Trains.com

bad spot for a Banner test Csx

10606 views
37 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,318 posts
bad spot for a Banner test Csx
Posted by JoeKoh on Saturday, June 28, 2008 7:20 AM

while in Deshler yesterday Matt and I whitnessed a banner test done by CSX.The q159 was westbound had to stop and then proceed by the signal near the tower and continue at restricted speed.The "obstruction" was near county road 3 west of Deshler.So when they had to stop the entire train had Deshler cut in half.Why did they choose this spot?I have seen them do tests before where they do not block towns off at all.

stay safe

joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,283 posts
Posted by n012944 on Saturday, June 28, 2008 12:05 PM

Not only are they doing a banner test on the crew, in this case I think they are e testing the dispatcher as well.  When you talk a train by a signal, there are certain blocks that must be put up on your board.  With the diamond at Deshler, the IP dispatcher would have much more track to block off and protect.  I think that someone in Indy was watching the dispatcher to make sure that he/she did what was supposed to be done. 

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, June 28, 2008 2:35 PM

Rule compliance testing is not done for convience but of necessity and is an FRA requirement.

The rules of the railroads have been written in blood since the first rule was written.  Compliance is a life or death issue.  The best testing is done in locations and circumstances when it would be least expected.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Saturday, June 28, 2008 5:51 PM

I understand Banner Tests being for compliance, but can someone give me just a little more information?  I know about the Book of Rules testing that at least they used to give, assume they still do - but Banner is something I don't completely understand.

Mook

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Brewster, NY
  • 648 posts
Posted by Dutchrailnut on Saturday, June 28, 2008 6:20 PM

For example NORAC:

80. Movement at Restricted Speed

Movements made at Restricted Speed must apply the following three requirements as the method of operation:

1. Control the movement to permit stopping within one half the range of vision short of:

a. Other trains or railroad equipment occupying or fouling the track,

b. Obstructions,

c. Switches not properly lined for movement,

d. Derails set in the derailing position,

e. Any signal requiring a stop.

AND

2. Look out for broken rail and misaligned track.

AND

3. Do not exceed 20 MPH outside interlocking limits and 15 MPH within interlocking limits. This restriction applies to the entire movement, unless otherwise specified in the rule or instruction that requires Restricted Speed.

 

Note the obstruction part of rule ??? a Supervisor will put up banner  across the track which will simulate the rear end of a train or other obstruction, if the engineer hits the banner he/she violated the rule and get either a letter of warning in file or is out of service.

 Is there a good place to do such a test, answer is no , but in practice  the best place to do such a test is where a crew will never expect supervision to do such a test.

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Saturday, June 28, 2008 6:29 PM
This is certainly a lot more civil and informative than the "discussion" I was reading this morning on that other Forum!

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: KS
  • 999 posts
Posted by SFbrkmn on Saturday, June 28, 2008 8:08 PM
From what I have been told, the opt test system we all work under now was mandated by the FRA in 1994. I have no problem w/this but there are a few company brass that don't always know or follow the rules themselves or let it go to their heads. We had a retired rd frmn who would go out and opt test on his vac! Get a life. When these dudes are out watching what's going on, or if they are simply riding along w/a crew, they are required to wear a orange vest &  hard hat. Recently I had a rd frmn on my job ride w/us as he had to give the engr a yearly check ride. No safety  gear other than boots and glasses. On top that, he makes a personal cell call to his wife w/the train moving.A  no no.  Another time I was observed at an industry for nearly an hr, the trnmstr & rd frmn pop out from behind the scenes , tell us we did a good job and keep it up. This was at night, but they were not wearing the required safety gear. Couple days later I learned that they were mad because they followed us for several hrs but did not catch any rule violation. And we didn;t even know anyone was out there.
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Saturday, June 28, 2008 11:33 PM

Is Deshler as much fun as Fostoria?  Or fun in different ways?  - al

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Sunday, June 29, 2008 5:32 AM
I'd say it's fun in different ways, Al.  All of the activity is concentrated in one spot, so that's where you'll find everyone.  There are a bunch of "regulars" who are very inclusive and knowledgeable (I'd count Joe and Matt in that group), and have provided a gathering point without much (if any) civic help.  Understandably, it's not as busy as Fostoria, with only CSX providing the action (Joe, what about shortline/regional trackage rights--do they exist?), but I think you go there for different reasons.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,318 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Sunday, June 29, 2008 6:28 AM

carl

cp used to have trackage rights on csx but now they run on the wabash line in montpelier and use the connection in butler indiana.However we do have some visitors that come by like a K 223 that has CP or other power that goes south at Deshler.Also the 508,509 use the nw wye and the 500 and 501 use the sw wye.(just to name a couple).I do go to fostoria sometimes but I can leave my vehicle unlocked in Deshler.The scanner in deshler also helps to identify trains coming as well.

stay safe

joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: My Old Kentucky Home
  • 599 posts
Posted by mackb4 on Sunday, June 29, 2008 8:03 AM

  A banner test is required on each qualified Engineer on a district in which he/she is qualified on at least once a year.

 An approach (or be prepared to stop at the next signal) test is required once a month on each Engineer on a district.

 A banner according to the FRA,must be visible within three (3) car lengths of the Engineers vantage point.This was well argued over here on the Pocahontas Division (NS) by the FRA several years back.

 Now as far as the location.It is up to the offical doing the banner check in conjuction with the cheif dispatcher.But if it is in violation of  local or state laws,that's a matter of law.

 In the three states that I run in a train is allowed to block a public crossing for the total time of 15 minutes stopped.If your moving there's really no amount of time.

 But to be in complete rule compliance,the crew must stop their train totally.Sound off that you have stopped.Announce on the radio the reason stopped and location.Than notify the dispatcher the reason stopped.The banner is removed to un-shunt the track and your notified by the official it's ok to move,and comfirm with your dispatcher.

 All this usually takes at least 15 minutes.

 So in my opinion.The CSX was wrong in the location they picked.My 2 cents [2c]

Collin ,operator of the " Eastern Kentucky & Ohio R.R."

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Sunday, June 29, 2008 10:30 AM

Were there better spots? Sure.

Was this spot "wrong"?  Nope.  Rules is rules, whether there are crossings or not. 

 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: KS
  • 999 posts
Posted by SFbrkmn on Sunday, June 29, 2008 2:21 PM
Procedures on moving your train after a banner test is finished would vary by the rr but the testers want to be as stealth as possible on what they are doing. I was banner tested once on the mainline. After stopping and the testers climbed on board and had a saftey briefing, they got off we resumed our trip. Now the rules do state that if you are stopped or delayed, you are to let the DS know. This was done and we told them it was acct of a banner test at mp so-so. Of course the two trains behind us heard all this and that sort of screwed up the testers next surprise test of those trains. I'm sure they didn't like us broadcasting but its in the rules and we were just giving our co workers behind us a heads up.
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: west central Illinois
  • 417 posts
Posted by Rodney Beck on Sunday, June 29, 2008 10:33 PM

The longest banner test I had was 3 minutes, the roadforeman removed it after I stopped the train no big deal.

 

Rodney

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: My Old Kentucky Home
  • 599 posts
Posted by mackb4 on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 1:23 AM

 SFbrkmn wrote:
Procedures on moving your train after a banner test is finished would vary by the rr but the testers want to be as stealth as possible on what they are doing. I was banner tested once on the mainline. After stopping and the testers climbed on board and had a saftey briefing, they got off we resumed our trip. Now the rules do state that if you are stopped or delayed, you are to let the DS know. This was done and we told them it was acct of a banner test at mp so-so. Of course the two trains behind us heard all this and that sort of screwed up the testers next surprise test of those trains. I'm sure they didn't like us broadcasting but its in the rules and we were just giving our co workers behind us a heads up.

 

 I agree ,procedures once the banner has been removed may vary from railroad to railroad.But it is a rule in the NS rule book that we notify the dispatcher,or other trains around of obstructions on the rail.Banner or not it is an obstrubtion and it's their (railroad) rules.   

Collin ,operator of the " Eastern Kentucky & Ohio R.R."

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 10:29 AM
I think what Joe was getting at, while the banner test was taking place the town was severed.  What if there had been an emergency, say a heart attack on one side of the train and the paramedics were on the other side?  Even 3 minutes of delay can mean the difference between life and death.  IF something like this had happened, the tone of this discussion would be radically different.
Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,019 posts
Posted by BigJim on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 11:25 AM

Even 3 minutes of delay can mean the difference between life and death.

I fully understand what you are saying. Even seconds could make the difference. However, it is a moot point. What if the train had gone into emergency from a break in two instead?

I once was trying to pull a hill where at the crest was a road crossing. Due to rain and grease and the type of units, they would get very little traction. I was down to about 2mph and two fire trucks on their way to whatever, pulled up to the crossing just as my lead unit passed over the crossing. Now what do I do? I tried to clear the crossing as quickly as possible, but the units couldn't get any traction. I was in a "Catch 22" situation. Even after topping the hill and getting more and more tonnage over the top, the train just wouldn't accellerate due to loss of traction. It took forever to clear that crossing. I did all that I could do and it wasn't fast enough for me and I'm sure it was excruciating for the rescue workers envolved.

 

.

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 11:48 AM

A couple of tests of trains I was on come to mind.  I was still a conductor both times.

The first we were on a local going thru West Des Moines.  This was an area that had a lot of new housing being built.  At the next crossing, about a half mile or so we saw an orange-reddish object.  We weren't sure what it was, it kind of looked like a traffic cone laid over.  About a quarter mile from it was a temporary private crossing for the building contractors.  My engineer blew the horn a couple of times for it even though there wasn't any traffic there.  After that the Des Moines MTO (trainmaster to most everyone else) came on the radio and said we had passed his efficiency test and he would pull down his flag and for us to keep going. 

The next time was on the double main.  This was ATC cab signal, no way side signal territory at the time.  At MP 236 was a hold point and a block boundry.  We went past that point and are cab signal went to restricting.  Continuing on at restricted speed, we passed a couple more boundries and the cab signal never cleared up.  Out about MP 228 we called the dispatcher and said we thought our cab signals had failed and asked for permission to cut them out and run on an absolute block.  The dispatcher said to continue on under train control.

Just after the dispatcher got off the radio, we heard the assisstant MTO tell a train over the radio, "high ball."  We then knew why we were under train control.  We come into Grand Jct at MP 225 and there he is.  His flag was a red metal sign, the kind M O W use for Form B track protection, between the rails.  We stop, get debriefed.  As we start to pull, the dispatcher comes on and tells him, "Per MTO ----, get your red board down and pull up your track shunts.  I have 7 trains getting close to you and most are getting short on time."  The senior MTO didn't get along with his assisstant and this episode didn't help.

Jeff

PS, We don't call them banner tests, we call them stop tests.   

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 12:41 PM
 BigJim wrote:

Even 3 minutes of delay can mean the difference between life and death.  I fully understand what you are saying. Even seconds could make the difference. However, it is a moot point. What if the train had gone into emergency from a break in two instead?

I agree, going into emergency is unplanned.  A banner test is planned, sort of.

I once was trying to pull a hill where at the crest was a road crossing. Due to rain and grease and the type of units, they would get very little traction. I was down to about 2mph and two fire trucks on their way to whatever, pulled up to the crossing just as my lead unit passed over the crossing. Now what do I do? I tried to clear the crossing as quickly as possible, but the units couldn't get any traction. I was in a "Catch 22" situation. Even after topping the hill and getting more and more tonnage over the top, the train just wouldn't accellerate due to loss of traction. It took forever to clear that crossing. I did all that I could do and it wasn't fast enogh for me and I'm sure it was excruciating for the rescue workers envolved.

I would HATE to in that situation.  on either side of the crossing gate.

 

Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Brewster, NY
  • 648 posts
Posted by Dutchrailnut on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 9:39 PM

Instead of crossings an overpass could be planned but unfortunatly the same people bitching would probably turn that down.

 

 Don't blame the railroad for the town being dirt cheap.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 12:34 PM

One of our conductors once pulled an inadvertent efficiency test on his engineer. 

In the course of planning for some special event, he placed a traffic cone trackside to mark a stopping point.

Turns out they weren't going to use the stopping point (I think the special event was cancelled), but the conductor didn't pick the cone up.

On another scheduled trip a few days later he noticed the train (he was conductor) slowing.  He called the engineer on the radio to ask why, and it was because of the cone.  After confirming between them that it was the cone he had placed, the they went their merry way.

Since we run through the woods, we occasionally encounter a tree down trackside.  Some trees (particularly some evergreens) turn red after they die, so you kind of perk up when you first spot one down the tracks. 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2019
  • 1,768 posts
Posted by MMLDelete on Friday, February 19, 2021 4:23 PM

mackb4
A banner according to the FRA,must be visible within three (3) car lengths of the Engineers vantage point.

What does this mean? The banner must be big/bright enough to be seen three car-lengths ahead of the engineer? So in long-hood-forward mode, that's two lengths ahead of the loco.

One is supposed to stop a 15-mph train in two car lengths??!!

What am I missing?

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, February 19, 2021 4:43 PM

Lithonia Operator
 
mackb4
A banner according to the FRA,must be visible within three (3) car lengths of the Engineers vantage point. 

What does this mean? The banner must be big/bright enough to be seen three car-lengths ahead of the engineer? So in long-hood-forward mode, that's two lengths ahead of the loco.

One is supposed to stop a 15-mph train in two car lengths??!!

What am I missing?

1/2 the RANGE OF VISION - not exceeding the speed mentioned (some carriers 15, others 20 MPH).

Operating long hood forward, the Engineer has much less vision on right hand curves than on left hand curves.  Operate accordingly and under those circumstance 15 MPH fully EXCEEDS 1/2 the range of vision..

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, February 19, 2021 5:20 PM

If I place a fusee trackside (being careful not to burn anything down), the engineer is required to hold restricted speed for one mile.  Period.  Given access, I could go almost to the end of that mile to place my banner.  Usually it's a quarter mile, give or take, but I try to include a curve.

A fusee or flag placed inside Rule 98 territory (restricted speed) requires a stop before reaching same.

We can use cones now, too, in place of the fusee.

I can't give them permission to resume track speed, either.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2019
  • 1,768 posts
Posted by MMLDelete on Friday, February 19, 2021 5:44 PM

"A banner according to the FRA,must be visible within three (3) car lengths of the Engineers vantage point."

I'm still confused about the 3 car-length thing.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, February 19, 2021 5:53 PM

Lithonia Operator
"A banner according to the FRA,must be visible within three (3) car lengths of the Engineers vantage point."

I'm still confused about the 3 car-length thing.

Of course - are we talking 36 foot cars, 40 foot cars, 50 foot cars, 60 foot cars, 89 foot cars or 299 foot cars?

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    May 2019
  • 1,768 posts
Posted by MMLDelete on Friday, February 19, 2021 10:15 PM

Okay, gang. I'm going to give this one more shot. I may be dense (a distinct possibility), but I have no clue what the three car-lengths refers to.

The engineer sees the fusee. He goes to restricted speed as quickly as is prudent. He proceeds at a speed whereby he can stop in half the distance to a visible obstruction. Sooner or later, he sees the banner. He stops, hopefully at a point which satisfies the trainmaster.

So, the three car-lengths: From what to what? When? Why?  ???

Help the challenged. You'll feel better about yourself. You'll be rewarded in the afterlife.

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Friday, February 19, 2021 11:56 PM

Lithonia Operator

 

 
mackb4
A banner according to the FRA,must be visible within three (3) car lengths of the Engineers vantage point.

 

What does this mean? The banner must be big/bright enough to be seen three car-lengths ahead of the engineer? So in long-hood-forward mode, that's two lengths ahead of the loco.

One is supposed to stop a 15-mph train in two car lengths??!!

What am I missing?

 

  Good luck, L.O.  I was wondering about that, too.  It seems absurdly close.  And by the way, he must be able to stop the train in half the distance so he's got to stop in one car length in your example running long hood forwaed.

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    February 2018
  • 299 posts
Posted by adkrr64 on Saturday, February 20, 2021 6:55 AM

Lithonia Operator
So, the three car-lengths: From what to what? When? Why?  ???

Three car lengths from the vantage point of the engineer. So don't put the banner  around the curve behind a building such that the engineer can't see it until they are 50 feet away. 

I am a DSLE on our RR and I have not heard that 3 car rule before. It might be a RR specific practice, though I will ask about it the next time I recertify my DSLE credentials. If operating at restricted speed properly, an engineer should in fact be able to stop short of ANY obstruction, regardless of how close they have to get to see it. That said, we are also not supposed to be setting traps with the intent of trying to cause failures. When I do a test, I will take into consideration if the engineer is running long or short hood forward, and make sure the fusee is on the engineer's side, though the banner will always be on a curve with limited sight distance.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,020 posts
Posted by tree68 on Saturday, February 20, 2021 7:10 AM

Without being able to read the FRA's mind, I have to guess, but...

I would suppose the rule is to prevent a banner from being placed where it would be impossible for the engineer to respond in time - think of that stop sign that's hidden behind trees until you're right at the intersection.

I mentioned involving a curve when I conduct a test - as most of our testers do - that's simply so the engineer can't see the banner at the same time as they see the fusee.  

The idea is to see if the engineer responds appropriately, not to place him in a situation where he can't.

In our case, where the conductor is back on the train, part of the procedure involves the engineer communicating the sighting of the fusee to the conductor, including the fact that he/she is reducing to restricted speed.  This communication will usually also be heard by the person conducting the test, indicating to them that the engineer has recognized the situation and is reacting appropriately.

In addition, in territory where restricted speed is the rule (ie, NORAC Rule 98), a tester could step out waving a red flag.  The FRA's guidance prevents them from doing so in such a manner that the engineer can't stop the train appropriately.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy