Trains.com

The Official Eleanor Roosevelt (And Anything Else Non-Topical) Thread

123519 views
1056 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, February 6, 2011 10:11 AM

Go Packers....

Er...

Go Steelers...

Er.....

Go Commercials...

Eleanor Roosevelt wishes you all a Happy Super Bowl Sunday!!!!

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
Posted by Victrola1 on Wednesday, February 9, 2011 11:50 AM

House Transportation Committee Chair Rep. John Mica (R) of Florida said previous administration grants to high-speed rail projects were a failure, producing "snail speed trains to nowhere." He called Amtrak a "Soviet-style train system" and said it "hijacked" nearly all the administration's rail projects.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/362107;_ylt=AvYzYYjVzKg23lvFrwT1UctzfNdF

Would Eleanor approve of a Soviet-style train system?

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, February 9, 2011 3:58 PM

Eleanor Roosevelt gives two handbags up to the modified threads page.

Good job!!!!!!

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, February 9, 2011 3:59 PM

Victrola1

House Transportation Committee Chair Rep. John Mica (R) of Florida said previous administration grants to high-speed rail projects were a failure, producing "snail speed trains to nowhere." He called Amtrak a "Soviet-style train system" and said it "hijacked" nearly all the administration's rail projects.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/362107;_ylt=AvYzYYjVzKg23lvFrwT1UctzfNdF

Would Eleanor approve of a Soviet-style train system?

 

Not sure about Eleanor, but FDR always said the "Uncle Joe" was reasonable fellow.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
Posted by Victrola1 on Thursday, February 10, 2011 9:00 AM

I can not find verification, but I believe Eleanor described the Soviet Union as one of the world's great democracies. In all fairness to Eleanor, that was during the early 1940's when through rail service from Berlin to Moscow was interrupted.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, February 10, 2011 1:30 PM

You are pretty far off the mark:

http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/eleanorroosevelt.htm

She was at the center of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in the late 1940's, and took on the Soviet repreentative:

She challenged the up to then quasi-exclusively internal or domestic nature of the treatment by a State of its nationals.  Vishinsky the Soviet representative had burst out:
"This is outrageous; you can't infringe the rights of governments; they're the things that
matter."

And Eleanor Roosevelt had turned to him and said "Mr. Vishinsky, we're not
dealing here with the rights of governments, they're far too much already. We're dealing
here, Mr. Vishinsky, with the rights of people, of men, of the right of man to be free.
Man, Mr. Vishinsky, not governments."

She won that debate.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
Posted by Victrola1 on Thursday, February 10, 2011 3:17 PM

I saw references to the exchange you reference. This comment was made during WWII. All those high hopes of what a post war world would be like unfortunately turned into a cold war.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, February 10, 2011 4:39 PM

Could be, but I'd like to see a citation, when, where, etc.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
Posted by Victrola1 on Thursday, February 10, 2011 5:36 PM

I will keep looking for a link to such a war effort comment concerning an at the time ally.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, February 21, 2011 5:05 PM

Eleanor Roosevelt wishes you all a very happy President's Day!

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
Posted by Victrola1 on Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:28 AM

Edith Wilson Day?

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:31 AM

Lou Hoover....

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, February 26, 2011 11:17 AM

I can't help but wonder if the spirit of Eleanor Roosevelt is at the UN today watching the debate over Libya........

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, February 26, 2011 6:30 PM

Murray

I can't help but wonder if the spirit of Eleanor Roosevelt is at the UN today watching the debate over Libya........

 

 

I wonder what she would have thought about what they will decide.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Saturday, February 26, 2011 7:07 PM
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Saturday, February 26, 2011 7:29 PM

.....An interesting column and well {and clearly}, written.

Isn't the LIbyan desert where the "Lady Be Good" WWII aircraft was found about a decade or so ago...and almost intact, from it's landing....

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, April 24, 2011 6:09 PM
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, April 24, 2011 6:27 PM
  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Calgary AB. Canada
  • 2,298 posts
Posted by AgentKid on Sunday, April 24, 2011 7:47 PM

Liked the film. The Roadmaster at Irricana, AB bought a 1960 Studebaker Lark new and kept it when he left in late 1964. My Dad thought it was a strange thing at the time, but told me later it must have been a good car because as far as he knew it started every time that fellow went out to use it  Year round in Canadian winters. Nearest dealership was in Calgary, 45 miles away.

Bruce

 

So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.

"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere"  CP Rail Public Timetable

"O. S. Irricana"

. . . __ . ______

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, April 24, 2011 8:03 PM
  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Calgary AB. Canada
  • 2,298 posts
Posted by AgentKid on Monday, April 25, 2011 12:05 AM

$90.33 for an AM Radio in the Riviera. Oh My!

Actually I'm not sure we saw 1964 Riviera's until some years later. The Canada/US Autopact wasn't in force until 1965. Before then there were definite differences in the Big 3 products between the two countries. Some large, some smaller.

There were Avanti's from the get-go I think.

Quentin mentioned on another thread about owning a '62 Chevrolet SuperSport. In Canada, to compete against that model Pontiac had the Parisienne Custom Sport, which I found out later was sort of a cross between a US only Bonneville and a GTO.

I bought a series of US carmaker history books about ten years ago and was showing them to my Mother. As I had suspected, the taillight treatment on our 1953 Pontiac Laurentiene was completely different than what was done in the US.

Actually, I always thought it would be funny to own a house in a US suburb with a big front driveway and have a Meteor Rideau 500, a Mercury pickup, and a Fargo pickup parked out there and watch the neighbours reactions trying to figure out what was going on.

Bruce

 

So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.

"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere"  CP Rail Public Timetable

"O. S. Irricana"

. . . __ . ______

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, April 25, 2011 6:25 AM

Good Morning Bruce:

Yes, you're right about the Canadian built Pontiacs.  GM made them by placing the Pontiac body over a Chevrolet frame and provided them with a Chevrolet V8 and Power-Glide transmission.

If you parked a Pontiac Laurentian next to a Pontiac Catalina, you can see the difference, especially in the wheelbase.

At one time we had a Canadian-built Pontiac...  a 1970 Tempest... good little car.

 

 

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Calgary AB. Canada
  • 2,298 posts
Posted by AgentKid on Monday, April 25, 2011 3:52 PM

Murray, that changed at various times over the years. The nicest car my dad every owned IMO was a 1974 Pontiac Parisienne Brougham. It may have been built on a Chevrolet frame, but that car was a bearcat to get fixed. It was built after GM lost that case about their engines being brand specific, and then had to call them all "GM Engines". In our case this car had US 'spec" Buick running gear. From the fan blade through the transmission to the muffler to the exhaust tip. From the first time my Dad had the oil and filter changed, and it took 5 Imperial quarts. of oil instead of four, he had to make sure the mechanics knew what they were dealing with. He didn't deal with the dealership. Eventually, it became generally know there were two types of 400 CID engines, "orange" and "blue". Ours was a blue.

We had a hardtop tent trailer then, and that car handled it like there was nothing there compared to the 1965 Pontiac we had before, with a 283. That car was all Chev all the way.

Bruce

 

So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.

"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere"  CP Rail Public Timetable

"O. S. Irricana"

. . . __ . ______

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 19, 2011 5:11 PM

Eleanor Roosevelt would like to extend to all the fathers out there a most pleasant safe and Happy Fathers Day!

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, June 19, 2011 7:26 PM

Hmmm.....A couple of car guys here....Interesting.

Yes, remembering back decades ago, occasionally  we'd see {in Pennsylvania}, some Canadian "Fords", and note the details of difference.

And on the confussion of GM engines and court cases years ago....Isn't it ironic between then and now, referring to Cadillac with the "Chevrolet engines" back roughly in the '70's....Now, Cadillac advertises "the fastest 4-dr. sedan", and it uses the 556 hp supercharged engine {similar to}, the Chevrolet Corvette ZR1...{of course, it's not called Chevrolet engine, no doubt referring to it as a GM engine}.

One other bit of trivia:  Referring to the "blue & green" engines of 400 ci....GM.  Back in the 70's Chevrolet offered two "400 ci." V8 engines of different design.  The 400 small block......and the 400 big block.  Actually the big block was 402 ci. but it was "ID'd", right on the car as a 400.  Mouse motor & Rat motor.

That caused us a problem many years ago down in Florida when a fan belt failed, and trying to explain "what engine" we needed it for.....I had the Rat motor.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 19, 2011 7:30 PM

Modelcar

Hmmm.....A couple of car guys here....Interesting.

Yes, remembering back decades ago, occasionally  we'd see {in Pennsylvania}, some Canadian "Fords", and note the details of difference.

And on the confussion of GM engines and court cases years ago....Isn't it ironic between then and now, referring to Cadillac with the "Chevrolet engines" back roughly in the '70's....Now, Cadillac advertises "the fastest 4-dr. sedan", and it uses the 556 hp supercharged engine {similar to}, the Chevrolet Corvette ZR1...{of course, it's not called Chevrolet engine, no doubt referring to it as a GM engine}.

One other bit of trivia:  Referring to the "blue & green" engines of 400 ci....GM.  Back in the 70's Chevrolet offered two "400 ci." V8 engines of different design.  The 400 small block......and the 400 big block.  Actually the big block was 402 ci. but it was "ID'd", right on the car as a 400.  Mouse motor & Rat motor.

That caused us a problem many years ago down in Florida when a fan belt failed, and trying to explain "what engine" we needed it for.....I had the Rat motor.

Quentin, I have a friend out here who has a '71 Corvette.  Its been a real "labor of love" for him.

He's always joking..."sure I can take her out...but I have to be sure "AAA" is close by"  Smile

It is a nice looking car though.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, June 19, 2011 7:33 PM

Murray........The Corvette Jean and I had fun with, is the one pic. as my Avatar.  That was our first trip down to Florida.  Back in 1959.

Quentin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 19, 2011 8:09 PM

Modelcar

Murray........The Corvette Jean and I had fun with, is the one pic. as my Avatar.  That was our first trip down to Florida.  Back in 1959.

That's a mighty nice looking car there Quentin.....

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,024 posts
Posted by tree68 on Sunday, June 19, 2011 8:47 PM

Cars and engines -

When my father worked at GM's proving grounds in Michigan they had a program under which employees could purchase some of the test cars when GM was done with them.

Dad was able to purchase a '63 Olds. 

The problem was that the car had been used for "cold start" tests.  In order to simulate what would happen to an engine if the owner only drove it short distances all the time, they would start it up and drive it until the "Cold" light (remember them?) went out.  It would then be parked for a period of time and the same thing done over.

When they got done, they decided to keep the engine itself for further inspection.

Since they were going to sell the car, they had to put a motor back in it, but they didn't have another '63 Olds motor available.  They did, however, have a '64 engine on hand, so they installed that.

In those days, not only the styling but many of the parts changed from year to year, which caused no end of trouble when buying parts for maintenance...

"Yeah - it's a '63, but it's got a '64 motor in it..."

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, June 20, 2011 9:24 AM

....Another incident that mixed things up in automobiles....The distruction by fire of the Hydra-matic plant in Mi., back about 1953

Pontiacs with Powerglade trainsmissions....Believe it even extended to Oldsmobile's using Dynaflow transmissions as well, and perhaps a few other different combinations in GM cars.

Can't remember if it spread to others like Kaiser / Frazier....and a few others using the Hydra-matic transmission.

Quentin

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy