schlimm2. If one looks at Western Europe, it really isn't so small.
But it is not the same size as the U.S. As well, the Europeans are not all in agreement with the HSR proponents there. There was a discussion on Deutsche Welle about the view that a good chunk of the debate was taken out because a lot of that opposition to HSR was due to many local/rural infrastructure projects were being suppressed in favour of the HSR investments. We also need to remember that a large chunk of this investment went to nationalized RRs, many of which service highly populated centers----there are not too many private railroads in Europe
schlimm3. Countries other than the "tiny" ones of Europe or Japan are also developing HSR and fairly fast rail practically from scratch, eg., China. If you think they are doing it for nostalgia or to be nice to the population, think again. Everything done in 21st century China is economic pragmatism. They are investing huge sums because it strengthens their economy by improving the infrastructure.
China is still politically a Communist state. The political/social culture there, again, is a social/communal one. Chinese traditional culture has always been more communal whereas ours was established along a more individualistic basis. Brazil is doing the same thing but again it has a more or less established culture of its own. Yes, they all have an infrastructural issue. So do we----but we do not necessarily need to follow everyone else's lead. We can do it on our own terms. And if it means that we do not do the HSR route or any other than what we deem necessary than so be it. And as mentioned before---doing what was done before does not constitute doing nothing.
We do not need to do it just because others are----again. Lets think OTHER---than the usual follow the bouncing ball
Any argument carried far enough will end up in Semantics--Hartz's law of rhetoric Emerald. Leemer and Southern The route of the Sceptre Express Barry
I just started my blog site...more stuff to come...
http://modeltrainswithmusic.blogspot.ca/
selector I disagree with the statement that doing nothing is always to be considered in a list of alternatives. While it may be the actual best choice in some circumstances, it is not considerable in dealing with, for example, a dlilemma, especially one of the ethical kind. Now, this is an academic approach, granted, but when confronted with an ethical dilemma, one is not going to actively consider "doing nothing" because to do nothing would be an indicator of indesiciveness, a lack of a sense of commitment or responsibility, and it wouldn't actually be an active step in choosing the 'correct' or best way ahead..the lesser of two evils, if you will. Maybe I am making the mistake of interpreting 'doing nothng' as having no active role in a determination. I take it literally, and in the example cited above, the choices are there, are considered, and the person may elect to continue to use the usual route. That is not doing nothing. -Crandell
I disagree with the statement that doing nothing is always to be considered in a list of alternatives. While it may be the actual best choice in some circumstances, it is not considerable in dealing with, for example, a dlilemma, especially one of the ethical kind. Now, this is an academic approach, granted, but when confronted with an ethical dilemma, one is not going to actively consider "doing nothing" because to do nothing would be an indicator of indesiciveness, a lack of a sense of commitment or responsibility, and it wouldn't actually be an active step in choosing the 'correct' or best way ahead..the lesser of two evils, if you will.
Maybe I am making the mistake of interpreting 'doing nothng' as having no active role in a determination. I take it literally, and in the example cited above, the choices are there, are considered, and the person may elect to continue to use the usual route. That is not doing nothing.
-Crandell
In this case, what I mean, and what I think some others here mean by "Do Nothing" is to seriously consider it to be one of the options. As in "Do Nothing" is always an option that should be considered.
We're talking about an investment decision. Obviously, not making any investment is an option that should be considered. With your military background you might be familiar with "Anything you do can get you killed, including nothing." But sometimes "Nothing" is the right choice. If you try to react to, and control, everything you'll run out of resouces.
I haven't seen a valid argument for forced Electrification or HSR yet. It's mostly "Other countries have it". That's no reason to have it in the US. We don't have the resources to "Do Everything" so "Do Nothing" will often be the right choice, all things considered.
selectorMaybe I am making the mistake of interpreting 'doing nothng' as having no active role in a determination. I take it literally, and in the example cited above, the choices are there, are considered, and the person may elect to continue to use the usual route. That is not doing nothing.
I think that the phrase "doing nothing" may be a misnomer? The phrase could be more that we continue doing things the way we've done them before---it being a more piecemeal approach that is sensitive to each regions issues. In other words the dreaded " Status Quo ".
The idea that I've seen bandied about more is that there is some kind of all encompassing system/solution---a "magic bullet" as it were. HSR has become precisely that magic bullet. Europe has a much more centralized methodology when it comes to infrastructure. Here not so much.
Some places go for an overarching system. Others go for a more smaller/regional approach. Why there should be an issue over the regional way is something else again
Greyhounds and Blownout....thanks. That works for me.
blownout cylinderChinese traditional culture has always been more communal whereas ours was established along a more individualistic basis. Brazil is doing the same thing but again it has a more or less established culture of its own. Yes, they all have an infrastructural issue. So do we----but we do not necessarily need to follow everyone else's lead. We can do it on our own terms. And if it means that we do not do the HSR route or any other than what we deem necessary than so be it. And as mentioned before---doing what was done before does not constitute doing nothing. We do not need to do it just because others are----again. Lets think OTHER---than the usual follow the bouncing ball
Chinese traditional culture has always been more communal whereas ours was established along a more individualistic basis. Brazil is doing the same thing but again it has a more or less established culture of its own. Yes, they all have an infrastructural issue. So do we----but we do not necessarily need to follow everyone else's lead. We can do it on our own terms. And if it means that we do not do the HSR route or any other than what we deem necessary than so be it. And as mentioned before---doing what was done before does not constitute doing nothing.
The proposition that the US has a more individualistic culture than some of the other countries does not rule out federal investments in infrastructure. You are only using that as an excuse for continuing what we have done in regard to rails for the past 50 years - nothing - while we collectively and wisely invested (remember, we are talking investment, not just spending money on expenses) many billions in the interstate highway system and the air transport system. One could just as easily conclude you take a contrarian approach to decisions.
C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan
schlimmThe proposition that the US has a more individualistic culture than some of the other countries does not rule out federal investments in infrastructure. You are only using that as an excuse for continuing what we have done in regard to rails for the past 50 years - nothing - while we collectively and wisely invested (remember, we are talking investment, not just spending money on expenses) many billions in the interstate highway system and the air transport system. One could just as easily conclude you take a contrarian approach to decisions.
And, I suppose, you would prefer to do this all because the Europeans are doing it therefore they must be right? This is what the argument seems to be revolving around--"Well, the Europeans do that so why can't we?". I'm tempted to reply---"Oh Waaah". Maybe the point is that it appears to me to be more a "want" vs "need" thing. And, yes, the Interstate highways were an investment--in the sense that the whole thing was thought of in terms of an added military advantage for rapid deployment, but that would be too crude a stick. The problem is that now you have a lot of areas with virtually no customer base in many of the areas in the mid west---yet they will find more tax dollars coming out of their areas to subsidize the tax base in the urban centers.
Again, a regional solution could be as good as any other centralized system.
Oh, BTW, there still is an argument going on about how the Interstate system may have been responsible for partially depopulating a lot of areas during the 1960's and after.
Look, I'm not necessarily against HSR as such. It is just that I'm not seeing why this is such a need now. And if my position is as a contrarian than so be it. It beats following the latest trends without thinking about the needs and desires of same.
blownout cylinder We do not need to do it just because others are----again. Lets think OTHER---than the usual follow the bouncing ball
But Mr. Wrinn says we need HSR for societal benefits such as less pollution, better land use, reduced congestion, and getting people off of the highway for their own safety. And without HSR, our friends overseas consider us to be an uncivilized nation.
Bucyrus blownout cylinder We do not need to do it just because others are----again. Lets think OTHER---than the usual follow the bouncing ball But Mr. Wrinn says we need HSR for societal benefits such as less pollution, better land use, reduced congestion, and getting people off of the highway for their own safety. And without HSR, our friends overseas consider us to be an uncivilized nation.
The coffee just went up my nose!!
HSR as the new "Magic Bullet"
But I have been a barbarian all of my life...why change now?.
Besides, I kinda like wearing animal skins and living in caves, and can't imagine snails as being food....
23 17 46 11
BucyrusAnd without HSR, our friends overseas consider us to be an uncivilized nation.
Visit look4trains.com
htgguy I frequently see the argument that "all the cool kids have it-why can't I? I want to be cool too!!!"
Name calling is not putting forth a very rational case either. You really cannot seem to accept the idea that the building of an improved passenger rail system isn't just doing what other countries do in a childish, aping of others. If you prefer to spend your tax dollars on endless wars, more and more highways and the like, then I guess that is your choice. But please have the courtesy in a rail forum not to merely belittle others' thoughts. Or is your only interest a negative one, or just nostalgia for the good old days?
schlimm You really cannot seem to accept the idea that the building of an improved passenger rail system isn't just doing what other countries do in a childish, aping of others.
I think the issue here is precisely just this. You don't like what the US does else where but you seem to think that you should have the US follow Europes lead? And you do mention that other countries are doing just this. Now you crab about the fact that others are picking up on this? You wrote these sorts of things yourself.
Still, the issue here is that HSR might work in some areas---but cannot be made to work everywhere. The HSR situation in Europe is still mostly serving those who live in major urban centers and do not include regular working people as part of the clientele. The cost of those tickets is a little out of the reach of many---although the tax dollars came out of their pockets
As long as the rhetoric here continues to come through the filter of the European experience, or others for that matter, then there will be criticisms of that focal point.
Shall those proponents start to come up with a viable business model to sell their "System"?
So much is eluding many here: if the US doesn't have an infrastsructure, a program, a system, or anything else in place, equal to or better than any other nation in the world, then it can't expect to compete! Or even worse, we will be purchased by foriegn companies and without a shot being fired we will wake up under a different flag! Sit there and poke at things based on your political, social, or educational postures, but to say we shouldn't do things in the country to stay competitive and independent is our death knell! All levels of government have been involved in our transportation, industry, and social sectors since 1776, it cannot be denied that land grants, charters, bailouts, tax easments and benefits, loans and other grants, coalitions and consortiums, the absolute building and maintaining of roads, airports, and highways, schools, hospitals, industrial parks, and...I could go on and on...have happened to make the USA a great nation. So to say that we, we as a nation, should not do anything about anythng for fear of being like Europe or Japan or China or anybody else is total bull simply because if we don't do anything we will be one of them!
RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.
henry6So much is eluding many here: if the US doesn't have an infrastsructure, a program, a system, or anything else in place, equal to or better than any other nation in the world, then it can't expect to compete!
I think we have adequate infrastructure to compete. Some of those countries you admire may actually be getting themselves into a less competitive position by allowing their government to dream up and execute expensive things they don’t need just to make more government.
henry6. So to say that we, we as a nation, should not do anything about anythng for fear of being like Europe or Japan or China or anybody else is total bull simply because if we don't do anything we will be one of them!
The problem is in how one formulates the issue. I don't think that one has to rip everything apart and rebuild the entire infrastructure from scratch----or fly headlong like panicing Turkeys into a single system like HSR for example. I still have to see a viable plan to make HSR work. From what a few people I've heard from in Europe are telling me, a lot of th hype around HSR is not very useful either. France right now for example is finding that funding the TGV project is starting to tell on some other aspects of their infrastructure too now--
Look, one issue we have up North of London ON in the Huron, Grey and Bruce counties--one of bridges needing upgrading. No sense in dumping those areas just to pile a bunch of infrastructure money into HSR along the Windsor to Montreal corridor. They have to get the food to our tables too. Yet, this is what a lot of urbanites--already caught up in the allure of HSR are saying---who needs those bridges?---D'uh--the people who feed you? Battle lines are drawn between those who want HSR and those who see a need to keep those things we have going.
The whole thing with HSR is that we need more than just HSR----what about LRT services? How about those areas that hav just enough demand for a rapid transit system involving a shuttle train of some sort? Or?
There is a need to get the head away from the billfold enough to see the possibilities of doing a bunch of different things---without necessarily tossing everything into the bit bucket to service one system.
BTW, it is true that it did take some form of government involvment in many ways it was also through the private individuals who had the visions and the wherewithall to stick to it that got things done--sometimes the governments also acted as a millstone too.
Bucyrushenry6So much is eluding many here: if the US doesn't have an infrastsructure, a program, a system, or anything else in place, equal to or better than any other nation in the world, then it can't expect to compete! I think we have adequate infrastructure to compete. Some of those countries you admire may actually be getting themselves into a less competitive position by allowing their government to dream up and execute expensive things they don’t need just to make more government.
Maybe on 1 count, HSR, the Europeans have us beat in the way of infrastructure. But as far as freight railroads, highways, and airlines I will take the ones in the good ol' USA any day of the week. Not as familiar with waterways, but I imagine ours would beat theirs in that category too.
Now how does being second fiddle in 1 out of 4 (possibly 5) areas of infrastructure put us at a competitive disadvantage to them?
How is HSR which moves people intra-country putting us at a global disadvantage when we have speedier alternatives already in place?
What will put us at a competitive disadvantage is the trillions of dollars of national debt we will incur if HSR is truly made national.
Jay
garr What will put us at a competitive disadvantage is the trillions of dollars of national debt we will incur if HSR is truly made national.
And this is much more likely to be the case. $8 Billion ? Try a figure like $500 Billion, not including cost over runs. Some of the figures that I've seen actually were closer to the 500 figure with one going to over a trillion dollars.
In order for a true HSR to work many of the lines used in Europe were designated as such/built as such. Wanna bet this thing will fly in the NE corridor? Where they gonna put it? Oh, and HSR has a few proponents who think Mag-Lev might work.
edblysard But I have been a barbarian all of my life...why change now?. Besides, I kinda like wearing animal skins and living in caves, and can't imagine snails as being food....
I think I'll try to form an "Actvist" group. "Barbarian Railfans North America." "BRNA-considered to be uncivilized by some Europeans and an editor in Waukesha, Wisconsin."
If they're going to consider me "uncivilized" I might as well enjoy it.
greyhounds edblysard But I have been a barbarian all of my life...why change now?. Besides, I kinda like wearing animal skins and living in caves, and can't imagine snails as being food.... I think I'll try to form an "Actvist" group. "Barbarian Railfans North America." "BRNA-considered to be uncivilized by some Europeans and an editor in Waukesha, Wisconsin." If they're going to consider me "uncivilized" I might as well enjoy it.
Does being cast as a contrarian count?----sounds like a fun group---
greyhoundsIf they're going to consider me "uncivilized" I might as well enjoy it.
Perhaps just a nostalgia fan.
henry6 So much is eluding many here: if the US doesn't have an infrastsructure, a program, a system, or anything else in place, equal to or better than any other nation in the world, then it can't expect to compete! Or even worse, we will be purchased by foriegn companies and without a shot being fired we will wake up under a different flag! Sit there and poke at things based on your political, social, or educational postures, but to say we shouldn't do things in the country to stay competitive and independent is our death knell! All levels of government have been involved in our transportation, industry, and social sectors since 1776, it cannot be denied that land grants, charters, bailouts, tax easments and benefits, loans and other grants, coalitions and consortiums, the absolute building and maintaining of roads, airports, and highways, schools, hospitals, industrial parks, and...I could go on and on...have happened to make the USA a great nation. So to say that we, we as a nation, should not do anything about anythng for fear of being like Europe or Japan or China or anybody else is total bull simply because if we don't do anything we will be one of them!
I'll try to explain why I think you are wrong.
We don't need more government involvement in railroading. Things are being done. Companies that are not directed by the government have made and are making significant investments in infrastructrure. Want some examples? How about three main tracks on the UP across much of Nebraska? 4 main tracks (up from ZERO mains not that many years ago) hauling coal out of the Powder River Basin. Double tracking of much of the former ATSF trans-con to accomodate increased intermodal business. Huge investments in new, more fuel efficient, and "greener" locomotives. Added and updated signaling on routes across the nation to increase capacity. CWR on more routes across the nation.
Are these things acceptable to you? Were they done at the behest of some central planning agency? No. They were done by investors seeking a place to use capital wisely to earn a rate of return. They did it of their own free will-because they saw a demand that could be met-while earning a rate of return on the invested capital. Yes, they did it because they are greedy-just like you and I. But they put THEIR money on the line, not the taxpayer's. They win and lose from the decisions they make.
I really don't care how Japan, or Europe, or China, do it. I care that the scarce capital that investors are able to generate is used efficiently. I acknowledge that there is no perfect method of directing that investment. The free market will make some colossal blunders. But in the long run, it will produce the most good for the most people. Some will get fabulously rich, some will continue to earn a good living, and some will go broke. I wish no one had to go broke, but that is called "creative destruction".
The alternative is to appoint a bunch of government officials (or even worse, congresscritters) to divy out the money. They will be most concerned with #1 keeping their job and #2 making sure no one benefits "unfairly". This will mis-allocate capital and lead to more misery and suffering for the human race.
That's a short course on why I advocate for the position I advocate for. Can you explain how what you advocate for improve the human condition across the board-not just for the small fraction of people who will ride the HSR trains you would build with tax money?
Thanks, Jim
Jim, yours is a political opinion. But I'm not sure its pragmatic. What I am saying is that we must unshackle ourselves from our political opinions and fears and start thinking in new directions.
Fellas, the dynamic fans are howling, but the speedometer warns me of a losing battle. Please, let's try to keep overt ideology out of our musings in this thread, or the order will go out to bail.
henry6 Jim, yours is a political opinion. But I'm not sure its pragmatic. What I am saying is that we must unshackle ourselves from our political opinions and fears and start thinking in new directions.
And you are not making political opinions? And Jims point is not pragmatic? Development of expansion in terms of the adding of RR into areas previously not serviced or adding to the services---not pragmatic. Huh? Some do not think that there needs be a political decision made as to infrastructure every dang time that a situation arises. He stated some facts-----I'm still waiting for some from the side that seems to think that government involvment is needed.
Why are you talking as if others need to unshackle themselves? And you by dint of your rhetoric imply that you don't? Hmmmm
selector Fellas, the dynamic fans are howling, but the speedometer warns me of a losing battle. Please, let's try to keep overt ideology out of our musings in this thread, or the order will go out to bail. -Crandell
For my two cents, I think almost everyone has kept this pretty well focused on railroad subjects:.
1) Jim Wrinn's editorial
2) Government involement in transportation
It's impossible to discuss either of those topics without bringing in economics. With some levity about Wrinn's "Uncivilized" remark, the discussion has focused on the two cited topics. Just let it settle itself out. Choose the "Do Nothing" option. Let us settle it among ourselves.
Nobody's doing personal attacks (for the most part). Just give her her head and see where she goes. Sometimes that's the best option.
greyhoundsNobody's doing personal attacks (for the most part). Just give her her head and see where she goes. Sometimes that's the best option.
If there have been personal attacks on this thread, none have been stronger than the attack Jim Wrinn put on some of his readers and long time subscribers with the December editorial.
Jay, I do think that is a little extreme and uncalled for. But why I'm here now: my political views are of course part of my arguement. But they are not that dirty word liberal that many of you suppose since it does not align with your views. I actually consider myself moderate and perhaps even independent. While I am enrolled as a voter of one party...and probably not the one you think...I never vote straight party lines. I am not a proponent of one form of transportation nor one solution. I just believe that we...the US as a whole, many here as a group...are stuck in thier own past, thier own thinking, thier own ruts if you will. Therefore there will be no consensus found here. Am I wrong? Are you wrong? It depends upon who you ask. And each of those answers is part of a very long and endless thread.
garr greyhounds Nobody's doing personal attacks (for the most part). Just give her her head and see where she goes. Sometimes that's the best option. If there have been personal attacks on this thread, none have been stronger than the attack Jim Wrinn put on some of his readers and long time subscribers with the December editorial. Jay
greyhounds Nobody's doing personal attacks (for the most part). Just give her her head and see where she goes. Sometimes that's the best option.
That was an interesting way to deal with the scepticism around HSR --- call them "uncivilized".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyhow, what I would like to toss in here is the notion that some are actually talking about up here. The idea is to encourage local development of mass transit solutions that may, or may not, include certain aspects of HSR. This ties in with the idea of a general local development framework involving industry and commercial initiatives in that local area---growing local markets for locally made goods and services. How would HSR work in this case? Move from passenger traffic to goods traffic? A generally mixed mode? Different possibilities----but developed in/through locally/regionally derived bases.
There are a whole slew of possibilities within a framework of local initiatives developed through each communities needs/potentials which would not necessarily require large scale governmental involvment.
As for the trans continental HSR proponents--can anyone give this little one a timeframe? A set of proposals as to how this is financed? Routes? Other avenues? I'd really like to see some of that---rather than label all the above as "uncivilized", "nostalgic" and all that. Or the infamous variation of a line I hear from children---"Well, Joey has an iPod, why can't I?"
henry6Jay, I do think that is a little extreme and uncalled for.
Henry, I am not sure if you are talking about Jay’s criticism of Jim Wrinn, or Mr. Wrinn’s contention that those who howl at his civilized view of HSR do not get it. Could you clarify?
henry6Jay, I do think that is a little extreme and uncalled for. ...Therefore there will be no consensus found here. Am I wrong? Are you wrong? It depends upon who you ask. And each of those answers is part of a very long and endless thread.
Jay, I do think that is a little extreme and uncalled for. ...Therefore there will be no consensus found here. Am I wrong? Are you wrong? It depends upon who you ask. And each of those answers is part of a very long and endless thread.
henry6,
I think this has been a civilized thread.
Just saying the initial blow was the strongest. When someone tells me "I don't get it", i.e. Jim Wrinn's last sentence in the editorial "Let's hope that those howling high speed critics finally get it", just because I have a differing view I consider that an attack, at the very least condescending. As if their opinion is the only correct one.
Thus the title of this thread.The eight pages in this thread has proven both sides are obtuse.
As I have stated consistently, I like High Speed Rail, but show me how it can be done without adding to the debt load that we will be handing off to our children and grandchildren. Once that is shown, start the shovels.
If our governments would use this criteria for all non emergency projects/programs, we would all be better off in the long run. Just because we have operated in the red in the past does not mean we should continue doing it. Same as our personal finances, a reckoning day is coming, just on a larger scale and most seem to have the opinion that it is fine as long as it is later. Just give me this one--- now.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.