Trains.com

Stupid Railroad names

8977 views
106 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, May 31, 2004 10:19 PM
CSX should have just been CHESSIE-SEABOARD
CONRAIL is the worst (and i grew up waching that boaring blue)
i like the ESQUALMUT & NANAIMO RR (if thats the way to spell it)
its on Vancouver Island
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, June 1, 2004 2:42 AM
If you don't like Burlington Fe, how about Sante Burlington? Dave
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 1, 2004 2:15 PM
BNSF = Great Northern Pacific.........
Genesee & Wyoming's policy of "two-wording" every RR they buy.......stupid
should've left the C&IM the way it was......including the paint!!! I'm not a big fan of green, but it's a helluva lot better than the "pumpkins" they've got all over the place!
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Tuesday, June 1, 2004 2:50 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by daveklepper

If you don't like Burlington Fe, how about Sante Burlington? Dave

How about Chicago,Santa Fe,& Quincy?[:)]
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 1, 2004 3:38 PM


I saw a older post here by espeefoamer, and well...

It needs some work on the font though
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 1, 2004 9:13 PM
ok i have one that looks like UP's logo font, but im having trouble uploading the picture to my site. Ill post the link ASAP.
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, June 2, 2004 2:16 AM
Again: Sante Burlington!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 2, 2004 5:39 PM
Why not simply call BNSF Santa Fe Northern? This was mentioned in an old Trains article (sorry, I don't remember which issue). It also said the SFN name wouldn't work because it made sense. At least it would have been easier to say than the mouthfull that Burlington Northern Santa Fe is.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:54 PM
The only odd name I can think of is the PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD. ITS not funny in its name but that the railroad ran a train called the SOUTH WIND between CHICAGO and FLORIDA and over the 1000 miles route I dont believe the train went through PENNSYLVANIA.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:04 PM
Instead of keeping railroads under one name each part should have its own identity. Example CN should still keep the illionois Central name in the south.
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: Central Florida - US
  • 168 posts
Posted by kog1027 on Thursday, June 10, 2004 10:52 PM
BNSF & CN had a good name picked out - North American Railways. CN even had rights to those reporting marks as they had absorbed the original holder, the Northern Alberta Railway.

But I think the all time bad name was the one that never happened - Southern Pacific & Santa Fe. That name alone was enough to make the ICC kill the merger. It was obvious, the railroad should have been called - Santa Fe Pacific. With none of those oversized speed letter initials, fully spelled out . And the AT&SF already held title to that name, it was used by one of their predicessors that built on those FRISCO land grants out to California.

Sadly it was only after selling the SP to Anschultz that the Santa Fe Southern Pacific Corporation changed it's name to - Santa Fe Pacific Corp.

Mark
In the Northeast Corner of Nowhere.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 11, 2004 9:24 PM
From the OFF THE WALL DEPT: What say that CN, UP and CSX were to merge into the Canadian Union and Alphabet Mixup Pacific Railroad (CUAMPR). It made no since when my 11 year old nephew told me either. But I do have to admit it would be a real stupid name for a railroad or any company for that matter[swg]
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Washington
  • 409 posts
Posted by emmar on Friday, June 10, 2005 4:27 PM
What's wrong with BNSF? The actual name is a bit long, but the acronym sounds fine. However their new name BNSF Railway is a stupid name. What kind of a name is that for a respected freight railroad.[V]
Yes we call it the Dinky. Why? Well cause it's dinky! Proud to be the official train geek of Princeton University!
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, June 10, 2005 8:40 PM
piouslion , how did you post this tommorrow. June 11 already?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 10, 2005 9:23 PM
BNSF=Buy Norfolk Southern First
CSX=Chicken S**t eXpress
SCL=Still Coast Line, or S**t Comes Later
UP=Uncle Pete
CN=Conrail North
SCL shoulda been Atlantic Seaboard System
Pennsylvania + New York Central shoulda been PaNyc

Maybe I'll think of more . . .

- Old Timer
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Louisville,Ky.
  • 5,077 posts
Posted by locomutt on Friday, June 10, 2005 9:32 PM
Old Timer,
I think you hit the nail on the head with PaNyc; and I believe a few of their
stockholders would have said the same thing there after.

Being Crazy,keeps you from going "INSANE" !! "The light at the end of the tunnel,has been turned off due to budget cuts" NOT AFRAID A Vet., and PROUD OF IT!!

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 11, 2005 6:29 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cim_spike

Genesee & Wyoming's policy of "two-wording" every RR they buy.......stupid
should've left the C&IM the way it was......including the paint!!! I'm not a big fan of green, but it's a helluva lot better than the "pumpkins" they've got all over the place!


I'm not keen on the orange either, it's not the most photogenic of liveries.

Some daft names from the UK:

"one" Anglia - just reading the name, it could be anything from a local pressure group to a government quango..

Northern Spirit - a stopgap measure between British Rail and full nationalisation, but it still sounds like a brand of paint stripper to me..
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Saturday, June 11, 2005 6:35 AM
The other thread wants to put Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern together with Iowa, Chicago and Eastern, Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern. Dakota, Iowa, Canadian and Kansas would have to put *** on all of their equipment.

Murphy Siding, I caused the time warp.
Dale
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Saturday, June 11, 2005 7:26 AM
CN should now be CI- Canadian International.
Andrew
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Saturday, June 11, 2005 9:25 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dave9999

QUOTE: Originally posted by macguy

QUOTE: Originally posted by dave9999

QUOTE: Originally posted by Hugh Jampton

UP could easily become: Pacific Omaha Overland
A good slogan would be: Furthering America's Railroad Transportation System

Of course this would be too much to paint on the side of a locomotive, so they'd have to use acronyms.


Hugh,
Those acronyms would really stink.[;)] Dave


[:D][:D][:D][:D][:)][:p][:p][:D][:D][^]

It took me a while on that one, before I could figure out why nobody would want "POO" on the sides of all their locomotives.

[:D][:D][:D]


Furthering America's Railroad Transportation System or "F.A.R.T.S".
"We ride through the night like the breaking wind" would make a nice slogan. [8D]Dave


Now THAT really is a good one...tip of hte proverbial hat on that one!
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Saturday, June 11, 2005 10:48 AM
How about a merger of the Board of Railways Association International Network or B.R.A.I.N for short? Then you get B.R.A.I.N.F.A.R.T.S
Andrew
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 11, 2005 11:56 AM
The most aptly named railroad I have ever had the pleasure of photographing was the Texas Mexican Railway...that is now gone as it is a sub-sid of Kanas City Southern now! Strange to note the that rail line connects Laredo and Corpus Christi, Texas and has trackage rights only to about Houston.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Southwestern Florida
  • 501 posts
Posted by Tharmeni on Sunday, June 11, 2006 3:41 AM
When I was an officer with the BN, I went to a series of meetings discussing a possible merger with the UP. At one of them, they distributed note pads reading "Burlington Northern Union Pacific Railroad". I 've kept mine and I always regret there was no "BNUPRR". I just like the sound of that when you pronounce it.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 11, 2006 1:21 PM
Santa Fe sold off the connection to Santa Fe years ago, but the name is catchy.

Burlington was not the biggest city on the BN, but that was catchy at the time.

BNSF is based out of Fort Worth and the most of the railroad is NorthWest of Fort Worth.

Fort Worth & NorthWestern is a possible name.

Yes, it is similar to other railroads, but the big railroad usually has more say in the name choice.

Andrew Falconer
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, June 11, 2006 8:54 PM
A unit rack train service could be called CARGO.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Monticello, Il.
  • 74 posts
Posted by gradyo54 on Sunday, June 11, 2006 9:40 PM
I think I remember reading in TRAINS before the merger that the AT&SF no longer ran to any of it's namesake cities. I may be wrong.
"Follow the Flag"
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: CSXT/B&O Flora IL
  • 1,937 posts
Posted by waltersrails on Sunday, June 11, 2006 10:14 PM
csx back to the chessie system
I like NS but CSX has the B&O.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:17 PM
The Pacific Great Eastern was a name that made sense to those living in Vancouver.

To the rest of North America it sounded and still sounds strange.

That strange sounding combination of words was clearly what prompted them to change to the stronger and more appropriate British Columbia Railway.

British Columbia Railway is a much better choice than Pacific Great Eastern for helping sell your Province and services.

Andrew Falconer
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Wednesday, June 14, 2006 11:59 PM
Well, I hate to see historic names like "Santa Fe'' and "Burlington Route" go byby - but one has to change with the times.

Since the airline has been merged away, a far better name than 'BNSF' (yetch, ick, awful!) would be "America West".
"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Eau Claire, WI
  • 1,882 posts
Posted by Lord Atmo on Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:17 AM
i've heard some lame accronyms in my time. who here wants some Fresh Air Ram Technology? not i... maybe some Pre Owned Office Products?

i second the idea for UP to be renamed the Pacific Omaha Overland. Furthering America's Railroad Transportation Systems. we cut through the night like the breaking wind!

boy i wonder how many ES44DCs and SD70ACEs it'll take to clean THAT mess up...

then again, check my signature out[;)]

Your friendly neighborhood CNW fan.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy