.

Oh my God, Don't start this again.   Your going to smoke out the idiots that think General Motors did in the Interurban system again.    Seriously though the argument that the BN ran the Milwaukee out of business was never supported by former Milwaukee Road employees to a large extent.   Most of the former Milwaukee PCE employees point to lack of money and poor physical plant in places along the route.   Compared with their later employers (BN, WP, and UP).

BTW, in each successive Milwaukee Road bankruptcy the PCE debt is specifically cited as one of the main contributing reasons why the railroad could not make it financially.   It is rather interesting that even though it is pointed to in several bankruptcies not a single Bankruptcy Trustee.......wrote off the damn debt.    Nope, they reorganized each time and kept the PCE debt on the books all the way to the sale to the Soo Line.    Which I think is pretty ironic.   

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Sunday, February 5, 2017 2:18 PM

Murphy Siding

 

 
greyhounds

Years ago there were some people here who had a veritable, almost religious, belief that the Milwaukee's Pacific Coast Extension was THE superior rail route to the Pacific Northwest.  They fervently argued that the rail line was done in by skullduggery and dirty deads ranging from government corruption to most foul play by the BN.  I came to regard them as basically a cult.

In contrast, I think this is a good and reasoned analysis.  

http://www.gngoat.org/MILW2014.pdf

The Milwaukee's PCE flat out sucked and we're well rid of it.

 

 

 

Them?  All two of them. Laugh In reading your post, I first thought of VerMontanan who was always the one spoiling MichaelSol's and Futurmodal's revisionist railroad history fantasies with  logic and reason. Then I started reading the article and had Deja-Vu. 

      I view the Milwaukee Road PCE much as I do the Ford Edsel. It's easy to point out the problems now, but it probably made perfect sense to the people who initiated it back then.

 

 

 

               Murphy S.:  Just finished reading the PDF by Mr. Myers, all 44 pages of a fascinating autopsy of the Milwaukee's PCE, and all its 'warts'.     Very thorough, and speaks to his years of marshaling power in that region...He sure gets a "tip of the Kromer cap"  for it. Thumbs UpThumbs Up

 

 


 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, February 5, 2017 1:29 PM

greyhounds

Years ago there were some people here who had a veritable, almost religious, belief that the Milwaukee's Pacific Coast Extension was THE superior rail route to the Pacific Northwest.  They fervently argued that the rail line was done in by skullduggery and dirty deads ranging from government corruption to most foul play by the BN.  I came to regard them as basically a cult.

In contrast, I think this is a good and reasoned analysis.  

http://www.gngoat.org/MILW2014.pdf

The Milwaukee's PCE flat out sucked and we're well rid of it.

 

Them?  All two of them. Laugh In reading your post, I first thought of VerMontanan who was always the one spoiling MichaelSol's and Futurmodal's revisionist railroad history fantasies with  logic and reason. Then I started reading the article and had Deja-Vu. 

      I view the Milwaukee Road PCE much as I do the Ford Edsel. It's easy to point out the problems now, but it probably made perfect sense to the people who initiated it back then.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, February 5, 2017 1:22 PM

n012944

I miss those old PCE discussions.  They were always good for a laugh.

 

How dare you have an opinion!!!! Mischief

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, February 5, 2017 12:39 PM

One thing foamers always overlook in their discussions of what railroad did or didn't do is the sheer volume of traffic that is required to make a line profitable and self sustaining.  It is always about the money.  When outgo exceeds income trouble ensues.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,283 posts
Posted by n012944 on Sunday, February 5, 2017 12:18 PM

I miss those old PCE discussions.  They were always good for a laugh.

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Sunday, February 5, 2017 12:03 PM

That author of that piece posts here as VerMontanan, as recently as yesterday, so hopefully he will chime in.

My personal opinion is that the Milwaukee built it as they had no friends to the Pacific, so tried to stop themselves from being boxed in. They made a few mistakes, though. They could have used Roger's Pass near Great Falls, probably at a 1% ruling grade, and instead of dealing with the huge mess of a track profile west of Missoula run it down the Clark Fork parallel to the NP and around the south shore of Lake Pend Oreille at the same ruling grade, and entered Spokane on their own trackage rather than inconvenient trackage rights. There is also enough space on the east side of the Cascades to have reduced the climb from the Columbia west of Beverly from 2.2% to probably 1% with a bunch more curvature. Cost wise, the Milwaukee couldn't bear it though.

Ultimately grades and the lack of feeders killed it. Like the SP&S, there are usually good reasons why a route dies that don't involve conspiracies.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Milwaukee Road Pacific Coast Extension - it seems to have sucked
Posted by greyhounds on Sunday, February 5, 2017 1:57 AM

Years ago there were some people here who had a veritable, almost religious, belief that the Milwaukee's Pacific Coast Extension was THE superior rail route to the Pacific Northwest.  They fervently argued that the rail line was done in by skullduggery and dirty deads ranging from government corruption to most foul play by the BN.  I came to regard them as basically a cult.

In contrast, I think this is a good and reasoned analysis.  

http://www.gngoat.org/MILW2014.pdf

The Milwaukee's PCE flat out sucked and we're well rid of it.

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy