Trains.com

CSX Pres, Ward hints at New Name for CSX...

6904 views
72 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Sunday, April 13, 2008 4:41 PM

Thanks for that info n012944,

Makes me wonder now, more than ever, if Ward is thinking wisely as a corporate leader or if he's grasping at straws (regardless of costs) to justify an image change.  My question to Mr. Ward (whether I was a stockholder or a regular working Joe) would be:  "Sir, with the high costs associated with a name/logo change.........how will you justify this expenditure? what will be the beneift? Who will benefit?"

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 89 posts
Posted by SR1457 on Sunday, April 13, 2008 4:22 PM
Well i dont think there will be any name change anytime soon, however if you wanting names, i suggest "Mickey&Minny, or just M&M, after all they do have Florida connections. Sorry thats the best i can do.SPEAKING OF FLORIDA, LOOKS LIKE TIGER IS HAVING A BAD DAY OVER AT AUGUSTA.Laugh [(-D]
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,283 posts
Posted by n012944 on Sunday, April 13, 2008 4:08 PM
 Awesome wrote:

http://www.railroadfan.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=853&pos=15

Tell me if this locomotive would look great over CSX?

 What, a NS renumbered Conrail unit?   I'll pass.

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,283 posts
Posted by n012944 on Sunday, April 13, 2008 4:05 PM
 AntonioFP45 wrote:

Interesting though,

IMHO, a lot of people don't realize how incredibly expensive it is for a large transportation business (whether corporate or non-profit) to change it's

1. Logos,

2. Paint schemes

3. Company stationery

4. Official legal documents

5. Update marketing advertisments, brochures, tv/radio ads

Costs can run into the millions of dollars.  Even if the expense is going to be partially or fully covered under a tax write-off, one should wonder if CSX could better utilize the funds that would go into changing its name. 

I can appreciate a company wanting to change it's logo and image if IT INDEED it's leadership has made actual changes that would make a positive impact on its workforce, customers, safety, etc.,.  

I do hope that things improve for CSX and its employees,  but if CSX is going to continue the "status quo" then will spending millions to change its name be beneficial? 

 

Sign - Ditto [#ditto]

CSX has spent millions of dollars in the last year in advertising to get its "brand" out there.  They have been running both TV and radio ads over the last year.  To change the name now would, for the most part, be wasting all the money spent on that campain.

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 462 posts
Posted by 4merroad4man on Sunday, April 13, 2008 2:56 PM
How about a tribute to Jack Ozanich's layout, the Atlantic and Great Eastern, with that fine Cornell Red and Black pinstripe paint scheme......
Serving Los Gatos and The Santa Cruz Mountains with the Legendary Colors of the Espee. "Your train, your train....It's MY train!" Papa Boule to Labische in "The Train"
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Sunday, April 13, 2008 2:50 PM

Interesting though,

IMHO, a lot of people don't realize how incredibly expensive it is for a large transportation business (whether corporate or non-profit) to change it's

1. Logos,

2. Paint schemes

3. Company stationery

4. Official legal documents

5. Update marketing advertisments, brochures, tv/radio ads

Costs can run into the millions of dollars.  Even if the expense is going to be partially or fully covered under a tax write-off, one should wonder if CSX could better utilize the funds that would go into changing its name. 

I can appreciate a company wanting to change it's logo and image if IT INDEED it's leadership has made actual changes that would make a positive impact on its workforce, customers, safety, etc.,.  

I do hope that things improve for CSX and its employees,  but if CSX is going to continue the "status quo" then will spending millions to change its name be beneficial? 

 

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 803 posts
Posted by GP40-2 on Sunday, April 13, 2008 2:02 PM
 Awesome wrote:
Tell me if this locomotive would look great over CSX?



No it wouldn't. So now you have been told.
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Sunday, April 13, 2008 1:36 PM

http://www.railroadfan.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=853&pos=15

Tell me if this locomotive would look great over CSX?

http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Vicksburg, Michigan
  • 2,303 posts
Posted by Andrew Falconer on Saturday, April 12, 2008 10:49 PM

Jacksonville Atlanta Baltimore

JAB

Andrew

 

Andrew

Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Mesa, AZ
  • 778 posts
Posted by silicon212 on Saturday, April 12, 2008 10:32 PM
How about Confederate Atlantic?  ;)
  • Member since
    May 2007
  • 19 posts
Posted by gardenengineer on Saturday, April 12, 2008 9:43 PM
Lets just hope it isn't "Childrens Investment Fund Railway".  Sorry for being a wet blanket!!
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 851 posts
Posted by Awesome! on Saturday, April 12, 2008 9:26 PM
Chessie System with the Cat logo.Pirate [oX)] Or put back the Blue CONRAIL>>>> They would do a better job in safety.Whistling [:-^]
http://www.youtube.com/user/chefjavier
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Saturday, April 12, 2008 7:13 PM

 carnej1 wrote:
IMHO, the name should have been Chessie Seaboard RR from the Beginning......

I like that one!  - al  

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,289 posts
Posted by carnej1 on Saturday, April 12, 2008 4:46 PM
IMHO, the name should have been Chessie Seaboard RR from the Beginning......

"I Often Dream of Trains"-From the Album of the Same Name by Robyn Hitchcock

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Saturday, April 12, 2008 4:28 PM
Bring back Conrail, or Chessie.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, April 12, 2008 4:09 PM
     I suppose SCX has already been proposed and rejected?Mischief [:-,]

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Portsmouth, VA
  • 372 posts
Posted by jfallon on Saturday, April 12, 2008 2:57 PM
PENN CENTRAL!!!

If everybody is thinking alike, then nobody is really thinking.

http://photobucket.com/tandarailroad/

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 432 posts
Posted by Ishmael on Saturday, April 12, 2008 2:27 PM
Baltimore and Ohio eXtended, or BOX
Baltimore and Ohio-America's First Railroad
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Saturday, April 12, 2008 1:52 PM
"Red White & Blue" ?
Dale
  • Member since
    November 2006
  • 59 posts
Posted by poneykeg on Saturday, April 12, 2008 1:21 PM
                                  I  should hope the MONON ROUTE would be included!!!
south of the Rathole
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Yonkers NY
  • 16 posts
Posted by CS_heX on Saturday, April 12, 2008 9:55 AM
 csxengineer98 wrote:

Cheep and Rusty Logistics Inc...

 

csx engineer 

 

How 'bout "Ol' Rusty"?  Wink [;)]

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Over yonder by the roundhouse
  • 1,224 posts
Posted by route_rock on Saturday, April 12, 2008 6:52 AM

  Yeah bring back Chessie! I found a little kitten a few months back.Shes cross eyed and goofy as all cats are,but I couldnt resist naming her Chessie.

  How about Can Someone Xplain how to run this railroad?

Yes we are on time but this is yesterdays train

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • 8,050 posts
Posted by fifedog on Saturday, April 12, 2008 6:44 AM
Howzabout just putting the cat back in the "C"...?
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Saturday, April 12, 2008 5:37 AM

"Great Lakes, Atlantic & Gulf" (the computer wouldn't let me quote the guy who suggested it) sounds appropriate and descriptive--and "GAG" could be used for the reporting mark.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Saturday, April 12, 2008 3:25 AM
Cant Stop eXpolding Tranportation.
Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Saturday, April 12, 2008 3:00 AM

Cheep and Rusty Logistics Inc...

 

csx engineer 

"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • 137 posts
Posted by Namerifrats on Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:25 AM
I heard a catchy one a few weeks back. RPE, or "Rolling Pyrotechnics Exhibit". They seem to make the news alot this past year or so
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 7,968 posts
Posted by K. P. Harrier on Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:19 AM

How about "Super Service [Railroad]" and then really giving rail customers their money's worth?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.P.’s absolute “theorem” from early, early childhood that he has seen over and over and over again: Those that CAUSE a problem in the first place will act the most violently if questioned or exposed.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Menasha, Wis.
  • 451 posts
Posted by Soo 6604 on Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:01 AM

How about:

Chicago, Richmond, Atlanta, Seaboard Hauling or CRASH for short Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 7,968 posts
Posted by K. P. Harrier on Friday, April 11, 2008 11:55 PM

What date TRAINS and page number mentioned Mr. Ward's interest in changing the name?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.P.’s absolute “theorem” from early, early childhood that he has seen over and over and over again: Those that CAUSE a problem in the first place will act the most violently if questioned or exposed.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy