Trains.com

Semi-official Rochelle webcam discussion thread

373260 views
3712 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, September 29, 2015 5:20 AM

If Rochelle is a truly 'automatic' crossing at grade (as I have been told), the Dispatchers have nothing to do with it's operation.  The movement of trains across the crossing is goverened by the activation of the various relays in the signal mechanisms that govern the crossing.

Either TTSI (Timetable Special Instructions) or local custom will govern the operation of trains when operating on less than Clear Signal indications and those Instructions or customs will instruct trains where to hold their trains, based upon train length, when the signal system does not indicate that the trains have clear movement across the crossing so as to prevent blocking road crossings for extended periods of time.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Monday, September 28, 2015 8:50 PM

Of course, the trains that were blowing for crossings before the trains on the other railroad cleared were proceeding prepared to stop at the home signal.  

It sounds like the railroads were cooperating with each other this afternoon.  Had they not been, there was a possibility that grade crossings in the city would have been blocked.  The dispatchers had to know that a window was gong to open, or the trains would have been stopped short of the city, clear of crossings.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Allen, TX
  • 1,320 posts
Posted by cefinkjr on Monday, September 28, 2015 3:56 PM

Fairly heavy traffic this afternoon.  In the last few minutes, I've seen:

  • An EB UP stack train with 2 DMUs only 10 or so cars before the end of the train.  I assume they were paying their way and not dead in train although I couldn't hear them as they passed.  I don't know what was on the head end; the train was already passing when I logged on.
  • A WB BNSF stack train that was blowing for the crossings long before the EB UP cleared the diamonds.  This guy had 30 or 40 well cars with only one container.  Looked odd.  Heavier than usual lading?
  • Another EB UP stacker.  This guy was blowing his horn before the BNSF cleared.  He had three units on the point and got his train up to speed (plus a little maybe) before clearing just now.
  • 10 minutes later, a WB UP stacker.  Had that window minimized and the power was out of sight by the time I heard the train and got the window open again.  It was moving right smartly!

Gotta close that window.  I'm not getting anything else done.

 

Chuck
Allen, TX

  • Member since
    March 2012
  • 174 posts
Posted by xjqcf on Sunday, September 27, 2015 9:16 AM
I was listening to the scanner feed when this happened - Earlier I heard the BNSF dispatcher making a comment to a stopped BNSF train trying to move something like "UP is playing games" for the reason for the delay. Then the vehicle train went westbound and then stopped at the crossover about a half mile west (CP 844)... and just waited. UP trains started stacking up, including a stack train coming out Global 3. At one point one of the UP trains got on the BNSF channel and asked the vehicle train why he was stopped, and , in reply, the vehicle train simple said "Red signal." At one point the UP dispatcher ordered the Global 3 stacker to back into the yard to clear the track for the westbound Z train parade. Finally (Might have been 45 minutes) a westbound BNSF stack train came west; probably was crossing over in front of the vehicle train). After a minute or two the vehicle train started crawling west. At no time did I hear on the radio anyone mentioning any cause for the situation other than the dispatcher snippet mentioned above; Since "Z" trains of both railroads were involved I bet a few bosses were involved in some "polite" conversation
CBT
  • Member since
    February 2015
  • 191 posts
Posted by CBT on Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:49 AM

cefinkjr

 

 
CBT

Yesterday I saw a UP double stack back up and pull forward then back up and pull forward etc...

 

Check Google Earth, CBT.  There's a fair sized container terminal just west of the diamonds.  Impossible for a normal length eastbound to leave or take blocks without using the main.

 

Thanks, ill check

And i just saw a littlle muskrat beside the track.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Allen, TX
  • 1,320 posts
Posted by cefinkjr on Friday, September 25, 2015 8:34 PM

CBT

Yesterday I saw a UP double stack back up and pull forward then back up and pull forward etc...

Check Google Earth, CBT.  There's a fair sized container terminal just west of the diamonds.  Impossible for a normal length eastbound to leave or take blocks without using the main.

Chuck
Allen, TX

CBT
  • Member since
    February 2015
  • 191 posts
Posted by CBT on Friday, September 25, 2015 5:08 PM

Yesterday I saw a UP double stack back up and pull forward then back up and pull forward etc...

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
Posted by rdamon on Friday, September 25, 2015 4:34 PM

Moving now ...  Turned on the scanner feed and heard "Red Flag Restriction" mentioned.

 Let's see how many UP trains are backed up!!

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • 192 posts
Posted by MrLynn on Friday, September 25, 2015 4:21 PM

rdamon

Been watching a stopped BNSF train full of Auto Racks stopped for the last two refreshes.

Auto racks still there; what's that, about half an hour?  BNSF storing them across the diamonds?  That's not going to sit well with UP.

/Mr Lynn

  • Member since
    June 2015
  • 43 posts
Posted by phkmn2000 on Friday, September 25, 2015 4:17 PM
That auto rack has been tying up the diamond for a LONG time.
  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
Posted by rdamon on Friday, September 25, 2015 3:58 PM

Interesting fact about the cab signals, thanks for sharing. Guess all of that is on borrowed time now with PTC.

 

Been watching a stopped BNSF train full of Auto Racks stopped for the last two refreshes.

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • 192 posts
Posted by MrLynn on Thursday, September 24, 2015 11:00 AM

There was a recent Trains article on run-through power.  Don't have the issue handy to cite.

Just saw the mid-day local heading long-hood forward into the siding with a few boxcars.  What engine is it--GP-XX?  And what are the white bulges atop the cab?

/Mr Lynn

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:45 AM

The lead unit of all trains on the UP has to be able to work with the old C&NW's cab signals and Automatic Train Control.  So you shouldn't ever see any foreign units in the lead.

Just last week I saw a train off CSX (nothing but CSX power) sitting on the UP main line at the west end of Proviso, with a UP unit about to tie on for the trip west.  Foreign trains are allowed to come as far west at Proviso (15 miles or so).

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Winnipeg, Mb
  • 628 posts
Posted by traisessive1 on Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:41 AM

I do hate that we get very little to no variety of foreign power on CN in Canada, even as trailing units. I guess that is the downfall of requiring a fridge and microwave in every lead unit. 

10000 feet and no dynamics? Today is going to be a good day ... 

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • From: Muskogee Oklahoma
  • 185 posts
Posted by MKT Dave on Thursday, September 24, 2015 7:38 AM

A couple months ago i caught two UP engines leading a four engine Stack on the Bnsf and the VERY next train WB on UP, had two Bnsfs, not head end, but in the power consist. was a bit slow to getting a picture of them and missed it.

...
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, September 23, 2015 3:37 PM

Probably "run through power," and/or paying back horsepower hours.

Nowadays, it's not uncommon for the locomotives a train starts with to stay on it for the entire trip.  We're mostly talking bulk commodities and expidited runs (UPS, perishables).  They therefore "run through" from origin to destination, even though they run on the home road's rails.

Of course, NS will want some compensation for the time that the locomotives are off home rails.  There's a lot of accounting that goes along with that.  One way that compensation can take place is for BNSF locomotives to be used on NS.  The "currency" is horsepower hours in that case.  If things get too out of whack, to the point that one railroad simply can't give up enough power to make the payback, cash may well change hands.

That's not to say that leasing doesn't take place, but I believe most leasing these days is from third party vendors, as opposed to other railroads.  I'll gladly stand corrected.

 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2015
  • 43 posts
Posted by phkmn2000 on Wednesday, September 23, 2015 1:45 PM
What's the story on the different engines on both lines? I just saw a BNSF led by 2 NS locos. Are these just leased units that go where they're needed?
  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Calgary AB. Canada
  • 2,298 posts
Posted by AgentKid on Wednesday, September 23, 2015 8:51 AM

I saw that too!!

The train that went by while he was up there was interesting as well. It was about as close to a unit train of wood products as you could ever see. From logs to various types of finished lumber.

Bruce

 

So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.

"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere"  CP Rail Public Timetable

"O. S. Irricana"

. . . __ . ______

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
Posted by rdamon on Wednesday, September 23, 2015 8:42 AM

Nice friendly wave from the workman on the roof!!

CBT
  • Member since
    February 2015
  • 191 posts
Posted by CBT on Monday, September 21, 2015 6:52 PM

Just got a Rio Grande diesel on the Union Pacific.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Allen, TX
  • 1,320 posts
Posted by cefinkjr on Sunday, September 20, 2015 11:03 PM

My thoughts exactly. Maybe because UP heralds on MoW trucks are smaller than their BNSF counterparts that I've seen, I had also assumed it was UP crews performing the maintenance.  But even if our assumptions are correct, BNSF would still be likely to be paying for the maintenance if BNSF (OK, a predecessor) is the junior road.

Chuck
Allen, TX

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Sunny (mostly) San Diego
  • 1,920 posts
Posted by ChuckCobleigh on Sunday, September 20, 2015 11:02 PM

MrLynn

My impression was that the crews who park over on the right-hand side of the diamonds (between the eastbound UP and the westbound BNSF tracks) and do almost all of the work I have seen, were all UP people.  Was this wrong?  Both roads seem to use all-white trucks, and I can't see any logos.

/Mr Lynn

I have on occasion been watching the webcam feed when a MOW truck has arrived and maneuvered so as to show the doors of the truck and it was pretty clear that the truck was a UP truck.  The trucks, especially the heavy ones, certainly look like the UP trucks one often sees in Tehachapi, especially at night when they are parked in front of the motel on Tehachapi Blvd.  Lots of trucks in the parking lot does not bode well for daytime train watching the next day.

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • 192 posts
Posted by MrLynn on Sunday, September 20, 2015 10:31 PM

My impression was that the crews who park over on the right-hand side of the diamonds (between the eastbound UP and the westbound BNSF tracks) and do almost all of the work I have seen, were all UP people.  Was this wrong?  Both roads seem to use all-white trucks, and I can't see any logos.

/Mr Lynn

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Allen, TX
  • 1,320 posts
Posted by cefinkjr on Sunday, September 20, 2015 7:37 PM

CBT
The first road through would have no worries about maintaining anything that is made necessary by a later arrival on the scene.

I suspect UP (or any other "senior road") would object to the phrase "no worries" here.  Their mgt is going to be just as much or more concerned with maintenance of diamond(s) as the junior road's.

The junior road would be responsible financially for the maintenance but local (and very old) agreements will determine who actually performs the maintenance.  The senior road would frequently not trust the junior's MoW crews and would insist on doing the maintenance with the junior paying for it.  The senior road was, of course, in the stronger bargaining position. 

Chuck
Allen, TX

CBT
  • Member since
    February 2015
  • 191 posts
Posted by CBT on Sunday, September 20, 2015 7:06 PM

Deggesty

 

 
CBT

Oh, and a question. If the diamond is shared bu UP and BNSF who is responsible for the maintence of the diamond. Thanks to any answers.

Chris

 

 

 

Johnny-come-lately--in this case the Burlington (now the BNSF) is the one responsible. The first road through would have no worries about maintaining anything that is made necessary by a later arrival on the scene.

 

 

Thanks

chris

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Sunday, September 20, 2015 6:46 PM

CBT

Oh, and a question. If the diamond is shared bu UP and BNSF who is responsible for the maintence of the diamond. Thanks to any answers.

Chris

 

Johnny-come-lately--in this case the Burlington (now the BNSF) is the one responsible. The first road through would have no worries about maintaining anything that is made necessary by a later arrival on the scene.

Johnny

CBT
  • Member since
    February 2015
  • 191 posts
Posted by CBT on Sunday, September 20, 2015 6:18 PM

Oh, and a question. If the diamond is shared bu UP and BNSF who is responsible for the maintence of the diamond. Thanks to any answers.

Chris

CBT
  • Member since
    February 2015
  • 191 posts
Posted by CBT on Sunday, September 20, 2015 10:34 AM

Just caught a NS powerd train.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Allen, TX
  • 1,320 posts
Posted by cefinkjr on Saturday, September 19, 2015 1:35 PM

Did I miss an email telling me that this thread had been abandoned?  Anyway:

Just saw a WB UP Salad Shooter (?); about 70 or 80 white reefers behind 4 units.  Most of the cars had been tagged; that's understandable as their white sides are great canvases for taggers.  But two things occurred to me as I watched that train pass:

1. About 20% of the cars had a bright orange stripe at the top and bottom of the sides.  Few of these had been tagged.  Newer cars or cars that are normally spotted where taggers can't get at them?

2. Much as I hate to admit it, some of the tags really look nice.  Such a waste of money, time, and talent!  

Chuck
Allen, TX

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Allen, TX
  • 1,320 posts
Posted by cefinkjr on Thursday, September 17, 2015 4:58 PM

Just saw an EB UP stacker rockin' and rollin' through the diamonds on #2.  Looked like the offender was the diamond with BNSF #1 but can't be sure; I only saw the last 10 or 15 cars and the train was moving at or near track speed.

Chuck
Allen, TX

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy