Trains.com

$50 million per mile?

8760 views
36 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, December 30, 2014 12:53 PM

Add to that that the San Pete and Thistle entries to the old DRGW Marysville Sub are roaded over or cut-off entirely, so there it goes. Johnny can always hope the Vernal extension happens (nobody ever quite got there yet, although Horace Sumner had Tom Milner survey a line in that direction from the D&SL railhead at Craig. Moffat was out of $$$ and died shortly thereafter.)

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:48 AM

Tunnels and Bridges have never been cheap!

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Calgary
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by cx500 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:43 AM

In difficult terrain it sounds to be in the ballpark.  CPR's Rogers Pass Project from 30 years ago cost $500-600 million dollars for 21 miles of new alignment.  Nearly half the distance was in two tunnels (1 and 9 miles respectively).  However with various bridges and retaining walls the open section cost close to the same as the tunnels.  Factor for 30 years of inflation and the number looks pretty comparable.

John

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,022 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:03 AM

I would opine that the bulk of the cost would have been tied up in that eight mile tunnel and other engineering challenges.  Grading roadbed and laying track would be much less as a part of the overall project.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 1,754 posts
Posted by diningcar on Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:53 AM

A new RR line through very rough topography can be very expensive construction. Then you add the ROW acquisition costs along with the litigation and its associated delays; the time value of money and necessity to be able to pay your bills on time comprise probably 85% or more of the $50 million.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:50 AM

Murphy Siding

     A story in the news section  http://trn.trains.com/news/news-wire/2014/12/utah-drops-plan-to-build-new-oil-field-railroad   says that a Utah oil railroad proposal has been dropped.  It would have been a 100 mile, $5 billion project.  That's $50 million per mile!  The article mentions 2.4% ruling grade, an 8 mile tunnel and several dozen bridges.   Can this be right?  Can a rail line cost $9470 per foot?

       The good news, I suppose, is that the folks involved figured out it didn't make economic sense to pursue this before spending a gazillion dollars.

 

Norris, thanks for posting this. I saw the news that the planners woke up to reality several days ago, and intended letting us all know--but by the time I moved over to my desk I had other things on my mind.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:14 AM

Miracle of miracles- I somehow managed to get the link to light up. Cool

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
$50 million per mile?
Posted by Murphy Siding on Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:13 AM

     A story in the news section  http://trn.trains.com/news/news-wire/2014/12/utah-drops-plan-to-build-new-oil-field-railroad   says that a Utah oil railroad proposal has been dropped.  It would have been a 100 mile, $5 billion project.  That's $50 million per mile!  The article mentions 2.4% ruling grade, an 8 mile tunnel and several dozen bridges.   Can this be right?  Can a rail line cost $9470 per foot?

       The good news, I suppose, is that the folks involved figured out it didn't make economic sense to pursue this before spending a gazillion dollars.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy