Trains.com

"Hobbist or Terrorist?" in Time Magazine

5449 views
83 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,431 posts
"Hobbist or Terrorist?" in Time Magazine
Posted by Bergie on Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:28 AM
Sorry if this has been mentioned elsewhere...

This week's (May 10, 2004) Time Magazine includes a story called "Hobbyist or Terrorist?" which talks about railfans and the scrunity since 9/11. Within that story, Trains associate publisher Kevin Keefe is quoted. It's pretty well done, in my opinion. The reporter spent a day with a railfan in the Philadelphia area plus got quotes from other sources.

It's only one page (which even the reporter was disappointed in) but it's interesting none the less.

If you've seen it, what do you think?

Erik
Erik Bergstrom
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:41 AM
On another forum the lady who wrote the article said something a monthy ago about it. I just read it on the BLE site and I think its pretty good. I was suprised that that guy had problems with Septa. I don't have any problems with them (then again I haven't been railfanning on Septa since 3/11).

PS you beat me to posting about this!
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Reedsburg WI (near Wisconsin Dells)
  • 3,370 posts
Posted by Noah Hofrichter on Wednesday, May 19, 2004 6:57 PM
Trains did a story on this a while back, I think in 2002 if I'm not mistaken. It was a good article and was well done. It's kind of weird to hear time magazine is doing the same thing.

Noah
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 19, 2004 7:06 PM
Read that article a few days ago on BLE website as well.

Interesting read, it's really interesting to see how much things have changed in the past few years.

I know they sure don't take it easy at the border like they used to.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 19, 2004 7:20 PM
Could someone please post a link to the article? I'd like to read it.

I've heard Kansas City Southern doesn't like foamers that much, but I haven't went railfanning on their line since before 9/11.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, May 19, 2004 8:28 PM
Read the article, but it left me kinda out there, it really didnt seem to draw any conclusion, other than railfaning is almost an exclusively male hobby, it isnt very well understood by those outside the hobby, and most railroaders are closet fans...the author never really answered the titles question, is it a Hobbist(railfan), or a Terrorist?.

Did like the reference to Trains mag, and Kevin Keefe's being quoted.
Lends a little prestige to the authors sources.[:D]

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 19, 2004 10:44 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cjm89

Could someone please post a link to the article? I'd like to read it.

I've heard Kansas City Southern doesn't like foamers that much, but I haven't went railfanning on their line since before 9/11.


Here's a link to the BLE who has a copy of the story.

http://www.ble.org/pr/news/headline.asp?id=10454
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:42 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edblysard

Read the article, but it left me kinda out there, it really didnt seem to draw any conclusion, other than railfaning is almost an exclusively male hobby,
Ed


Great now I'm going to start getting even more spam....

"XXX Railroad Honeys"

"Lonely Russian Women Seeking American Railfan Dates"

"Make it a BigBoy.....Railfan Viagra Special"

great.........thanks Time
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, May 20, 2004 3:37 AM
Note that in many places outside North America, conventional railfanning as an individual is practially an illegal act. Not far from where I now live, I was photographing an old EMD switcher switching cars when both the stationmaster and a railroad policeman shoes up and wanted to confiscate my camera. Luckely I had both fan and professional railroad identification, and I told them I was writing an article for a Sound Magazine on Audio-Visual for public transit and they let me and my camera alone, but I have not done any "obvious" railfan photography since. The article did appear in Sound and Communications Magazine, "A-V for Public Transit", with some of my photographs, and if I do anymore railroad photography I will carry a photocopy with me! Dave Klepper daveklepper@yahoo.com
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Thursday, May 20, 2004 6:58 AM
While the article was a little light, it was interesting. I am not a foamer, but I do like to spend time near the tracks. I hate the railroad's "new attitude" and think it's ridiculous. In the last few months I have been approached a couple of times, and even asked to leave once. Nothing major, but still stupid.

On Tuesday I went to my favorite hot spot, a place that has basicly become off limits due to railroad police patrol. I was actually able to spend a couple of hours there, but of course I wasn't alone. There were at least 10 railroad workers there. Of course they weren't there to chase railfans away, they were building a switch.

I actually had a chance to talk to a couple of them. The one that I spent the most time talking to was very friendly. He even admitted that he thought the "security policy" was rather excessive.

I wi***here was some kind of screening and credentialing process for railfans. I think the railroads know that we aren't the "bad guys", but anyone found near the rails these days, is now suspect. Sad times indeed.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 20, 2004 9:22 AM
Seems that NJ Transit is taking this pretty seriously too, apparently this article says you have to apply and obtain a permit before you can take pictures of NJ Transit trains and property.

Here's the quote off the BLE site from this morning.

QUOTE:
Shutterbugs beware

(The following story by Tom Hester Jr. appeared on the Trenton Times website on May 20.)
TRENTON, N.J. -- Impromptu photography is a lifeblood for railroad enthusiasts and for those who work in the transportation industry, but NJ Transit is trying to put a stop to it, claiming that for security reasons it has the right to control whether people take photos of its property.
The mass transit agency's policy has raised civil liberty concerns among rail enthusiasts and an expert in photography rights.
"There's no legal authority for anyone, including government, to prohibit photography of just about anything in public view," said Bert P. Krages, an attorney from Portland, Ore., who specializes in photographer's rights.
Although the agency hasn't publicized it, a policy was implemented at least as far back as 2000 that requires permits for people taking photos of agency property, according to NJ Transit spokeswoman Janet Hines.
The free permits can be obtained from the agency's real estate division, and it usually takes a day to obtain one after an application, which can be faxed or e-mailed, is completed, Hines said.
The agency, she said, fears people taking photographs of trains, railroad structures and other equipment may not always be train buffs, especially after the March 11 train bombings in Spain and the 9/11 terrorist attacks, although the policy was put into effect before both events.
"Things have obviously changed very much in the way we secure our system," Hines said. "This is one of those things where our goal is to make sure our passengers are safe, our employees are safe and to protect our infrastructure."
Hines didn't know if NJ Transit police had issued any summonses or confiscated anyone's cameras and film for not obtaining a permit.
Railroad buffs said the policy has especially become troublesome after the River Line light-rail system began operating this spring between Camden and Trenton, attracting people with cameras to take photographs of the sleek, shiny new trains.
"This is obviously cause for concern," said railroad enthusiast Douglas John Bowen, president of the New Jersey Association of Railroad Passengers.
Lyndon Henry works as a transportation planner and data analyst for the Capitol Metro mass transit system in Austin, Texas, and as a consultant to www.lightrailnow.org. He said NJ Transit's policy is a "huge concern" to people working in the public transit profession "since much of our work depends upon the use of photos to inform the public about rail transit issues."
"NJ Transit seems to be taking a pretty extreme attitude," Henry said.
Bowen and Henry said forcing people to get a permit to take photographs creates so much bureaucracy it makes it nearly impossible for people either visiting or using NJ Transit services to take spur-of-the-moment photographs.
"You don't have to be a civil libertarian on the fringe to be concerned about stuff like this," Bowen said.
Henry, in an e-mail, wrote, "The ban on photography, using the pretext of the war on terrorism, invokes serious civil liberties and free speech concern. Furthermore, it threatens the traditional ongoing historic documentation of rail transit operations."
Krages, who authored a pamphlet on photography rights, said NJ Transit's policy is just the latest attempt to restrict photography, citing incidents at industrial plants, bridges and sea vessels across the nation since the terror attacks.
Such restrictions, he said, "aren't really rooted in real-life events."
Krages said he knew of no terrorist event or crime that has relied upon photographs to be carried out. He likened amateur photographers to a "neighborhood watch" that works with police to prevent crime.
"From my perspective, I don't think public photography presents any type of risk and can actually be beneficial in improving security," Krages said.
NJ Transit should welcome photographers, Bowen said. "They're going to be the ones to see something suspicious," he said.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: A State of Humidity
  • 2,441 posts
Posted by wallyworld on Thursday, May 20, 2004 9:44 AM
The article seemed to have a subtle subtext that inferred that rail fans that practice this level of activity are at worst, obsessive-compulsives and at best are nothing more than amusing but harmless eccentrics. Neither characterization is fair nor does it capture the one important question that lies behind this kind of activity: Why? I think this article had more of a opportunity to explain the rational reasoning why some of us do what we do than it took advantage of.

Nothing is more fairly distributed than common sense: no one thinks he needs more of it than he already has.

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Thursday, May 20, 2004 10:03 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by macguy

Seems that NJ Transit is taking this pretty seriously too, apparently this article says you have to apply and obtain a permit before you can take pictures of NJ Transit trains and property.

Here's the quote off the BLE site from this morning.

QUOTE:
Shutterbugs beware

(The following story by Tom Hester Jr. appeared on the Trenton Times website on May 20.)
TRENTON, N.J. -- Impromptu photography is a lifeblood for railroad enthusiasts and for those who work in the transportation industry, but NJ Transit is trying to put a stop to it, claiming that for security reasons it has the right to control whether people take photos of its property.
The mass transit agency's policy has raised civil liberty concerns among rail enthusiasts and an expert in photography rights.
"There's no legal authority for anyone, including government, to prohibit photography of just about anything in public view," said Bert P. Krages, an attorney from Portland, Ore., who specializes in photographer's rights.
Although the agency hasn't publicized it, a policy was implemented at least as far back as 2000 that requires permits for people taking photos of agency property, according to NJ Transit spokeswoman Janet Hines.
The free permits can be obtained from the agency's real estate division, and it usually takes a day to obtain one after an application, which can be faxed or e-mailed, is completed, Hines said.
The agency, she said, fears people taking photographs of trains, railroad structures and other equipment may not always be train buffs, especially after the March 11 train bombings in Spain and the 9/11 terrorist attacks, although the policy was put into effect before both events.
"Things have obviously changed very much in the way we secure our system," Hines said. "This is one of those things where our goal is to make sure our passengers are safe, our employees are safe and to protect our infrastructure."
Hines didn't know if NJ Transit police had issued any summonses or confiscated anyone's cameras and film for not obtaining a permit.
Railroad buffs said the policy has especially become troublesome after the River Line light-rail system began operating this spring between Camden and Trenton, attracting people with cameras to take photographs of the sleek, shiny new trains.
"This is obviously cause for concern," said railroad enthusiast Douglas John Bowen, president of the New Jersey Association of Railroad Passengers.
Lyndon Henry works as a transportation planner and data analyst for the Capitol Metro mass transit system in Austin, Texas, and as a consultant to www.lightrailnow.org. He said NJ Transit's policy is a "huge concern" to people working in the public transit profession "since much of our work depends upon the use of photos to inform the public about rail transit issues."
"NJ Transit seems to be taking a pretty extreme attitude," Henry said.
Bowen and Henry said forcing people to get a permit to take photographs creates so much bureaucracy it makes it nearly impossible for people either visiting or using NJ Transit services to take spur-of-the-moment photographs.
"You don't have to be a civil libertarian on the fringe to be concerned about stuff like this," Bowen said.
Henry, in an e-mail, wrote, "The ban on photography, using the pretext of the war on terrorism, invokes serious civil liberties and free speech concern. Furthermore, it threatens the traditional ongoing historic documentation of rail transit operations."
Krages, who authored a pamphlet on photography rights, said NJ Transit's policy is just the latest attempt to restrict photography, citing incidents at industrial plants, bridges and sea vessels across the nation since the terror attacks.
Such restrictions, he said, "aren't really rooted in real-life events."
Krages said he knew of no terrorist event or crime that has relied upon photographs to be carried out. He likened amateur photographers to a "neighborhood watch" that works with police to prevent crime.
"From my perspective, I don't think public photography presents any type of risk and can actually be beneficial in improving security," Krages said.
NJ Transit should welcome photographers, Bowen said. "They're going to be the ones to see something suspicious," he said.



NJ Transit has the exact wrong idea about photography!! The people quoted at the end of the article are correct.

The truth is that prohibition of any kind in this society is just asking for trouble. AND, I'LL DRINK TO THAT!!!!

[swg]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 20, 2004 10:49 AM
CRAP! There go's my planned NJT railfan trip[:(!] Another railroad go's to the top of my least favorite least. They are letting the terrorist's win by taking away freedoms.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: A State of Humidity
  • 2,441 posts
Posted by wallyworld on Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:31 AM
Jay,
I agree with you inasmuch as the general media stereotypes nearly everything it consumes through some bizarre reductionist formula. By inference it assumes we are morons who will be incapable digesting complexities.
I don't appreciate this trend throughout our society in the corporate info-tainment pablum we are spoon fed nor in the polarized views of what passes for statesmenship these days. I have been fascinated by all things mechcanical from an early age, especially trains. I resent being labeled as an eccentric when as you so aptly pointed out, the same does not apply to car buffs or for that matter ( pardon the stereotyping) sports fans. I have seen many a collectables show on television where some spent a lifetime collecting cookie jars or matchbook covers. Are these folks identifiable as foamers?
My family and freinds neither understand nor do they question my interests and at times, I don't understand their fascinations but I don't insult them or portray them as mentally imbalanced because I don't "get it." This seems to be a growing trend to label and sterotype everything. How about Liberals and Conservatives? I wish I had a dime for everytime I hear those two idiotic labels.

Nothing is more fairly distributed than common sense: no one thinks he needs more of it than he already has.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Alexandria, VA
  • 847 posts
Posted by StillGrande on Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:09 PM
I think it is funny I that I was able to go to Andrews AFB Saturday (the home of Air Force One), walk all over, take pictures of all the airplanes, including shots of the F-22 and F-35 JSF, the F-111, B-1, and C-17, walk inside most of the transports and larger aircraft, see demonstrations of their capabilities and explained in detail by their operators and manufacturers, demonstrations of airborne assaults and rescue actions, but would not be able to take a picture of NJ Transit train. I doubt a terrorist would be in an area long enough to be noticed.
Dewey "Facts are meaningless; you can use facts to prove anything that is even remotely true! Facts, schmacks!" - Homer Simpson "The problem is there are so many stupid people and nothing eats them."
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,022 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:53 PM
People always fear what they don't understand. That ceramic thimble foamer hasn't a clue as to why we'd want to watch trains, so we are to be feared. I work with enough security specialists to know that they can be pretty paranoid. In times like this, people actually listen to their blathering. Groups such as us are our own worst enemies in one way - we keep a low profile, partly from years of doing a little surreptious tresspassing to get a little better shot, partly because people don't understand why we do what we do, so we don't even bother to try explaining. People don't know we exist, so when we come to the fore - watch out!

When I visited the Durand, MI depot last fall there were several folks quietly watching the action, talking, and listening to their scanners; I had camera in hand. Hardly a threat, unless a fear-monger gets ahold if it. Then we are spies, and worse.

I'd love some sort of ID, especially if it had an official flavor to it. Then, if you were sitting in an appropriate area, watching the action, and were challenged, you could show the ID and say "It's OK officer..." Of course, I'm sure that getting the ID would involve somehow acknowleging that you shouldn't trespass, etc, etc; so getting caught doing so would be that much worse.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 20, 2004 6:04 PM
QUOTE:
I'd love some sort of ID, especially if it had an official flavor to it. Then, if you were sitting in an appropriate area, watching the action, and were challenged, you could show the ID and say "It's OK officer..." Of course, I'm sure that getting the ID would involve somehow acknowleging that you shouldn't trespass, etc, etc; so getting caught doing so would be that much worse.


That's what it talks about in the above article about NJ Transit.

Before you take pictures they want you to fill out an application and send it in to NJT and then they will send a copy of your "license" (free by the way) to you.

Who knows what kind of info they want from you in order to issue a license...
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 20, 2004 6:30 PM
I've had a chance to view the work of John Almeida (the man profiled in the article); he has a fabulous collection of Philadelphia-area video as well as being a moderator of the Lansdale-area railfan forum on Yahoo. He is EXTREMELY knowledgeable and has much to contribute to any discussion of railroading. I was also a little put off by the portrayal of him specifically and railfans in general, but it's inevitable in this day and age. Sadly, you have to think ahead when you railfan...make sure you have all kinds of ID, a reason for being where you are and above all NO ATTITUDE. It's not a very pleasant way to enjoy a hobby in a country where we take our freedoms for granted, but that's how it is. I recently moved from NJ to Portland, OR and the atttitudes are like night and day. In NJ you can get arrested, get your film confiscated, or rudely be shooed away from your perch, even if it is on public (NOT RAILROAD) property. Here, I've only been asked once what I've been doing (in Union Station) and have had no problem hanging out anywhere I wanted to see a train or two. I've also been able to meet my wife for lunch almost daily, where we go to the airport and watch the planes land, which indicates the overall attitude towards curious onlookers, at least here.
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • From: Independence, MO
  • 1,570 posts
Posted by UPTRAIN on Thursday, May 20, 2004 6:56 PM
I will certainly not report anyone unless they are tresspassing or stealing...and the special agent knows that too, he also knows most of the local railfans by first name.

Pump

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 20, 2004 8:51 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tree68

People always fear what they don't understand. That ceramic thimble foamer hasn't a clue as to why we'd want to watch trains, so we are to be feared. I work with enough security specialists to know that they can be pretty paranoid. In times like this, people actually listen to their blathering. Groups such as us are our own worst enemies in one way - we keep a low profile, partly from years of doing a little surreptious tresspassing to get a little better shot, partly because people don't understand why we do what we do, so we don't even bother to try explaining. People don't know we exist, so when we come to the fore - watch out!

When I visited the Durand, MI depot last fall there were several folks quietly watching the action, talking, and listening to their scanners; I had camera in hand. Hardly a threat, unless a fear-monger gets ahold if it. Then we are spies, and worse.

I'd love some sort of ID, especially if it had an official flavor to it. Then, if you were sitting in an appropriate area, watching the action, and were challenged, you could show the ID and say "It's OK officer..." Of course, I'm sure that getting the ID would involve somehow acknowleging that you shouldn't trespass, etc, etc; so getting caught doing so would be that much worse.

That's an excellent idea! Maybe Trains could develope and sponser such (and pass the cost on to us) It could be a good standardized way to inform the rr police that your a fan and not the enemy.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Anywhere there are trains
  • 578 posts
Posted by Train Guy 3 on Thursday, May 20, 2004 9:14 PM
I love trains always have, always will... I seriuosly don't think I'm gonna start derailing them. No one can enjoy their hobbies anymore. Everyone has gotta ask you a bunch of questions about why your doing something and what for. I have a friend into aviation, needless to say his hobby got chopped up like mine after 9-11-01. I guess us train guys get affected just like the airplane guys.
I'm all up for keeping the country sucure, but I think if the government looks into someone long enough they can tell the difference between a hobbists and terrorists. Unfortunalty its gonna be a long while before things can become "normal" again. It's just hard to be a railfan in today's world.

TG3 LOOK ! LISTEN ! LIVE ! Remember the 3.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,022 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, May 20, 2004 9:37 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by toyomantrains
[brThat's an excellent idea! Maybe Trains could develope and sponser such (and pass the cost on to us) It could be a good standardized way to inform the rr police that your a fan and not the enemy.

We discussed this not long ago. I opined then that I would find it doubtful that TRAINS (or any other magazine) would lend it's name to such a venture. What we need is the same level of assurance that, say, a gun purchaser or a driver's license carries. That means a background check at some level. Details would have to be worked out (after all, a DWI doesn't make you a terrorist), and there would most certainly be a cost if a government was involved and the background check was any more than a computer search on NCIC.

QUOTE: That's what it talks about in the above article about NJ Transit.

Before you take pictures they want you to fill out an application and send it in to NJT and then they will send a copy of your "license" (free by the way) to you.

Who knows what kind of info they want from you in order to issue a license...


It would be interesting to know what the application consists of. Anyone from Jersey willing to give it a try? Of course, that's good around NJT. One reason I think that it should come from a neutral third party, based on a consistent format, is that it would then be portable across the country. UP may not recognize the NJT permit, but the "national standard" permit would be a lot like a driver's license - good anywhere.

I now have a scanner permit for the state of Michigan - asked for it, got it. If I get hassled, I get out the permit. Don't know when I'll next be in Michigan, but I'm ready....

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 20, 2004 10:09 PM
OK- how about using a third party, like digimarc or the parent company of ident-a-kid. I doubt however that any outside co will put out the money to research such an idea without a beneficial payoff which is why, I think, that if it were sponsored by Trains or another reputable co in the industry- or even a rr- it would carry more weight. I don't think we want governmental regs for a hobby either. It would be interesting to know what would need to be required from an applicant. If Trains sponsored it , part of the 'background check' could be the applicants Trains forum membership history. At minimum it would give Trains more exposure and a stance to supporting the hobby.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: USA
  • 165 posts
Posted by rf16a on Thursday, May 20, 2004 11:47 PM
First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

If we allow the terrorists to diminish our constitutional rights and freedoms, then the terrorists have won.

If I am on public property, I am going to photograph any train, including New Jersey Transit, that I darn well please to photograph.
I can understand getting written permission to be on private property and photograph, but not on public property.

The only written permission we need to photograph trains or anything else from public property is the First Amendment.

Railfans would be better off setting their own standards of conduct and insisting that fellow railfans follow those standards rather than seeking a government or company "permit". For example, standards of no tresspassing on railroad property, cooperating with law enforcement officers, (if they confront you, politely explain who you are and what you are doing, and if they tell you to leave, just leave, even if you are on public property.), reporting any suspicious or dangerous activity to the proper authorities.
Once you get the government involved in most things, it usually completely screws it up, and costs somebody (you and I) a bundle of money.

Yes, we have to have security, yes we have to protect our country, yes we have to prevent another attack, yes we have to find, arrest, prosecute,and puni***errorists, BUT we can do so without tearing up the Constitution, and we have to do so with reason and wisdom and logic.




  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, May 21, 2004 12:14 AM
The theory of a 'railfan' id is passive- no governmental control and would (seamingly) be to pacify any hassle we railfans may encounter. It couldn't be anything more. Like an NRA membership- within your constitutional rights. As to a 'terrorist' applying- I guess whatever checks are in place could help eliminate that, whatever they may be. Example: toyomantrains applies for a railfan id- if Trains sponsered it my profile and history are already registered.and further checks wouldn't be to difficult to confirm
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,022 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, May 21, 2004 7:25 AM
The paranoia continues:
QUOTE:

Subways get shutter bugged

(Originally published on May 21, 2004)

By PETE DONOHUE
NY DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Smiling will still be allowed on the subways, but - sorry, tourists - taking pictures may soon be banned.

Transit officials, at the request of police, yesterday proposed prohibiting photography and videotaping in the subway system and on buses - hoping to thwart terrorists from gathering information for an attack.

It's just one of several proposed revisions to the Transit Authority's Rules of Conduct that include these other hard-to-enforce no-nos:

Walking between subway cars.

Placing a foot on a subway seat, bus seat or a platform bench.

Wearing skates, standing on a skateboard or riding a scooter.
Violators could get slapped with tickets ranging from $25 to $100.

"The world we live in has changed dramatically," TA President Lawrence Reuter said as he announced the first proposed revision of the rules in a decade. "These changes are intended to enhance security and safety."

Some riders railed against the new rules, which must be approved by the full Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board.

"All that stuff is just common New York behavior," said Patrick DeShond, 18, a college student from Brooklyn. "I think the city is so desperate for money that this is what it's come to."

Others said some of the rule changes make sense - especially penalizing those who soil seats with dirty shoes.

John Erboso, 46, a messenger from Queens, supported a photo ban, saying it's hard to tell a tourist from a terrorist. "You don't know who to trust anymore," he said.

But Christopher Dunn, associate legal director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, called the photo ban "grossly excessive."

"There is no reason a tourist taking a snapshot in a subway car should be interrogated by the police or face the prospect of being taken into custody," he added.

NYPD Transportation Police Chief Michael Scagnelli said police would use discretion in issuing summonses to shutterbugs. But violators could be questioned and subjected to background checks, he said, and have their film confiscated.

The TA said exemptions would be granted to the press, and others who have obtained "written authorization" from the agency to snap pictures.

With Nick Lacher


LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Friday, May 21, 2004 7:40 AM
Yeah, I forgot, a "real, highly trained terrorist" has to have super detailed photographs before they can begin to plan their attack, after all, it isnt like they can just ride the thing, and look for themselves....because we all know Homeland Security has managed to keep all of the bad guys out of the country, just like the dope sumgglers, and the illegal immigrants, stopped cold at the borders.

Seig Heil....wait, uhhh, no, I guess it is the right goverment to say that to.

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Friday, May 21, 2004 7:56 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edblysard

Yeah, I forgot, a "real, highly trained terrorist" has to have super detailed photographs before they can begin to plan their attack, after all, it isnt like they can just ride the thing, and look for themselves....because we all know Homeland Security has managed to keep all of the bad guys out of the country, just like the dope sumgglers, and the illegal immigrants, stopped cold at the borders.

Seig Heil....wait, uhhh, no, I guess it is the right goverment to say that to.

Ed for president!!!! It would be nice to see someone with COMMON SENSE in the White House![swg]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, May 21, 2004 10:11 AM
40 years ago when I was working on the ELRR in the Croxton Yards I wanted to take some photos. My foreman, Benny Tricoli, made it very plain to me that no one can take pictures in the yards.

Too bad. We had a roundhouse, hooks, scores of locomotives, humps, KW tower with its big bell ..... just about anything one's RR heart desired. I remember one WB freight which pulled out with 155 cars.

Nowadays I would like to take photos. Maybe if I carry my old MOW union and AARP cards I could do so.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy